scholarly journals Potential cardiovascular risk reduction with evolocumab in the real world: a simulation in patients with a history of myocardial infarction from the HEYMANS register

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Ray ◽  
I Bridges ◽  
E Bruckert ◽  
P Perrone-Filardi ◽  
L Annemans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Real World ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Private Company ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background/Introduction FOURIER included 22,351 patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) and a median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of 2.4 mmol/L. Reducing LDL-C with evolocumab reduced the risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events by 1.3%, in absolute terms, over 2.2 years. Whether similar benefits might be observed in real-world evidence from evolocumab use is unknown. Purpose Simulate CV risk and assess the potential CV risk reduction among a large European cohort of evolocumab users with a history of MI. Methods We used interim data from HEYMANS, a register of patients initiating evolocumab in routine clinical practice across 12 European countries, from August 2015 with follow-up through July 2020. Demographic and clinical characteristics, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and lipid values were collected from routine medical records (6 months prior to evolocumab initiation through 30 months post initiation). Patients with a history of MI were considered and two sub-cohorts were created: recent MI (MI ≤1 year before evolocumab initiation) and remote MI (MI >1 year before evolocumab initiation). For each patient, we 1) simulated their CV risk using three different sources, correcting for age and LDL-C: i) the REACH equation, ii) FOURIER, iii) an observational study including FOURIER-like patients; 2) calculated their absolute LDL-C reduction on evolocumab; 3) simulated their relative risk reduction (RRR) by randomly sampling from the inverse probability distribution of the rate ratio per 1 mmol/L from the key secondary endpoint in the FOURIER landmark analysis; 4) calculated their absolute risk reduction (ARR) and number needed to treat (NNT) over 2 years (recent MI) or 10 years (remote MI). Results Our analysis included 90 recent MI and 489 remote MI patients initiating evolocumab in clinical practice per local reimbursement criteria, with up to 24 months follow-up. Median (inter-quartile range) age was 59 (53–67) and 61 (53–68) years in recent MI and remote MI patients, respectively. LDL-C before evolocumab was 3.8 (3.2–4.6) and 3.6 (3.0–4.5) mmol/L. Absolute LDL-C reduction on evolocumab was 2.2 (1.4–2.8) and 2.2 (1.6–2.8) mmol/L, meaning relative LDL-C reduction of 60% (44%-73%) and 62% (47%-72%), respectively. Predicted ARR with evolocumab was substantial, whether over 2 years (recent MI) or over 10 years (remote MI). See Table 1. Conclusions This cohort of evolocumab users in clinical practice had a higher baseline LDL-C and CV risk than patients enrolled in FOURIER. LDL-C reduction and RRR were very similar in recent MI and remote MI patients. However, patients with a recent MI had a higher short-term CV risk and therefore showed a larger ARR on evolocumab. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen

scholarly journals What potential risk reduction could be achieved with evolocumab treatment? A simulation based on observational data from a cohort of users in 10 European countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K.K Ray ◽  
I Bridges ◽  
E Bruckert ◽  
B Van Hout ◽  
M Sibartie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Real World ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Simulation Based

Abstract Background/Introduction The FOURIER trial enrolled very high-risk patients with a mean LDL-C of 2.5 mmol/L, and demonstrated that evolocumab reduced major cardiovascular events by 1.5% in absolute terms over 2.2 years. Further research may be conducted to understand the potential benefits of evolocumab in the real world. Purpose Predict/simulate baseline CV risk and assess potential risk reduction among a large European cohort of evolocumab users. Methods We used interim data from an observational study of patients initiating evolocumab across 10 European countries from August 2015 with follow-up through October 2019. Demographic and clinical characteristics, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and lipid values were collected from routine medical records (6 months prior to evolocumab initiation through 30 months post initiation). For each patient, we 1) predicted/simulated their 10-year CV risk using three different approaches: i) a prediction using REACH score, ii) a simulation based on FOURIER trial patients, iii) a simulation based on real-world FOURIER-like patients from a published obervational study; 2) calculated their absolute LDL-C reduction on evolocumab treatment; 3) simulated their relative risk reduction (RRR) by randomly sampling from the probability distribution of the rate ratio per 1 mmol/L from the key secondary endpoint in the FOURIER trial landmark analysis; 4) calculated their absolute risk reduction (ARR). Results Our analysis included 779 patients initiating evolocumab in clinical practice per local reimbursement criteria, with up to 18 months follow-up. Mean (SD) age was 62.7 (9.6) years and mean (SD) baseline LDL-C was 3.85 (1.39) mmol/L. Mean (SD) absolute LDL-C reduction on evolocumab was 2.1 (1.2) mmol/L. Predicted/simulated 10-year CV risk, RRR and ARR are presented in Table 1. Simulated probability distributions (based on FOURIER) for 10-year CV risk before and after evolocumab treatment are shown in Figure 1. Conclusion(s) This cohort of evolocumab users in clinical practice had an almost 2-fold higher baseline LDL-C than patients enrolled in FOURIER trial, which translated to higher baseline CV risk. For that reason, the estimated 10-year absolute benefit in this cohort was larger than expected based on FOURIER trial results. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen

