scholarly journals P588 Steroid sparing effect of adalimumab in cortisone–depended ulcerative colitis patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S539-S539
Author(s):  
M Sina ◽  
E Pengili ◽  
X Pemaj ◽  
D Osmanaj ◽  
I Bibolli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Average Dose ◽  
Biologic Treatment ◽  
Steroid Dose ◽  
Steroid Dependent ◽  
Sparing Effect ◽  
Steroid Sparing

Abstract Background Corticosteroids are indicated for induction of remission in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. However, due to their adverse effects associated with long-term use, steroids are not indicated as a maintenance therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the steroid sparing effect of adalimumab (ADA) in steroid-dependent UC patients. Methods This is a prospective study carried out at a tertiary hospital center in Albania from 2016–2020, including consecutive moderate-to-severe UC patients. All patients received biologic therapy with subcutaneous ADA 160/80mg at weeks 0/2 followed by 40mg every 2 weeks. We evaluated the steroid-sparing effect of ADA measuring the number of steroid–free patients and the average steroid dose at baseline before initiating biologic treatment and at week 8, 24, 52, 104, 156. Clinical remission was defined as total Mayo score ≤ 2 points. Results We enrolled 26 UC patients, mean age 47.3 ± 16.1 (24–85) years, 55.6% were females. The average disease duration before starting ADA was 7.3 ± 7.0 years (range 1–33); 44.4% had pancolitis and 55.6% left side colitis. 8(29.6%) patients were on combination therapy with azathioprine. 17/26 (65.4%) patients were taking prednisone at the time of the first ADA injection with an average dose of 17.7mg. The number of steroid-free patients at week 8, 24, 52, 104 and 156 was 12/26 (46.2%), 16/26 (61.5%), 15/21 (71.4%), 11/14 (78.6%), 8/9 (88.9%) respectively. At the end of the follow-up (week 156), the proportion of steroid free patient was significantly higher than at baseline [88.9% (8/9) vs 34.6% (7/26), p=0.005]. The reduction of the average dose of prednisone (8.8 mg, 4 mg, 6.8mg, 3.8mg and 3,8mg at week 8, 24, 52, 104 and 156 respectively), was also statistically significant (p<0.01). Clinical remission rates were 7.7% (2/26) at week 8, 47.6% (10/21) at week 52, 42.9% (6/14) at week 104 and 44.4 % (4/9) at week 156. Conclusion In our cohort, ADA administration to moderate–to severe UC significantly reduced the steroid dose and the proportion of patients taking cortisone during 3 years follow-up.

Impact of rituximab on anthropometric indices among childhood steroid-dependent nephrotic syndromes

2020 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2019-318019
Author(s):  
Rajiv Sinha ◽  
Sushmita Banerjee ◽  
Anwesha Mukherjee ◽  
Shakil Akhtar ◽  
Subal Pradhan
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Short Stature ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Anthropometric Parameters ◽  
Anthropometric Indices ◽  
Steroid Dependent ◽  
Sparing Effect ◽  
Steroid Sparing

BackgroundThere is scarcity of data on impact of rituximab on anthropometrical parameters (weight, height and body mass index i.e. BMI SD score (SDS)) among children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndromes (SDNS).MethodsMulticentre retrospective review.Results102 children with SDNS (male: 63%; n=64), median age 7 (IQR: 4.3–9.6) years, received a total of 217 rituximab infusions (total 110 cycles). At median follow-up of 2.1 (IQR: 1.3–2.8) years, 58 (57%) children were off steroids and a significant fall in steroid threshold for relapse was noted (median 0.6; IQR 0.4–0.9 to median 0.3; IQR 0.12 - 0.5 mg/kg/alternate day, p=0.005). Anthropometric parameters (BMI SDS: 0.92±1.8 to 0.25±1.47, p=0.003; weight SDS: 0.20±1.6 to −0.11±1.3, p=0.01; and height SDS: −0.93±1.88 to −0.45±1.54, p=0.04) as well as obesity (38% to 20%, p=0.003) and short stature (11% to 3%, p=0.02) improved. Results remained significant even when analysis was restricted to children ≤12 years (n=88), (BMI SDS: 0.97±1.98 to 0.25±1.5, p=0.001; weight SDS: 0.33±1.6 to 0.02±1.2, p=0.01; and height SDS: −0.67±1.84 to −0.186±1.42, p=0.001).ConclusionsUse of rituximab resulted in significant steroid sparing effect with an improvement in both growth and obesity parameters.

