95 DIRECT ORAL FEEDING AFTER A MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY: A SINGLE-CENTER PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Fransen ◽  
T Janssen ◽  
M Aarnoudse ◽  
G Nieuwenhuijzen ◽  
M Luyer

Abstract   A recent randomized controlled trial showed the safety and feasibility of direct oral feeding following a minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). However, significant differences were found regarding complication rate between hospitals, potentially influencing the effect of direct oral feeding. This study aimed to investigate the effect of direct oral feeding compared to the standard of care in a center with low anastomotic leakage and overall complication rates following a MIE. Methods Patients in this single-center prospective cohort study received either direct oral feeding (intervention group) after a MIE with intrathoracic anastomosis or nil-by-mouth for 5 days postoperative and tube feeding (standard of care). Primary outcome was time to functional recovery—defined as adequate pain control with oral analgesics, recovery of mobility, sufficient caloric intake, no intravenous fluid therapy and no signs of active infection—and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, cardiopulmonary complications and other (surgical) complications. Results Baseline characteristics were similar in the intervention (n = 85) and control (n = 111) group. Median time to functional recovery was respectively 7 versus 9 days in the intervention and control group (p < 0.001). Median length of hospital stay was respectively 8 versus 10 days in the intervention and control group (p < 0.001). Thirty-day postoperative complications were significantly lower in the intervention group (p = 0.037). Anastomotic leakage and pneumonia rates did not differ between the intervention and control group (respectively 11.8% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.834; 27.1% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.651). Chyle leakage only occurred in the control group (18.9%, p < 0.001). All other postoperative complications were similar between groups. Conclusion Direct oral feeding in a center with a low postoperative complication rate after a MIE results in a reduced time to functional recovery and a shorter length of hospital stay. Importantly, the 30-day postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in patients directly starting oral feeding.

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gijs H K Berkelmans ◽  
Laura F C Fransen ◽  
Annemarie C P Dolmans-Zwartjes ◽  
Ewout A Kouwenhoven ◽  
Marc J van Det ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Patients undergoing an esophagectomy are often kept nil-by-mouth postoperatively out of fear for increasing anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications. This study investigates the effect of direct start of oral feeding following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared to standard of care. Background & Methods Elements of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been successfully introduced in patients undergoing an esophagectomy. However, start of oral intake, which is an essential part of the ERAS protocols, remains a matter of debate. Patients in this multicenter, international randomized controlled trial were randomized to directly start oral feeding (intervention) after a MIE with intrathoracic anastomosis or to receive nil-by-mouth and tube feeding for five days postoperative (control group). Primary outcome was time to functional recovery. Secondary outcome parameters included anastomotic leakage, pneumonia rate and other surgical complications scored by predefined definitions. Results Baseline characteristics were similar in the intervention (n=65) and control (n=67) group. Functional recovery was seven days for patients receiving direct oral feeding compared to eight days in the control group (p-value 0.436). Anastomotic leakage rate did not differ in the intervention (18.5%) and control group (16.4%, p-value 0.757). Pneumonia rates were comparable between the intervention (24.6%) and control group (34.3%, p-value 0.221). Other morbidity rates were similar, except for chyle leakage which was more prevalent in the standard of care group (p-value 0.032). Conclusions Direct oral feeding after an esophagectomy does not affect functional recovery and did not increase incidence or severity of postoperative complications.


Author(s):  
Thijs H J B Janssen ◽  
Laura F C Fransen ◽  
Fanny F B M Heesakkers ◽  
Annemarie C P Dolmans-Zwartjes ◽  
Krishna Moorthy ◽  
...  