scholarly journals What is the potential cardiovascular risk reduction associated with achieving LDL-C levels recommended in the ESC/EAS guidelines for very high-risk patients? Data from 18 European countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K.K Ray ◽  
S Bray ◽  
A.L Catapano ◽  
N Poulter ◽  
G Villa
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background/Introduction For patients at very-high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, the 2016 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines recommended lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) to achieve an LDL-C level below 70 mg/dL. This was lowered to an LDL-C level below 55 mg/dL in the 2019 guidelines. Purpose To assess: 1) the risk profile of European patients with established atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) receiving LLT; and 2) the treatment gap between the estimated risk and the population benefits if all patients were to achieve LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL and 55 mg/dL. Methods We used data from Da Vinci, an observational cross-sectional study conducted across 18 European countries. Data were collected at a single visit between June 2017 and November 2018, for consented adults who had received any LLT in the prior 12 months and had an LDL-C measurement in the prior 14 months. LDL-C level was assessed at least 28 days after starting the most recent LLT (stabilised LLT). For each patient with established ASCVD receiving stabilised LLT, we: 1) calculated their absolute LDL-C reduction required to achieve LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL and 55 mg/dL; 2) predicted their 10-year CV risk using the REACH score based on demographic and medical history; 3) simulated their relative risk reduction (RRR) by randomly sampling from the probability distribution of the rate ratio per 38.7 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) estimated by the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration meta-analysis; and 4) calculated their absolute risk reduction (ARR) achieved by meeting LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL and 55 mg/dL. Results A total of 2039 patients with established ASCVD were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) LDL-C was 83.1 (35.2) mg/dL. 40.4% and 19.3% of patients achieved LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL and 55 mg/dL, respectively. Mean (SD) 10-year CV risk calculated using the REACH score was 36.3% (15.4%). Mean absolute LDL-C reductions of 19.6 mg/dL and 30.4 mg/dL were needed to reach LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL and 55 mg/dL, respectively. When adjusted for the LDL-C reduction required to achieve an LDL-C level of 70 mg/dL, mean ARR was 3.0%, leaving a mean (SD) residual 10-year CV risk of 33.3% (15.5%). When adjusted for the LDL-C reduction required to achieve an LDL-C level of 55 mg/dL, mean ARR was 4.6%, leaving a mean (SD) residual 10-year CV risk of 31.7% (15.2%). Conclusion(s) In a contemporary European cohort with ASCVD receiving LLT, the 10-year risk of CV events is high and many patients do not achieve LDL-C levels of 55 mg/dL or even of 70 mg/dL. Moreover, even if all patients were to achieve recommended LDL-C levels, they would still remain at a high residual risk of CV events. These data suggest these patients require even more intensive LLT. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen

P5015Efficacy of lipid lowering therapy beyond statins to prevent cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Dykun ◽  
R Mincu ◽  
M Totzeck ◽  
T Rassaf ◽  
A A Mahabadi
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy

