scholarly journals Optimal ablation targets during second catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mohanty ◽  
C Trivedi ◽  
D G Della Rocca ◽  
C Gianni ◽  
B MacDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Crista Terminalis ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Introduction Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablative therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the one-year success rate after single ablation procedure is known to be up to 60%, necessitating repeat procedures in many. Purpose We evaluated the impact of different ablation strategies on procedural success at the second ablation in patients with persistent AF (PerAF). Methods Consecutive PerAF patients scheduled to undergo their second ablation were screened and only those that have received PVI plus isolation of left atrial posterior wall (PWI) and superior vena cava (SVC) at the first procedure (n=1390), were included in the analysis. At the second ablation, all reconnected structures were ablated. Additionally, based on operators' decision, non-PV triggers were targeted for ablation. Patients were classified into two groups based on the ablation strategy: group 1: Re-isolation of reconnected PVs, PW, SVC and group 2: additional ablation of non-PV triggers (from inter-atrial septum, coronary sinus (CS), left atrial appendage (LAA) and crista terminalis). Arrhythmia-monitoring was performed quarterly for 1 year and biannually afterwards. Ablation success was assessed off-antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD). Results Of the 1390 patients included in the analysis, 698 were in group 1 and 692 were in group 2. In group 1, reconnected PV, PW and SVC were re-isolated in 98 (14%), 311 (44.5%) and 173 (24.8%) respectively. In 131 (18.7%) patients, in the absence of any reconnection, CS was empirically isolated. In group 2, PV, PW and SVC were re-isolated in 83 (12%), 270 (39%) and 113 (16.3%) patients respectively. Additionally, non-PV triggers were ablated in 505 (73%) and empirical isolation of LAA and CS in the absence of detectable triggers and PV reconnection was performed in 187 (27%). At 2 years of follow-up, 425 (61%) and 602 (87%) from group 1 and 2 were arrhythmia-free off-AAD (p<0.001). Conclusion Including non-PV triggers as targets for ablation at the repeat procedure was associated with significantly higher success rate in persistent AF. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals Natural History of Arrhythmia After Successful Isolation of Pulmonary Veins, Left Atrial Posterior Wall, and Superior Vena Cava in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multi‐Center Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghamitra Mohanty ◽  
Chintan Trivedi ◽  
Pamela Horton ◽  
Domenico G. Della Rocca ◽  
Carola Gianni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Left Atrial Posterior ◽  
Group 1

Background We evaluated long‐term outcome of isolation of pulmonary veins, left atrial posterior wall, and superior vena cava, including time to recurrence and prevalent triggering foci at repeat ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with or without cardiovascular comorbidities. Methods and Results A total of 1633 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation that were arrhythmia‐free for 2 years following the index ablation were classified into: group 1 (without comorbidities); n=692 and group 2 (with comorbidities); n=941. We excluded patients with documented ablation of areas other than pulmonary veins, the left atrial posterior wall, and the superior vena cava at the index procedure. At 10 years after an average of 1.2 procedures, 215 (31%) and 480 (51%) patients had recurrence with median time to recurrence being 7.4 (interquartile interval [IQI] 4.3–8.5) and 5.6 (IQI 3.8–8.3) years in group 1 and 2, respectively. A total of 201 (93.5%) and 456 (95%) patients from group 1 and 2 underwent redo ablation; 147/201 and 414/456 received left atrial appendage and coronary sinus isolation and 54/201 and 42/456 had left atrial lines and flutter ablation. At 2 years after the redo, 134 (91.1%) and 391 (94.4%) patients from group 1 and 2 receiving left atrial appendage/coronary sinus isolation remained arrhythmia‐free whereas sinus rhythm was maintained in 4 (7.4%) and 3 (7.1%) patients in respective groups undergoing empirical lines and flutter ablation ( P <0.001). Conclusions Very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful isolation of pulmonary veins, regardless of the comorbidity profile, was majorly driven by non‐pulmonary vein triggers and ablation of these foci resulted in high success rate. However, presence of comorbidities was associated with significantly earlier recurrence.

