scholarly journals 1470 Consenting for a Bedside Procedure: A Prospective Observational Analysis of Consenting Practice in the Surgical Emergency Admissions Unit of a District General Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Davis ◽  
S Mishra ◽  
C Balakumar ◽  
A Shrestha

Abstract Aim Consent is necessary to enable patient autonomy, and it is vital that it is voluntary, informed and, where possible, the patient has valid mental capacity to give consent. Recent case law has grown around consent and practice guidance has evolved. This was a prospective observational study investigating the quality of consenting practice for incision and drainage procedures performed within the surgical emergency admissions unit (SEAU) at a district general hospital. Method A prospective study was conducted on consent documentation for a study period from August to September 2020, for patients undergoing bedside incision and drainage (I&D) procedures within the SEAU. Documentation was reviewed and data collected for quality of consent. Further data into the quality of this documentation was also collected; including legibility, risk and benefit discussions, local anaesthetic used, operation note documentation and discussion of the procedure. This was compared against GMC standards. Results Of 20 cases (n = 20), 1 case had written consent and 15 cases had verbal consent documented. 4 cases had no documentation of consent. No cases had benefit documentation, and 4 out of the 20 cases had risks documented. 4 cases had documentation of procedure discussion. 13 cases had an operation note included. Conclusions This study highlights a deviation from recommended practice, and results have been communicated at a departmental level. Recommendations have been offered in an attempt to improve compliance, including the display of posters in the SEAU. We shall re-audit practice within the coming months after these changes have been implemented.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashwat Mishra ◽  
Heather Davis ◽  
Charannya Balakumar ◽  
Ashish Shrestha

Abstract Aims Consent is necessary to enable patient autonomy and essential to providing good clinical care. Recent case law has grown around consent and practice guidance has evolved. This was a prospective, observational study consisting of two cycles. It investigated the quality of consent for bedside incision and drainage (I&D) procedures performed in the surgical emergency admissions unit (SEAU) at a district general hospital compared with GMC guidance. Methods A prospective analysis of consent documentation was performed from August to September 2020. Data was gathered for quality of consent including risk and benefit discussions, local anaesthetic used, operation note documentation and procedure discussion. We communicated these results at a departmental level, increased awareness of available consent forms and placed them in more accessible locations. Data to see the benefit of these interventions were gathered from November 2020 to January 2021. Results In cycle one, of 20 cases (n = 20), 5.0% had written consent documentation, and 75.0% had verbal consent documentation. 20.0% of cases had no consent documented. Following interventions, of 14 cases (n = 14), 57.1% of cases had written consent documentation, and 7.14% had verbal consent documentation. 35.0% of cases had no consent documented. Conclusion This study highlighted a deviation from GMC guidance. Interventions have shown to increase the proportion of cases with written consent. Overall cases with no written evidence of consent remain high and further work is required to increase compliance. We aim to refine the interventions we have implemented in order to promote the highest quality of consent documentation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 01009
Author(s):  
Virna Widora Saputri ◽  
Rico Januar Sitorus ◽  
H. M. Zulkarnain

The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that affect the quality of life of CRF patients in Hemodialysis Unit at Pringsewu District General Hospital. This study was conducted from February to May 2018 with cross sectional study design. The sampling technique using total sampling technique. Measurement of quality of life using KDQOL-SFTM version 1.3. The results found that quality of life scores were quite low in some domains and subscales. The mean of total score was 55.70 ± 21.30 with mean of Physical Health Composite (PHC) = 38.85 ± 9.26 and mean of Mental Health Composite (MHC) = 36.13 ± 7.08. Regarding the targeted area of ESRD, the scale of renal disease burden and occupational status scale resulted in the lowest score. The sleep quality scale score was 56.18 ± 20.72. Only 61 patients responded to questions of sexual activity with a score of 55.53 ± 27.44 on the scale of sexual function. In the 36-item health survey, the mean total score was 45.90 ± 21.95. The lowest score represented the limitations of roles caused by physical and emotional health problems. The result of statistical test showed that the variables significantly related to the quality of life of CRF patients were age, income, duration of hemodialysis and family support. Thus, family support was the variable that had the greatest impact on determining the quality of life of CRF patients. The CRF patients who lacked family support were 4.6 times more likely to lead poorer life compared to CRF patients who received good family support after being controlled by age, income, duration of hemodialysis, gender, working status, and diabetes mellitus variables.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
B. K. Mutha ◽  
Gauri S. Kulkarni ◽  
Sushma R. Dugad ◽  
Saurabh Borgaonkar

Asthma is commonly controllable but often neglected disease associated with huge burden to family and society. It is important to obtain optimal control to improve quality of life in asthmatics. The suboptimal control of disease occurs due to very poor adherence to aerosol therapy. Objective is to study the aerosol therapy compliance in bronchial asthmatics and the factors responsible for non compliance of aerosol therapy and effect of repeated health education on compliance. It is a prospective study where patient was followed up monthly for three months for collecting data and checking the compliance. This study included 113 bronchial asthmatics who were taking aerosol therapy for 1 or more years. After three months it was observed that only 45 patient (39.82%) were compliant and 68 (60.17%) were non compliant to aerosol therapy as advised by doctor, after employing various strategies, compliance improved in 22 (32.35%) of the previously compliant patients. Factors responsible for poor compliance were low level of education, patients from poor socioeconomic strata, poorly accessible pharmacy, adverse effect and fear of adverse effect (forgetfulness busy life style, ill altitude to chronic condition) felt better with medications, negligence dislike medication. Non compliance with treatment is an eminent challenge in asthma management and various compliance improving strategies can helpful to improve compliance in few patient.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-12
Author(s):  
Seán J Slaght ◽  
◽  
Nic U Weir ◽  
Joanna K Lovett ◽  
◽  
...  