Abstract Background Lipid lowering therapy is a key cornerstone in secondary prevention of patients with coronary artery disease. However, only a minority of patients with statin therapy reach LDL thresholds as suggested by the ESC. Ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors allow for reduction in LDL-cholesterol in addition to statin therapy. Purpose To perform a meta-analysis of existing trials, evaluating how lipid lowering therapy beyond statins impacts cardiovascular outcome. Methods We performed a systematic search using the Pubmed, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases for studies, evaluating the impact of an intensified lipid lowering therapy via ezetimibe or PCSK-9 inhibitor in addition to statin therapy compared to statin therapy alone. Manuscript and congress presentations, published until 1st of November 2018, were included. We made our search specific and sensitive using Medical Subject Headings terms and free text and considered studies published in English language. Search terms used were “ezetimibe”, “evolocumab”, “alirocumab”, or “bococizumab” and “cardiovascular events”. Results A total of 100,610 patients from 9 randomized controlled trials (IMPROVE-IT, FOURIER, ODYSSEY Outcomes, SIPRE I, SPIRE II, ODYSSEY LONG TERM, OSLER-1 and OSLER-2, HIJ-PROPER) were included. Treatment with ezetimibe or a PCSK-9 inhibitor was associated with a 18% risk reduction in cardiovascular events (OR [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.75–0.89]). Effect sizes were similar for myocardial infarction (0.84 [0.76–0.92]) and even more pronounced for ischemic stroke (0.77 [0.67–0.83]). In contrast, all-cause mortality was not improved by the intensified lipid lowering therapy (0.94 [0.85–1.05]). No relevant heterogeneity and inconsistency between groups was present in all analyses (detailed data not shown). Comparing efficacy of LDL-reduction and relative risk redaction of cardiovascular events, a linear relationship was observed (figure). Figure 1. Correlation of reduction of LDL-cholesterol at one year with relative risk reduction (95% confidence interval) of cardiovascular events in included trials. Conclusion Intensified LDL-lowering therapy with ezetimibe or PCSK-9 inhibitors, in addition to statins, reduces the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, however, does not impact overall mortality. There is a linear relationship between LDL reduction and cardiovascular risk reduction, confirming the beneficial effects of LDL lowering therapy beyond statins in secondary prevention.

scholarly journals Patients with History of Myocardial Infarction and Acute Cerebrovascular Accidentin Clinical Practice: Demographic, Clinical Characteristics, Drug Treatment and Outcomes (Data of Outpatient and Hospital Registry REGION)

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 656-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Yu. Okshina ◽  
M. M. Loukianov ◽  
S. Yu. Martsevich ◽  
S. S. Yakushin ◽  
N. P. Kutishenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Family History ◽  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of ◽  
Hospital Registry

Aim. To assess the demographic and clinical characteristics, drug treatment and outcomes in patients with a history of acute cerebrovascular accident (ACVA) and with concomitant history of myocardial infarction (MI) in clinical practice based on outpatient and hospital parts of REGION registry.Material and methods. The total 1886 patients with a history of ACVA (aged of 70.6±12.5 years, 41.9% men) were enrolled into the outpatient registry REGION (Ryazan) and the hospital registry REGION (Moscow). 356 patients had ACVA and a history of MI (group “ACVA+MI” and 1530 patients had ACVA without history of MI (group “ACVA without MI”). The incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), non-CVD comorbidities, drug therapy and outcomes were analyzed.Results. In the group ACVA+MI compared with group ACVA without MI the significantly higher proportions of patients with the following conditions (diagnosis) were revealed: arterial hypertension (AH) – 99.1% and 94.2%; coronary heart disease (CHD) – 100% and 57%; chronic heart failure (CHF) – 61.5% and 41.8%; atrial fibrillation (AF) – 42.7% and 23.8%; repeated ACVA – 32.9% and 18.9%, respectively, p<0.0001 for all. In ACVA+MI and ACVA without MI groups the respective proportions of patients were smokers – 16.2% and 23.7% (p=0.10), had a family history of premature CVD – 3.2% and 1.2% (p=0.01), and had a hypercholesterolemia – 47% and 59.7% (p<0.001). The incidence of drug administration with proved positive prognostic effect was insufficient in both groups, but higher in the ACVA+MI group compared with ACVA without MI group (on average 47.1% and 40%, respectively), including: anticoagulants in AF – 19.1% and 21.4% (p=0.55); antiplatelets in CHD without AF – 69.4% and 42% (p<0.001); statins in CHD – 26.4% and 17.2% (p<0.001); beta-blockers in CHF – 39% and 23.8% (p=0.002), respectively. During 4- year follow-up in the group ACVA+MI compared with group ACVA without MI there were significantly higher all-cause mortality – 44.9% and 26.8% (p<0.001), nonfatal recurrent ACVA – 13.7% and 5.6% (p=0.0001), and nonfatal MI – 6.9% and 1.0% (p<0.0001), respectively.Conclusion. The proportion of patients with a history of MI was 18.9% among the patients with a history of ACVA. In patients of ACVA+MI group, compared with patients of ACVA without MI group a higher incidence of the following characteristics was revealed: a presence of AH, CHD, CHF, AF, repeated ACVA and a family history of premature CVD. The incidence of taking drug with proved positive effect on prognosis in patients of the compared groups was insufficient, especially of statins and anticoagulants in AF. During the follow-up period ACVA+MI group was characterized by a higher all-cause mortality and higher incidence of nonfatal ACVA and MI. In these patients the improvement of the quality of pharmacotherapy and of the secondary prevention effectiveness are the measures of especial importance. 

