scholarly journals 1644 Trainee Perspective in Sarcoma Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Leong ◽  
R Clancy ◽  
Z Jessop ◽  
T Bragg
Keyword(s):  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Written Assessment ◽  
Excision Margins

Abstract Aim Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and aggressive tumours. Appropriate multidisciplinary management requires robust knowledge of best practice and understanding of current guidelines. Plastic surgery trainees must therefore be proficient in the assessment, investigation, and treatment of patients with STS. We aimed to evaluate trainee education, confidence, and competence in managing patients with STS. Method All plastic surgery trainees in Wales completed an online questionnaire and written assessment. This was designed by the lead for STS and TPD. Formal training, knowledge of national guidelines and excision margins for different types of STS and skin cancer was assessed using short answer questions. A five-point Likert scale was used to assess trainee confidence in STS and skin cancer management and follow-up. Volume and type of teaching in sarcoma and skin cancer was also quantified. Results Trainees received less sarcoma training and were less confident in STS assessment and follow-up, in comparison to skin cancer. More senior trainees or those with formal sarcoma training were more confident in skin cancer management (mean confidence rating 4.4 vs 2.2) and performed better in the written assessment of excision margins (mean score 100% vs 61.45%) Conclusions Trainees receive less training in sarcoma with a significant impact on their competence and confidence in sarcoma care. We believe this is consistent across the United Kingdom as evidenced by just two sarcoma webinars held during the COVID-19 pandemic. Formal national evaluation of sarcoma teaching should be carried out to inform ongoing efforts to improve educational resources on this important topic for trainees.

scholarly journals Delivery of the National Child Measurement Programme in England

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Martin Čadek ◽  
Stuart W. Flint ◽  
Ralph Tench
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
The Other ◽  
Service Availability ◽  
Healthy Weight ◽  
Weight Category ◽  
Convenience Sampling

Abstract Objective: The National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP) is a mandatory initiative delivered in England to children in reception and year 6. To date, no research has explored the methods used to deliver the NCMP by Local Government Authorities (LGA) across England. Design: An online survey was administered between February 2018 and May 2018 to explore the delivery of the NCMP across the 152 LGAs in England and disseminated using non-probability convenience sampling. Setting: LGAs received an anonymous link to the survey. Participants: A total of 92 LGAs participated in the survey. Results: Most LGAs who responded provide result feedback (86%), a proactive follow-up (71%) and referrals to services (80%). Additionally, 65% of the authorities tailor Public Health England specimen result letters to suit their needs, and 84% provide attachments alongside. Out of 71% of LGAs who provide proactive follow-up, 19 (29%) provide the proactive follow-up only to upper weight categories, and only 4 (6 %) include Healthy Weight category with other categories in proactive follow-up. Regarding the service availability for children, out of 80% of LGAs who indicated that services are available, 32 (43%) targeted solely upper weight categories while the other 42 (57%) offered services across all weight categories. Finally, most LGAs (88%) commission providers to manage various parts of the NCMP. Conclusions: The results show that LGAs in England localise the NCMP. Further guidance regarding standards of best practice would help LGAs to find the most suitable localisation out of various options that exist across other LGAs.

Classification of Male Breast Lesions According to the IAC Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Cytopathology

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Melissa Oosthuizen ◽  
Rubina Razack ◽  
Jenny Edge ◽  
Pawel Tomasz Schubert
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Internal Audit ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aims to determine the diagnostic utility of the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology in lesions of the male breast. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) reports between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively recategorized according to the 5-tiered IAC Yokohama Reporting System. Our database yielded a total of 1,532 FNAB reports from breast lesions, obtained from 1,350 male patients. The risk of malignancy (ROM) and diagnostic performance of FNAB were determined using follow-up histopathological diagnosis and/or clinical follow-up, where available, for each category. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The category distribution were as follows: inadequate, 40%; benign, 57%; atypical, 0.6%; suspicious for malignancy, 0.7%; and malignant, 1.6%. The ROM in each category was nondiagnostic, 11%; benign, 3%; atypical, 28%; suspicious for malignancy, 56%; and malignant, 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were recorded as 63, 100, 100, and 84.6% respectively, when only malignant cases were considered as positive tests. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study validates the IAC Yokohama System for reporting male breast cytopathology. In accordance with the aim of the Yokohama System to establish best practice guidelines for reporting breast cytopathology, this comprehensive scheme facilitates comparisons between local and international institutions. The ROM acts as an internal audit for quality assurance within one’s own laboratory and provides guidance for clinical management. It highlights inefficiencies such as high inadequacy rates for category 1 and also features strengths with impressive specificity for categories 4 and 5.

