Does the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score Help Predict Which Patients Will Benefit From a Modern Modular Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Intracapsular Proximal Femoral Fractures?

Author(s):  
Sush Ramakrishna Gowda

Introduction: Hemiarthroplasty for the management of intracapsular neck of femur fractures is common but current practice in the UK still varies regionally and individually. Guided by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) we have observed a move towards modern, modular prostheses such as the Exeter V40 Stem but the use of older, monoblock prostheses such as the Thompsons Hemiarthroplasty remains controversial. Use of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores (NHFS) can help surgeons stratify patients according to risk and select the most appropriate prosthesis to meet their individual needs. Materials and Methods: 765 hip hemiarthroplasties were analysed over a 28-month period at a single, high-volume, orthopaedic department in the UK. We calculated the NHFS and recorded the choice of prosthesis. Patients were then followed up for at least a year. Outcomes were mortality and change in residential status. Results: Six hundred and forty-six (446) patients were treated with monoblock prostheses (mean age=85.6; range 62-105). 319 patients received modular prostheses (mean age=81.0; range 61-98). Patients who were selected to receive a monoblock prosthesis were over twice as likely to be dead at a year (32.87% vs. 13.65%) and over twice as likely to require increased assistance with living (50.12% vs. 23.81%). Amongst patients with equivocal NHFS, those who receive a monoblock stem suffered worse outcomes in all but the very highest risk group, who experienced lower mortality (OR=0.71, CI 0.52-0.96) and change in residential status (OR=0.76, CI 0.58-0.99). Conclusion: Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) can confer predictable outcomes in hip fracture patients treated with modular stems. Modular stems should be the default choice when performing hemiarthroplasties for intracapsular neck of femur fractures. However, in keeping with other studies, we found that in very old, frail, or co-morbid patients, modular stems are not associated with better survival or return to pre-morbid function.

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O A Javed ◽  
M J Khan ◽  
Y Abbas ◽  
S Pillai ◽  
K Hristova ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Elderly patients with femoral fractures are often frail and require a multidisciplinary approach to optimise medical care, rehabilitation and prevention of further injury. Previously, neck of femur fracture patients were the focus of such an approach, but NICE and BOAST guidelines emphasise extending this care to other elderly trauma patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of 43 patients over 60 years old at Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in 2019 with a femoral fracture other than a neck of femur fracture. BOAST guideline standards were surgery within 36 hours, orthogeriatric assessment within 72 hours, a documented ceiling of treatment, falls risk assessment, bone health review, nutritional assessment and physiotherapy review. Results Our study showed worse outcomes in all standards for patients with femoral shaft, distal femur and periprosthetic femur fractures compared to neck of femur fractures: surgery within 36 hours (63.9% vs. 66%); orthogeriatric assessment within 72 hours (32.6% vs. 91.9%); falls risk assessment (76.7% vs. 99.6%); bone health review (41.9% vs. 99.7%); nutritional assessment (55.8% vs. 99.6%); physiotherapy review (97.7% vs. 98.9%). The group also had worse outcomes for average length of stay (19 days vs. 14 days) and 30 day mortality (9.3% vs. 8.6%). Discussion Our study showed a discrepancy in care received by elderly patients with femoral fractures other than neck of femur. We will introduce a proforma for all femoral fractures, present our findings to orthogeriatric, bone health and physiotherapy teams to involve them in the care of such patients and re-audit following these recommendations.


2021 ◽  
pp. 175045892110640
Author(s):  
Benjamin Thomas Vincent Gowers ◽  
Michael Sean Greenhalgh ◽  
Kathryn Dyson ◽  
Karthikeyan P Iyengar ◽  
Vijay K Jain ◽  
...  

Background: Hip fractures are common presentations to orthopaedic departments, and their surgical management often results in blood transfusions. Compared with general anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia reduces the need for transfusions and mortality in the wider surgical population. Aims: In hip fracture patients, our primary outcome measure was to examine any relationship between anaesthetic modality and transfusion rates. The secondary outcome measure was to assess the relationship between anaesthetic modality and one-year mortality. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 280 patients was carried out in 2017 and 2018. Data were collected from patient records, local transfusion laboratory and the national hip fracture database. Results: A total of 59.6% had regional and 40.4% general anaesthesia. Regional anaesthesia patients were younger with fewer comorbidities (p < .05). About 19.8% regional and 34.5% general anaesthesia patients received transfusions (odds ratio (OR) = 0.47, p < .05); 13.6% were taking anticoagulants and were less likely to receive a regional anaesthetic (31.6% versus 64%, OR = 0.26, p < .05). One-year mortality was 27% for regional and 37% for general anaesthetic patients (OR = 0.64, p = .09). Conclusion: Regional anaesthesia halved the risk of blood transfusion. Anticoagulated patients were 74% less likely to receive regional anaesthetics, but had no additional transfusion risk. With optimisation, a larger proportion of patients could have regional anaesthesia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1223-1229
Author(s):  
Philip M Stott ◽  
Sunny Parikh

