P765 Does detection of thrombus in left atrial appendage increase risk of ischemic stroke and mortality?

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Kagawa ◽  
M Kato ◽  
N Oda ◽  
E Kunita ◽  
M Nagai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Transoesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Free Rate

Abstract Background Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus is one of causes of cardiogenic stroke and detection of LAA thrombus by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) strongly suggest cardiogenic stroke. It was reported that cardiogenic stroke patients had higher in-hospital mortality about 19%; however, little is known about LAA thrombus and mortality after indexed detection of LAA thrombus. We investigated LAA thrombus detection and their prognosis including ischemic stroke and survival. Methods The patients who were performed TOE between 2005 and 2016 in our hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on thrombus detection in the LAA, and baseline characteristics and outcomes including prevalence of 5-y stroke-free and survival from the indexed TOE were compared. Results Among the 1260 study patients, the follow-up duration was median 971 d (interquartile range 345 d – 2017 d), and 67% of the patients were performing TOE for atrial fibrillation (AF), 20% for cerebral infarction, and 14% for valvular heart disease. Non-valvular AF was seen in 64% of the study patients and rheumatic AF was in 2%. The age (74 y [66 y – 79 y] vs 70 y [62 y – 76 y], p < 0.001), the prevalence of male sex (67% vs 69%, p = 0.63), and hemoglobin level (13.9 g/dl [12.5 – 15.1 g/dl] vs 13.8 g/dl [12.4 – 14.9 g/dl], p = 0.49) were similar between the patients with LAA thrombus and those without. The CHA2DS2-VASc score (p = 0.008), the prevalence of receiving anticoagulation before TOA (34% vs 24%, p = 0.01), those of after TOA (98% vs 66%, p < 0.001), serum creatinine (0.92 mg/dl [0.80 – 1.10 mg/dl] vs 0.85 mg/dl [0.71 – 1.00 mg/dl], p < 0.001), d-dimer level (1.7 mcg/ml [0.9 – 3.5 mcg/ml] vs 0.8 mcg/ml [0.5 – 2.2 mcg/ml], p < 0.001), and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (315 pg/ml [128 – 515 pg/ml] vs 126 pg/ml [47 – 284 pg/ml], p < 0.001) were higher in the patients with LAA thrombus than those without. The 5-y ischemic stroke-free rate was lower in the patients with LAA thrombus than those without (p < 0.001) (Figure, Panel A); however, the 5-y survival was similar between the 2 groups (p = 0.93) (Panel B). Conclusions The patients who were detected thrombus in the LAA had higher incidence of ischemic stroke, but the survival rate were similar. The higher rate of receiving anticoagulation therapy in the patients with LAA thrombus may be the cause of this discrepancy. Further studies are necessary to clarify this issue. Abstract P765 Figure

Prognosis and cause of death in patients with left atrial appendage thrombus treated with or without anticoagulation therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Kagawa ◽  
M Kato ◽  
N Oda ◽  
E Kunita ◽  
M Nagai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Transoesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Free Rate

