scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants with diabetes and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Costa ◽  
L Goncalves ◽  
R Teixeira
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors

Abstract Background Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an independent risk factor for stroke and atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, the risk/benefit profile of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is of clinical interest. Purpose To compare efficacy and safety outcomes of DOAC for nonvalvular AF in patients with DM versus without DM. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, in January 2020, for interventional studies comparing DOAC efficacy and safety in patients with AF and diabetes versus without diabetes. Results Four randomized clinical trials were included, providing a total of 63987 patients, 18860 with DM and 45127 without DM. In terms of efficacy, our meta-analysis revealed a similar rate of stroke/systemic embolism (pooled OR 1.02 [0.79, 1.31], P=0.87, I2=83%), stroke (pooled OR 1.98 [0.68, 1.40], P=0.90, I2=90%) and all-cause mortality (pooled OR 1.18 [0.97, 1.43], P=0.10, I2=87%), albeit with a significant heterogeneity. However, in direct factor Xa inhibitors sub analysis, diabetic patients had a lower trend of systemic embolism/stroke (pooled OR 0.90 [0.79, 1.02], P=0.09, I2=18%), significantly lower stroke rate (pooled OR 0.82 [0.73, 0.93], P<0.01, I2=0%), but a higher all-cause mortality (pooled OR 1.08 [1.00, 1.16], P<0.01, I2=0%). In terms of safety, the diabetic patients receiving DOAC had higher rates of major bleeding events (pooled OR 1.28 [1.14, 1.45], P<0.01, I2=50%), although with significant heterogeneity. Direct factor Xa inhibitors sub analysis also revealed a higher rate of major bleeding events (pooled OR 1.22 [1.08, 1.38], P<0.01, I2=24%), but a similar intracranial bleeding events (pooled OR 1.03 [0.86, 1.24], P=0.72, I2=0%). Conclusion Our pooled analysis suggests that diabetic patients on DOAC have an higher bleeding risk on DOAC, although with a superior embolic protection. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Systemic Embolism/Stroke in DM vs. NonDM

Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of acute cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23156-e23156
Author(s):  
Harry E Fuentes ◽  
Robert McBane ◽  
Waldemar Wysokinski ◽  
Alfonso Javier Tafur ◽  
Charles L. Loprinzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Patients With Cancer

e23156 Background: A direct meta-analysis was performed to explore the efficacy and safety of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors with dalteparin in patients with cancer associated acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Also, the comparative efficacy and safety of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban was assessed with a network meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched for trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to dalteparin for the management of cancer associated acute VTE. A network meta-analysis using both frequentist and Bayesian methods was performed to analyze VTE recurrence, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Results: Three randomized control trials, at low risk of bias, enrolled 1,739 patients with cancer associated VTE. Direct comparison showed a lower rate of VTE recurrence in DOAC compared to dalteparin groups (odds Ratio [OR]:0.48, 95% Confidence interval [CI]:0.24-0.96; I2:46%). Indirect comparison suggested that apixaban had greater reduction in VTE recurrence compared to dalteparin (OR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01–0.82), but not rivaroxaban or edoxaban. Apixaban also had the highest probability of being ranked most effective. By direct comparisons, there was an increased likelihood of major bleeding in the DOAC group compared to dalteparin (OR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.04–2.78). CRNMB did not differ. Indirect estimates were imprecise. Subgroup analyses in gastrointestinal cancers suggested that dalteparin may have the lowest risk of bleeding whereas estimates in urothelial cancer were imprecise. Conclusions: DOACs appear to lower the risk of VTE recurrence compared to daltaparin while increasing major bleeding. Apixaban may be associated with the lowest risk of VTE recurrence compared to the other DOACs.

Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of stroke in AF with arterial origin stroke: a meta-analysis.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxia Li ◽  
Hong Lin ◽  
Jiankuan Shi ◽  
Qianru Yang ◽  
Jianjun Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