scholarly journals Efficacy, Safety and Steroid-sparing Effect of Topical Cyclosporine A 0.05% for Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Indian Children

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arkendu Chatterjee ◽  
Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Cyclosporine A ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis ◽  
Indian Children ◽  
Steroid Dependent ◽  
Sparing Effect ◽  
Steroid Sparing

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and steroid-sparing effect of topical cyclosporine A (Cs A) 0.05% in patients with moderate to severe steroid dependent vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). Methods: A prospective, comparative, placebo controlled study was carried out on 68 VKC patients, with 34 patients treated with topical Cs A 0.05% and the remaining 34 with topical carboxymethyl cellulose 0.5% (placebo). Both groups also received topical loteprednol etabonate 0.5%. Symptom (itching, photophobia, tearing, and discharge) score, sign (tarsal and limbal papillae, corneal involvement, and conjunctival hyperemia) score, and drug score (steroid drop usage/day/eye) were recorded at baseline and each followup visit. The intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement and evaluation of any ocular side effects were carried out. Results: Significant reduction in symptom score and sign score was seen in both groups. Cs A group significantly showed more reduction in symptom (P < 0.0001 in all follow-up visits) and sign (P < 0.0001 in all follow-up visits) scores compared to the placebo group. At day 7, mean steroid usage reduced from 4 to 3.44 ± 0.5 and 3.79 ± 0.4 in Cs A and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Steroid drops completely stopped in 21 patients at day 60 in the Cs A group compared to none in the placebo group. No significant rise in IOP or any side effects were noted in either group. Conclusion: Topical Cs A 0.05% is effective and safe in patients with moderate to severe VKC with good steroid-sparing effect.

scholarly journals Granulocyte-Monocyte Apheresis in Steroid-Dependent, Azathioprine-Intolerant/Resistant Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Multicenter Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Gianni Imperiali ◽  
Arnaldo Amato ◽  
Maria Maddalena Terpin ◽  
Ivo Beverina ◽  
Aurora Bortoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Prospective Multicenter Study ◽  
Steroid Dependent ◽  
Specific Subgroup ◽  
One Year

Background. Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis has been proposed for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, although it is limited by costs and variability of results. Aim. To assess effectiveness of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis in patients with steroid-dependent, azathioprine-intolerant/resistant moderate ulcerative colitis. Methods. Consecutive patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled, treated by apheresis, and followed up for 12 months. The primary end point of the study was steroid-free clinical remission at 12 months, with no need for biologic therapy or surgery. Results. From January to December 2013, 33 patients were enrolled. After one year of follow-up, 12 (36%) patients had clinical remission, were steroid-free, and had no need for biological therapy or surgery; 3 (9%) cases showed a clinical response (but not clinical remission). Moreover, 12 (36%) patients required biologic therapy, 4 (12%) underwent colectomy, and in the other 2 (6%) a reduction, but not withdrawal, of steroid dose was achieved. Conclusions. Our study shows that a standard course of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis is associated with a 36% steroid-free clinical remission in patients with steroid-dependent, azathioprine-intolerant or resistant moderate ulcerative colitis. Apheresis might represent an alternative to biologic therapy or surgery in this specific subgroup of patients. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrial.gov NCT03189888.