Summary Postoperative morbidity following esophagectomy remains substantial. Studies in major abdominal surgery have shown that prehabilitation can improve postoperative outcomes. This single-center study investigated the influence of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-IL). Data were collected on patients that underwent a MIE-IL and received a fully standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program, between October 2015 and February 2020. The intervention group comprised patients enrolled in the PREPARE prehabilitation program. The control group comprised a retrospective cohort with similar ERAS care, prior to implementation of PREPARE. Postoperative outcomes included (functional) recovery, length of hospital stay (LOHS), cardiopulmonary complications (CPC) and other predefined outcomes. The PREPARE group comprised 52 and control group 43 patients. Median time to functional recovery was 6 vs. 7 days (P = 0.074) and LOHS 7 vs. 8 days (P = 0.039) in PREPARE and control patients, respectively. Hospital readmission rate was 9.6 vs. 14.3% (P = 0.484). A 17% reduction in thirty-day overall postoperative complication rate was observed in PREPARE patients, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.106). Similarly, a clinically relevant reduction of 14% in CPC rate was observed (P = 0.190). Anastomotic leakage rate was similar (9.6 vs 14.0%; P = 0.511). Despite no difference in severity (Clavien-Dindo) of complications (P = 0.311), ICU readmission rate was lower in PREPARE patients (3.8 vs. 16.3%, P = 0.039). Prehabilitation prior to MIE-IL led to a shorter LOHS and reduced ICU readmission rate. Additionally, a clinically relevant improvement in postoperative recovery and reduced morbidity rate was observed in prehabilitated patient.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 330-334
Author(s):  
Syeda Mehnaz ◽  
MAK Azad Chowdhury ◽  
BH Nazma Yasmeen ◽  
Md Masudur Rahman ◽  
Rowshan Jahan Akter ◽  
...  

Background : Perinatal asphyxia is an insult to the fetus or newborn infant due to lack of oxygen (hypoxia) and/or a lack of perfusion (ischemia) to various organs, which will manifest as difficulty in establishing spontaneous respiration evident by delayed cry after birth, at least after one minute. World-wide, perinatal asphyxia accounts for about 900,000 deaths each year. In Bangladesh it is a major cause of neonatal death. A substantial proportion of the children that survive suffer late effects such as cerebral palsy and epilepsy. Objective : To determine the efficacy of erythropoietin in improving the neurological outcome of term neonates with perinatal asphyxia (HIE stage II and III). Materials and methods : A Randomized Controll Trial was carried out in the Neonatal ward and NICU of Dhaka Shishu Hospital from 1st April 2014 to 30th Sep 2015. A total 68 neonates with perinatal asphyxia (both HIE stage II and III) who fulfill the inclusion criteria were enrolled and randomly assigned to intervention group (n=35) and control group (n=33). Intervention group received rHuEPO 300- 500 U/kg/dose daily subcutaneously for 5 days within first 48 hours of birth along with the standard treatment protocol and control group received standard treatment protocol only. Results : Baseline clinical characteristics, USG of brain during hospital stay were almost similar in both groups. Statistically significant effect was noted in seizure control, tolerance of oral feeding, hospital stay and neurological outcome at 3 months of age (p=008). USG of brain at 3 months of age also improved significantly (p=0.027). Conclusion : This study demonstrates the effectiveness of early administration of rHuEPO to term neonates with moderate to severe asphyxia, beneficial effect on short term outcomes like seizure control, tolerance of oral feeding and neurological outcome at 3 months of age. A large multicenter study would be done for further evaluation of these findings. Northern International Medical College Journal Vol.10(1) Jul 2018: 330-334


2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 1247-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo V. Feo ◽  
Serena Lanzara ◽  
Davide Sortini ◽  
Riccardo Ragazzi ◽  
Mario De Pinto ◽  
...  

In the attempt to reduce postoperative complications and costs and improve outcomes, the concept of fast track surgery has been proposed. Improvements in anesthesia techniques and a better understanding of the pathophysiologic events occurring during and after surgery have made it possible. A group of patients undergoing colorectal resections with a fast track approach were investigated; specifically, the effects on postoperative morbidity, resumption of intestinal function, and duration of hospitalization. Fifty patients were managed according to a protocol, which included epidural analgesia, early ambulation, and oral feeding (fast track group); they were compared with 50 patients managed with a different protocol: no epidural analgesia, early ambulation, and early oral diet (control group). Primary outcome end-points reported include morbidity, time to passage of flatus and stool, and length of hospital stay. Fourteen complications occurred in the fast track group and 13 in the control group ( P = not significant (NS)). Resumption of intestinal function occurred after 3 days, and length of hospital stay was 5 days in the fast track group compared with 4 and 7 days respectively in control patients ( P = NS, P < 0.01). Patients undergoing elective colorectal resections can be managed safely with fast track protocols reducing hospital stay.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiou Yi Ho ◽  
Zuriati Ibrahim ◽  
Zalina Abu Zaid ◽  
Zulfitri 'Azuan Mat Daud ◽  
Nor Baizura Md Yu