Abstract 15046: Arrhythmia Profile in Female Atrial Fibrillation Patients With versus Without Autoimmune Disorders

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghamitra Mohanty ◽  
CHINTAN G TRIVEDI ◽  
Joseph Gallinghouse ◽  
Domenico G Della Rocca ◽  
Carola Gianni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Autoimmune Disorders ◽  
Inflammatory Conditions ◽  
Ablation Success ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Autoimmune disorders (AuID) are pro-inflammatory conditions and inflammation is known to promote atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the arrhythmia profile in female AF patients with vs without AuID. Methods: Consecutive female patients undergoing their first catheter ablation at our center were included in the analysis and divided into two groups; group 1: with AuID (n=192) and group 2: no AuID (n=2324). All received PV isolation + isolation of left atrial posterior wall and superior vena cava. Additionally, non-PV triggers identified by isoproterenol-challenge were ablated in all.Patients were included in group 1 if they had an established diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes (DM), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Lupus, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Psoriasis, Sjogren syndrome, Grave’s disease or Celiac disease. Results: Baseline characteristics of the study groups are provided in table 1. Most prevalent AuID were DM (56, 29%), RA (52, 27%), Lupus (35, 18.2%) and IBD (40, 20.8%). Patients with AuID were significantly younger and more had non-paroxysmal AF. They also had larger LA diameter and lower LVEF compared to the group with no AuID. Significantly higher number of non-PV triggers were detected in group 1 patients (149 (77.6%) vs 883 (38%), p<0.001). After 2.5 years of follow-up, 139 (72.4%) and 1775 (76.3%) patients from group 1 and 2 were arrhythmia-free off-AAD (p=0.1). Conclusion: Women with autoimmune diseases experienced AF at an earlier age with significantly more non-paroxysmal AF compared to those without. However, similar ablation success was observed in both groups that could be attributed to the ablation strategy including all detectable non-PV triggers. Table:

scholarly journals Multicenter study of novel mapping technique to detect non-pulmonary vein triggers excluding the origin from left atrial posterior wall and superior vena cava

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Matsunaga ◽  
Y Egami ◽  
M Yano ◽  
M Yamato ◽  
R Shutta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Mapping Technique ◽  
Left Atrial Posterior ◽  
Self Reference

Abstract Background It has been reported that elimination of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers after PV isolation is a good predictor of atrial tachyarrhythmia free survival. However, precise mapping of triggers outside from superior vena cava (SVC) or left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) are difficult. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of self-reference mapping technique to eliminate non-PV triggers originated from outside of primordial pulmonary vein area. Methods Total of 431 patients (446 procedures) underwent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in a hospital and in a medical center from January 2017 to March 2019. After isolation of PV, non-PV triggers were induced with isoproterenol and/or adenosine triphosphate. Reproducible non-PV triggers were targeted to ablate using following self-reference mapping technique: A trigger conducts centrifugally and the earliest site should be distinguished from other later activated sites. Using a PentaRay multipolar catheter, the operators annotated the earliest site of local activation and a reference tag was placed. The multipolar catheter was then moved to the reference tag and the process repeated. Ultimately, we identified clusters of early circumferential activation and ablated. Results A total of 32 non-PV triggers excluding the origin from LAPW and SVC were induced in 23 patients. Nineteen triggers (59%) were located in the right atrium and 13 triggers (41%) in the left atrium (Figure 1). All triggers were eliminated with ablation and AF was non-inducible in all patients at the end of the procedure. During the follow-up (529±270 days), 18 patients (77%) were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias after a 3-month blanking period. Three patients received additional ablation procedures for recurrent atrial arrhythmias. No non-PV triggers ablated during the previous procedure were observed. Conclusion A novel self-reference mapping technique is useful for eliminating non-PV triggers in terms of the short- and long-term success. Figure 1. Distribution of non-PV triggers Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Benefits of early intervention with catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mohanty ◽  
C Trivedi ◽  
D G Della Rocca ◽  
C Gianni ◽  
B MacDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Early Intervention ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Late Group