Abstract Background Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy were adopted respectively for the prevention ofcardio-embolic stroke or arterial origin stroke. while it’s difficult to make decisions for individual with Atrial fibrillation(AF)and arterial origin stroke as comorbidities, so we attempted to evaluate the efficacy and safety ofanticoagulants and antiplatelet forthe prevention of stroke in AF with arterial origin stroke and make an optimal treatment for these comorbidities. Methods Databases included PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to 31 Aug 2019. Eight RCTs with 77048 participants were enrolled. Results Direct oral anticoagulants(DOACs) reduced the relative risk of stroke and systemic embolism by 15% (95%CI 0.75-0.97, I2=65.6%) and the major bleeding by 23%(95%CI 0.63-0.95, I2=92.3%,). DOACs or warfarin plus aspirin compared with DOACs or warfarin alone did not show the benefit on stroke and systemic embolism prevent in AF patients, but increase the risk of major bleeding with RR 1.40 (95%CI 1.13-1.75,) and 1.33（95%CI 1.09-1.63）respectively. No differences in preventionof ischemic stroke were detected between OACs versus aspirin in arterial origin stroke. The major bleeding was significantly higher in the OACs group (RR,2.40,1.46-3.94, I2=62.2%). However, compared with aspirin, rivaroxabandid not increase the risk of major bleeding in Branch atheromatous stroke (RR,1.54,95%CI 0.26-9.12). Conclusions We speculatedthat DOACs alone may be enough to prevent stroke recurrence and not to increase the risk of bleeding in AF patients with arterial origin stroke. The well designed RCTs with the direct comparison would be needed in future.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in morbidly obese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mhanna ◽  
A Beran ◽  
A Al-Abdouh ◽  
O Srour ◽  
W Abdulsattar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Warfarin Group

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, with an estimated prevalence between 1–4%. On the other hand, obesity continued to be a prevalent health issue worldwide. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly preferred over warfarin; however, The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) recommended avoiding the use of DOACs in patients with a BMI >40 or weight >120 kg because of limited clinical data in these patients. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with non-valvular AF. Method We performed a comprehensive literature search using multiple databases from database inception through January 2021, for all the studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with non-valvular AF. The primary outcome of interest was stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) rate. The secondary outcome was major bleeding (MB). All meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effect model. Results A total of 10 studies including 89,494 morbidly obese patients (BMI >40 or weight >120 kg) with non-valvular AF on oral anticoagulation therapy (45427 on DOACs vs. 44067 on warfarin) were included in the final analysis. One included study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT), another study was a post hoc analysis of an RCT and the rest were retrospective cohort studies. The mean follow-up period was 1.8 years (range 8 months to 3.1 years). The SSE rate was significantly lower in DOACs group compared to warfarin group (odds ratio (OR): 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62, 0.81; p<0.0001; I2=0%). MB rate was also significantly lower in DOACs group compared to the warfarin group (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46–0.78, P<0.0001, I2=86%). Subgroup analysis in the rivaroxaban and apixaban AF cohort showed a statistically significant difference in SSE and MB event rates favoring both over warfarin therapy. Dabigatran showed non-inferiority to warfarin in SSE rate but superiority in the safety outcome. Conclusions Our meta-analysis demonstrated that DOACs are effective and safe when compared to warfarin in morbidly obese patients. However, more large scale randomized clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin in this cohort of patients. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Stroke and systemic embolism events Major bleeding events

Abstract 215: Efficacy and Safety of Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) in Asian population with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - A Meta-Analysis

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayumi Fukuda ◽  
Daniel E Singer ◽  
Paul A Bain ◽  
Shoichiro Sato ◽  
Daiki Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Asian Population ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events

Background and purpose: Asians have higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared to non-Asians. Although recent clinical trials have shown non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were favorable in preventing ICH as well as thrombotic events among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), it is unclear whether the efficacy and safety of NOACs are consistent among Asians. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of NOACs in Asians with NVAF. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, the Western Pacific Index Medicus, Clinicaltrials.Gov and supplemented with conference abstracts were searched up to June 2014. Phase III randomized control trials that reported efficacy and safety of NOACs vs. warfarin in Asians and non-Asians with NVAF were identified. Each study was reviewed by two reviewers and differences were resolved by consensus. The end points analyzed were all stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, major or clinically relevant non major bleeding events (CRNM), and ICH. The hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of each endpoint in NOACs compared to warfarin was extracted separately among Asians and non-Asians. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled HR and 95% CI. Results: 5 eligible studies were identified. Total of 8928 Asians and 64023 non-Asians were included. All stroke or systemic embolism were significantly reduced with NOACs in Asians (HR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.59-0.88], p=0.002) but not in non-Asians (HR: 0.82 [0.66-1.01], p=0.097). The risk of ischemic stroke was not decreased in Asians (HR: 0.88 [0.64-1.21], p=0.43) or non-Asians (HR: 0.98 [0.80-1.12], p=0.73), whereas the risk of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly decreased in both groups (HR: 0.28 [0.17-0.47], p<0.001 for Asians, HR: 0.37 [0.24-0.55], p<0.001, respectively). The risk of major bleeding or CRNM was significantly reduced in Asians (HR: 0.68 [0.56-0.83], p<0.001) but not in non-Asians (HR: 0.78 [0.60-1.0], p=0.21). The risk of ICH was significantly decreased in both groups (HR: 0.30 [0.21-0.42], p<0.001, HR: 0.41 [0.34-0.48], p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of NOACs in Asians with NVAF is consistent with the overall results.