Abstract Introduction: There has been growing evidence on the favourable outcomes of fast tract recovery (FTR) surgery; expedite recovery, minimise complications, reduce length of hospital stay on surgical patients. However, there is lack of evidence on the effectiveness of FTR in surgical gynaecologic cancer patients. Most of previous study did not focus on feeding composition in FTR surgery protocol. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of FTR feeding with whey protein infused carbohydrate loading drink pre-operatively and early oral feeding post-operatively on post-operative outcomes among surgical gynaecologic cancer patients. Methods and analysis: This open labelled RCT will randomly allocate patients into intervention and control group. Ambulated Malaysian aged over 18 years and scheduled for elective surgery for (suspected) GC, will be included in this study. Intervention group will be given whey protein infused carbohydrate loading drinks evening before operation and 3 hours before operation as well as started on early oral feeding 4 hours post-operatively. Control group will be fasted overnight pre-operation and only allowed plain water, and the diet transition fashion is followed when there is bowel sound post-operatively. Primary outcomes of study are length of post-operative hospital stay, length of clear fluid toleration, solid food toleration and bowel function. Additional outcome measures are changes in nutritional status, biochemical profile and functional status. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03667755. Registered 12 September 2018 – Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03667755


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambudhar Sharma ◽  
Charu Sharma ◽  
Sujeet Raina ◽  
Balraj singh ◽  
Devendra Singh Dadhwal ◽  
...  

Abstract ObjectivesThe pathophysiology of SARS-Cov-2 is characterized by inflammation, immune dysregulation, coagulopathy, and endothelial dysfunction. No single therapeutic agent can target all these pathophysiologic substrates. Moreover, the current therapies are not fully effective in reducing mortality in moderate and severe disease. Hence, we aim to evaluate the combination of drugs (aspirin, atorvastatin, and nicorandil) with anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, immunomodulatory, and vasodilator properties as adjuvant therapy in covid- 19.Trial designSingle-centre, prospective, two-arm parallel design, open-label randomized control superiority trial. ParticipantsThe study will be conducted at the covid centre of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College Tanda Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India. All SARS-CoV-2 infected patients requiring admission to the study centre will be screened for the trial. All patients >18years who are RT-PCR/RAT positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection with pneumonia but without ARDS at presentation (presence of clinical features of dyspnoea hypoxia, fever, cough, spo2 <94% on room air and respiratory rate >24/minute) requiring hospital admission and consenting to participate in the trial will be included.Patients with documented significant liver disease/dysfunction (AST/ALT > 240), myopathy and rhabdomyolysis (CPK > 5x normal), allergy or intolerance to statins, allergy or intolerance to aspirin, patients taking medications with significant interaction with statins, prior statin use (within 30 days), prior aspirin use (within 30 days), history of active GI bleeding in past three months, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100000/ dl), pregnancy, active breastfeeding, patient unable to take oral or nasogastric medications, patients in altered mental status, shock, acute renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, sepsis and ARDS at presentation will be excluded. Intervention and comparatorAfter randomization, participants in the intervention group will receive aspirin, atorvastatin, and nicorandil. Atorvastatin will be prescribed as 40 mg starting dose followed by 40 mg oral tablets once daily for ten days or till hospital discharge whichever is later. Aspirin dose will be 325 starting dose followed by 75 mg once daily for ten days or till hospital discharge whichever is later. Nicorandil will be given as 10 mg starting dose followed by 5mg twice daily ten days or till hospital discharge whichever is later. All patients in the intervention and control group will receive a standard of care for covid management as per national guidelines. All patients will receive symptomatic treatment with antipyretics, adequate hydration, anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin, intravenous remdesivir, corticosteroids (intravenous dexamethasone for 5 days or more duration if oxygen requirement increasing or inflammatory markers are raised), and oxygen support. Patients will receive treatment for comorbid conditions as per guidelines.Main outcomesThe patients will be followed up for outcomes during the hospital stay or for ten days whichever is longer. The primary outcome will be in-hospital mortality. Any progression to ARDS, shock, acute kidney injury, impaired consciousness, length of hospital stay, length of mechanical ventilation (invasive plus non-invasive) will be secondary outcomes. Changes in serum markers (CRP, D –dimer, S ferritin) will be other secondary outcomes. The safety endpoints will be hepatotoxicity (ALT/AST > 3x ULN; hyperbilirubinemia), myalgia—muscle ache, or weakness without creatine kinase (CK) elevation, myositis—muscle symptoms with increased CK levels (3-10) ULN, rhabdomyolysis—muscle symptoms with marked CK elevation (typically substantially greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal [ULN]) and with creatinine elevation (usually with brown urine and urinary myoglobin) observed during the hospital stay. RandomizationComputer-generated block randomization will be used to randomize the participants in a 1:1 ratio to the active intervention group A (Aspirin, Atorvastatin, Nicorandil) plus conventional therapy and control group B conventional therapy only. Blinding (masking)The study will be an open-label trial. Numbers to be randomized (sample size)A total of 396 patients will participate in this study, which is randomly divided with 198 participants in each group.Trial statusThe first version of the protocol was approved by the institutional ethical committee on 1st February 2021, IEC /006/2021. The recruitment started on 8/4/2021 and will continue until 08/07/2021. A total of 281 patients have been enrolled till 21/5/2021.Trial registrationThe trial has been prospectively registered in Clinical Trial Registry – India (ICMR- NIMS): CTRI/2021/04/032648 [Registered on: 08/04/2021].Full protocolThe full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol. The study protocol has been reported under the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Clinical Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines (Additional file 2).


