EP.FRI.971 Is routine endoscopic evaluation of the colon necessary after an episode of acute diverticulitis?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adiba Hussain ◽  
Akash Dhanri ◽  
Rehma Sayed ◽  
Ahmed Saleh ◽  
Arin Saha ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Currently standard practice is for patients diagnosed with diverticulitis to undergo endoscopic evaluation of the colon following the acute episode. The primary aim of endoscopy is to exclude underlying malignancy which may have been undetectable on initial CT scanning. We aim to determine if endoscopic evaluation of the colon is necessary for all patients. Methods All patients with CT proven diverticulitis were included between May 2017 and July 2018. Medical records, CT and endoscopy reports of 154 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the CT reports, diverticulitis was classified as either uncomplicated (colonic wall thickening, pericolic fat stranding) or complicated (perforation, abscess, generalised free air and/or fluid). Results There were 154 patients included in the study. 59% percent were male. Median age at the time of diagnosis was 56 years old.  There were 114 patients with uncomplicated and 40 patients with complicated diverticulitis. 79 patients (50 flexible sigmoidoscopy, 29 colonoscopy) with uncomplicated diverticulitis and 21 patients (15 flexible sigmoidoscopy, 6 colonoscopy) with complicated diverticulitis underwent endoscopy. Of the patients that underwent endoscopy, one patient (1.3%) with uncomplicated disease and one patient (4.8%) with complicated disease were found to have colorectal cancer (both rectal). Neither of these were associated with the diverticular segment. Conclusions Our data shows that routine endoscopic evaluation of the colon after an episode of acute diverticulitis may not be necessary in all cases. Patient numbers in this study are small therefore further work is required to draw conclusions which could influence future clinical practice.

2020 ◽  
pp. 003693302094922
Author(s):  
Hisham El Zanati ◽  
Adriel Chen ◽  
Abdulaziz Attiya ◽  
Edward Leung

Aims To assess the incidence of underlying colorectal malignancy in patients admitted as an emergency with a CT diagnosis of acute diverticulitis and determine the need for routine follow up colonoscopy Methods A retrospective study was performed on all patients who had been admitted to our surgical unit with CT diagnosed diverticulitis from September 2016 to September 2018 (n = 125). Results 11 patients (8.8%) required emergency resection with no underlying malignancy found. 76 patients (61%) had a follow up colonoscopy after being discharged. 4 patients were found to have an underlying colorectal malignancy, one of them suspected on CT and another an incidentally detected caecal polyp cancer. Therefore 3/87(3.4%) had an unexpected cancer diagnosis and all those in the diseased segment were within complicated diverticulitis. Conclusion Nowadays, multi-slice CT scanners are so good at giving an accurate assessment of colonic pathology. In our study, 96.6% of the patients with a CT diagnosis of acute diverticulitis had no underlying malignancy in the diseased segment with all the cancers within complicated diverticulitis. With such a low yield of underlying malignancy in uncomplicated diverticulitis, we question the need for routine follow up colonoscopy when there is no CT suspicion of malignancy in these patients


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K-Y Hong ◽  
Anita R Skandarajah ◽  
Omar D Faiz ◽  
Ian P Hayes

