scholarly journals SP9.1.12 Bone protection in neck of femur fracture patients in a DGH without a fracture liaison service

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Brock ◽  
Sanjeevan Yoganathan
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Fracture Liaison Service ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Dexa Scan ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Bone Protection

Abstract Introduction In England and Wales, there are approximately 75,000 proximal femoral fractures per year. Bone protection is vital in these patients and a key recommendation of NICE guidelines (CG124) for multidisciplinary approach in hip fracture management. Method Data were collected retrospectively using clinical portal, admission records and medication charts. The data were inputted into the FRAX calculator to calculate a patient’s risk of developing an osteoporotic fracture; depending on their risk they would be appropriate for bone protection or DEXA scanning for further assessment. As certain data criteria were not available for the FRAX calculation, risk calculation was underscored i.e. if parental hip fracture status was not known. Results A total of 59 patients were audited between July and October 2019. Of those patients, 25 were calculated as high risk, however, only 6 patients had adequate bone protection. 19 patients were deemed intermediate risk and would benefit from a DEXA scan for further assessment. Of those 19 patients, only 8 had adequate bone protection. DEXA scan was only requested for 2 of the patients who were intermediate or high risk. In the year following, 4 patients have had another fracture, with 3 of those patients not on any bone protection medication and had a high risk FRAX calculation. Conclusion Following a local meeting; a proforma was piloted to identify patients at risk and requiring bone protection. With the help of a dedicated orthopaedic pharmacist and nurse practitioners, continuity of care can be achieved to aid patients long-term wellbeing.

scholarly journals 861 Bone Protection in Neck of Femur Patients in A DGH Without A Fracture Liaison Service

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Yoganathan ◽  
I Ibrahim ◽  
A Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Fracture Liaison Service ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Dexa Scan ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Bone Protection

Abstract Introduction In England and Wales, there are approximately 75,000 proximal femoral fractures per year. Bone protection is vital in these patients and is a key recommendation of NICE guidelines (CG124) for multidisciplinary approach in hip fracture management. Method Data were collected retrospectively using clinical portal, admission records and medication charts. The data were inputted into the FRAX calculator to calculate a patient’s risk of developing an osteoporotic fracture; depending on their risk they would be appropriate for bone protection or require a DEXA scan for further assessment. As certain data criteria were not available for the FRAX calculation, risk calculation was underscored i.e., if parental hip fracture status was not known. Results A total of 59 patients were audited between July and October 2019. Of those patients, 25 were calculated as high risk, however, only 6 patients had adequate bone protection. 19 patients were deemed intermediate risk and would benefit from a DEXA scan for further assessment. Of those 19 patients, only 8 had adequate bone protection. DEXA scan was only requested for 2 of the patients who were intermediate/high risk. In the year following, 4 patients have had another fracture, with 3 of those patients not on any bone protection medication and had a high risk FRAX calculation. Conclusions Following a local meeting; a proforma has been piloted to identify patients at risk and requiring bone protection. With the help of a dedicated orthopaedic pharmacist and nurse practitioners, continuity of care can be achieved to aid a patient’s long-term wellbeing.

Does the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score Help Predict Which Patients Will Benefit From a Modern Modular Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Intracapsular Proximal Femoral Fractures?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sush Ramakrishna Gowda
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Residential Status ◽  
Orthopaedic Department ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Modular Prostheses ◽  
The Uk ◽  
To Receive

Introduction: Hemiarthroplasty for the management of intracapsular neck of femur fractures is common but current practice in the UK still varies regionally and individually. Guided by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) we have observed a move towards modern, modular prostheses such as the Exeter V40 Stem but the use of older, monoblock prostheses such as the Thompsons Hemiarthroplasty remains controversial. Use of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores (NHFS) can help surgeons stratify patients according to risk and select the most appropriate prosthesis to meet their individual needs. Materials and Methods: 765 hip hemiarthroplasties were analysed over a 28-month period at a single, high-volume, orthopaedic department in the UK. We calculated the NHFS and recorded the choice of prosthesis. Patients were then followed up for at least a year. Outcomes were mortality and change in residential status. Results: Six hundred and forty-six (446) patients were treated with monoblock prostheses (mean age=85.6; range 62-105). 319 patients received modular prostheses (mean age=81.0; range 61-98). Patients who were selected to receive a monoblock prosthesis were over twice as likely to be dead at a year (32.87% vs. 13.65%) and over twice as likely to require increased assistance with living (50.12% vs. 23.81%). Amongst patients with equivocal NHFS, those who receive a monoblock stem suffered worse outcomes in all but the very highest risk group, who experienced lower mortality (OR=0.71, CI 0.52-0.96) and change in residential status (OR=0.76, CI 0.58-0.99). Conclusion: Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) can confer predictable outcomes in hip fracture patients treated with modular stems. Modular stems should be the default choice when performing hemiarthroplasties for intracapsular neck of femur fractures. However, in keeping with other studies, we found that in very old, frail, or co-morbid patients, modular stems are not associated with better survival or return to pre-morbid function.