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuewei Cui ◽  
Yongyan Shi ◽  
Siyang Gao ◽  
Xindong Xue ◽  
Jianhua Fu

Abstract Background Preterm infants have immature gastrointestinal tracts and poor immunity. In this study, the effects of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 first on early feeding tolerance, growth, and second on infection prevention in preterm infants were evaluated. Methods One hundred fourteen formula-fed preterm infants with a gestational age between 30 weeks and 37 weeks, and a birth weight between 1500 and 2000 g were enrolled; 57 in the intervention and 57 in the control group:the intervention group was given a dose of 1 × 108 colony-forming units (5 drops) of L. reuteri DSM 17938 once daily, beginning with the first feeding until discharge. The control group did not receive probiotics. Early feeding tolerance (as time to full enterla feeding and number of reflux), growth, incidences of sepsis, localized infection, NEC, and adverse effects were recorded for both groups. Results The number of Daily reflux episodes (times/d) was lower (2.18 ± 0.83 vs. 3.77 ± 0.66, P < 0.01) and time to full enteral feedings (120 mL/kg/d) (9.95 ± 2.46 d vs. 13.80 ± 3.47 d, P < 0.05) was shorter in the intervention group. Average daily weight gain (14.55 ± 3.07 g/d vs. 10.12 ± 2.80 g/d), head circumference increas e(0.0760 ± 0.0157 cm/d vs. 0.0681 ± 0.0108 cm/d), and body length increase (0.1878 ± 0.0151 cm/d vs. 0.1756 ± 0.0166 cm/d) of the intervention group were higher (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the incidences of sepsis (4.44% vs. 8.33%), localized infection (6.67% vs. 8.33%), or NEC (2.22% vs. 10.42%) between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The number of daily defecations (times/d) in the intervention group was higher (3.08 ± 0.33 vs. 2.29 ± 0.20, P < 0.01) and the length of hospital stay was shorter than that in the control group (20.60 ± 5.36 d vs. 23.75 ± 8.57 d, P < 0.05). No adverse effects were noted among the infants receiving L. reuteri. Conclusion L. reuteri may be an useful tool in improving early feeding tolerance in preterm infants, promoting growth, increasing the frequency of defecation, and shortening the length of hospital stay. Trial registration ChiCTR, ChiCTR1900025590. Registered 1 February 2019- Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx.