<p>The measurement of quality outcomes is crucial in surgical care. Administrative data are increasingly used but their ability to provide clinically useful information is reliant on how closely the coding can define a particular cohort.        In acute admissions for diverticular disease, it is important to differentiate between complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis, and between diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding. We aim to develop a method to define clinically relevant cohorts of patients from an administrative database in acute diverticulitis. Codes for acute diverticulitis were found from the ICD-10-AM (Australia and New Zealand) coding system, and the accuracy was established with retrospective chart review and cross-referenced with a clinical database at a single institution. Coding of non-diverticular and missed diverticular  cases was examined to determine non-diverticular codes that could differentiate these cases. These were combined into  logic algorithms designed to differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis admissions derived from   an administrative database. Specific K57 diverticular codes possessed sensitivity and positive predictive values of 0.92    and 0.69 for uncomplicated diverticulitis, respectively, with 0.61 and 0.92 for complicated diverticulitis, respectively, based on 153 cases. Most of the missing cases were usually complicated diverticulitis whilst some cases coded incorrectly  as uncomplicated diverticulitis were often found as undifferentiated abdominal pain. Diagnostic codes combined into algorithms that accounted for predictable variations improved cohort definition. In conclusion, algorithms with combined codes improved definitions of clinically relevant cohorts for acute diverticulitis from an Australian or New Zealand administrative database. This method may be used to develop logic algorithms for other surgical conditions and enable widespread measurement of relevant surgical outcomes.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175628481879150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Cammarota ◽  
Martina Cargiolli ◽  
Paolo Andreozzi ◽  
Bernardo Toraldo ◽  
Anna Citarella ◽  
...  

Background: Scarce data are available on the epidemiological trend of diverticulitis and its financial burden in Italy. The aim of this work was to explore a potential variation in the rate and costs of hospital admissions for uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis over the last decade. Methods: We selected all hospitalizations for diverticulitis of residents in the Abruzzo Region, Italy between 2005 and 2015. Age-standardized hospitalization rates (HRs) per 100,000 inhabitants for overall, uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis were calculated. A linear model on the log of the age-standardized rates was used to calculate annual percentage changes (APC). Costs were derived from the official DRG tariff. Results: From 2005 to 2015, the HR for acute diverticulitis increased from 38.9 to 45.2 per 100,000 inhabitants (APC + 1.9%). The HR for complicated diverticulitis increased from 5.9 to 13.3 (APC + 7.6%), whereas it remained stable for uncomplicated diverticulitis. The mean hospital cost was 1.8-times higher for complicated diverticulitis compared with that for uncomplicated disease and 3.5-times higher for patients with a surgery stay compared with that for patients with a medical stay. Conclusion: During the last decade, in the Abruzzo Region, the HRs for diverticulitis and their costs increased significantly, mainly due to disease complications. Further studies are needed to explore strategies to prevent complications and to realise cost-saving policies.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany K Weidner ◽  
John T Kidwell ◽  
David A Etzioni

Diverticulitis is the cause of 300,000 inpatient admissions in the United States each year. Surgical evaluation and treatment are commonly required for the treatment of diverticulitis. This chapter discusses the diagnosis, triage, and treatment of acute diverticulitis. Medical treatment, as well as the indications for surgical treatment for diverticulitis, is discussed. Current controversies, including the need for antibiotics for a patient with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, necessity of colonoscopy after resolution of an acute episode, and indications for urgent surgery, are reviewed.  This review contains 10 figures, 3 tables, and 67 references. keywords: acute diverticulitis, colonic fistula, complicated diverticulitis, diverticular abscess, diverticular disease, diverticulitis, diverticulosis, perforated diverticulitis, uncomplicated diverticulitis


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Averi L. Gibson MD ◽  
Byron Y. Chen ◽  
Max P. Rosen MD ◽  
S. Nicolas Paez ◽  
Hao S. Lo MD

Abstract Purpose: This study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department CT use for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain, to better understand why imaging volume so drastically decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: This was a retrospective review of emergency imaging volumes from January 5 to May 30, 2020. Weekly volume data were collected for total imaging studies, abdominopelvic CT, and abdominopelvic CTs positive for common causes of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain. Two emergency radiology attendings scored all diverticulitis cases independently and weekly volume data for uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis cases was also collected. Volume data prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic was compared, using 2019 volumes as a control.Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, overall emergency imaging volume decreased 30% compared to 2019 (p = 0.002). While the number of emergency abdominopelvic CTs positive for appendicitis and small bowel obstruction did not significantly change during the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of cases of diverticulitis decreased significantly compared to 2019 (p = 0.001). This reduction can be specifically attributed to decreased uncomplicated diverticulitis cases, as the number of uncomplicated diverticulitis cases dropped significantly (p = 0.002) while there was no significant difference in the number of complicated diverticulitis cases (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Reduced emergency abdominopelvic CT volume during the COVID-19 pandemic can partially be explained by decreased imaging of lower acuity patients. This data may help formulate future strategies for imaging resource utilization with an improved understanding of the relationship between perceived imaging risk and symptom acuity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Barman ◽  
L Meney ◽  
C Boyle ◽  
C Collison ◽  
K Shalli