scholarly journals P272 Tofacitinib as salvage therapy for patients hospitalized with refractory severe active ulcerative colitis: a GETAID multicenter prospective/retrospective cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S305-S306
Author(s):  
M Uzzan ◽  
C Bresteau ◽  
D Laharie ◽  
C Stefanescu ◽  
F Carbonnel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Multiple Drug ◽  
Biologic Treatment ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background Up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require hospitalization for severe flare. In UC patients admitted who have already experienced multiple drug failures, including steroids and anti-TNF agents, new quick-acting medical options are needed. Tofacitinib is effective in refractory UC and has a rapid mechanism of action. It could be considered in this setting. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients hospitalized for an acute UC flare. Methods We conducted an observational and multicenter study with both retrospective and prospective collections in 14 GETAID tertiary IBD centers. The primary objective was to assess the survival without colectomy following tofacitinib initiation. We determined rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and clinical steroid-free remission at week 6 and week 14 and safety. Results Fifty-eight patients were included. All but one patient with active lupus were exposed to antiTNF. 50 (86.2%) patients have received infliximab and 18 (31%) to ciclosporin. Patients were previously exposed to a median of 2.5 lines of biologic treatment before tofacitinib.Median Lichtiger at inclusion was 11.5 (interquartile range IQR[9 - 13]), median CRP was 17 mg/l (IQR[6.5 - 67]) and total Mayo score was 10 (IQR[9.3 - 11]). Deep ulcerations were observed in 10 patients (17.2%).With a median follow-up of 6.5 months (IQR [2.9-12.4]), colectomy-free survival rates were estimated at 80.1% (95CI [70.1-91.4]) at 3 months and at 75.1% (95CI[64.1-88.1]) at 6 months. Rates of clinical response, clinical remission and clinical steroid-free remission were 60.3%, 46.6% and 37.9% at week 6 an, 48.1%, 37% and 35.2% at week 14, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 29 patients (50%) were still treated with tofacitinib. The survival without tofacitinib discontinuation was estimated at 82.8% (95CI[73.6-93.1), 67.8% (95CI[56.6-81.4]) and 46.2% (95CI[34.2-62.4]) at 1, 3, and 6 months (Figure 3).Regarding safety, no death was observed, three patients withdrew tofacitinib due to adverse events. Two herpes zosters occurred in patients aged over 60 years old. No thrombotic event occurred. Conclusion Tofacitinib appears as a promising option in patients hospitalized with a severe UC flare that needs further validation in prospective and controlled trials.

scholarly journals POS0338 STEROID-SPARING EFFECT OF ANAKINRA IN GIANT-CELL ARTERITIS: A CASE SERIES WITH CLINICAL, BIOLOGICAL AND ICONOGRAPHIC LONG-TERM ASSESSMENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 397.1-397
Author(s):  
S. Deshayes ◽  
K. Ly ◽  
V. Rieu ◽  
G. Maigné ◽  
N. M. Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Interleukin 1 ◽  
Oral Prednisone ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Sparing Effect ◽  
Steroid Sparing

