scholarly journals Infected cardiac-implantable electronic devices: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (37) ◽  
pp. 2484-2490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Cosedis Nielsen ◽  
Jens Christian Gerdes ◽  
Niraj Varma
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (54) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Łukasz Mazurek ◽  
Agnieszka Kotalczyk ◽  
Michał Mazurek ◽  
Ewa Jędrzejczyk-Patej

We currently have a wide range of different imaging tests that are constantly improving and developing. Each test has its sensitivity and specificity and is used in various fields of medicine. Knowledge of the possibilities of using imaging tests in electrotherapy is an important element of the diagnostic and therapeutic process. This article presents selected issues regarding the use of imaging methods in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1378-1384 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Bhuva ◽  
R. Moralee ◽  
J. C. Moon ◽  
C. H. Manisty

Abstract More than half of us will need a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in our lifetimes. MRI is an unmatched diagnostic test for an expanding range of indications including neurological and musculoskeletal disorders, cancer diagnosis, and treatment planning. Unfortunately, patients with cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators have historically been prevented from having MRI because of safety concerns. This results in delayed diagnoses, more invasive investigations, and increased cost. Major developments have addressed this—newer devices are designed to be safe in MRI machines under specific conditions, and older legacy devices can be scanned provided strict protocols are followed. This service however remains difficult to deliver sustainably worldwide: MRI provision remains grossly inadequate because patients are less likely to be referred, and face difficulties accessing services even when referred. Barriers still exist but are no longer technical. These include logistical hurdles (poor cardiology and radiology interaction at physician and technician levels), financial incentives (re-imbursement is either absent or fails to acknowledge the complexity), and education (physicians self-censor MRI requests). This article therefore highlights the recent changes in the clinical, logistical, and regulatory landscape. The aim of the article is to enable and encourage healthcare providers and local champions to build MRI services urgently for cardiac device patients, so that they may benefit from the same access to MRI as everyone else. Key Points • There is now considerable evidence that MRI can be provided safely to patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, the volume of MRI scans delivered to patients with CIEDs is fifty times lower than that of the estimated need, and patients are approximately fifty times less likely to be referred. • Because scans for this patient group are frequently for cancer diagnosis and treatment planning, MRI services need to develop rapidly, but the barriers are no longer technical. • New services face logistical, educational, and financial hurdles which can be addressed effectively to establish a sustainable service at scale.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Kathy L Lee ◽  

Cardiac pacemakers have been the standard therapy for patients with bradyarrhythmias for several decades. The pacing lead is an integral part of the system, serving as a conduit for the delivery of energy pulses to stimulate the myocardium. However, it is also the Achilles’ heel of pacemakers, being the direct cause of most device complications both acutely during implant and chronically years afterwards. Leadless pacing with ultrasound-mediated energy has been demonstrated in animals and humans to be safe and feasible in acute studies. Implantable defibrillators revolutionised the treatment and prevention of sudden cardiac death. Subcutaneous implantable defibrillators have been under development for more than 10 years. A permanent implantable system has been shown to be feasible in treating induced and spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias. These developments and recent advances in pacing and defibrillation will arouse further interest in the research and development of leadless cardiac implantable electronic devices.


Author(s):  
Khurrum Khan ◽  
Jitae A. Kim ◽  
Andra Gurgu ◽  
Muzamil Khawaja ◽  
Dragos Cozma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document