scholarly journals P195. Bone metabolic disease in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients with past or current corticosteroid treatment

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S173-S173
1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1409-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Goldsmith ◽  
B. McGarity ◽  
A. F. Walls ◽  
M. K. Church ◽  
G. H. Millward-Sadler ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 1957-1961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh C. Tripathi ◽  
Barbara S. Kirschner ◽  
Michael Kipp ◽  
Brenda J. Tripathi ◽  
David Slotwiner ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 904-908
Author(s):  
Ronald M. Laxer ◽  
Earl D. Silverman ◽  
J. Williamson Balfe ◽  
S. Poucell ◽  
Reuben Baumal

Renal failure occurred in a 14-year-old girl with peripheral arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease while she was being treated with naproxen. She had previously received aspirin and tolmetin sodium and had no complications. A renal biopsy showed a severe tubulointerstitial nephritis. Although her renal function improved somewhat with corticosteroid treatment, it worsened when the steroids were discontinued. This case emphasizes that renal failure can develop insidiously in children on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy and that such children must be monitored closely for signs of nephrotoxicity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Triantafillidis ◽  
Costas Vagianos ◽  
Apostolos E. Papalois

Enteral nutrition (EN) is considered to be of great importance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and nutritional problems. This comprehensive review is aiming to provide the reader with an update on the role of EN in IBD patients. EN can reduce Crohn’s disease (CD) activity and maintain remission in both adults and children. Nutritional support using liquid formulas should be considered for CD patients and in serious cases of ulcerative colitis (UC), especially for those who may require prolonged cycles of corticosteroids. Given that the ultimate goal in the treatment of CD is mucosal healing, this advantage of EN over corticosteroid treatment is valuable in therapeutic decision-making. EN is indicated in active CD, in cases of steroid intolerance, in patient’s refusal of steroids, in combination with steroids in undernourished individuals, and in patients with an inflammatory stenosis of the small intestine. No differences between the efficiency of elemental diets and nonelemental formulas have been noticed. EN must be the first choice compared to TPN. EN has a restricted value in the treatment of patients with large bowel CD. In conclusion, it seems important not to underestimate the role of nutrition as supportive care in patients with IBD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 148-148
Author(s):  
Lindsay Anne Sceats ◽  
Cindy Kin ◽  
Amber Trickey ◽  
Maria Polyakova ◽  
M. Kate Bundorf

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Our primary objectives were to examine the impact of biologic cost sharing on 1) adherence to biologics and 2) persistence on biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Our secondary objective was to assess the effect of biologic cost sharing on clinical IBD outcomes, including rates of hospitalization, abdominal surgery, and corticosteroid treatment. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This retrospective cohort analysis used a national insurance claims database (Optum Clinformatics DataMart) to assess adult IBD patients enrolled in medium or large private insurance plans from 2007-2016. Patients were followed for one year of continuous enrollment after their index biologic claim. We assessed adherence to biologic medications (medication possession ratio >0.8) dependent on patient cost sharing, as measured by an employer-plan’s average out-of-pocket biologic medication cost. We also examined the effects of patient cost sharing for biologics on need for hospitalization, abdominal surgery, or corticosteroid treatment. We used multivariate logistic regression models adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics. We estimated the effect of cost sharing on biologic therapy persistence using repeated measures proportional hazard survival models. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We identified 2,193 adult IBD patients who initiated biologic therapy and met study criteria (Crohn’s disease 66.1% vs. ulcerative colitis 24.9%, mean age 40.8 years, mean Charlson index 0.50). Median [IQR] out-of-pocket cost per 30-day biologic prescription was $62 [$34 - $157]. 66.9% of patients were adherent to biologic therapy. Higher out-of-pocket costs for biologics were associated with increased odds of nonadherence; patients with ulcerative colitis were more price-responsive than patients with Crohn’s disease or indeterminate colitis (Figure 1). However, higher out-of-pocket biologic costs were not associated with increased odds of all-cause or IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, or corticosteroid prescriptions for IBD flares. Patients whose out-of-pocket costs were less than $10 per 30-day biologic prescription persisted on biologic therapy for significantly longer than patients who paid >$10 (Figure 2). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Nonadherence to biologics increases when IBD patients face higher out-of-pocket costs, particularly for ulcerative colitis patients. However, this is not associated with worse clinical outcomes. Patients with cost-sharing<$10 persisted on biologics longer than patients whose cost sharing exceeded $10.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1316-1329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander M Dorrington ◽  
Christian P Selinger ◽  
Gareth C Parkes ◽  
Melissa Smith ◽  
Richard C Pollok ◽  
...  

Abstract The use of corticosteroids to treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] has been the bedrock of IBD therapeutics since the pioneering work of Truelove and Witts in the UK in the 1950s and subsequent large cohort studies in the USA and Europe. Nevertheless, although effective for induction of remission, these agents do not maintain remission and are associated with a long list of recognised side effects, including a risk of increased mortality. With the arrival of an increasing number of therapies for patients with IBD, the question arises as to whether we are using these agents appropriately in contemporary practice. This review discusses the historical background to steroid usage in IBD, and also provides a brief review of the literature on side effects of corticosteroid treatment as relevant to IBD patients. Data on licensed medications are presented with specific reference to the achievement of corticosteroid-free remission. We review available international data on the incidence of corticosteroid exposure and excess, and discuss some of the observations we and others have made concerning health care and patient-level factors associated with the risk of corticosteroid exposure, including identification of ‘at-risk’ populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document