Left Ventricular Thrombus Therapy With Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 107424842097756
Author(s):  
Carolina Saleiro ◽  
João Lopes ◽  
Diana De Campos ◽  
Luís Puga ◽  
Marco Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus

Background: Current guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for left ventricular thrombus (LVT) resolution. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly evaluated as alternatives to the standard of care in anticoagulation. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the use of DOACs vs VKAs for LVT treatment. The occurrence of LVT resolution, systemic embolism (SE) or stroke, and bleeding events were compared during follow-up using random-effects analysis. Results: The 5 included studies were all observational (a total of 828 patients). Of these, 284 patients (34%) were treated with DOACs, and 544 (66%) treated with VKAs. Thrombus resolution was similar for both methods (pooled odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.47-1.75; I2 = 63%; P = .78). The incidence of SE or stroke was also similar (pooled OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.85-2.97; I2 = 0%; P = .14). Clinically relevant bleeding incidence was similar for both groups (pooled OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.31-1.40; I2 = 0%; P = .28), although all bleeding events were less frequent in the DOAC group (pooled OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.90; I2 = 0%; P = .02). Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests DOACs were as effective as VKAs for LVT resolution, with a similar risk of systemic embolism/stroke and clinically relevant bleeding. These results, obtained from observational studies, are not definitive and hence randomized controlled trials are needed. Nevertheless, our analysis identifies key experimental features required in future studies.

Oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (21) ◽  
pp. e2421-e2431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konark Malhotra ◽  
Muhammad F. Ishfaq ◽  
Nitin Goyal ◽  
Aristeidis H. Katsanos ◽  
John Parissis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events

ObjectiveData regarding the efficacy and safety of warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain scarce.MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of studies involving patients with CKD treated with oral anticoagulants were conducted to evaluate the following outcomes: ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), combined ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke (strokecombined), stroke or systemic embolism, mortality, and major bleeding events. CKD was defined based on creatinine clearance (CrCl) ranging from mild (CrCl: 60–89 mL/min), moderate (CrCl: 30–59 mL/min), to severe (CrCl: 15–29 mL/min).ResultsFifteen studies (7 comparing NOAC vs warfarin and 8 comparing warfarin vs no anticoagulant) were identified comprising 78,053 patients. Warfarin (vs no anticoagulant) was associated with reduced risk of ischemic stroke (risk ratio [RR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.84]) and mortality (RR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.62–0.78). In comparison to warfarin, NOAC use lowered the risk of ICH (RR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.33–0.56), strokecombined (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.72–0.96), stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.62–0.85), and major bleeding (RR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.66–0.90). In adjusted analyses, warfarin use (vs no anticoagulant) was associated with reduced mortality (HRadj = 0.68; 95% CI 0.61–0.76), whereas NOAC (vs warfarin) use reduced the risk of ICH (HRadj = 0.39; 95% CI 0.30–0.50) and stroke or systemic embolism (HRadj = 0.75; 95% CI 0.65–0.88). Our sensitivity analyses comparing different NOACs exhibited that factor Xa inhibitors (compared to warfarin) consistently reduced strokecombined (RR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.73–0.96), mortality (RR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.70–1.00), ICH (RR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.24–0.85), and major bleeding (RR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.64–0.91).ConclusionsAmong patients with CKD treated with oral anticoagulants, NOACs present with a more favorable safety and efficacy profile for various cardiovascular outcomes.

scholarly journals Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Left Ventricular (LV) Thrombus, a prospective randomized trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Alcalai ◽  
R Rashad ◽  
A Butnaru ◽  
G Moravsky ◽  
D Leibowitz
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Warfarin Group ◽  
Acute Mi