Abstract Background Radiofrequency catheter ablation, a widely recognized therapeutic option for atrial fibrillation (AF) has limited success rate as it is influenced by several factors including duration of AF. Purpose We evaluated the ablation success in AF patients intervened early versus late in the disease course. Methods Consecutive AF patients undergoing their first catheter ablation in 2015–16 at our center were included in the analysis. Patients were classified into two groups based on the time to ablation after AF diagnosis; 1) early: ≤12 months and 2) late: &gt;12 months. All received PV isolation plus isolation of posterior wall and superior vena cava. Additionally, in non-paroxysmal AF cases, non-PV triggers were identified with isoproterenol-challenge and ablated. Patients were prospectively followed up for 3 years with regular rhythm monitoring. Results A total of 752 and 1248 patients were included in the “early” and “late” group respectively. Baseline characteristics of the study population is provided in Table 1 A. At 4 years of follow-up, overall success rate off-antiarrhythmic drugs was significantly higher in the “early” group (65.4% vs 57%, p&lt;0.001). After stratification by AF type, “early” group was still associated with significantly higher success rate compared to the “late” group (Table 1B). Conclusion In this large series with standardized ablation strategy, early intervention with catheter ablation was associated with higher success rate in all AF types. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Table 1

P4421Increased circulating levels of VCAM-1 correlate with left atrial remodeling in highly trained athletes

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Gabrielli ◽  
L Garcia ◽  
R Fernandez ◽  
J Vega ◽  
M P Ocaranza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
P Value ◽  
Atrial Remodeling ◽  
Marathon Runners ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Introduction Reports have shown increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in athletes. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1) is associated with new onset AF in general population. VCAM1 and its relation with left atrial (LA) remodeling have not been investigated in athletes. Purpose To study VCAM1 and LA remodeling in marathon runners. Methods Study of 36 male marathon runners in the training period previous to race (42 km) and 18 sedentary controls with no risk factors. Athletes were divided in two groups according to highest training intensity reached (group 1, >100 km/week; group 2, 50–100 km/week). Previous to race in all subjects, VCAM1 serum levels were measured by ELISA and an echocardiogram was performed. In athletes, VCAM1 was measured immediately post-race. Wilcoxon and Spearman were used. Results See table. Group 1 showed a significant increment in VCAM1 post-race (651±350 to 905±373 ng/mL; p=0.002) as compared to group 2 with no increment (533±133 to 651±138 ng/mL; p=0.117). In athletes, a moderate correlation between LA volume and VCAM1 was found (rho: 0.483; p=0.007). Baseline characteristics Group 1 (n=18) Group 2 (n=18) Controls (n=18) p value Age (years) 37±6 38±5 36±4 0.373 Heart rate (bpm) 53±8 57±7 69±6 * 0.001 Body surface area (m2) 1.8±0.1 1.8±0.1 1.9±0.1 0.075 LV diastolic diameter (mm) 49±5 48±5 46±4 0.404 LV systolic diameter (mm) 29±5 30±5 30±4 0.879 Septal wall (mm) 9.1±1.2† 8.2±1.1 8.1±0.8 0.005 Posterior wall (mm) 9.3±2.1† 8.5±1.2 7.6±0.8 0.001 Ejection fraction (%) 55±3 55±6 57±4 0.110 LV mass index (g/m2) 106±27† 78±18 58±11 0.001 LA volume (mL/m2) 42±8† 30±11 25±9 0.001 E wave (cm/sec) 78±13 84±12 77±15 0.217 A wave (cm/sec) 50±12 53±10 48±16 0.438 DT (msec) 233±65 229±65 221±66 0.184 VCAM1 (ng/mL) 651±350† 533±133 440±98 0.022 Mean ± SD. *p<0.05 vs group 1 and 2 post Kruskall-Wallis; †p<0.05 vs other groups post Kruskall-Wallis. LV, left ventricle; LA, left atrium; DT, deceleration time. Conclusions Most trained athletes had increased levels of VCAM1 as compared to controls and less trained athletes. They also showed an increment post-effort. VCAM1 is related to LA remodeling in athletes. VCAM1 could be a potential biomarker of AF in athletes which should be confirmed. Acknowledgement/Funding FONDECYT 1170963 (LG); FONDAP 15130011 (LG,SL)