Many hospitals are still setting up acute stroke thrombolysis services, often delayed by fears over workload. However, there are few data on how many patients require urgent assessment before one is treated. We prospectively studied all referrals to the 24-hour stroke thrombolysis service, February 2009 – January 2010, in Southampton General Hospital. 128 patients were referred to the thrombolysis team and 20 received thrombolysis. The most common reasons for treatment exclusion were: stroke severity (37%), time from onset (26%) or CT findings (15%). Approximately six patients required urgent assessment by the thrombolysis team for every one treated. These data are crucial to inform service planning.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 52-52
Author(s):  
Mohummad S Goonoo ◽  
Ismail Al-Talib ◽  
Nidal Hammoud ◽  
Pankaj Chaturvedi

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Nur ◽  
Aditya Agrawal

Abstract Aims To evaluate early perioperative outcomes following emergency and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a district general hospital against the national average. Methods A retrospective audit was carried out on consecutive Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies performed between January 2020 and June 2018. All indications were included. Demographics and base data included; age, gender, ASA grade, type of surgery (Emergency/Elective), number of symptomatic days preoperatively, preoperative bloods, preoperative ERCP, operative findings, postoperative complications and length of stay. Data was gathered from physical and electronic patient records. Results 166 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were included in the audit. Of the 166 included patients, 48 were male and 118 were female. Mean age at time of operation was 53.4 years. 106 of the laparoscopic cholecystectomies were carried out as Elective cases and 60 were performed as Emergencies. 100% of cases were performed laparoscopically, with 3 cases requiring conversion to open intraoperatively. Postoperatively, 5 patients had post-op pneumonia. There were 3 documented cases of bile leak with 1 patient requiring ERCP as a result. There were 2 cases of wound infection requiring re-admission. Other documented complications included; umbilical port sit abscess requiring incision and drainage, collection in the gallbladder fossa, small bowel injury and a post-op drop in Haemoglobin requiring transfusion. Conclusions Outcomes in this cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomies are comparable to national data. The focus of further evaluation from this cohort should be to compare outcomes between Emergency and Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies, with Emergency cases further stratified according to the number of symptomatic days preoperatively.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Bobi Rizki Ananda ◽  
Roni Ekha Putera ◽  
Ria Ariany

TThis study aims to explain service innovations in the health sector that have been carried out by the Pariaman District General Hospital so that the services provided to the community are better. So far what has happened in the city is the presence of bad services performed by various existing hospitals in the regions so that there are people who complain about these health services. This study uses qualitative research methods with data collection techniques through interviews, observation and documentation. The informants came from the hospital and the community who performed the service. The results of this study indicate that the Pariaman Regional General Hospital has been innovating as a form of effort of the Pariaman Regional General Hospital in facilitating matters of service to the community, with the existence of innovations in the Pariaman Regional General Hospital since 2018, the quality of services has increased, things this is proven by the Community Satisfaction Index (IKM) in 2018 which is outstanding value. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan inovasi–inovasi pelayanan di bidang kesehatan yang telah dilakukan oleh Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Pariaman sehingga pelayanan yang diberikan kepada masyarakat menjadi lebih baik. Selama ini yang terjadi di masyarakat adalah terdapatnya pelayanan buruk yang dilakukan oleh berbagai rumah sakit yang ada di daerah. Sehingga dengan demikian ada masyarakat yang mengeluhkan pelayanan kesehatan tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan Teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Informan berasal dari pihak rumah sakit dan masyarakat yang melakukan layanan. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Pariaman telah melakukan inovasi sebagai bentuk upaya Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Pariaman dalam mempermudah urusan pelayanan kepada masyarakat. Dengan adanya inovasi di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Pariaman tersebut semenjak tahun 2018, kualitas pelayanan semakin meningkat, hal ini dibuktikan dengan Indek Kepuasan Masyarakat (IKM) pada tahun 2018 yang bernilai sangat baik. 


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Eisenhut ◽  
Blanche Sun ◽  
Sarah Skinner

Prescribing errors are the most common type of medical errors and can result in harm particularly in young children. Doctors were enrolled in a programme of written assessment in prescribing skills and individualized feedback. Pharmacists audited the impact. The setting was the paediatric wards and neonatal unit of a District General Hospital. 16 doctors were tested and received feedback. A total of 110 errors were identified in this test, out of a 51 were classified as major including wrong dose and frequency, and prescribing medication the patient had an allergy to. Audit of impact of this intervention revealed a reduction of errors from 47 to 21, and patients affected from 19 to 11 per 100 () emergency admissions compared to an audit before the intervention. An intervention combining a comprehensive multifaceted assessment and detailed feedback can lead to reduction of prescribing errors in paediatric trainees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document