scholarly journals 193 An Audit of Compliance for NICE Guidance of Management of Displaced Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Sheen ◽  
G Higgins
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Nice Guideline ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Nice Guidance ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Operation Note ◽  
Management Recommendations

Abstract Introduction The 2011 NICE guideline ‘CG124 Hip fracture: management’ covers the management of hip fractures in adults aged over 18. It was updated in 2017 to highlight the role of total hip replacement in intracapsular fracture management – Recommendations 1.6.2 and 1.6.3. The aim of this audit was to assess, and improve, the compliance of Torbay Hospital’s management of intracapsular neck of femur fractures. Method The study was split over the three cycles, using data from the National Hip Fracture Database, followed by a review of patient notes. The first audit of 2017 data assessed the compliance of the department. A first change was then implemented to operation note documentation and 2018 data analysed. A further change was then implemented to operation notes and 2019-2020 data analysed. Results The 2017 audit showed a compliance of 67.7% against statement 1 and 41.1% against statement 2. After the initial change, the 2018 re-audit showed a slight improvement to 76.0% and 54.9%. After the second change was made, compliance subsequently rose to 100% and 100%. Conclusions The initial compliance with NICE guidance was poor. Following changes to the documentation on the operation note, compliance rose to 100%.

scholarly journals 89 Poor Attendance for DXA in Older People with A Low Trauma Fragility Fracture: A 6 Year Data Analysis of the Nottingham Fracture Liaison Service

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i28-i29
Author(s):  
H Desai ◽  
O Hershkovich ◽  
T Ong ◽  
L Marshall ◽  
O Sahota
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Fragility Fracture ◽  
Fragility Fractures ◽  
Fracture Liaison Service ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Fracture Liaison

Abstract Introduction Hip Fractures are common and result in significant patient morbidity and increased mortality. Up to 40% of these patients have sustained a previous low-trauma fracture. The Department of Health advises that patients presenting with fragility fracture should have access to ‘Fracture Liaison Services (FLS)’. These are models of care which systematically identify patients at risk, assess bone health, treat patients (if needed) and follow patients up to support medication adherence. Methods Demographics of FLS patients between January 2012 and December 2017 was obtained retrospectively from the Nottingham University Hospitals FLS database. We examined DNA rates and further characteristics of these types of patients. Deprivation scores were deprived using the English indices of deprivation 2015 (1–Most deprived; 5-Least deprived). The 2016 cohort of patients were followed-up till January 2019 to assess for re-fractures. Results 6528 high-risk patients were identified and referred to DXA. Mean (SD) age was 68±10.5 years [Females=5302 (81%)]. 1386 patients (21%) did not attend. High prevalence of non-attendance was in females [1032 patients (74%)] and the most deprived individuals [398 patients (29%)]. Females from the most deprived areas had the highest DNA rate [287 patients (29%)]. All eligible patients >75 years old were referred (n=1542 (100%), [Females=1284 (83%), non-attendance=473 (31%), non-attendance in females=390 (82%), highly deprived females=96 (25%)]. 826 patients were referred in 2016. Median follow-up time was 2.46 years (IQR 0.16–3.00 years). 52 patients (7%) re-fractured. 17 patients (33%) DNA their previous DXA scan [Females=12 patients (71%)]. Conclusions Nottingham FLS have identified patients with fragility fractures that are high-risk for further fractures. Despite a dedicated FLS there is a DNA of 21%. Many patients that DNA are generally considered as having a high-risk of further fractures; females, older age and more deprived. Further studies are needed to explore why patients do not attend for bone density scanning.