Background: The majority of modern surgical treatments for managing hip fracture in the elderly are successful and result in a very low rate of revision surgery. Subsequent operations are however occasionally necessary. Optimal management of complications such as infection, dislocation or failed fixation is critical in ensuring that this frail patient group is able to survive their treatment and return to near normal function. Methods: This paper is a discussion of techniques, tips and tricks from a high volume hip fracture unit Conclusion: This article is a technique-based guide to approaching the surgical management of failed hip fracture treatment and includes sections on revising both failed fixation and failed arthroplasty.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 699-706
Author(s):  
Ioannis V. Papachristos ◽  
Peter V. Giannoudis

Thirty per cent of patients presenting with proximal femoral fractures are receiving anticoagulant treatment for various other medical reasons. This pharmacological effect may necessitate reversal prior to surgical intervention to avoid interference with anaesthesia or excessive peri/post-operative bleeding. Consequently, delay to surgery usually occurs. Platelet inhibitors (aspirin, clopidogrel) either alone or combined do not need to be discontinued to allow acute hip surgery. Platelet transfusions can be useful but are rarely needed. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA, e.g. warfarin) should be reversed in a timely fashion and according to established readily accessible departmental protocols. Intravenous vitamin K on admission facilitates reliable reversal, and platelet complex concentrate (PCC) should be reserved for extreme scenarios. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) must be discontinued prior to hip fracture surgery but the length of time depends on renal function ranging traditionally from two to four days. Recent evidence suggests that early surgery (within 48 hours) can be safe. No bridging therapy is generally recommended. There is an urgent need for development of new commonly available antidotes for every DOAC as well as high-level evidence exploring DOAC effects in the acute hip fracture surgical setting. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:699-706. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190071


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Hannah R. Lancer ◽  
Peter Smitham ◽  
Pinak Ray

According to the National Hip Fracture Database, over 64,000 patients were admitted with a hip fracture across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland in 2013, but very few are bilateral, and there are no current cases in the literature of bilateral neck of femur fractures in a patient with bilateral below-knee amputations. We present a case of a 69-year-old bilateral below-knee amputee male admitted to the emergency department with bilateral hip pain and radiological evidence of bilateral displaced neck of femur fractures. The patient subsequently underwent synchronous bilateral total hip replacements under general anaesthetic and an epidural and then went on to make a full recovery. He was discharged 27 days after arrival in hospital. Outpatient follow-up at 3 months has shown that the patient has returned to a similar level of preinjury function and is still able to carry out his daily activities with walking aids and bilateral leg prostheses.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Okereke ◽  
Sridhar Rao Sampalli

Abstract BackgroundHip fracture is the most common serious injury in older people. It is also the most common reason for older people to need emergency anaesthesia and surgery, and the commonest cause of death following an accident. A FICB is the injection of anaesthetic agents into the fascia- iliaca compartment with the effect of blocking the lumbar plexus via an anterior approach. FICB is clinically safe and efficient and provides consistent analgesic effects irrespective of the performing doctor's experience of frailty fractures of the proximal femur.Methods Data from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) for all patients admitted with a neck of femur fracture between October 2018 and May 2019 was interrogated and audited. Results of this audit were discussed in the department of Trauma & Orthopaedics' and the Trust's mortality review meetings. Teaching sessions were held for doctors and filling out of the neck of femur fracture proforma to detail administration or not of FICB and a valid reason when the later occurred was encouraged. A re-audit was carried out in May 2020 where a retrospective study of patients admitted with a neck of femur fracture over six months from October 2019 to April 2020 was done to assess improvement in compliance rates of administration of fascia iliaca blocks.Results We noted a statistically significant increase in the number of patients who got a fascia iliaca block on presentation with a fractured neck of the femur from after our second audit (p<0.00001). There were no complications associated with the administration of FICB to patients with neck of femur fractures. ConclusionThis study showed that clinical processes could be improved through audits, staff education and by employing the use of proformas to ensure compliance.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Kalraiya ◽  
Pranai Buddhdev