Background:The treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) relies on corticosteroids but is burdened by a high rate of relapses and adverse effects. Anti-interleukin-6 treatments show a clear benefit with a significant steroid-sparing effect, but late relapses occur after treatment discontinuation. In addition to interleukin-6, interleukin-1 also appears to play a significant role in GCA pathophysiology.Objectives:We report herein the efficacy of anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, in 6 GCA patients exhibiting corticosteroid dependence or resistance, specifically analyzing the outcome of aortitis in 4 of them, and including the long-term follow-up of 2 previously described patients (1).Methods:This retrospective study analyzed the cases of all GCA patients treated with anakinra from the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis.Patients had to satisfy the following two criteria to be enrolled in this retrospective study. First, their diagnosis of GCA should be based on the fulfillment of at least 3 criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) for GCA or on the satisfaction of 2 of these criteria along with the demonstration of LVI on imaging. Second, patients should have received anakinra because of corticosteroid dependence or resistance.Corticosteroid dependence was defined as ≥2 relapses or the combination of 2 of the following criteria: a daily dose of oral prednisone >20 mg/day (or 0.3 mg/kg) at 6 months; a daily dose of oral prednisone >10 mg/day (or 0.2 mg/kg) at 12 months; and/or a treatment maintained >24 months because of a relapsing disease course. Corticosteroid resistance was defined as persistent increased inflammatory parameters at month 3 despite a steroid dosage over 0.5 mg/kg.Results:After a median duration of anakinra therapy of 19 [18–32] months, all 6 patients exhibited complete clinical and biological remission. Among the 4 patients with large-vessel involvement, 2 had a disappearance of aortitis under anakinra, and 2 showed a decrease in vascular uptake. After a median follow-up of 56 [48–63] months, corticosteroids were discontinued in 4 patients, and corticosteroid dosage could be decreased to 5 mg/day in 2 patients. One patient relapsed 13 months after anakinra introduction in the context of increasing the daily anakinra injection interval to every 48 hours. Three patients experienced transient injection-site reactions, and 1 patient had pneumonia.Figure 1.Steroid dosages before and after the introduction of anakinra in 6 patients with giant-cell arteritis and corticosteroid dependence or resistance. The black arrow indicates the time of anakinra introduction.Conclusion:In this short series, anakinra appears to be an efficient and safe steroid-sparing agent in refractory GCA, with a possible beneficial effect on large-vessel involvement.References:[1]Ly K-H, Stirnemann J, Liozon E, Michel M, Fain O, Fauchais A-L. Interleukin-1 blockade in refractory giant cell arteritis. Joint Bone Spine 2014;81:76–8.Disclosure of Interests:Samuel Deshayes: None declared, Kim LY: None declared, Virginie Rieu: None declared, Gwénola Maigné: None declared, Nicolas Martin Silva: None declared, Alain Manrique: None declared, Jacques Monteil: None declared, Hubert de Boysson Speakers bureau: Roche-Chugai, Grant/research support from: Roche-Chugai, Achille Aouba Grant/research support from: SOBI

scholarly journals P421 Prognostic and therapeutic long-term outcome of patients with ulcerative proctitis: analysis from a large referral centre cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S383-S384
Author(s):  
E Dubois ◽  
A Moens ◽  
J Sabino ◽  
M Ferrante ◽  
S Vermeire
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Therapeutic Outcome ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Referral Centre ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Ulcerative Proctitis

Abstract Background Data about long-term prognostic and therapeutic outcome of patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP) are scarce. Real-world data are very important as these patients are usually excluded from participation in randomised controlled clinical trials. Methods All patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis limited to the rectum (further defined as UP) and followed at our referral centre between 1998 and 2018, were identified via an automated search of electronic medical records and were reviewed for long-term therapeutic outcome. Treatment success was defined as clinical remission (complete disappearance of UP-related symptoms as judged by the treating physician) and endoscopic inactive disease (Mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 on sigmoidoscopy) if available at last follow-up. Results From a total of 1561 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 168 patients with UP were identified (54% female, mean age at diagnosis 36 years). While the majority (118 patients or 70%) had proctitis since diagnosis, another 50/168 (30%) were diagnosed with left-sided colitis or extensive colitis but had a predominant disease course of proctitis afterwards. Nearly, all patients received treatment with 5-ASA but 71 patients (42%) were refractory to rectal ± oral therapy with 5-ASA and corticosteroids necessitating azathioprine in 41 patients (24%) and/or biological therapies in 59 patients (35%). Azathioprine was started as monotherapy in 34 patients. Anti-TNF was the first-line biological in 45 and vedolizumab in 14 patients. After a median follow-up of 76.5 months (IQR 34.3–143.8), clinical remission was observed in 143 patients (85%) and in 52/71 patients with 5-ASA refractory proctitis (73%). In this last group, clinical remission rates were significantly higher for patients treated with biologicals (44/59 or 75%) as compared with patients treated with azathioprine (8/34 or 24%; p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusion Ten per cent of patients with ulcerative colitis from our referral centre cohort had disease confined to the rectum. With a median follow-up of more than 6 years, good clinical outcomes were recorded with 85% of patients achieving clinical remission. Nevertheless, more than one third needed escalation to biologicals to control the proctitis. Long-term outcome in patients on biologicals was superior to azathioprine. Our data do not suggest inferior outcomes for patients with proctitis compared with left-sided or extensive colitis.

