513 WHAT FACTORS INFLUENCE THE ACCURACY OF CLINICAL STAGING OF ESOPHAGEAL- AND GASTRIC CANCER IN SWEDEN? A NATIONAL REGISTER STUDY
Abstract Cancer treatment is increasingly tailored to the individual patient. Treatment decisions are based on the evaluation of clinical stage which in turn is based on the result of the diagnostic pre-treatment work-up. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of clinical staging of esophageal and gastric cancer in Sweden and what factors influence the quality of the staging procedure. Methods All patients operated for esophageal or gastric cancer, without neoadjuvant treatment, in Sweden from 2006 to 2018 was extracted from the Swedish national registry for esophageal and gastric cancer. Clinical TNM (cTNM) and pathological TNM (pTNM) was compared. The most common preoperative modalities for staging were endoscopy and CT-scan. Data on sex, age, smoking habits, multidisciplinary cancer conferences (yes/no), time of surgery (categorized in 5-year periods), number of resected lymph nodes and region of surgery were extracted from the registry. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were made comparing patients with correct cTNM to patients with incorrect cTNM. Results A total of 2500 patients met the inclusion criteria. 1173 patients were excluded because of missing data leaving 1327 patients for analyses. cTNM stage and pTNM stage was identical in 38% of patients. In 35% of patients there was a +/−1 stage difference comparing cTNM to pTNM. For esophageal cancer T-stage was on target in 32% and N-stage in 50% of cases. For gastric cancer the corresponding figures were 35% and 48% respectively. Multivariate regression analyzes showed that operation in the later time periods, a higher number of resected lymph nodes and discussion at multidisciplinary cancer conference improved staging accuracy. Conclusion In this study we found that 73% of patients were staged on target or +/− one stage-level. Operation in the later time periods, a higher number of resected lymph nodes and discussion at multidisciplinary cancer conference improved staging accuracy. This data indicate that treatment decisions should be made in a multidisciplinary setting. We believe that the gradual centralization of surgery and treatment decisions in Sweden during this time-period partly explains the improved accuracy over time.