61 HIP Fracture Management of Older Adults in a Public Tertiary Hospital in Kuala Lumpur: Analysis and Comparison with the Standard of Care in UK

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv13-iv17
Author(s):  
Gordon Hwa Mang Pang ◽  
Elizabeth Gar Mit Chong ◽  
Rizah Mazzuin Razali ◽  
Fatt Soon Lee ◽  
Weng Keong Yau
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Operation Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bone Protection

Abstract Background There has been rapid improvement in evidence-based care for hip fracture in UK in which prompt, effective, multidisciplinary management has been shown to improve quality and reduce costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current outcome of hip fractures in our hospital, and to compare it to the outcome of evidence-based management of hip fractures in UK. Methods A cross-sectional study of all hip fracture patients aged 60 and above, admitted from 1st March 2018 until 28th Feb 2019. Medical records of 105 patients obtained from a hip fracture registry were reviewed. Clinical data such as patients’ sociodemographics, fall circumstances, fractures, peri-operative details, complications and mortality were extracted and analysed. Results The surgery rate was 67% (96.5% in UK). Among the 37 patients (35.2%) not operated, 15 refused operation. Rate of early surgery was only 9.3% (71.3% in UK). Medical stabilisation (28.2%) and no operating time (40.8%) were the main reasons for surgical delay. None had falls assessment (98% in UK) and only 7.6% was started on bone protection prior to discharge (60% in UK). The average length of stay was 17 days (15.8 days in UK). The 30 day mortality was 9.5% (8.5% in UK). Discussion Our results showed that there was no significant difference in length of stay and 30 day mortality compared to UK. However, this may be due to our small sample size. Lack of awareness of falls assessment and bone protection suggests that our current model of care needed improvement. Conclusion Our results highlighted the need to implement proactive strategies to improve the management of hip fracture in our centre. Ortho-geriatrics shared-care in hip fracture management was subsequently implemented in an effort to improve patient care and service. Further studies need to be done to re-evaluate the outcomes post implementation.

scholarly journals 72 Surviving the Epidemic That Confronts Us—Fracture Liaison Service Evaluation Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
T Larcombe ◽  
R A Lisk ◽  
K F Yeong
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
Fracture Liaison Service ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Fracture Liaison

Abstract Introduction 1 in 2 women and 1 in 5 men over the age of 50 will break a bone and a significant proportion will suffer from osteoporosis.A fragility fracture will double the risk of future fractures. Between 1990 and 2000, there was nearly a 25% increase in hip fractures worldwide. A hip fracture is one of the most devastating, and often terminal, injury for an older person. Intervention The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) captures patients aged 50 and above that present to fracture clinic with possible fragility fractures with the aim to reduce further fracture incidence. Patients are assessed for osteoporosis and recommendations made for treatment. Results Here we present the results of our FLS service evaluation after 6 years in operation, using the rate of hip fractures (number of hip fractures/Emergency Department [ED] attendances over 75’s) as a surrogate marker for effectiveness. Evaluation Summary Trend analysis of our data indicates a reduction in the number of patients attending the Trust with fractured neck of femur (NOF) despite the increase in ED attendances. This is against the trend nationally where fractured NOF numbers are rising (National Hip Fracture Database, accessed online August 2019). Next steps The FLS to attempt to comprehensively capture muscular-skeletal patients and to consider opportunities present to target case finding to high risk cohorts.

HIP FRACTURES IN 5 YEARS AT HUE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

2014 ◽  
pp. 47-50
Author(s):  
Duy Binh Ho ◽  
Nghi Thanh Nhan Le ◽  
Maasalu Katre ◽  
Koks Sulev ◽  
Märtson Aare
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference

Aim: This study aimed to review the clinical findings and surgical intervention of the hip fracture at the Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. Methods:The data of proximal femoral fractures was collected retrospectively. All patients, in a period of 5 years, from Jan 2008 to December 2012, suffered either from intertrochanteric or femoral neck fractures. The numbers of patients were gathered separately for each year, by age groups (under 40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, older) and by sex. We analyzed what kind of treatment options were used for the hip fracture. Results:Of 224 patients (93 men and 131 women) studied, 71% patients are over 70 years old, 103 women and 56 men (p<0.05). For patients under 40 years, there were 1 woman and 11 men (p<0.05). There were 88 intertrochanteric and 136 femoral neck fractures. There was no significant difference in the two fractures between men and women. The numbers of hip fracture increased by each year, 29/224 cases in 2010, 63/224 cases in 2011, 76/224 cases in 2012. Treatment of 88 intertrochanteric fractures: 49 cases (55.7%) of dynamic hip screw (DHS), 14 cases of hemiarthroplasty (15.9%), 2 cases of total hip replacement (2.3%). Treatment of 136 femoral neck fractures: 48 cases of total replacement (35.3%), 43 cases of hemiarthroplasty (31.6%), 15 cases of screwing (11%). In cases of 40 patients (17.9%) hip fracture was managed conservatively, 23 were femoral neck fractures and 17 were intertrochanteric fractures. Conclusions: Hip fracture is growing challenge in Hue medical university hospital. The conservative approach is still high in people who could not be operable due to severe medical conditions as well as for patients with economic difficulties. Over 70% of the hip fractures in people 70+ are caused by osteoporosis. The number of hip fracture is increasing in the following years, most likely due to the increase in the prevalence of osteoporosis. Early detection and prevention of osteoporosis should be addressed, particularly in high risk population. More aggressive surgical approach should be implemented in order to improve the quality of life in patients with hip fractures. Key words:Hip fracture.