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 3373-3378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamideh Abbaspour Kasgari ◽  
Siavash Moradi ◽  
Amir Mohammad Shabani ◽  
Farhang Babamahmoodi ◽  
Ali Reza Davoudi Badabi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background New therapeutic options are urgently needed to tackle the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Repurposing existing pharmaceuticals provides an immediate treatment opportunity. We assessed the efficacy of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir with ribavirin for treating patients with COVID-19. Methods This was a single-centre, randomized controlled trial in adults with moderate COVID-19 admitted to the Ghaem Shahr Razi Hospital in Mazandaran Province, Iran. Patients were randomly assigned to 400 mg sofosbuvir, 60 mg daclatasvir and 1200 mg ribavirin (intervention group) or to standard care (control group). The primary endpoint of this study was length of hospital stay. This study is registered by IRCT.ir under the ID: IRCT20200328046886N1. Results Between 20 March 2020 and 8 April 2020, 48 patients were recruited; 24 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 24 to the control group. The median duration of hospital stay was 6 days in both groups (P = 0.398). The number of ICU admissions in the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir/ribavirin group was not significantly lower than the control group (0 versus 4, P = 0.109). There was no difference in the number of deaths between the groups (0 versus 3, P = 0.234). The cumulative incidence of recovery was higher in the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir/ribavirin arm (Gray’s P = 0.033). Conclusions This randomized trial was too small to make definitive conclusions. There were trends in favour of the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir/ribavirin arm for recovery and lower death rates. However, there was an imbalance in the baseline characteristics between the arms. Larger randomized trials should be conducted to investigate this treatment further.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huashuang Chen ◽  
Yanling Luo

ABSTRACT】OBJECTIVE: To access the effect and the effectiveness of sit-up training on elderly bedridden patients with severe pneumonia. METHODS: A total of 150 elderly bedridden patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia were recruited for this study. They were divided equally into the observation group and control group i.e. 75 cases in each group. All patients were selected from January 2016 to April 2018. On this basis, both groups were treated with the same routine nursing care except with the addition of 30 to 60 minutes sit-up trainings twice daily for the control group under supervision. The clinical hospitalization outcomes, length of hospital stay, and patient care satisfaction of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The clinical hospitalization outcomes, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction of the observation group were found to be superior to the control group, and the difference was significant. Conclusion: In bedridden elderly patients with severe pneumonia, sit-up training had positive effects and beneficial in improving the clinical outcomes and recovery rate.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Enomoto ◽  
Masao Iwagami ◽  
Asuka Tsuchiya ◽  
Kojiro Morita ◽  
Toshikazu Abe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Dexmedetomidine is an alpha 2-adrenergic receptor agonist. Apart from its sedative effects, dexmedetomidine has the potential to reduce mortality through its anti-inflammatory effect. However, the impact of dexmedetomidine on in-hospital outcomes of patients with severe burns remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the association between dexmedetomidine and mortality in mechanically-ventilated patients with severe burns, using a Japanese nationwide database of in-hospital patients.Methods: We included adults with severe burns (burn index ≥ 10) who were registered in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination national inpatient database from 2010 to 2018, started mechanical ventilation within 3 days of admission, and received any sedative drug (dexmedetomidine, midazolam, or propofol). One-to-one propensity score matching was performed between patients who received dexmedetomidine on the day of mechanical ventilation initiation (dexmedetomidine group) and those who did not receive dexmedetomidine (control group). The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation in all patients and survivors.Results: Eligible patients (n = 1,888) were classified into the dexmedetomidine group (n = 371) or the control group (n = 1,517). After one-to-one propensity score matching, we compared 329 patients from each of the two groups. No significant difference was observed in 30-day mortality between patients in the dexmedetomidine and control groups (22.8% vs. 22.5%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.46). Moreover, there were no significant differences between patients in the dexmedetomidine and control groups in terms of the length of hospital stay or the duration of mechanical ventilation.Conclusions: We found no significant association between dexmedetomidine use and in-hospital outcomes (mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of mechanical ventilation) in mechanically-ventilated patients with severe burns. Dexmedetomidine use may not improve the above-mentioned outcomes; therefore, its selection should be based on the patient’s general condition and the target level of sedation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document