scholarly journals Dietary Patterns and Colorectal Cancer Risk

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 354-354
Author(s):  
Hui Sun ◽  
Zhi-gui He ◽  
Dong Zhao

Abstract Objectives Over the past decade, Multiple systematic reviews and meta- analyses have reported epidemiological associations between colorectal cancer and dietary patterns. while the use of new technologies, such as metabolomics, to analyze the effects of different dietary patterns on metabolites and intestinal flora, can provide further insights into the relationship between diet and cancer risk. In this Review, we summarize the current state of the field to assess the impact of various dietary patterns on colorectal cancer risk. Methods This review mainly adopts the literature research method. The references were collected from PubMed and Web of Science, with colon cancer, colorectal cancer, rectal cancer, Dietary patterns, Mediterranean Dietary patterns (MED), western Dietary patterns (WD), Plant-based Dietary patterns (PBD), Pro-inflammatory Dietary patterns (PID) and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) as the key words, and the publications of the last ten years were collected for analysis. Results The impact of different dietary patterns on colorectal cancer risk may depend on family history, gender, age and other lifestyle and intestinal flora factors. But overall, PBD, MED, DASH, and Antioxidant-rich diets (ARD) can reduce colorectal cancer risk. WD, PID, and  Hyperinsulinaemic diet (HID) may increase the risk of colorectal cancer. Conclusions Increasing the proportion of whole fruits, grains, vegetables, olive oil, and fish in the diet, and reducing red and processed meats, fine grains, fruit juices, and alcohol intake can reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. Funding Sources This work was supported by Guilin Science and Technology Bureau [Science and Technology Breakthrough Project 20,170,103–4]. Zhi-gui He is the corresponding author.

2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-395
Author(s):  
Hisham Hussan ◽  
Samuel Akinyeye ◽  
Maria M. Mihaylova ◽  
Eric McLaughlin ◽  
chienwei chiang ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (25) ◽  
pp. e3759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Park ◽  
Jeonghee Lee ◽  
Jae Hwan Oh ◽  
Aesun Shin ◽  
Jeongseon Kim

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Jones ◽  
Janet Cade ◽  
Charlotte Evans ◽  
Neil Hancock ◽  
Darren Greenwood

AbstractDietary pattern analyses have most commonly used food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data for large population studies, whilst food diaries (FD) tend to be used with smaller datasets and followed up for shorter terms, restricting the possibility of a direct comparison. Studies comparing dietary patterns derived from two different assessment methods, in relation to diet and disease are limited. The aims of this study are to assess the agreement between dietary patterns derived from FFQ and FDs and to compare the associations between the Mediterranean dietary pattern and the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) dietary pattern in relation to colorectal cancer incidence.The study population included 2276 healthy middle-aged women – participants of the UK Women's Cohort Study. Energy and nutrient intakes, derived from 4-day FDs and from a 217-item FFQ were compared. A 10 and an 8-component score indicating adherence to the Mediterranean diet and to the 2007 WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations respectively were generated. Agreement was assessed by weighted Kappa statistics and the Bland-Altman method. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for colorectal cancer risk for both the FD and the FFQ patterns, for each score separately.The Bland-Altman method showed that the FFQ gave a higher energy intake compared to the FD with a bias of -525 kcal (95% CI -556, -493) between the two methods. Agreement was slight for the Mediterranean diet score (Κ = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.16) and fair for the WCRF/AICR score (Κ = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.39). A total of 173 incident cases of colorectal cancer were documented. In the multi-variable adjusted models, the estimates for an association with colorectal cancer were weak: HR = 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.06) for a 1-unit increment in the Mediterranean diet score using FD and HR = 1.01 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.24) for a 1-unit increment in the WCRF/AICR score using FD. For scores derived from the FFQ, estimates were inverse, but weak (HR = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.90 to 1.00) for a 1-unit increment in the Mediterranean diet score using FFQ and HR = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.05) for a 1-unit increment in the WCRF/AICR score using FFQ.There is insufficient evidence of an association of colorectal cancer risk with the Mediterranean dietary pattern or with the WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations, irrespective of the dietary assessment method in this sample. Further studies with larger sample sizes, using FD for diet assessment are warranted.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1387-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Ge ◽  
Xiaoli Zheng ◽  
Erjiang Zhao ◽  
Xuewen Sheng ◽  
Su Lu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 727-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumi Kumagai ◽  
Wan-Ting Chou ◽  
Yasutake Tomata ◽  
Yumi Sugawara ◽  
Masako Kakizaki ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 763-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E Steck ◽  
Mark Guinter ◽  
Jiali Zheng ◽  
Cynthia A Thomson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document