1416 Trauma Laparotomy: Experience of a Newly Established Major Trauma Centre in Northern Ireland

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Lee ◽  
B Bashabayev ◽  
S Yoong
Keyword(s):  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Royal Victoria Hospital ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Network ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Year ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative pathway and outcomes of trauma laparotomy during a one-year period in a newly established Major Trauma Centre in Northern Ireland. Method Retrospective review of a trauma registry undertaken at the Belfast Royal Victoria Hospital between August 2019 and August 2020. Results During this one-year period, there were a total of 17 trauma laparotomies, with a female-to-male ratio of 6:11, and a mean age of 38.9 years. 15 of 17 cases were due to blunt trauma, with only 2 cases of penetrating trauma. Of trauma laparotomies, 8 were performed during day-time hours (0801-1800), 4 during evening-hours (1801-0000), and 5 during night-time hours (0001-0800). One perioperative death was recorded. The mean time to CT from arrival to ED was 34 minutes (national target of 30 minutes). The mean time until final report was 477 minutes (national target of < 24 hours). The decision to proceed to trauma laparotomy was made prior to the final report in 9 cases. The mean length of inpatient stay for trauma laparotomy patients was 23.3 days, with a mean of 8.9 days spent in critical care. Conclusions This review provides an overview of provision of care for patients who underwent trauma laparotomies in Royal Victoria Hospital MTC and identifies areas for improvement. We plan to prospectively review outcomes following the opening of the Major Trauma Ward on 7th September 2020 and the implementation of the Northern Ireland Major Trauma Network Bypass protocol on 26th October 2020.

P9 Impact of the relocation of a regional neuroscience service on major trauma patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. e28.2-e28
Author(s):  
C Cabaret ◽  
M Nelson ◽  
M Foroughi
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ct Head ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mean Time

ObjectivesEvaluating the impact of relocating a regional neuroscience service on major trauma patients.DesignRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 01/08/2013 to 31/07/2017.SubjectsPatients≥20 years with a TBI in the 2 years pre-relocation (cohort 1) and 2 years post-relocation (cohort 2).MethodsPatients were identified using the TARN registry. Comparison of the cohorts for demographics, type of neurosurgical input, site of first presentation and the times to first CT head and operation was conducted using cross-tabulation, percentages and statistical analysis (SPSS).Results30% of patients in cohort 1 (112 or 373) were admitted in neurosurgery. This increased to 40% of patients in cohort 2 (181 of 450). There was an increase in admissions for monitoring (70% vs 82%). Patients<60 years had a higher increment in admission (+16 points) than patients≥60 years (+8 points). A strong association was found between the relocation of the neuroscience service and the increase in proportion of patients first transported to the major trauma centre (63% vs 74%; p=0.037). There was a significant decrease in the mean time to operation (3.9 hour vs 2.0 hour; p=0.008) and no significant difference in the mean time to first CT head (1.3 hour vs 1.4 hour; p=0.689).ConclusionsThe relocation of neurosurgery has resulted in a significant increase in admission of patients<60 years with TBI in neurosurgery for monitoring, an increase in the proportion of patients first transported to the MTC and a reduction in the time to operation.

Laparotomy for Abdominal Stab Wound With Combined Omental and Organ Evisceration: 10-Year Experience From a Major Trauma Centre in South Africa

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110318
Author(s):  
Victor Kong ◽  
Cynthia Cheung ◽  
Nigel Rajaretnam ◽  
Rohit Sarvepalli ◽  
William Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Large Bowel ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Stab Wound ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Overall Mortality