Pazopanib-associated secondary adrenal insufficiency in a patient with malignant solitary fibrous tumor

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110160
Author(s):  
Muhammed Muhiddin Er ◽  
Murat Araz ◽  
Meryem Karabacak ◽  
Muzaffer Uğraklı ◽  
Melek Karakurt Eryılmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Solitary Fibrous Tumor ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Pituitary Hormones ◽  
Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Primary Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Hypoglycemic Attack ◽  
Fibrous Tumor

Introduction Pazopanib is an agent that is being successfully used in soft tissue sarcomas. Some endocrine side effects may develop during pazopanib treatment. Here, we presented a case diagnosed with secondary adrenal insufficiency while being investigated for etiology of hypoglycemia which developed after pazopanib. Case report A 69-year-old male patient was operated in June 2019 due to a lung mass 26 × 18 × 10 cm in size. Pathological diagnosis revealed a solitary fibrous tumor with malignant behavior. The patient received three lines of chemotherapy. After pazopanib treatment, a hypoglycemic attack was reported. Management and outcome: Blood cortisol and ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic hormone) levels were not increased at the time of the hypoglycemic attack, and levels of other pituitary hormones were found to be normal. Electrolyte levels were in normal range. Since the counteracting hormone did not reach a sufficient level, it was considered secondary adrenal insufficiency. Hypoglycemic attacks did not occur during follow-up while taking steroid therapy and pazopanib. Discussion A single case of primary adrenal insufficiency has been reported in the literature. We here present a case who developed hypoglycemia after pazopanib and was diagnosed with drug-associated secondary adrenal insufficiency. When hypoglycemia develops during pazopanib treatment, we must be aware of adrenal insufficiency.

scholarly journals Defining key questions for clinical practice guidelines: a novel approach for developing clinically relevant questions

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Chakraborty ◽  
Bianca Brijnath ◽  
Jacinta Dermentzis ◽  
Danielle Mazza
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
International Guideline ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Clinical Questions ◽  
Key Questions

Abstract Background There is no standardised protocol for developing clinically relevant guideline questions. We aimed to create such a protocol and to apply it to developing a new guideline. Methods We reviewed international guideline manuals and, through consensus, combined steps for developing clinical questions to produce a best-practice protocol that incorporated qualitative research. The protocol was applied to develop clinical questions for a guideline for general practitioners. Results A best-practice protocol incorporating qualitative research was created. Using the protocol, we developed 10 clinical questions that spanned diagnosis, management and follow-up. Conclusions Guideline developers can apply this protocol to develop clinically relevant guideline questions.

scholarly journals Functional Outcome in Sarcomas Treated With Limb-Salvage Surgery or Amputation

Sarcoma ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rikke Johansen ◽  
Ole S. Nielsen ◽  
Johnny Keller
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Salvage Surgery ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Limb Salvage Surgery ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Functional Scores

Purpose.In all patients treated at the Centre for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas of Aarhus the functional outcome is prospectively evaluated by use of the Enneking system for the functional evaluation after surgical treatment of tumours of the musculoskeletal system. This system has been accepted by the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society and the International Symposium on Limb Salvage.Patients/methods.In the present study the functional outcome after limb-salvage surgery (89 patients) and amputation (58 patients) was compared. In the limb-salvage group the treatment was surgery alone in 50% and surgery combined with either radiotherapy in 39% or chemotherapy in 11%. Inclusion criteria were: Deep seated extremity sarcomas, age >14 years, more than 1 year post-treatment follow-up time and alive at the end of the study. Median age was 49 years (range 14–88 years). Median tumour diameter was 8 cm (range 1–20 cm), median follow-up time was 4.8 years (range 1–11 years). Wilcoxon andχ2-tests were used for statistical analyses.Results.The two groups were comparable according to age, sex, size of tumour, type of tumour, location of tumour, as well as post-treatment follow-up time. The functional scores were significantly higher after limb-salvage surgery as compared to amputation, the median scores being 85 and 47, respectively (p<0.001). A similar difference was observed if the Enneking scores were subdivided into general health-related scores and extremity-related scores. No association was found between functional scores and the following factors by use of univariate analysis: size of tumour, radiation therapy, localization of tumour and surgical margin.Discussion.We conclude that this study indicates that limb-salvage surgery is associated with a better functional outcome than that observed after amputation. However, whether this also indicates a difference in quality of life needs further studies.

scholarly journals Exploring the Relationships Between Resilience and News Monitoring with COVID Distress in Health Profession Students

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Yu ◽  
Michael Wilkes ◽  
Ana-Maria Iosif ◽  
Margaret Rea ◽  
Alice Fisher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Science ◽  
Health Profession ◽  
First Year ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Student Stress ◽  
School Of Nursing ◽  
Resilience Scale ◽  
Related Stress

