scholarly journals EP.WE.573Outcomes of Emergency Laparotomies during the COVID-19 Pandemic - A retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nader Habib Bedwani ◽  
William English ◽  
Christopher Smith ◽  
Shailendra Singh ◽  
Paul Vulliamy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Critical Care Admission ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Aims A better understanding of patient monitoring and outcomes is required following emergency laparotomy. We aimed to evaluate recovery following emergency laparotomy during the ‘first wave’ of the COVID-19 pandemic and assess for COVID-19-associated coagulopathy in this group. Methods We performed a single-centre, retrospective cohort study on adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy from 23rdMarch – 16thMay 2020 comparing patients with or without suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2. Main outcome measures included; 30-day mortality, post-operative respiratory failure, ARDS and other complications, critical care admission and length of stay (CCLOS) and total length of stay (LOS). Laboratory results were collected for three days post-operatively including platelet counts and clotting screen. Results 33 patients undergoing 36 emergency laparotomies were included, of which 9 had confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to have severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) (9/9 vs 5/24; p < 0.001), post-operative respiratory failure (9/9 vs 2/24; p < 0.001), ARDS (3/9 vs 0/24; p = 0.015) and need for critical care stay (9/9 vs 12/24; p = 0.012) with a longer LOS and CCLOS (17 vs 7 days; p = 0.004 and 6 vs 1 day; p < 0.001 respectively). Platelet counts were consistently lower on all peri-operative days and patients had a higher incidence of coagulopathy (7/11 vs 3/17; p = 0.020). Conclusions Emergency laparotomy is associated with increased post-operative morbidity in patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 with increased respiratory complications and critical care stay. Post-operative patients with COVID-19 show mildly reduced platelet counts and deranged clotting that may be part of a COVID-19-associated coagulopathy.

scholarly journals Organisational Factors Induce Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay in Elderly Patients – A Retrospective Cohort Study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e0135066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffie H. A. Brouns ◽  
Patricia M. Stassen ◽  
Suze L. E. Lambooij ◽  
Jeanne Dieleman ◽  
Irene T. P. Vanderfeesten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Organisational Factors

scholarly journals A retrospective cohort study of idiopathic diaphragmatic palsy: a diagnostic triad, natural history and prognosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 00953-2020
Author(s):  
Syeda Nafisa ◽  
Ben Messer ◽  
Beatrice Downie ◽  
Patience Ehilawa ◽  
William Kinnear ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Neuromuscular Disorders ◽  
Inspiratory Muscle ◽  
Diaphragmatic Palsy ◽  
Infection And Inflammation ◽  
Diaphragmatic Weakness

The diaphragm is the main inspiratory muscle, and diaphragmatic weakness can lead to respiratory failure. Diaphragmatic weakness or paralysis commonly presents in association with more generalised neuromuscular disorders. However, it can be caused by other pathologies, such as trauma, compression, infection and inflammation [1]. Isolated diaphragmatic palsy (DP) is well-described [2], but often missed in adults [3], especially in bilateral diaphragmatic palsy (BDP) where both domes of the diaphragm are elevated.

scholarly journals Illnesses Associated With Increased Length of Stay for Individuals Experiencing Homelessness: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumantra Monty Ghosh ◽  
Khokan Sikdar ◽  
Adetola Koleade ◽  
Peter Farris ◽  
Jordan Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background: Individuals experiencing homelessness (IEH) tend to have increased length of stay (LOS) in acute care settings, which negatively impacts health care costs and resource utilization. It is unclear however, what specific factors account for this increased LOS. This study attempts to define which diagnoses most impact LOS for IEH and if there are differences based on their demographics. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted looking at ICD-10 diagnosis codes and LOS for patients identified as IEH seen in Emergency Departments (ED) and also for those admitted to. Data were stratified based on diagnosis, gender and age. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine which ICD-10 diagnoses were significantly associated with increased ED and inpatient LOS for IEH compared to housed individuals.Results: Homelessness admissions were associated with increased LOS regardless of gender or age group. The absolute mean difference of LOS between IEH and housed individuals was 1.62 hours [95% CI 1.49 – 1.75] in the ED and 3.02 days [95% CI 2.42-3.62] for inpatients. Males age 18-24 years spent on average 7.12 more days in hospital, and females aged 25-34 spent 7.32 more days in hospital compared to their housed counterparts. Thirty-one diagnoses were associated with increased LOS in EDs for IEH compared to their housed counterparts; maternity concerns and coronary artery disease were associated with significantly increased inpatient LOS. Conclusion: Homelessness significantly increases the LOS of individuals within both ED and inpatient settings. We have identified numerous diagnoses that are associated with increased LOS in IE; these inform the prioritization and development of targeted interventions to improve the health of IEH.

scholarly journals Association of patient-to-emergency department staff ratio with the incidence of cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Occupancy Rate ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Ed Overcrowding

Background: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding and overuse are global healthcare problems. Despite that substantial pieces of literature have explored quality parameters to monitor the patients’ safety and quality of care in the ED, to the best of our knowledge, no reasonable patient-to-ED staff ratios were established. Objectives: This study aimed to find the association between unexpected emergency department cardiac arrest (EDCA) and the patient-to-ED staff ratio. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a medical center in Taiwan. Non-trauma patients (age > 18) who visited the ED from January 1, 2016 to November 30, 2018 were included. The total number of patients in ED, number of patients waiting for boarding, length of stay over 48 hours, and physician/nurse number in ED were collected and analyzed. The primary outcome was the association of each parameter with the incidence of EDCA. Results: A total of 508 patients were included. The total number of patients in ED ( > 361, RR: 1.54; 95% CI {1.239-1.917}), ED occupancy rate (> 280, RR: 1.54; 95% CI {1.245-1.898}), ED bed occupancy rate (> 184, RR: 1.63; 95% CI {1.308-2.034}), number of patients waiting for boarding (> 134, RR: 1.45; 95% CI {1.164-1.805}), number of patients in ED with length of stay over 48 hours (> 36, RR: 1.27; 95% CI {1.029-1.558}) and patient-to-nurse ratio (> 8.5, adjusted RR: 1.33; 95% CI {1.054-1.672}) had significant associations with higher incidence of EDCA. However, the patient-to-physician ratio was not associated with EDCA incidence. Discussions: Regarding loading parameters, the patient-to-nurse ratio is more representative than the patient-to-physician ratio as regards association with higher EDCA incidence. Conclusions: A higher patient-to-nurse ratio (> 8.5) was associated with an increment in the incidence of EDCA. Our findings provide a basis for setting different thresholds for different ED settings to adjust ED staff and develop individually tailored approaches corresponding to the level of ED overcrowding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document