Abstract Background Thrombus in left atrial appendage (LAA) is associated with cardiogenic ischemic stroke; however, little is known about prognosis of patients with LAA thrombus detected by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE). Purpose This study is to investigate the prognosis of patients with LAA thrombus and their cause of death. Methods Between 2005 and 2016, the patients who were performed TOE in our hospital were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Five-year stroke free and survival curves were constructed by Kaplan-Meir method and cause of death were assessed. Results Among the 1263 study patients, LAA thrombus was detected in 146 (12%) patients. The patients with LAA thrombus were elder (74 y [66–79 y] vs. 70 y [62–76 y], P<0.001), than those without LAA thrombus, respectively. The prevalence of male sex (67% vs. 69%, P=0.63) were similar between the 2 groups. The prevalence of CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, d-dimer (1.7 mcg/ml [0.9–3.5 mcg/ml] vs. 0.8 mcg/ml [0.5–2.2 mcg/ml], P<0.001), and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (315 pg/ml [128–515 pg/ml] vs. 126 pg/ml [47–284 pg/ml], P<0.001) were higher in the patients with LAA thrombus than those without (89% vs. 78%, P=0.003). The LAA velocity was slower in the patients with LAA thrombus than those without (23 cm/s [15–34 cm/s] vs. 51 cm/s [35–72 cm/s], P<0.001). The prevalence of receiving anticoagulation therapy before (34% vs. 24%, P=0.01) and after (98% vs. 66%, P<0.001) TOE 1 month were higher in the patients with LAA thrombus than those without. The 5-year stroke free rate was lower in the patients with LAA thrombus than those without (82% vs. 93%, P<0.001); however, the 5-year survival were similar between the 2 groups (84% vs. 84%, P=0.93) (Figure). The cause of death as ischemic stroke was only 7% (1/14) and 3% (3/94), (P=0.43); the cardiac cause (14% vs. 43%, P=0.07) and the malignancy (35% vs. 29%, P=0.75) were the frequent cause of death in the patient with LAA thrombus and those without, respectively. Conclusions The patients who were detected thrombus in the LAA had higher incidence of ischemic stroke; however, the 5-y survival were similar. The ischemic stroke was not major cause of death in the patients with and without LAA thrombus. The higher rate of receiving anticoagulation therapy may be one of the causes of the discrepancy. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 16527: Peri-Procedural and 45-Day Outcomes in the Roll-In Cohort of the Amplatzer Amulet Ide Trial of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Gopinathannair ◽  
Scott M Koerber ◽  
Krishna Akella ◽  
Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Watchman Device ◽  
Major Adverse Events

Background: The Amulet IDE trial is an ongoing, randomized, worldwide trial, enrolled but following patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk of stroke. The study is comparing the safety and effectiveness of the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ left atrial appendage (LAA) Occluder to the Watchman device. At US sites, the implanting physicians only had experience with the Watchman device; therefore, up to three roll-in subjects with Amplatzer Amulet device implantation were permitted prior to randomization. The purpose of this analysis is to describe the peri-procedural outcomes for the roll-in cohort. Methods: Roll-in subjects met the same eligibility criteria and have the same data collection requirements as randomized subjects. Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee and LAA occlusion was assessed by an independent core laboratory based on the 45-day TEE. Major adverse events included all cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism or device-/procedure-related events requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascular intervention within 7 days post implant or hospital discharge, whichever is later. Results: From August 2016 to November 2018, 201 patients with non-valvular AF at high risk of stroke and bleeding were enrolled at 82 sites as roll-in subjects. Mean age was 74.2 ± 7.5 years and 62% of subjects were male. The Amplatzer Amulet device was successfully deployed in 99% of subjects. Major adverse events within 7 days or hospital discharge occurred in 2.5% of patients and included death (n=3), ischemic stroke (n=1) and vascular access site bleeding (n=1). The majority (79%) of patients were discharged on antiplatelet therapy only or no anti-thrombotic medication. TEE follow-up at the 45-day visit revealed adequate (≤ 5 mm jet) occlusion of the appendage in 98.9% (178/180) of patients. Device-related thrombus (DRT) was identified by the core laboratory in 6 patients (3%); no patient experienced a thrombo-embolic event. Conclusions: In the roll-in cohort, with implanting physicians having no prior experience using the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device, there was a low rate of procedural complications and high rates of both implant success and adequate LAA sealing at follow up.

Evaluating long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion: the results of a prospective single-center registry