Micra pacemaker implant after cardiac implantable electronic device extraction: feasibility and long-term outcomes

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1229-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Zucchelli ◽  
Valentina Barletta ◽  
Veronica Della Tommasina ◽  
Stefano Viani ◽  
Matteo Parollo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Device ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Electrical Performance ◽  
Lead Extraction ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Aims We aimed at investigating the feasibility and outcome of Micra implant in patients who have previously undergone transvenous lead extraction (TLE), in comparison to naïve patients implanted with the same device. Methods and results Eighty-three patients (65 males, 78.31%; 77.27 ± 9.96 years) underwent Micra implant at our centre. The entire cohort was divided between ‘post-extraction’ (Group 1) and naïve patients (Group 2). In 23 of 83 patients (20 males, 86.96%; 73.83 ± 10.29 years), Micra was implanted after TLE. Indication to TLE was an infection in 15 patients (65.21%), leads malfunction in four (17.39%), superior vena cava syndrome in three (13.05%), and severe tricuspid regurgitation in one case (4.35%). The implant procedure was successful in all patients and no device-related events occurred at follow-up (median: 18 months; interquartile range: 1–24). No differences were observed between groups in fluoroscopy time (13.88 ± 10.98 min vs. 13.15 ± 6.64 min, P = 0.45), single device delivery (Group 1 vs. Group 2: 69.56% vs. 55%, P = 0.22), electrical performance at implant and at 12-month follow-up (Group 1 vs. Group 2: pacing threshold 0.48 ± 0.05 V/0.24 ms vs. 0.56 ± 0.25 V/0.24 ms, P = 0.70; impedance 640 ± 148.83 Ohm vs. 583.43 ± 99.7 Ohm, P = 0.27; and R wave amplitude 10.33 ± 2.88 mV vs. 12.62 ± 5.31 mV, P = 0.40). A non-apical site of implant was achievable in the majority of cases (72.3%) without differences among groups (78.26% vs. 70%; P = 0.42). Conclusion Micra implant is an effective and safe procedure in patients still requiring a ventricular pacing after TLE, with similar electrical performance and outcome compared with naïve patients at long-term follow-up.

Five-box thoracoscopic maze based on the Gemini-S bipolar ablation device to treat atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Closure ◽  
Electrophysiological Effects ◽  
Left Atrial Posterior

Thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation ablation seeks to replicate the electrophysiological effects of more invasive, open surgical procedures. The authors present a lesion concept that includes isolation of the pulmonary veins, the left atrial posterior wall, and the superior vena cava, respectively, lines to inhibit perimitral and periauricular flutter circuits, and left atrial appendage closure. All lesions are tested for bidirectional block.

scholarly journals Risk factors and effective ablation strategy in patients presenting with left atrial flutter with no previous ablation for atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mohanty ◽  
C Trivedi ◽  
D.G Della Rocca ◽  
C Gianni ◽  
A Salwan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Atrial Flutter ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Ectopic Beats ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Reentrant Circuit ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background A typical left atrial flutter (LAFL) may occur as a proarrhythmic complication of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective We evaluated the risk factors and the best ablation strategy for LAFL in patients with no prior AF ablation. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing first catheter ablation for AFL with no prior procedure for AF were included in this prospective analysis. Based on the ablation strategy, patients were divided into, Group 1: PVI+ Flutter ablation (ablation of re-entry circuits) and Group 2: PVI+ Non-PV trigger ablation (targeting areas of focal activity as triggers). 3-D mapping of the LA was performed during tachycardia to identify the reentrant circuit. PV isolation was performed in all patients. In group 1, ablation line was chosen to transect the area critical for the circuit (roof and mitral line). In group 2, ectopic beats arising from extra-PV foci detected by isoproterenol challenge were ablated. Off-drug success rate was assessed in all. Results A total of 92 and 90 patients were included in group 1 and 2 respectively. Baseline characteristics are provided in table 1. Pre-existent LA scar was detected in 91.3% and 90% of patients in group 1 and 2 respectively. At 2 years of follow-up, 11/92 (12%) from group 1 and 60/90 (66.7%) from group 2 remained arrhythmia-free off-drugs (p&lt;0.001). In the multivariate analysis, PVI +flutter ablation was detected to be associated with significantly high risk of recurrence [HR: 3.92 (95% CI: 2.52–6.1, p&lt;0.001)] Conclusion In this series of patients presenting with LAFL with no earlier AF ablations, pre-existent left atrial scar was detected in majority of cases and PVI+ non-PV trigger ablation provided significantly better success rate than PVI+ flutter ablation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals The impact of an empiric superior vena cava isolation added to pulmonary vein isolation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation associated with left atrial low voltage areas