scholarly journals P668 Real-life comparison of different anti-TNF biologic therapies for ulcerative colitis treatment: A retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S548-S549
Author(s):  
B Barberio ◽  
F Zingone ◽  
R D’Incà ◽  
C Marinelli ◽  
M C Maccarone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis Treatment ◽  
Similar Good

Abstract Background Currently, ulcerative colitis (UC) can be treated with different anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) drugs, which selection is mainly based on physician’s perspective. Indeed, head-to-head comparison studies evaluating the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-TNF drugs are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-TNF-α drugs used in clinical practice in a cohort of patients with moderate to severe UC. Methods Retrospectively, 122 UC patients treated with Infliximab (IFX) Originator and Biosimilar, Adalimumab (ADA) and Golimumab (GOL) were included. We performed an intention to treat analysis to evaluate the clinical response, clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission and endoscopy response according to the different time-points of the follow-up (ie. after induction, at 30 and 52 weeks). Baseline and post-induction predictor factors of these outcomes were evaluated using multivariate logistic regressions models. Data were analyzed using STATA11 software. Results Overall clinical response was 79.5% after induction, 79.5% at 30 weeks, 75.4% at 52 weeks, while the overall steroid-free clinical remission was 42.6%, 45.1%, 55.7%, respectively. After induction, a higher rate of treatment failure was observed in GOL group. Moreover, at the end of follow-up, lower rates of steroid-free clinical remission and clinical response were obtained by GOL (38.7% and 54.8% with p = 0.006 and p = 0.003, respectively). At week 52, endoscopic response was achieved by 46.5% of the population (IFX Originator: 46.7%; IFX Biosimilar: 40%; ADA: 51.6%; GOL: 22.6%; p = 0.003). Conclusion Among the different anti-TNF treatment, moderate-to-severe UC seems to respond better to IFX and ADA, whereas GOL seems to be less effective, despite a similar good safety profile. Current possibility of optimising also GOL will clarify whether these discrepancies are due to reduced drug exposure to GOL.

scholarly journals MODERATE TO SEVERE ENDOSCOPIC INFLAMMATION IS FREQUENT AFTER ACHIEVING CLINICAL REMISSION IN PEDIATRIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S13-S13
Author(s):  
Chen Sarbagili-Shabat ◽  
Dror Weiner ◽  
Joram Wardi ◽  
Lee Abramas ◽  
Michal Yaakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Sustained Remission ◽  
High Relapse Rate ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by low sustained remission rates and frequent extension of disease even if clinical remission is obtained with therapy. Moderate to severe endoscopic activity is a risk factor for relapse while evidence regarding early mucosal healing or persistence of inflammation after remission in children is not available. Our aim was to evaluate if persistence of significant inflammation is common and could explain the high relapse rate in pediatric UC. Methods Pediatric UC patients with clinical remission, defined as pediatric UC activity index (PUCAI) scores &lt; 10, were prospectively assessed for mucosal healing by endoscopy 3–5 months after remission was documented. Mayo score was assessed for each segment by a blinded adult gastroenterologist using central reading. Symptomatic patients prior to sigmoidoscopy were excluded Sustained remission was assessed retrospectively at 18 months follow-up. Results Forty-six children were enrolled, 28 children in continuous clinical remission at time of sigmoidoscopy were included in the final analysis. Mayo 0 was present in 12/28 (42.86%), Mayo 1 in 2/28 (7.1%) and Mayo 2–3 in 14/28 (50.0%) endoscopies. Among 23/28 patients with follow-up through 18 months, remission was sustained in 2/11 (18.18%) of patients with Mayo 2 and 3 versus 6/12 (50.0%) with Mayo score 0–1. Conclusion Over 50% of children assessed for mucosal healing 3–5 months after clinical remission is obtained have residual disease activity, primarily moderate to severe inflammation which was associated with lower sustained remission. Early sigmoidoscopy after clinical remission for assessment of mucosal disease should be considered in pediatric UC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document