Introduction Combined omental and organ evisceration following anterior abdominal stab wound (SW) is uncommon and there is a paucity of literature describing the management and spectrum of injuries encountered at laparotomy. Methods A retrospective study was undertaken on all patients who presented with anterior abdominal SW involving combined omental and organ evisceration who underwent laparotomy over a 10-year period from January 2008 to January 2018 at a major trauma centre in South Africa. Results A total of 61 patients were eligible for inclusion and all underwent laparotomy: 87% male, mean age: 29 years. Ninety-two percent (56/61) had a positive laparotomy whilst 8% (5/61) underwent a negative procedure. Of the 56 positive laparotomies, 91% (51/56) were considered therapeutic and 9% (5/56) were non-therapeutic. In addition to omental evisceration, 59% (36/61) had eviscerated small bowel, 28% (17/61) had eviscerated colon and 13% (8/61) had eviscerated stomach. A total of 92 organ injuries were identified. The most commonly injured organs were small bowel, large bowel and stomach. The overall complication rate was 11%. Twelve percent (7/61) required intensive care unit admission. The mean length of hospital stay was 9 days. The overall mortality rate for all 61 patients was 2%. Conclusions The presence of combined omental and organ evisceration following abdominal SW mandates laparotomy. The small bowel, large bowel and stomach were the most commonly injured organs in this setting.

scholarly journals 592 Surgical Management of Open Tibia Fractures at A Major Trauma Centre: A Review of Cases Over A One-Year Period

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Khajuria
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Open Fracture ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Soft Tissue Coverage ◽  
Internal Stabilization ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Tibia Fractures ◽  
One Year

Abstract Introduction The BOAST/BAPRAS updated the open fracture guidelines in December 2017 to replace BOAST 4 Open fracture guidelines; the changes gave clearer recommendations for timing of surgery and recommendations for reducing infection rates. Method Our work retrospectively evaluates the surgical management of open tibia fractures at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC), over a one-year period in light of key standards (13,14 and 15 of the standards for open fractures). Results The vast majority of cases (93%) had definitive internal stabilization only when immediate soft tissue coverage was achievable. 90% of cases were not managed as ‘clean cases’ following the initial debridement. 50% of cases underwent definitive closure within 72 hours. The reasons for definitive closure beyond 72hours were: patients medically unwell (20%), multiple wound debridement’s (33%) and no medical or surgical reason was clearly stated (47%). Conclusions The implementation of a ‘clean surgery’ protocol following surgical debridement is essential in diminishing risk of recontamination and infection. Hence, this must be the gold standard and should be clearly documented in operation notes. The extent of availability of a joint Orthoplastic theatre list provides a key limiting step in definitive bony fixation and soft tissue coverage of open tibia fractures.

Pre-hospital and emergency department management of pelvic fractures and major trauma centre status: Has practice changed?

Trauma ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-211
Author(s):  
Jonathan Barnes ◽  
Philip Thomas ◽  
Ramsay Refaie ◽  
Andrew Gray
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Pelvic Fracture ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Pelvic Fractures ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Initial Imaging ◽  
One Year

Introduction Pelvic fractures are indicative of high-energy injuries and carry a significant morbidity and mortality and pelvic binders are used to stabilise them in both the pre-hospital and emergency department setting. Our unit gained major trauma centre status in April 2012 as part of a national programme to centralise trauma care and improve outcomes. This study investigated whether major trauma centre status led to a change in workload and clinical practice at our centre. Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted with a pelvic fracture for the six-month periods before, after and at one-year following major trauma centre status designation. Data were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records and binder placement assessed using an accepted method. Patients with isolated pubic rami fractures were excluded. Results Overall, 6/16 (37.5%) pelvic fracture admissions had a binder placed pre-major trauma centre status, rising to 14/34 (41.2%) immediately post-major trauma centre status and 22/32 (68.8%) ( p = 0.025) one year later. Binders were positioned accurately in 4 patients (80%, one exclusion) pre-major trauma centre status, 12 (92.4%) post-major trauma centre status and 22 (100%) at one year. CT imaging was the initial imaging used in 9 (56.3%) patients pre-major trauma centre status, 29 (85.3%) ( p = 0.04) post-major trauma centre status and 27 (84.4%) at one year. Discussion Pelvic fracture admissions doubled following major trauma centre status. Computed tomography, as the initial imaging modality, increased significantly with major trauma centre status, likely a reflection of the increased resources made available with this change. Although binder application rates did not change immediately, a significant improvement was seen after one year, with binder accuracy increasing to 100%. This suggests that although changes in clinical practice often do not occur immediately, with the increased infrastructure and clinical exposure afforded through centralisation of trauma services, they will occur, ultimately leading to improvements in trauma patient care.