scholarly journals 2214Prevalence and severity of coronary disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia hospitalized for an acute myocardial infarction: data from the RICO survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Farnier ◽  
B Mouhat ◽  
T Pommier ◽  
H Yao ◽  
M Maza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Familial Hypercholesterolemia ◽  
Statin Treatment ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Syntax Score ◽  
World Population ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
History Of ◽  
Acute Mi

Abstract Aim Individuals with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are at high risk of early myocardial infarction (MI). However, coronary artery disease (CAD) burden of FH remains not well described. From a large database of a regional registry of acute MI, we aimed to address prevalence of FH and severity of CAD. Methods Consecutive patients hospitalized with MI in a multicentre database from 2001–2017 were considered. An algorithm, adapted from Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria, was built upon 4 variables (LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipid lowering agents, premature and family history of CAD) to identify FH probabilities. Results Among the 11624 patients included in the survey, 249 (2.1%) had probable/definite FH (score ≥6), and 2405 (20.7%) had possible FH (score 3–5). When compared with patients without FH (score 0–2), FH patients (score ≥6) were 20y younger (51 (46–57) vs 71 (61–80) y, p<0.001), with a lower rate of hypertension (47 vs 59%, p<0.001), diabetes (17 vs 25%, p<0.001) and prior stroke (4 vs 8%, p=0.016), but a higher prevalence of smokers (56 vs 23%, p<0.001), personal (20 vs 15%, p=0.02) or familial history of CAD (78 vs 18%, p<0.001). Chronic statin treatment was only used in 48% of FH patients and ezetimibe in 8%. After adjustment for age, sex and diabetes, FH patients were characterized by increased extent of CAD (syntax score 11 (4–19) vs 7 (1–13), p<0.001) and multivessel disease (55 vs 40%, p<0.001). Conclusion In this large real world population of acute MI, a high prevalence of FH was found. FH patients were characterized by their young age associated with the severity of CAD burden and limited use of preventive lipid lowering therapy. Acknowledgement/Funding University Hospital Center Dijon Bourgogne, Agence Régionale de Santé Bourgogne Franche Comté, France

5130Association between degree of LDL-cholesterol decrease after a myocardial infarction and mortality - a nationwide cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Schubert ◽  
B Lindahl ◽  
H Melhus ◽  
H Renlund ◽  
M Leosdottir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Index Event ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Statin Use

Abstract Background In clinical trials, patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) benefit the most from lipid lowering therapy, and more intensive LDL-C lowering therapy is associated with better prognosis. Purpose To investigate the association between degree of LDL-C lowering and prognosis in MI patients from a large real-world setting. Methods Patients admitted with an MI between 2006 and 2016 and registered in the Swedish MI-registry (SWEDEHEART) were followed until 2018. The difference in LDL-C between the MI hospitalization and a 6–10 week follow-up was measured. In multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for clinical risk factors (eg. age, diabetes, prior cardiovascular disease), the association between LDL-C change, mortality and recurrent MI was assessed using restricted cubic splines. Further, the patients were stratified according to quartile decrease in LDL-C from MI hospitalization to the follow-up. Results A total of 44,148 patients (median age: 64) had an LDL-C measured during the MI hospitalization and at follow-up. Of these, 9,905 (22.4%) had ongoing statin treatment prior to admission. The median LDL-C at the MI hospitalization was 2.96 (interquartile range 2.23, 3.74) mmol/L and the median decrease in LDL-C was 1.17 (0.37, 1.86) mmol/L. During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, 3,342 patients died and 3,210 had an MI. Patients with the highest quartile of LDL-C decrease (1.86 mmol/L) from index event to follow-up, had a lower risk of mortality, hazard ratio (HR) 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44–0.80) compared to those with the lowest quartile of LDL-C decrease (0.37 mmol/L) (figure). For MI, the corresponding HR was 0.83 (95% CI 0.68–1.02). Ongoing statin-use prior to admission did not alter the effect of LDL-C decrease and outcome in the analysis. Conclusions In this large nationwide cohort of MI patients, a gradually lower risk of death was observed in patients with larger decrease in LDL-C from index event to follow-up, regardless of statin use prior to admission. The same trend was observed for recurrent MI, although not reaching statistical significance. This confirms previous findings that efforts should be made to lower LDL-C after MI.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Ponatinib in CML and Ph+ ALL Patients in Real-World Clinical Practice: Data from a Belgian Registry