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Omuro ◽  
Y Yoshiga ◽  
M Fukuda ◽  
T Kato ◽  
S Fujii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Low Voltage ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Initial Session ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) are associated with recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of LVAs on recurrence after an empiric pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) strategy for non-Paroxysmal AF (PAF) patients remains unclear. Purpose We evaluated the impact of LVAs on the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs)/AF in patients who underwent an empiric SVCI added to the PVI for non-PAF. Methods We enrolled 153 consecutive patients with non-PAF who underwent a PVI alone (PVI group; n=51) or empiric PVI plus SVCI (PVI+SVCI group; n=102). Left atrial voltage maps were constructed during sinus rhythm to identify the LVAs (&lt;0.5 mV). No patients underwent a substrate modification of the LVAs. We divided the patients into two groups based on the LVAs (with or without an LVA &gt;5% of the left atrial surface area) and investigated the ATs/AF free survival rate after the initial and multiple procedures. Results LVAs were identified in 65% and 73% of the PVI and PVI + SVCI groups, respectively (P=0.319). In the PVI group, the 18-month ATs/AF-free survival was 61% of the patients without LVAs and 27% of patients with LVAs after the initial session (P=0.018) (Figure 1-A). Seventy-two percent of the patients without LVAs and 46% of those with LVAs were free from ATs/AF after multiple sessions (P=0.083) (Figure 1-B). In the PVI+SVCI group, 50% of the patients with LVAs and 61% of those without LVAs had no recurrence after the initial session (P=0.374) (Figure 2-A). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the 18-month ATs/AF-free survival between the patients with and without LVAs after multiple sessions (73% vs. 79%; P=0.520) (Figure 2-B). Conclusion A PVI alone strategy for non-PAF patients with LVAs had limited efficacy for the outcomes, even with multiple procedures. However, an SVCI may have the potential to compensate for an impaired outcome in patients with LVAs. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Effekt of blood flow shutdown on the vein damage when exposed to HIFU

2017 ◽  
pp. 46-50
Author(s):  
Н.Н. Петрищев ◽  
Д.Ю. Семенов ◽  
А.Ю. Цибин ◽  
Г.Ю. Юкина ◽  
А.Е. Беркович ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Vein Wall ◽  
Ultrasound Exposure ◽  
Isolated Segment ◽  
The Impact

The purpose. In the study we investigated the impact of the partial blood flow shutdown on structural changes in the rabbit vena cava posterior wall after exposure to high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Methods. Ultrasound Exposure: frequency of 1.65 MHz, the ultrasound intensity in the focus of 13.6 kW/cm, the area of the focal spot 1 mm, continuous ultrasound, exposure for 3 seconds. Results. Immediately after HIFU exposure all layers of the vein wall showed characteristic signs of thermal damage. A week after exposure structural changes in the intima, media and adventitia was minimal in the part of vessel with preserved blood flow, and after 4 weeks the changes were not revealed. A week after HIFU exposure partial endothelium destruction, destruction of myocytes, disorganization and consolidation of collagen fibers of the adventitia were observed in an isolated segment of the vessel, and in 4 weeks endothelium restored and signs of damage in media and adventitia persisted, but were less obvious than in a week after exposure. Conclusion. The shutdown of blood flow after exposure to HIFU promotes persistent changes in the vein wall. Vein compression appears to be necessary for the obliteration of the vessel, when using HIFU-technology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document