The sensitivity of pre-hospital and in-hospital tools for the identification of major trauma patients presenting to a major trauma centre.

2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19
Author(s):  
D Potter ◽  
A Kehoe ◽  
JE Smith
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Trauma Network ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Injury Assessment ◽  
Trauma Response ◽  
Retrospective Database

AbstractThe identification of major trauma patients before arrival in hospital allows the activation of an appropriate trauma response. The Wessex triage tool (WTT) uses a combination of anatomical injury assessment and physiological criteria to identify patients with major trauma suitable for triage direct to a major trauma centre (MTC), and has been adopted by the South-West Peninsula Trauma Network (PTN). A retrospective database review, using the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database, was undertaken to identify a population of patients presenting to Derriford Hospital with an injury severity score (ISS) > 15. The WTT was then applied to this population to identify the sensitivity of the tool. The sensitivity of the WTT at identifying patients with an ISS>15 was 53%. One of the reasons for this finding was that elderly patients who are defined as having major trauma due to the nature of their injuries, but who did not have a mechanism to suggest they had sustained major trauma (such as a fall from standing height), were not identified by these triage tools. The implications of this are discussed.

scholarly journals Experience of managing open fractures of the lower limb at a major trauma centre

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
AM Ali ◽  
JM McMaster ◽  
D Noyes ◽  
AJ Brent ◽  
LK Cogswell
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Open Fractures ◽  
Trauma Network ◽  
Soft Tissue Cover ◽  
Major Trauma Centre

Introduction In April 2012 the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford became a major trauma centre (MTC). The British Orthopaedic Association and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons joint standards for the management of open fractures of the lower limb (BOAST 4) require system-wide changes in referral practice that may be facilitated by the MTC and its associated major trauma network. Methods From 2008 to 2013 a multistep audit of compliance with BOAST 4 was conducted to assess referral patterns, timing of surgery and outcomes (surgical site infection rates), to determine changes following local intervention and the establishment of the MTC. Results Over the study period, 50 patients had soft tissue cover for an open lower limb fracture and there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients receiving definitive fixation in our centre (p=0.036). The median time from injury to soft tissue cover fell from 6.0 days to 3.5 days (p=0.051) and the median time from definitive fixation to soft tissue cover fell from 5.0 days to 2.0 days (p=0.003). The deep infection rate fell from 27% to 8% (p=0.247). However, in 2013 many patients still experienced a delay of >72 hours between injury and soft tissue cover, primarily owing to a lack of capacity for providing soft tissue cover. Conclusions Our experience may be relevant to other MTCs seeking to identify barriers to optimising the management of patients with these injuries.

Injured patients who would benefit from expedited major trauma centre care: a consensus-based definition for the United Kingdom

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
Gordon Fuller ◽  
Samuel Keating ◽  
Janette Turner ◽  
Josh Miller ◽  
Chris Holt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Trauma Network ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
The Right

Introduction: Despite the importance of treating the ‘right patient in the right place at the right time’, there is no gold standard for defining which patients should receive expedited major trauma centre (MTC) care. This study aimed to define a reference standard applicable to the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service major trauma networks.Methods: A one-day facilitated roundtable expert consensus meeting was conducted at the University of Sheffield, UK, in September 2019. An expert panel of 17 clinicians was purposively sampled, representing all specialities relevant to major trauma management. A consultation process was subsequently held using focus groups with Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) representatives to review and confirm the proposed reference standard.Results: Four reference standard domains were identified, comprising: need for critical interventions; presence of significant individual anatomical injuries; burden of multiple minor injuries; and important patient attributes. Specific criteria were defined for each domain. PPI consultation confirmed all aspects of the reference standard. A coding algorithm to allow operationalisation in Trauma Audit and Research Network data was also formulated, allowing classification of any case submitted to their database for future research.Conclusions: This reference standard defines which patients would benefit from expedited MTC care. It could be used as the target for future pre-hospital injury triage tools, for setting best practice tariffs for trauma care reimbursement and to evaluate trauma network performance. Future research is recommended to compare patient characteristics, management and outcomes of the proposed definition with previously established reference standards.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document