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1744-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Devos ◽  
Koen Theunissen ◽  
Fleur Samantha Benghiat ◽  
Alain Gadisseur ◽  
Stef Meers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Best Response ◽  
History Of ◽  
T315i Mutation

Abstract Background Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for adult patients with resistant or intolerant chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase, or blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), or those with the T315I mutation. In Belgium, ponatinib has been commercially available since March 2016. The goal of this registry was to collect efficacy and safety data in CML and Ph+ ALL patients and to evaluate ponatinib in routine clinical practice in Belgium. Methods This ongoing, prospective, multi-center registry includes patients ≥18 years of age with CML or Ph+ ALL, who have initiated ponatinib treatment. Demographic, efficacy and safety data were collected for patients enrolled from March 2016 (day 0) onwards. Results up to study month 24 are presented. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Ethics Committee approval was obtained and all patients provided informed consent. Results At time of data analysis, 34 patients (21 CP-CML and 13 Ph+ ALL) were enrolled. The median age of CP-CML and Ph+ ALL patients was 57 and 55 years, respectively. Patients were heavily pretreated: 90% of CML and 92% of Ph+ ALL patients had received ≥2 prior TKIs. Several patients had one or more risk factors for TKI cardiovascular toxicity: hypertension (10), history of cardiovascular disease (11), smoker (10), hypercholesterolemia (5), and diabetes (4). Median follow-up was 539 days for CML and 135 days for Ph+ ALL patients. The reasons for starting ponatinib therapy were related to refractoriness to previous TKIs (36%), progression (18%), presence of the T315I mutation (18%) or intolerance (29%). Eighty percent (8/10) of the patients who started ponatinib due to intolerance to previous TKIs had received ≥3 prior TKIs. At entry, 17 of the 34 patients (50%) had a confirmed BCR-ABL mutation. Of these 17, 10 (59%; 5 CML and 5 Ph+ ALL) had the T315I mutation. Starting doses of ponatinib in CML patients were 45 mg (76%), 30 mg (10%) and 15 mg (14%) once daily. Starting doses in Ph+ ALL patients were 45 mg (85%), 30 mg (8%) and 15 mg (8%). At latest follow up, the median treatment duration for the 21 CML patients was 531 days (range 15 - 2483) and for the 13 Ph+ ALL patients it was 123 days (range 13 - 1945). Best response was a major molecular response (MMR), which was obtained in 71% of CML patients and 38% of Ph+ ALL patients. The median time-to-best response was 175 days in CML and 35 days in Ph+ ALL patients. In the 10 patients (7 CML and 3 Ph+ ALL) who started ponatinib because of intolerance to several previous TKIs, 80% achieved MMR. The median time to achieve best response in these patients was 192 days for CML and 31 days for Ph+ ALL patients. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 20 patients (59%); the most common were rash (26%), dry skin (9%) and constipation (9%). Three patients reported ≥1 treatment-related serious AE (SAE): thrombocytopenia (n=1), cholecystitis (n=1) and hepatocellular injury (n=1). Three serious cardiovascular events were observed in 1 patient, who had a history of congenital cardiomyopathy and aortic prosthesis. They were scored as not related to ponatinib. Dose reductions or interruptions occurred in 33 cases (20 in CML and 13 in Ph+ ALL patients), with the following reasons most frequently mentioned: AEs (76%), to prevent AEs (18%) and other (6%). Dose increases occurred in 12 cases (10 in CML and 2 in Ph+ ALL patients), for the following reasons: good tolerance of treatment (58%), no or low response (33%) or other (8%). At time of analysis, 19 patients (9 CML and 10 Ph+ ALL) had discontinued treatment, of which 32% due to AEs, 5% due to an SAE, 21% due to planned allogeneic transplant, 16% due to disease progression and 26% due to other reasons. [Note: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding] Conclusion Real-world evidence from this Belgian registry shows that ponatinib has a favorable efficacy and safety profile in, and supports its use in CML and Ph+ ALL patients who are resistant or intolerant to previous therapies or those with the T315I mutation. Deep molecular responses were obtained in the majority of patients. No new safety signals emerged with ponatinib treatment than those previously reported. Funding: Incyte Biosciences Benelux BV Disclosures Devos: Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Theunissen:Incyte: Honoraria. Van Eygen:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Kuipers:Incyte Biosciences Benelux BV: Employment.