Abstract Background Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) have an elevated risk of stroke, mostly due to left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation, which typically occur within the first 2 weeks following an anterior MI. Currently the recommended management of LV thrombus after acute MI is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist. To date, there are no prospective data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) for stroke prevention in the setting of LV thrombus. Aim To assess the efficacy of apixaban vs. warfarin in treating LV thrombus after MI. Methods The study is a prospective, randomized, multi-center open label trial comparing apixaban (at a dose of 5 mg twice daily) with s.c enoxaparin 1mg/kg BID followed by dose-adjusted warfarin to achieve a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 3.0 for 3 months in patients with LV thrombus detected by echocardiography 3 to 14 days after acute MI. The primary outcome was the presence and size of LV thrombus 3 months after initiation of anticoagulation as assessed by 2D echocardiogram. Secondary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding and death from any cause. Results 25 patients have been enrolled to date in 3 medical centers, 13 were randomized to apixaban and 12 to warfarin. Mean age was 59.8±10.7 and 19 (76%) were males with no difference between the study groups. Mean LV thrombus size at enrollment was 24X15 mm in the apixaban group and 19X14 in the warfarin group (p=NS). After 3 months of treatment thrombus completely resolved in all patients in the warfarin group and in 12 of 13 in the apixaban group. In one patient in the apixaban group who had a very large thrombus of 40x20mm size upon enrollment the thrombus size was reduced significantly to 20x12 after 3 months. No death, stroke or systemic embolism was documented in either group. There were two patients with major bleeding in the warfarin group, one had sub-arachnoid hemorrhage after 2 months and anticoagulation was stopped, and another had GI bleeding after 1 month and was switched to enoxaparin. One patient in the warfarin group refused to continue the treatment after 3 weeks. No major bleeding events were recorded in the apixaban group and all patients completed 3 months of treatment. Conclusions Our preliminary results indicate that apixaban is a safe and effective treatment for patients with LV thrombus post anterior wall MI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Bleeding Risk in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3672-3672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yimin Pearl Wang ◽  
Rohan Kehar ◽  
Alla Iansavitchene ◽  
Alejandro Lazo-Langner
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: The standard oral anticoagulant therapy administered to non-valvular AF patients has typically been Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) particularly warfarin. In recent years, Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) including Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) and Direct Factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) have become an alternative to warfarin. Randomized trials comparing warfarin and DOACs showed comparable effectiveness without significant additional major bleeding risk. However, bleeding events in RCTs may differ from those in daily use due to the routine exclusion of patients with a higher risk of bleeding from many studies. We aimed to assess bleeding risk between DOACs and warfarin in AF patients in observational studies and we also sought to determine differences between patients that were experienced or naïve to oral anticoagulants. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the OVID MEDLINE® and EMBASE® electronic databases. Observational studies and randomized control trials (RCT) from 1990 to January 2019 were retrieved and examined by two independent reviewers. A pooled effect hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using a random effects model using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup analyses according to previous exposure to anticoagulants, study type, funding type and DOAC type were conducted. The primary outcome was major bleeding risk. The secondary outcome was clinically relevant non-major bleeding. All studies must have used an established or validated definition of major bleeding. Results: The initial literature search identified 3359 potentially eligible citations. After primary screening, 150 articles were eligible for full text review and there were 35 studies including 2,356,201 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Overall, patients on DOACs were less likely to experience a bleeding event compared to warfarin (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.71, 0.85, P&lt;0.001). The results were consistent when analyzing patients receiving DTIs or FXa inhibitors (DTI: HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67,0.87; FXa inhibitors: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69,0.89). However, among patients receiving factor Xa inhibitors, there was a significant difference in the risk of bleeding according to individual drug. Among patients receiving rivaroxaban the risk of bleeding was similar to warfarin (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.91,1.06, p=0.60) whereas in those receiving apixaban there was a 40% reduction in the risk of bleeding compared to warfarin (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.50,0.71, p&lt;0.001) (Figure 1). Three studies reported information according to previous anticoagulant exposure. The overall pooled hazard ratio was 0.68 (95% CI 0.55, 0.82 p&lt;0.001) in favor of patients on DOACs. In the subgroup analysis of previous anticoagulant use, the risk of bleeding was lower for DOACs compared to warfarin in both the experienced population (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.51, 0.96) and the naïve population (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47,0.87). However, heterogeneity was moderate to high among both subgroups. Conclusion: This review and meta-analysis of observational studies including over 2.3 million patients showed that overall DOACs have a lower risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to warfarin. Most importantly, although the pooled effect estimate did not differ between DTIs and FXa inhibitors, among patients receiving FXa inhibitors there was a significant difference between individual agents. Patients on apixaban had a significantly lower risk of bleeding compared to warfarin in contrast to patients on rivaroxaban who had a similar risk. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document