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Maarse ◽  
L Wintgens ◽  
E Aarnink ◽  
M Huijboom ◽  
B Abeln ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Closure ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by an unrestricted grant from Boston Scientific. Boston Scientific was not involved in the design/conduct of the study, data collection/analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript. Background Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion is an emerging alternative to anticoagulation in the prevention for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, especially in patients with a contra-indication for oral anticoagulation therapy. Long-term results on the efficacy and safety of this treatment remain scarce. Methods In this single-center prospective registry, data of all consecutive patients that underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage closure between 2009 and 2019 were collected. Patients with successful left atrial appendage closure (peri-device leakage ≤5mm) and at least one year of follow-up data were analyzed. The occurrence of thrombo-embolic events (ischemic stroke, TIA and systemic embolism), major bleeding events (BARC >2) and anticoagulation use during long-term follow-up were evaluated. Results A total of 192 patients after left atrial appendage occlusion were included (61 % male, age 69.0 ± 8.4 years, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.0[3.0-5.0], HAS-BLED 3.0[2.0-3.25]) with a mean follow-up duration of 5.7 ± 2.8 years (in total 1087 patient-years). During follow-up 36 patients (19%) died. 49 thrombo-embolic complications were observed in 38 patients. The ischemic stroke rate was 1.9 events per 100 patient-years, accounting for a 70% reduction compared to CHA2DS2-VASc predicted rate. Device-related thrombus (DRT) occurred in 5 patients (2.6%), 3 were observed during routine follow-up and were not associated with thrombo-embolic complications. The other 2 DRT were observed in patients presenting with ischemic stroke more than 3 years after device implantation. Furthermore, 38 non-procedural major bleeding complications occurred in 19 patients, resulting in 3.5 events per 100-patients years, accounting for a reduction of 43% compared to estimated bleeding rates under OAC use. At the end of the study 71% of all patients were on single antiplatelet or no antiplatelet/anticoagulation treatment at all. Conclusions During long-term follow-up thrombo-embolic event rates and non-procedural major bleeding rates were consistently low (ischemic stroke rate reduction 70% and non-procedural major bleeding rate reduction 40% compared to predicted rates). These results confirm the efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion. Abstract Figure. Ischemic stroke rates

scholarly journals Spontaneously occluded left atrial appendage in a patient with atrial fibrillation and stroke: a case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Andreas Bugge Tinggaard ◽  
Kasper Korsholm ◽  
Jesper Møller Jensen ◽  
Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Transoesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background  The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF). Transcatheter closure is non-inferior to warfarin therapy in preventing stroke. Case summary  A patient with two consecutive strokes associated with AF was referred for transcatheter LAA occlusion (LAAO). Preprocedural cardiac CT and transoesophageal echocardiography demonstrated a spontaneously occluded LAA with a smooth left atrial surface, with stationary results at 6- and 12-month imaging follow-up. Warfarin was discontinued, and life-long aspirin instigated. Discussion  Left atrial appendage occlusion has shown non-inferiority to warfarin for prevention of stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality. No benefits from anticoagulation have been demonstrated in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. In the present case, we observed that the LAA was occluded and, therefore, treated with aspirin monotherapy assuming similar efficacy as transcatheter LAAO.

Ligation of Left Atrial Appendage during Off-Pump Coronary Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (08) ◽  
pp. 695-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soslan Enginoev ◽  
Dmitry Koz'min ◽  
Gasan Magomedov ◽  
Sergey Makeev ◽  
Igor Chernov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Group 2

Abstract Objective The main purpose of this article is to evaluate an impact of epicardial ligation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) on the development of ischemic stroke and mortality. Methods From 2009 to 2013, a total of 125 patients (86.4% men, mean age 64 ± 7 years, 95% confidence interval: 61–65 years) received a combined OPCAB and LAA ligation because of coronary artery disease and AF. All the subjects were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 57)—LAA ligation during OPCAB, group 2 (n = 68) without LAA ligation during OPCAB. Primary endpoints were postoperative incidence of ischemic stroke and mortality. Results No difference in the number of ischemic stroke (0 vs. 5.9%) and death (0 vs. 4.4%) in both groups during the hospital period (p > 0.05). Median overall follow-up was 41 (22–61) months: without difference for groups (p > 0.05). During follow-up, there was a difference in the number of ischemic stroke (0 vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001), while there was no difference in mortality in two study groups (5.3 vs. 16.2%, p > 0.05). Conclusion Epicardial ligation of LAA during OPCAB in patients with AF may reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in long-term follow-up and does not affect the mortality.

scholarly journals Risk of Cardiovascular Complications in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation after Dissolution of a Thrombus in the Left Atrial Appendage

Kardiologiia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
E. S. Mazur ◽  
V. V. Mazur ◽  
N. D. Bazhenov ◽  
Yu. A. Orlov
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiovascular Complications ◽  
Main Group ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Control Group