scholarly journals Early mortality in hip fracture patients admitted during first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Northern Italy: a multicentre study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dante Dallari ◽  
Luigi Zagra ◽  
Pietro Cimatti ◽  
Nicola Guindani ◽  
Rocco D’Apolito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Multicentre Study ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Femur Fracture ◽  
Northern Italy ◽  
Proximal Femur Fracture ◽  
Time To Surgery ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Treatment of hip fractures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unique challenges for the management of COVID-19-infected patients and the maintenance of standards of care. The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the mortality rate at 1 month after surgery in symptomatic COVID-positive patients with that of asymptomatic patients. A secondary endpoint of the study is to evaluate, in the two groups of patients, mortality at 1 month on the basis of type of fracture and type of surgical treatment. Materials and methods For this retrospective multicentre study, we reviewed the medical records of patients hospitalised for proximal femur fracture at 14 hospitals in Northern Italy. Two groups were formed: COVID-19-positive patients (C+ group) presented symptoms, had a positive swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and received treatment for COVID-19; COVID-19-negative patients (C− group) were asymptomatic and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The two groups were compared for differences in time to surgery, survival rate and complications rate. The follow-up period was 1 month. Results Of the 1390 patients admitted for acute care for any reason, 477 had a proximal femur fracture; 53 were C+ but only 12/53 were diagnosed as such at admission. The mean age was > 80 years, and the mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 3 in both groups. There was no substantial difference in time to surgery (on average, 2.3 days for the C+ group and 2.8 for the C− group). As expected, a higher mortality rate was recorded for the C+ group but not associated with the type of hip fracture or treatment. No correlation was found between early treatment (< 48 h to surgery) and better outcome in the C+ group. Conclusions Hip fracture in COVID-19-positive patients accounted for 11% of the total. On average, the time to surgery was > 48 h, which reflects the difficulty of maintaining normal workflow during a medical emergency such as the present pandemic and notwithstanding the suspension of non-urgent procedures. Hip fracture was associated with a higher 30-day mortality rate in COVID-19-positive patients than in COVID-19-negative patients. This fact should be considered when communicating with patients and/or their family. Our data suggest no substantial difference in hip fracture management between patients with or without COVID-19 infection. In this sample, the COVID-19-positive patients were generally asymptomatic at admission; therefore, routine screening is recommended. Level of evidence Therapeutic study, level 4.

scholarly journals Vertebral Fractures in Ireland: A Sub-analysis of the DXA HIP Project

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J Carey ◽  
Lan Yang ◽  
E. Erjiang ◽  
Tingyan Wang ◽  
Kelly Gorham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Vertebral Fractures ◽  
Fragility Fractures ◽  
Vertebral Fracture Assessment ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Women Subjects ◽  
The World ◽  
High Risk Populations

AbstractOsteoporosis is an important global health problem resulting in fragility fractures. The vertebrae are the commonest site of fracture resulting in extreme illness burden, and having the highest associated mortality. International studies show that vertebral fractures (VF) increase in prevalence with age, similarly in men and women, but differ across different regions of the world. Ireland has one of the highest rates of hip fracture in the world but data on vertebral fractures are limited. In this study we examined the prevalence of VF and associated major risk factors, using a sample of subjects who underwent vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) performed on 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machines. A total of 1296 subjects aged 40 years and older had a valid VFA report and DXA information available, including 254 men and 1042 women. Subjects had a mean age of 70 years, 805 (62%) had prior fractures, mean spine T-score was − 1.4 and mean total hip T-scores was − 1.2, while mean FRAX scores were 15.4% and 4.8% for major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture, respectively. Although 95 (7%) had a known VF prior to scanning, 283 (22%) patients had at least 1 VF on their scan: 161 had 1, 61 had 2, and 61 had 3 or more. The prevalence of VF increased with age from 11.5% in those aged 40–49 years to > 33% among those aged ≥ 80 years. Both men and women with VF had significantly lower BMD at each measured site, and significantly higher FRAX scores, P < 0.01. These data suggest VF are common in high risk populations, particularly older men and women with low BMD, previous fractures, and at high risk of fracture. Urgent attention is needed to examine effective ways to identify those at risk and to reduce the burden of VF.

scholarly journals Hip Fracture Management

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e069
Author(s):  
Theodore Miclau
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Fracture Management
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document