scholarly journals Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from asymptomatic and presymptomatic individuals in healthcare settings despite medical masks and eye protection

Author(s):  
Michael Klompas ◽  
Meghan A Baker ◽  
Diane Griesbach ◽  
Robert Tucker ◽  
Glen R Gallagher ◽  
...  

Abstract We describe 3 instances of SARS-CoV-2 transmission despite medical masks and eye protection, including transmission despite the source person being masked, transmission despite the exposed person being masked, and transmission despite both parties being masked. Whole genome sequencing confirmed perfect homology between source and exposed persons’ viruses in all cases.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S470-S471
Author(s):  
Scott C Roberts ◽  
Egon A Ozer ◽  
Teresa Zembower ◽  
Chao Qi

Abstract Background Candida auris (C. auris), an emerging yeast species, is often drug-resistant and has caused outbreaks in healthcare settings. Surging C. auris cases at our institution prompted whole genome sequencing (WGS) of patient and environmental specimens and comparison to local and international isolates. Methods WGS was performed on clinical and environmental isolates obtained from Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH) from June 2018 to December 2019. Genome sequences were compared against isolates from other institutions in the Chicagoland area obtained from a reference lab (ACL) and from the CDC. Two isolates underwent long-read sequencing on the Oxford Nanopore GridION platform to obtain closed genomes. WGS was performed on the remaining isolates with the Illumina MiSeq platform. Results Twenty isolates from NMH, five from ACL, and two from the CDC underwent WGS to yield 12.6 Mb genomes. Any two NMH isolates differed from each other by a maximum of 36 single nucleotide variants (SNV) (Figure 1). Two patients thought to be part of a transmission cluster (isolates CA06 and CA07), differed by 7 SNVs. No phylogenetic grouping between hospital systems across Chicagoland was observed. Isolates from room surfaces from a C. auris patient differed by 1-6 SNVs from each other and from 7-8 SNVs from the patient isolate. Samples taken from different body sites of another patient differed by 4-9 SNVs. Average SNV counts were lower among nosocomially acquired cases when compared to C. auris isolates present on admission (Figure 2). All NMH isolates were fluconazole sensitive, but a fluconazole resistant ACL isolate differed from a sensitive NMH isolate by only 4 SNVs. Figure 1: Phylogenetic tree of all NMH and ACL isolates with fluconazole sensitivities Figure 2: Observed pairwise SNP differences between nosocomial and POA strains Conclusion WGS of C. auris did not reveal identical isolates in any instance, even from the same patient or the patients and their environment. Generally, lower numbers of SNVs were observed for intra- versus inter-institutional isolates. More work is needed to determine the use, if any, of WGS in outbreak investigations. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s51-s51
Author(s):  
Lindsey Gottlieb ◽  
Emilia Sordillo ◽  
Harm van Bakel ◽  
Barbara Smith ◽  
Bernard Camins ◽  
...  

Background: Accurately tracing nosocomial transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is critical to developing effective infection prevention policies. Given the high prevalence and variable incubation period of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the utility of traditional contact tracing is limited. We describe a nosocomial outbreak in which whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was pivotal to identifying the primary case. Methods: This study was conducted at a New York City academic hospital. The index case was identified on August 13, 2020, and the last case on September 9, 2020. Hospital policy required all inpatients to be screened for COVID-19 on admission by SARS-CoV-2 molecular amplification testing. All healthcare workers (HCWs) were required to wear masks and eye protection for patient care. After a patient (patient 1), who tested SARS-CoV-2 negative on admission, was positive on preprocedure screening on hospital day 9, contact tracing was initiated. Two patients (patients 2 and 3) and 13 HCWs with high-risk exposures (HREs) to patient 1 were quarantined and referred for testing. Additional surveillance testing was performed on 18 inpatients and 84 HCWs on the affected unit. Patients 2 and 3 and 3 HCWs (HCW-1, -2, and -3), only 1 of whom had a high-risk exposure to patient 1, tested positive. WGS was performed to further investigate this outbreak. Results: The outbreak variant (clade 20A) was found in samples from 6 patients and 2 HCWs. Patients 2 and 3 were roommates of patient 1 in the 2 days before patient 1’s positive test, and they did not consistently wear masks in the room. HCW-1 placed a peripheral IV in patient 1 the day before patient 1’s positive test without wearing eye protection. Four additional cases in this cluster (patients 4–6 and HCW-4) were identified by surveillance WGS of positive tests. A review indicated that patient 1 was located ~3 m (~10 feet) away from patient 4 in the emergency department (ED) for 6 hours on hospital day 1, when the admission SARS-CoV-2 test from patient 4 was not positive. No epidemiologic link was found to patient 5 or 6 or HCW-4. The specimen from HCW-2 was inadequate for WGS. The specimen from HCW-3 was not linked to this cluster. Conclusions: This complex nosocomial outbreak highlights the importance of WGS in understanding transmission events. Patient 4 was not identified by traditional contact tracing but was linked to patient 1 and was recognized as the primary case through WGS, having likely infected patient 1 in the ED. Based on these findings, we focused our corrective actions on more promptly isolating suspected COVID-19 cases in the ED, increasing inpatient masking, and improving HCW adherence to universal eye protection.Funding: NoDisclosures: None


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Stevenson ◽  
Alistair T Pagnamenta ◽  
Heather G Mack ◽  
Judith A Savige ◽  
Kate E Lines ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
D. M. Bickhart ◽  
L. Xu ◽  
J. L. Hutchison ◽  
J. B. Cole ◽  
D. J. Null ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ainhoa Arrieta-Gisasola ◽  
Aitor Atxaerandio Landa ◽  
Javier Garaizar ◽  
Joseba Bikandi ◽  
José Karkamo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document