Abstract Introduction The current Royal College of Surgeons commissioning guideline on colonic diverticular disease suggests that patients should undergo endoscopic evaluation of the colonic lumen after an episode of computed tomography (CT) proven acute diverticulitis to rule out malignancy. The necessity of routine endoscopic assessment of CT proven diverticulitis remains debatable. Aim To establish whether routine endoscopic assessment should be carried out for patients after an episode of acute diverticulitis. Method Data was collected retrospectively from all patients diagnosed with acute diverticulitis on CT and who subsequently had follow up endoscopic assessment from January to July 2019. Results Total number of patients were 64.Median age of the cohort was 58.Of all patients, 48 had diagnosis of uncomplicated diverticulitis whereas 16 patients had diagnosis of complicated diverticulitis on CT scan. All patients had follow up colonoscopy after an acute attack with following findings: 2 patients had no pathology, 56 patients had diagnosis of only diverticulosis, 4 patients had both diverticulosis and polyps and 2 patients had bowel cancer. All 4 cases of polyps had benign pathology and uncomplicated diverticulitis on CT scan. Two bowel cancer patients, one had complicated diverticulitis with thickening of proximal sigmoid and the other patient had abnormal sigmoid colon suggestive of malignancy on CT scan. Conclusion Recent meta-analysis showed no difference between diverticulitis and normal population group in terms of risk of bowel cancer. Routine colonoscopy may not be appropriate in patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis but endoscopic assessment after an episode of complicated diverticulitis is necessary.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhanuka Dissanayake ◽  
Matthew J. Burstow ◽  
Arunan Jeyakumar ◽  
Peter J. Yuide ◽  
Justin Gundara ◽  
...  

Acute diverticulitis is an emergency surgical condition that is commonly managed via an acute surgical unit model. Operative surgery is indicated in selected situations including generalized peritonitis or fistulous disease; however, limited data exist on how borderline patients potentially needing surgery may be salvaged by close clinical management with modern interventional techniques. The aims of the study were to identify the operative surgery rates in acute diverticulitis and predictors for identifying patients with complicated diverticulitis. Retrospective data collection was performed on a prospectively held database at a high-volume acute surgical unit at Logan Hospital, Queensland. Patient demographic data, disease-related factors, and treatment-related factors were collected for reporting and analysis. Over three years (2016–2018), 201 patients (64%) were admitted with uncomplicated diverticulitis and 113 patients (36%) with complicated diverticulitis. An observable downward trend was noted in the number of yearly admissions for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Complicated diverticulitis was associated with male gender ( P = 0.039), increased length of hospital stay ( P < 0.001), temperature ≥37.5 ( P = 0.025), increased white cell count ( P < 0.001), and elevated C-reactive protein ( P < 0.001). Twelve patients (11%) with complicated diverticulitis initially failed conservative management. Seven patients (6%) underwent a definitive Hartmann's procedure, and 5 patients (4%) underwent percutaneous drainage of abscesses. Acute diverticulitis can be safely managed nonoperatively by medical therapy and percutaneous drainage of abscesses, with surgery reserved for patients with complicated diver-ticulitis with sepsis or peritonitis.