Aim      To compare the incidence of cardiovascular complications (CVC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) following thrombus dissolution in the left atrial appendage (LAA) and in patients with persistent AF without preceding LAA thrombosis.Material and methods  The main group included 43 patients who had been diagnosed with LAA thrombosis on the first examination, transesophageal echocardiography, and who showed dissolution of the thrombus on a repeated study performed after 7.1+2.0 weeks of the anticoagulant treatment. The control group consisted of 123 patients with a risk score >0 for men without LAA thrombosis and score >1 for women without LAA thrombosis according to the CHA2DS2‑VASc scale. The patients were followed up for 47.3±17.9 months. The following unfavorable outcomes were recorded: all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, hemorrhagic stroke or severe bleeding, and myocardial infarction (MI).Results Unfavorable clinical outcomes were observed in 39.5 % of patients in the main group and in 3.3 % of patients in the control group (p<0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of ischemic stroke (relative risk (RR), 12.9; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 2.89–57.2), and MI (RR, 5.72; 95 % CI, 1.09–30.1) was higher in the main group. However, the number of MI cases in both groups and the number of stroke cases in the control group increased during the entire follow-up period, while the number of stroke cases rapidly increased only during the first year of follow-up.Conclusion      In patients with persistent AF, the risk of CVC after LAA thrombus dissolution remains significantly higher than in patients with AF without LAA thrombosis.

scholarly journals Is warfarin associated with higher risk of thrombus in left atrial appendage than direct oral anticoagulants?

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Kagawa ◽  
M Kato ◽  
N Oda ◽  
E Kunita ◽  
M Nagai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
The Body ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Warfarin Group

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Thrombus in left atrial appendage (LAA) is associated with cardiogenic ischemic stroke, and anticoagulation therapy is utilized to prevent thromboembolism. Purpose This study is to investigate the incidence of thrombus in left atrial appendage detected by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) under anticoagulation therapy with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Methods Between 2005 and 2016, the patients who underwent TOE under anticoagulation therapy due to atrial fibrillation more than one month were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether treated with warfarin or DOAC and baseline characteristics and incidence of LAA thrombus were assessed. Results Among the 313 study patients, 243 (78%) were treated with warfarin. The patients treated with warfarin were elder (median 73 y vs. 67 y [interquartile range 66 – 78 y vs. 58 – 72 y], P &lt; 0.01), the body mass index was lower (23.2 vs. 24.0 [21.0 – 25.4 vs. 21.3 – 26.9], P = 0.03). The prevalence of male sex (64% vs. 71%, P = 0.26) were similar between the 2 groups. The previous history of hypertension (69% vs. 59%, P = 0.10), diabetes (24% vs. 19%, P = 0.32), vascular disease (30% vs. 26%, P = 0.52), and ischemic stroke were similar between the 2 groups (30% vs. 23%, P = 0.22). The prevalence of CHA2DS2-VASc score &gt; 1 (84% vs. 59%, P &lt; 0.01) and the d-dimer level (0.7 vs. 0.5 mcg/ml [0.5 – 1.8 vs. 0.5 – 0.5 mcg/ml], P &lt; 0.01) were higher in the warfarin groups than those of the DOAC. The velocity of LAA was slower in the warfarin group than those of DOAC (35 vs. 55 cm/s [21 – 54 vs. 38 – 68 cm/s], P &lt; 0.01). The incidence of detection of LAA thrombus was 19% in the warfarin group and 3% in the DOAC group (P &lt; 0.01). In the warfarin group, the PT-INR were lower in the patients with LAA thrombus (1.38 vs. 1.66 [1.11 – 1.92 vs. 1.34 – 2.03], P = 0.03). Conclusions The higher risk of ischemic stroke and out of range PT-INR may be the cause of the higher incidence of LAA thrombus in the patients treated with warfarin than those with DOAC. Abstract Figure.

A collective European experience with left atrial appendage suture ligation using the LARIAT+ device

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 924-931
Author(s):  
Roland Richard Tilz ◽  
Thomas Fink ◽  
Krzysztof Bartus ◽  
Tom Wong ◽  
Julia Vogler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Transoesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Suture Ligation ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation ◽  
European Experience ◽  
Laa Closure