Abstract Objective Alarming rates of anxiety and burnout in pre-clinical health profession trainees are now challenged by additional COVID-19 stressors. This study explored COVID-related stressors among first-year medical, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, and veterinary medical students. The authors examined associations between resilience, news monitoring, and COVID stress. Methods Students completed an online questionnaire that included the Brief Resilience Scale at their matriculation in August 2019. Survey results were linked to demographic information collected by all schools. A follow-up survey in May 2020 included original questions on COVID-19 stressors and news monitoring. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression models. Results Across schools, 74% (266/360) provided consent for the 2019 survey, and 76% (201/264) responded to COVID-19 questions in the follow-up 2020 survey. Students were “extremely” or “very” concerned about family members getting infected (n = 71, 76% School of Medicine (SOM); n = 31, 76% School of Nursing (SON); n = 50, 75% School of Veterinary Medicine (SVM)) and curriculum schedule changes (n = 72, 78%, SOM; n = 28, 68% SON; n = 52, 79% SVM). Greater frequency of COVID news monitoring was associated with greater COVID-related stress (p = 0.02). Higher resilience at matriculation was associated with lower COVID-related stress ten months later (p < 0.001). Conclusions Amid COVID-19 uncertainty, health science schools should address the immense student stress regarding curriculum disruptions. The results of this study underscore the powerful role of resilience in protecting against stress not only during the known academic rigor of health professions training but also during unprecedented crises.

The impact of multimodality therapies in marginally inoperable soft tissue sarcomas (STS): The Toronto Sarcoma Program (TSP) experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11548-11548
Author(s):  
Olga Vornicova ◽  
Jay Wunder ◽  
Peter W. M. Chung ◽  
Abha A. Gupta ◽  
Rebecca Anne Gladdy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Disease Characteristics ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Progression Of Disease ◽  
Modality Approach ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

11548 Background: The mainstay therapy of operable STS remains surgery, which may include (neo)adjuvant therapies. Within the TSP, marginally inoperable STS are often treated with sequential chemo (CTX) and radiation (RT) therapy, followed by surgery (SX). Herein we present our experience of multi-modality therapies for marginally inoperable STS patients (pts). Methods: This was a dual-center, single program, retrospective review. Pts were included if deemed to have marginally inoperable primary or recurrent STS, as determined at the TSP tumor board. Pts included must have had CTX with the intent of having RT and SX after. Pts demographics, treatment details and clinical outcomes data were collected. Relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis of the influence of disease characteristics and treatment on outcomes was assessed using Cox regression. Results: From June 2005 to May 2019, 75 pts were identified. Median age was 52 years (range 16-72). Pts were predominantly male (55%). Histological subtypes included dedifferentiated liposarcoma (29%), leiomyosarcoma (27%), synovial sarcoma (19%) and others (25%). Primary tumor was located in the retroperitoneum (48%), extremity (23%), pelvis (12%), thorax (9%), and other sites (8%). All pts had doxorubicin and ifosfamide CTX (median 4 cycles; range 1-6), while RT dose delivered was 50.4Gy/28 fractions in 58 (77%) of cases. Twenty three pts (31%) achieved partial response, 40 pts (53%) had stable disease and 12 pts (16%) had progression of disease (PD) on CTX, of which half (8%) did not undergo further treatment. Nine pts (12%) underwent CTX followed by SX due to significant response, 9 pts (12%) underwent CTX and RT without SX due to persistent tumor unresectability or PD. The final 50 pts (67%) completed multi-modality treatment (CTX, RT & SX). Overall, 59 pts (79%) had SX; negative margins were achieved in 53 (71%). 19 pts (25%) had postoperative complications, causing death in 2 pts (2.7%). With a median follow-up of 72 months, median RFS and OS were 26.9 months (95% CI: 0-86.0), and 65 months (95% CI: 13.5-116.4). Extremity location was associated with superior RFS (median not reached [NR], HR 0.28 95% CI 0.09-0.83, p = 0.022), and OS (median NR, HR 0.29 95% CI 0.09-0.90, p = 0.032). Receipt of RT was associated with superior RFS (median NR, HR 0.23 95% CI 0.10-0.52, p < 0.001); and OS (median NR, HR 0.21 95% CI 0.09-0.50, p < 0.001). Pts who had PD after CTX were associated with poor outcomes - RFS (median 4.7 months, HR 2.03 95% CI 0.61-6.76, p = 0.24); and OS (median 21.9 months, HR 2.48 95% CI 0.73-8.47, P = 0.144). Conclusions: Multi-modality approach resulted in successful resection for most pts with marginally inoperable STS. Extremity location and RT administration were associated with better RFS and OS, while progression on CTX confers worse survival outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document