scholarly journals Evolocumab use in Europe: clinical guidelines vs. reimbursement thresholds – results from the HEYMANS study

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K K Ray ◽  
E Bruckert ◽  
P Filardi ◽  
C Ebenbichler ◽  
A Vogt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Guidelines ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Pcsk9 Inhibitors ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Statin Monotherapy ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines recommend a 50% lowering in untreated LDL-C and use of PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) for patients (pts) at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk when LDL-C goals of &lt;1.4mmol/L are not met despite maximally tolerated statins and ezetimibe. However, the LDL-C threshold at which PCSK9i are reimbursed are higher than the goals recommended in clinical guidelines. Purpose This prospective observational cohort study describes clinical characteristics and LDL-C control among pts initiating evolocumab across 12 EU countries. Methods Pts are followed from evolocumab initiation (baseline). Demographic/clinical characteristics, lipid lowering therapy (LLT) and lipid values are being collected from medical records (6 months before evolocumab up to 30 months post initiation). We report interim data from pts initiating evolocumab from August 2015 followed-up until July 2020. Results Of the 1,952 pts in whom evolocumab was initiated as per local reimbursement criteria, most (1844 [94%]) had 12 months follow-up, 785 (40%) had 24 months follow-up; mean follow-up: 20 months. Mean (SD) age was 60 (10.8) years; 85% of pts had a history of CV disease, 45% had familial hypercholesterolemia, 19% had type 2 diabetes, 65% were hypertensive, 7% had chronic kidney disease and 51% were prior/current smokers. At evolocumab initiation, 60% reported statin intolerance and 41% were on no background LLT. Fewer than half (846 [43%]) were receiving a statin (± ezetimibe); of these, most received a high/moderate intensity (68%/22%), with 13% receiving statin monotherapy. Median (Q1, Q3) baseline LDL-C was 3.98 (3.17, 5.07) mmol/L. Within 3 months of initiation median LDL-C fell by 58% to 1.63mmol/L. This reduction was maintained over time (Figure 1). Overall, 58% of pts achieved at least one LDL-C &lt;1.4mmol/L during follow-up. Among pts receiving background statins ± ezetimibe at evolocumab initiation, 67% (710/1053) achieved at least one LDL-C &lt;1.4mmol/L, versus 44% (317/714) of pts not receiving background statins/ezetimibe. During follow-up background oral LLT did not materially change; 40–45% pts received no LLT, 41–44% received statin ± ezetimibe, 12–14% received statin monotherapy. Conclusion In Europe, pts initiated on evolocumab had baseline LDL-C levels almost 3x higher than the present threshold for PCSK9i use recommended in guidelines reflecting disparities between local reimbursement criteria and guidelines. Although evolocumab led to a &gt;50% reduction in LDL-C, only ∼50% pts achieved an LDL-C &lt;1.4mmol/L, as approximately 41% received only evolocumab as monotherapy. LDL-C goal attainment was however higher among pts receiving evolocumab with background LLT. Therefore, lowering the LDL-C threshold for PCSK9i reimbursement, would result in more patients receiving combination therapy with oral LLT plus PCSK9i, thus increasing the likelihood of more pts achieving very-high risk LDL-C goals. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen Europe GmbH

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document