Musculoskeletal problems account for a vast proportion of presentations encountered by doctors globally, with figures ranging from 15-36%. However, the time medical schools allocate to learning orthopedics is by no means proportional to this. This study aims to bridge this gap by developing an international orthopedic teaching program tailored to the specific knowledge and skills required by junior doctors in different countries. This prospective study asked fifty junior doctors, who had recently completed an orthopedics job, what three orthopedic teaching topics taught retrospectively would have benefitted their clinical practice. The most requested topics were used to design educational workshops for junior doctors and these consequently comprised the TROJAN (Teaching Requested by Orthopaedic Juniors And Novices) training program. Data was collected from twenty-five junior doctors in KwaZulu-Natale State, South Africa, and twenty-five in London, UK. It is therefore in these two countries that the TROJAN program was subsequently made available. Participants who selected topics were within two years of graduating medical school and had worked an orthopedic or Accident and Emergency job within the last year. 49% of topics chosen by SA doctors were practical skills such as wrist and ankle fracture reduction techniques, and management of open fractures. The most requested topic by UK doctors (11 out of 25) was management of neck of femur fractures. This is rationalized by the fact South African doctors require more handson responsibility in their daily practice whereas in the UK greater emphasis is placed on optimizing patients for theatre and making sound management plans. TROJAN currently develops orthopedic skills and knowledge in junior doctors in South Africa and United Kingdom with teaching customized based upon location. Feedback has been exceptionally positive with every candidate thus far rating the usefulness of TROJAN as the highest option, <em>very useful.</em>


JRSM Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 205427041667508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafik RD Yassa ◽  
Mahdi Y Khalfaoui ◽  
Karunakar Veravalli ◽  
D Alun Evans

Objective The aims of the current study were to determine whether pre-operative urinary tract infections in patients presenting acutely with neck of femur fractures resulted in a delay to surgery and whether such patients were at increased risk of developing post-operative surgical site infections. Design A retrospective review of all patients presenting with a neck of femur fracture, at a single centre over a one-year period. The hospital hip fracture database was used as the main source of data. Setting UK University Teaching Hospital Participants All patients ( n = 460) presenting across a single year study period with a confirmed hip fracture. Outcome measures The presence of pre-operative urinary tract infection, the timing of surgical intervention, the occurrence of post-operative surgical site infection and the pathogens identified. Results A total of 367 patients were operated upon within 24 hours of admission. Urinary infections were the least common cause of delay. A total of 99 patients (21.5%) had pre-operative urinary tract infection. Post-operatively, a total of 57 (12.4%) patients developed a surgical site infection. Among the latter, 31 (54.4%) did not have a pre-operative urinary infection, 23 (40.4%) patients had a pre-operative urinary tract infection, 2 had chronic leg ulcers and one patient had a pre-operative chest infection. Statistically, there was a strong relationship between pre-operative urinary tract infection and the development of post-operative surgical site infection ( p-value: 0.0005). Conclusion The results of our study indicate that pre-operative urinary tract infection has a high prevalence amongst those presenting with neck of femur fractures, and this is a risk factor for the later development of post-operative surgical site infection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Tan ◽  
L Hoggett ◽  
Q Choudry ◽  
S Aithal ◽  
A Bokhari

Abstract Introduction According to NICE CG124, the gold standard of treatment for neck of femur (NOF) fractures is operative management on the day or day after admission. In practice, this is not always achievable depending on various factors, e.g. patient preference, clinical condition and theatre availability, with a further subset of patients undergoing conservative management. Method A retrospective analysis was performed on all NOF fractures managed non-operatively at a single centre from January 2017 to August 2019 by case notes analysis and review of radiographical images. Demographics, fracture type, pre-fracture mobility status, co-morbidities, mortality and Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) are reported. Where applicable, our dataset is correlated with the National Hip Fracture Database for comparison. Result 24 patients were included in the study period, with a mean age of 79.9 years (range 54-99 years) and male:female ratio of 0.85:1. The mean NHFS (n=18) was 5.7 (range 3-8) and at least 62.5% (n=15) were deemed unfit for surgery or arrested pre-operatively. Conservatively managed NOF fractures are associated with a 30-day mortality of 41.7% compared to the centre average of 8.2% and national average of 6.9% for all NOF fractures. Overall mortality within 1 year is 95.5% (n=22). Conclusion Our study confirms that the conservative management of NOF fractures is associated with high mortality, however it may be the only treatment option acceptable in patients who are limited by unfavourable clinical conditions. Therefore, the decision for conservative management in NOF fractures requires careful consideration with the need for an established decision-making pathway. Take-home message The conservative management of neck of femur fractures is associated with high mortality, therefore requires careful consideration with the need for an established decision-making pathway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document