Author(s):  
Dulitha Kumarasinghe ◽  
Assad Zahid ◽  
Greg O'Grady ◽  
Timothy Leow ◽  
Tabrez Sheriff ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Diverticulosis is extremely common in western society. A recent study has shown that outpatient, non-antibiotic management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis may be a feasible and safe option. However the ability to identify these patients is still difficult. This study explores the ability of white cell count, C-reactive protein and bilirubin in differentiating patients with complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis as well as progression to surgical intervention. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients admitted with acute diverticulitis over a 5-year period (2009-2014) at a single institution in Australia. Patients were classified into three groups; uncomplicated diverticulitis, complicated diverticulitis without surgery and complicated diverticulitis with surgery. ANOVA and Bonferroni's post-hoc analyses were used to compare markers across the groups. RESULTS: A total of 541 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in white cell count (p&lt;0.0001), C-reactive protein (p&lt;0.0001) and bilirubin (p=0.0006) between all three groups. Post-hoc analyses showed a significant difference in white cell count, C-reactive protein and bilirubin when comparing uncomplicated diverticulitis against complicated diverticulitis without surgery (p&lt;0.05) and complicated diverticulitis with surgery (p&lt;0.05). White cell count also showed a significant difference when comparing complicated diverticulitis without surgery and complicated diverticulitis with surgery (p&lt;0.05). CONCLUSIONS: White cell count, C-reactive protein and bilirubin can distinguish between uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis.


Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Harraz ◽  
Ahmed H. Abouissa

Abstract Background Although gall bladder perforation (GBP) is not common, it is considered a life-threating condition, and the possibility of occurrence in cases of acute cholecystitis must be considered. The aim of this study was to assess the role of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in the assessment of GBP. Results It is a retrospective study including 19 patients that had GBP out of 147, there were 11 females (57.8%) and 8 males (42.1%), aged 42 to 79 year (mean age 60) presented with acute abdomen or acute cholecystitis. All patients were examined with abdominal ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced abdominal MSCT after written informed consent was obtained from the patients. This study was between January and December 2018. Patients with contraindications to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (pregnancy, acute kidney failure, or allergy to iodinated contrast agents) who underwent US only were excluded. Patients with other diagnoses, such as acute diverticulitis of the right-sided colon or acute appendicitis, were excluded. The radiological findings were evaluated such as GB distention; stones; wall thickening, enhancement, and defect; pericholecystic free fluid or collection; enhancement of liver parenchyma; and air in the wall or lumen. All CT findings are compared with the surgical results. Our results revealed that the most important and diagnostic MSCT finding in GBP is a mural defect. Nineteen patients were proved surgically to have GBP. Conclusion GBP is a rare but very serious condition and should be diagnosed and treated as soon as possible to decrease morbidity and mortality. The most accurate diagnostic tool is the CT, MSCT findings most specific and sensitive for the detection of GBP and its complications.


BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n72
Author(s):  
Anne F Peery

ABSTRACT Left sided colonic diverticulitis is a common and costly gastrointestinal disease in Western countries, characterized by acute onset of often severe abdominal pain. Imaging is necessary to make an initial diagnosis and determine disease severity. Colonoscopy should be done six to eight weeks after diagnosis to rule out a missed colon malignancy. Antibiotic treatment is used selectively in immunocompetent patients with mild acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. The clinical course of diverticulitis commonly includes unpredictable recurrences and chronic gastrointestinal symptoms, which are a detriment to quality of life. A better understanding of prognosis has prompted a shift toward non-operative approaches. The decision to undergo prophylactic colon resection should be individualized to consider the severity of diverticulitis, the patient’s health and immune status, and the patient’s preferences and values, as well as benefits and risks. Because only a section of colon is removed, recurrent diverticulitis remains a risk. Acute diverticulitis with an abscess is treated with antibiotics that cover Gram negative and anaerobic bacteria, with or without percutaneous drainage. Acute diverticulitis with purulent or feculent contamination of the peritoneal cavity is managed with surgery; primary resection and anastomosis is the procedure of choice in stable patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document