P6272First plus recurrent CV and hospitalization events in the CArdiovascular and Renal Microvascular outcomE study with LINAgliptin (CARMELINA) in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiorenal disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Marx ◽  
D K McGuire ◽  
O Johansen ◽  
J Rosenstock ◽  
S E Kahn ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction CARMELINA was a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to demonstrate the cardiovascular (CV) safety of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and concomitant cardiorenal disease. Despite a particularly elevated CV risk, only limited long-term evidence from randomized controlled trials for safety and efficacy of glucose lowering medications is available for this population. Purpose To characterize the effects of linagliptin on net CV disease and hospitalization burden in this population. Methods People with T2D and either i) urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) >30 mg/g with concomitant CV disease, or ii) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 ml/min/1.73m2 regardless of UACR, or eGFR ≥45–75 mL/min/1.73m2 and UACR >200 mg/g, were randomized to linagliptin 5 mg or placebo q.d. in a double-blind fashion in addition to standard of care. We assessed the effects of linagliptin versus placebo on all first plus recurrent CV events and all-cause hospitalizations using a using a negative binomial model to account for within-subject correlation. Results A total of 6979 participants were enrolled (mean age 66 years, 63% male, eGFR 54.6 ml/min/1.73m2, median UACR 162 mg/g, 59% with history of ischemic heart disease, 27% with history of heart failure (HF)) and followed for a median of 2.2 years. Adding recurrent events increased the number of events for analysis from 5.3–57.5% across CV/HF outcomes and 112.4% for hospitalizations. In analyses of first plus recurrent events, the event rate ratio (95% CI) with linagliptin versus placebo was 0.98 (0.82, 1.16; p=0.78) for 3-point MACE, 1.03 (0.79, 1.35; p=0.83) for myocardial infarction 1.03 (0.83, 1.29; p=0.77) for myocardial infarction plus revascularization, 0.89 (0.65, 1.22; p=0.48) for stroke, 0.94 (0.70, 1.27; p=0.69) for stroke plus TIA, 0.94 (0.75, 1.20; p=0.63) for hospitalized HF, 0.92 (0.77, 1.11; p=0.40) for the composite of CV death or hospitalized HF, and 0.96 (0.87, 1.06; p=0.40) for all-cause hospitalization (Figure). Conclusion Linagliptin showed similar risk of either first or recurrent CV or hospitalization events compared with placebo in patients with T2D and cardiorenal disease. These data support the CV safety of linagliptin and, considering the high volume of recurrent events, underscores the significant CV disease burden experienced by patients with T2D and cardiorenal disease Acknowledgement/Funding Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D McGuire ◽  
B Zinman ◽  
S E Inzucchi ◽  
S D Anker ◽  
C Wanner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial included patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease. Empagliflozin reduced the risk of 3-point major adverse CV events (MACE; composite of CV death, myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke) by 14%, CV death by 38% and hospitalisation for heart failure (HF) by 35% vs placebo in analyses of time to first event. We assessed the effect of empagliflozin on all-cause hospitalisation in post-hoc analyses of all (first and recurrent) events. Materials and methods Patients were randomised to receive empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, or placebo in addition to standard of care. We assessed the effects of empagliflozin pooled vs placebo on first event of all-cause hospitalisation using Cox regression and all (first and recurrent) events of all-cause hospitalisation using a negative binomial model. Results A total of 7020 patients were treated (4687 empagliflozin; 2333 placebo, mean [SD] age 63 [9] years, 71% male, 47% with history of MI, 23% with history of stroke, 10% with HF). In this analysis, 1725/4687 (36.8%) empagliflozin patients and 925/2333 (39.6%) placebo patients experienced an event leading to hospitalisation. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR; 95% CI) vs placebo for first all-cause hospitalisation using the Cox regression model was 0.89 (0.82, 0.96; p=0.0033; Figure); In analyses of all (first and recurrent) hospitalisation events, there were 3168 events in the empagliflozin group and 1863 in the placebo group. The adjusted event rate ratio (95% CI) vs placebo was 0.83 (0.76, 0.91; p<0.0001; Figure). Conclusion In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, risk reductions with empagliflozin were seen in both first and all hospitalisation events and were numerically more favourable in analyses of all events vs analyses of first events. These analyses expand on the favourable CV effects of empagliflozin by also showing a reduction in the total burden of hospitalisation events in patients with T2D and established CV disease. Acknowledgement/Funding Boehringer Ingelheim & Eli Lilly and Company Diabetes Alliance


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Marx ◽  
D.K McGuire ◽  
O.E Johansen ◽  
J Rosenstock ◽  
E Pfarr ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction CAROLINA (cardiovascular outcome study of linagliptin versus glimepiride in type 2 diabetes) was a randomised controlled clinical trial designed to compare the effects of linagliptin with glimepiride on CV events and other outcomes in patients with relatively early type 2 diabetes at elevated CV risk. Purpose To characterise the effects on net CV disease and the hospitalisation burden of this population, we assessed the effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on all first plus recurrent CV events and all cause hospitalisations. Methods Participants with relatively early type 2 diabetes, high CV risk and HbA1c 6.5–8.5% were randomized to linagliptin 5 mg or glimepiride 1–4 mg once daily on top of standard of care. Cox regression was used to produce hazard ratios for time to first event. A negative binomial model was used to produce event rate ratios for all events. Results A total of 6033 participants were enrolled (mean age 64.0 years, HbA1c 7.2%, body mass index 30.1 kg/m2, eGFR 77 ml/min/1.73 m2, median type 2 diabetes duration 6.3 years, urine albumin:creatine ratio 10 mg/g, 42% with CV disease, 4.5% with heart failure). Adding recurrent events increased the number of events for analysis from first event by 10% more to 77% across CV/heart failure outcomes and by 119% for all cause hospitalisations, with corresponding increases in rates per 100-patient years in both treatment groups (e.g. for the composite of CV death/MI/stroke from 2.1 to 2.8 for linagliptin and 2.1 to 2.9 for glimepiride) over a median follow up of 6.3 years. Results of analyses of first-event and first plus recurrent events are presented below (Fig). Conclusion No significant differences were observed between linagliptin and glimepiride for either first or first + recurrent CV or hospitalisation events. These data underscore the significant CV disease burden experienced even in relatively early type 2 diabetes and reinforce the similar CV safety between linagliptin and glimepiride, differing only on hypoglycaemia risk. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly and Company


Author(s):  
Joana Furtado de Figueiredo Neta ◽  
Vivian Saraiva Veras ◽  
Danilo Ferreira de Sousa ◽  
Maria da Conceição dos Santos Oliveira Cunha ◽  
Maria Veraci Oliveira Queiroz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document