Abstract Aims We report the collective European experience of percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) suture ligation using the recent generation LARIAT+ suture delivery device. Methods and results A total of 141 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC), thrombo-embolic events despite OAC or electrical LAA isolation were enrolled at seven European hospitals to undergo LAA ligation. Patients were followed up by clinical visits and transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) following LAA closure. Left atrial appendage ligation was completed in 138/141 patients (97.8%). Three patients did not undergo attempted deployment of the LARIAT device due to pericardial adhesion after previous epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation (n = 1), a pericardial access-related complication (n = 1), and multiple posterior LAA lobes (n = 1). Serious 30-day procedural adverse events occurred in 4/141 patients (2.8%). There were two device-related LAA perforations (1.4%) not resulting in any corrective intervention as the LAA was completely sealed with the LARIAT. Minor adverse events occurred in 19 patients (13.5%), including two pericardial effusions due to procedure-related pericarditis requiring pericardiocentesis. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed after LAA ligation in 103/138 patients (74.6%) after a mean of 181 ± 72 days. Complete LAA closure was documented in 100 patients (97.1%). Two patients (1.8% of patients with follow-up) experienced a transient ischaemic attack at 4 and 7 months follow-up, although there was no leak observed with TOE. There were two deaths during long-term follow-up which were both not device related. Conclusion Initial experience with the LARIAT+ device demonstrates feasibility of LAA exclusion. Further larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted.

P1002Echocardiographic assessment of optimal device position after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion - introduction of a novel classification and its impact on outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V O Vij ◽  
B Al-Kassou ◽  
D Nelles ◽  
M Stuhr ◽  
R Schueler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Transoesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
Implantation Depth ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAo) is an established therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, criteria regarding optimal device position are not well defined making comparability of procedural results virtually impossible. We therefore sought to a) introduce a classification describing optimal vs. suboptimal device-position by assessing predefined parameters in transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and to b) analyze the impact of device-position on outcome in patients treated with different LAAo devices. Methods and results We retrospectively analyzed 120 patients who were treated by LAAo and had undergone follow-up TEEs after 3 or 6 months. Patients were at mean age: 76±8 years; female 40% and presented an increased CHADS-VASC- (4.6±1.4) and HAS-BLED-score (3.7±1). TEE-guidance was performed in all cases. In 62.5% (75/120) pacifier occluders (PO) (ACP/Amulet, Lambre, Ultraseal) were used, whereas 37.5% (45/120) were treated with non-pacifier occluders (NPO) (Watchman, Wavecrest, Occlutech). To assess device position, TEE images in a commissural view (60–90°) were analyzed and characterised by 1) implantation depth in the left atrial appendage, 2) peridevice flow (PF) and 3) the angle between occluder disc and pulmonal ridge (LUPV). For the purpose of this study, optimal device position was defined as a) ostial (LUPV length <10mm) or slightly subostial position (LUPV length ≤15mm, angle ≥100°) with b) the absence of major PF (>3mm). Overall, occluders were implanted at a depth of 12±7.8 mm with ostial positioning being achieved in 47.5% (57/120). Major PF was seen in 7.5% (9/120). NPOs were implanted deeper than POs (depth: 15.6±7.1 vs. 9.8±7.4 mm, p<0.01; ostial position: 31.1% vs. 57.3%, p<0.01) and were associated with a higher incidence of major PF (15.6% vs. 2.7%, p=0.01). Also, the depth/angle ratio was higher (i.e. “worse”) in NPOs (18.3±9 vs. 14.6±8, p<0.04). As a result, optimal device position was achieved in 48.3% (58/120) of all patients, with lower rates in NPOs than in POs (26.7% vs. 61.3%, p<0.01). Procedural aspects revealed slight differences in occluder size (optimal: 23.7±3.2 vs. suboptimal: 24.5±3.7 mm, p=0.3), need for repositioning (10.3% vs. 17.7%, p=0.25) and procedural duration (48±36 vs. 52±34 min, p=0.3). Of interest, device related thrombi (DRT) occurred less frequently in optimally implanted devices (3.4% vs. 12.9%, p=0.06). Hereby, implantation depth and depth/angle ratio were found to be predictors for DRT in ROC-analysis, respectively (AUC: 0.7, 95% Confidence interval [CI]: 0.56–0.84, p=0.05 and AUC: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58–0.86, p=0.03). Optimal vs. suboptimal position Conclusion Echocardiographic classification of device-position is warranted to provide comparability and appears to be feasible. Based on the novel classification provided, optimal device-position is achieved in 50% and is found more often with the use of POs. DRT appeared to occur more often in suboptimal device-position.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document