scholarly journals The assessment of myocardial dysfunction in septic shock patients admitted in intensive care unit by 2-dimensional speckle tracking image

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P3875-P3875
Author(s):  
S. J. Ha ◽  
H. S. Kim ◽  
J. S. Woo ◽  
S. J. Kim ◽  
W. Kim ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Antoine Kimmoun ◽  
Bruno Levy

Shock remains a major cause of intensive care unit admission. Initially categorized into hypovolaemic, cardiogenic, and distributive shock, understanding of the pathophysiology has recently evolved such that tissue hypoperfusion in all shock states leads to a dysregulated inflammatory response. After 24 hours, septic shock and ischaemiareperfusion related to hypovolaemic and cardiogenic shock share similar haemodynamic and pro-inflammatory profiles. Vascular hyporesponsiveness to catecholamines is a major consequence of this common pathophysiology, which is focused upon activation of NF-κ‎b with subsequent NO overproduction. Myocardial dysfunction is a frequent complication of the cytokine storm that follows septic shock and ischaemiareperfusion. It may worsen haemodynamic status, but nevertheless, remains transient and totally reversible.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vallabhajosyula ◽  
S. Pruthi ◽  
S. Shah ◽  
B. M. Wiley ◽  
S. V. Mankad ◽  
...  

Sepsis continues to be a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the intensive care unit. Cardiovascular dysfunction in sepsis is associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes. Sepsis-related myocardial dysfunction is noted in 20%–65% of these patients and manifests as isolated or combined left or right ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction Echocardiography is the most commonly used modality for the diagnosis of sepsis-related myocardial dysfunction. With the increasing use of ultrasonography in the intensive care unit, there is a renewed interest in sepsis-related myocardial dysfunction. This review summarises the current scope of literature focused on sepsis-related myocardial dysfunction and highlights the use of basic and advanced echocardiographic techniques for the diagnosis of sepsis-related myocardial dysfunction and the management of sepsis and septic shock.


2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desy Rusmawatiningtyas ◽  
Nurnaningsih Nurnaningsih

Background Septic shock remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children admitted to the intensive care unit. Recent investigations from developed countries have reported mortality rates of 20-30%. Few studies have reported mortality rates from pediatric septic shock in intensive care settings in developing countries with limited resources.  Objective  To determine the current mortality rates for pediatric patients with septic shock in a developing country.Methods A retrospective study was conducted in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) at DR. Sardjito General Hospital. Medical records and charts were reviewed and recorded for diagnoses of septic shock, from November 1st, 2011 to June 30th, 2014. Results  A database of all PICU admissions was assembled, and cases with diagnoses of septic shock were reviewed. The final data consisted of 136 patients diagnosed with septic shock. Septic shock was defined as a clinical suspicion of sepsis, manifested by hyperthermia or hypothermia, and accompanied by hypoperfusion  The overall mortality rate for the study cohort was 88.2%.  The median age of patients was 16 months, with 52.2% males. Median initial PRISM III and PELOD scores were 10 and 22, respectively. The median length of PICU stay was 4 days. A total of 48.5% of the subjects were in need of crystalloid and colloid fluid at a median amount of 40 mL/kg. The median time required to complete the initial resuscitation was 60 minutes. Mechanical ventilator support in the first 24 hours was required in 79.4% of the cases. Fluid overload of > 10% (FO>10%) was found in 58.8% of the subjects.Conclusion The mortality rate in pediatric septic shock in our hospital is very high. There is a higher incidence of fluid overload in the non-survival group .


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung-Jun Kim ◽  
Kyeongman Jeon ◽  
Byung Ju Kang ◽  
Jong-Joon Ahn ◽  
Sang-Bum Hong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rapid response systems (RRSs) improve patients’ safety, but the role of dedicated doctors within these systems remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate patient survival rates and differences in types of interventions performed depending on the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. Methods Patients managed by the RRSs of 9 centers in South Korea from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017, were included retrospectively. We used propensity score-matched analysis to balance patients according to the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of interventions performed. A sensitivity analysis was performed with the subgroup of patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. Results After propensity score matching, 2981 patients were included per group according to the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. The presence of the dedicated doctors was not associated with patients’ overall likelihood of survival (hazard ratio for death 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93‒1.20). Interventions, such as arterial line insertion (odds ratio [OR] 25.33, 95% CI 15.12‒42.44) and kidney replacement therapy (OR 10.77, 95% CI 6.10‒19.01), were more commonly performed for patients detected using RRS with dedicated doctors. The presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS was associated with better survival of patients with sepsis or septic shock (hazard ratio for death 0.62, 95% CI 0.39‒0.98) and lower intensive care unit admission rates (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37‒0.75). Conclusions The presence of dedicated doctors within the RRS was not associated with better survival in the overall population but with better survival and lower intensive care unit admission rates for patients with sepsis or septic shock.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-405
Author(s):  
Cyril Pernod ◽  
◽  
Antoine Lamblin ◽  
Andrei Cividjian ◽  
Patrick Gerome ◽  
...  

1971 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-332
Author(s):  
Roy G. Fitzgerald

This is an autobiographical account of an episode of life-threatening endotoxin shock experienced in the intensive care unit of a university-affiliated V.A. hospital. It was written within a day of the event by a psychiatrist interested in sharing with other physicians and nurses his harrowing time as a patient. He has added some afterthoughts as his perspective has broadened. The account presents the moment-to-moment events as he perceived them as well as his thoughts, feelings and fantasies. The ambiguities of being a psychiatrist-patient with its passivity-control, intellectual defenses, denial and fears of death are prominent in his thoughts.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P LaRosa ◽  
Steven M. Opal

Sepsis, along with the multiorgan failure that often accompanies this condition, is a leading cause of mortality in the intensive care unit. Although modest improvements in the prognosis have been made over the past two decades and promising new therapies continue to be investigated, innovations in the management of septic shock are still required. This chapter discusses the definitions, epidemiology, and pathogenesis (including microbial factors, host-derived mediators, and organ dysfunction) relating to sepsis. Management of severe sepsis and septic shock is also described.  This review contains 5 figures, 11 tables, and 99 references. Keywords:Organ dysfunction, sepsis, septic shock, infection, bacteremia, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document