Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Europe: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey

The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), who require oncological management including radiotherapy (RT) is still increasing. According to current knowledge the most frequent device dysfunction related to exposition to ionizing radiation is reprogramming to emergency mode (soft reset). There are uncommon cases of complete, irreversible device damage. CIED dysfunction during RT can be observed in approximately 3% of patients. In majority of cases they are asymptomatic, although in literature there are descriptions of deterioration of clinical status due to bradycardia or exacerbation of heart failure. The most important factor of device malfunction is radiotherapy with photons of energy >10 MV or protons despite energy used. So far there were no cases published with inadequate ICD therapies due to the presence of electromagnetic field interference during RT. Because patients with CIED undergoing RT need complex care to achieve high level of safety, experts of Heart Rhythm Society establish document, published in 2017 which summarized current knowledge about this group of patients. The document contains guidelines on peri-radiotherapy care of patients with CIED.

Download Full-text

Canadian Registry of Electronic Device Outcomes: remote monitoring outcomes in the Abbott battery performance alert—a multicentre cohort

EP Europace ◽

10.1093/europace/euab025 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Sharath Kumar ◽

Jason Davis ◽

Bernard Thibault ◽

Iqwal Mangat ◽

Benoit Coutu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Remote Monitoring ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Electronic Device ◽

Electronic Devices ◽

Cardiac Resynchronization ◽

Device Performance ◽

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Multicentre Cohort

Abstract Aims Cardiac implantable electronic devices with device advisories have the potential of device malfunction. Remote monitoring (RM) of devices has been suggested to allow the identification of abnormal device performance and permit early intervention. We sought to describe the outcomes of patients with and without RM in devices subject to the Abbott Premature Battery Depletion (PBD) advisory with data from a Canadian registry. Methods and results Patients with an Abbott device subject to the PBD advisory from nine implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanting centres in Canada were included in the registry. The use of RM was identified from baseline and follow-up data in the registry. The primary outcome was detection of PBD and all-cause mortality. A total of 2666 patients were identified with a device subject to the advisory. In all, 1687 patients (63.2%) had RM at baseline. There were 487 deaths during follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 5.7 ± 0.7 years, mortality was higher in those without a remote monitor compared with RM at baseline (24.7% vs. 14.5%; P < 0.001). Pre-mature battery depletion was identified in 36 patients (2.1%) with RM vs. 7 (0.7%) without RM (P = 0.004). Time to battery replacement was significantly reduced in patients on RM (median 5 vs. 13 days, P = 0.001). Conclusion The use of RM in patients with ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy under advisory improved detection of PBD, time to device replacement, and was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. The factors influencing the association with mortality are unknown and deserve further study.

Download Full-text

Follow-Up of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices—Remote Monitoring and in Person

Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy ◽

10.1016/b978-0-323-37804-8.00040-7 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 1133-1157

Author(s):

Niraj Varma ◽

Renato Pietro Ricci

Keyword(s):

Remote Monitoring ◽

Electronic Devices ◽

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Download Full-text

Challenges in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in 2021

Kardiologia Polska ◽

10.33963/kp.15899 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Giovanni Malanchini ◽

Gabriele Ferrari ◽

Cristina Leidi ◽

Paola Ferrari ◽

Michele Senni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Remote Monitoring ◽

Electronic Devices ◽

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Download Full-text

Lead-Related Infective Endocarditis in Latvia: A Single Centre Experience

Medicina ◽

10.3390/medicina55090566 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 55 (9) ◽

pp. 566

Author(s):

Nesterovics ◽

Stradins ◽

Kalejs ◽

Ansabergs ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Infective Endocarditis ◽

Electronic Devices ◽

Positive Culture ◽

Major Complication ◽

Heart Rhythm ◽

University Hospital ◽

Lead Extraction ◽

Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽

Common Location

Background and Objectives: Over the last five decades cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) have become established as the mainstay for the treatment of permanent bradycardias, chronic heart failure and dangerous heart rhythm disturbances. These devices improve survival and quality of life in many patients. However, infections associated with CIED implantation, particularly lead-related infective endocarditis (LRIE), can offset all benefits and make more harm than good for the patient. To date, there are no other studies in Latvia, addressing patients with lead-related infective endocarditis. The objective of this study was to identify the most common pathogens associated with LRIE and their antimicrobial resistance and to identify possible risk factors of patients who present with LRIE. Materials and Methods: The study was performed retrospectively at Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital (PSCUH). The study included patients who were referred to PSCUH due to LRIE for lead extraction. Patients were identified from procedural journals. Information about isolated microorganisms, patient comorbidities and visual diagnostics data was taken from patient records. Results: Forty-nine patients with CIED related infective endocarditis were included in the study, 34 (69.4%) were male, median age of all patients was 65.0 (50.5–73.0) years, median hospital stay was 15.5 (22.0–30.5) days. Successful and complete lead extraction was achieved in all patients. Thirty-two (65.3%) had received antibiotics prior to blood sample. Only in 31 (63.3%) positive culture results were seen. The most common isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (23.5%) and coagulase negative staphylococci (23.5%). Other bacteria were isolated considerably less often. The atrial lead was most common location for lead vegetations, seen in 50.0% of cases. Five (10.2%) patients have died due to the disease. Conclusions: Lead-related infective endocarditis is a major complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices with considerable morbidity and mortality, which in our study was as high as 10.2%.

Download Full-text

Results of remote follow-up and monitoring in young patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

Cardiology in the Young ◽

10.1017/s1047951114002613 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 26 (1) ◽

pp. 53-60 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Massimo S. Silvetti ◽

Fabio A. Saputo ◽

Rosalinda Palmieri ◽

Silvia Placidi ◽

Lorenzo Santucci ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Remote Monitoring ◽

Heart Defects ◽

Electronic Devices ◽

Young Patients ◽

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators ◽

Wireless Devices ◽

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽

System Inclusion ◽

To Receive

AbstractBackgroundRemote monitoring is increasingly used in the follow-up of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Data on paediatric populations are still lacking. The aim of our study was to follow-up young patients both in-hospital and remotely to enhance device surveillance.MethodsThis is an observational registry collecting data on consecutive patients followed-up with the CareLink system. Inclusion criteria were a Medtronic device implanted and patient’s willingness to receive CareLink. Patients were stratified according to age and presence of congenital/structural heart defects (CHD).ResultsA total of 221 patients with a device – 200 pacemakers, 19 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and two loop recorders – were enrolled (median age of 17 years, range 1–40); 58% of patients were younger than 18 years of age and 73% had CHD. During a follow-up of 12 months (range 4–18), 1361 transmissions (8.9% unscheduled) were reviewed by technicians. Time for review was 6±2 minutes (mean±standard deviation). Missed transmissions were 10.1%. Events were documented in 45% of transmissions, with 2.7% yellow alerts and 0.6% red alerts sent by wireless devices. No significant differences were found in transmission results according to age or presence of CHD. Physicians reviewed 6.3% of transmissions, 29 patients were contacted by phone, and 12 patients underwent unscheduled in-hospital visits. The event recognition with remote monitoring occurred 76 days (range 16–150) earlier than the next scheduled in-office follow-up.ConclusionsRemote follow-up/monitoring with the CareLink system is useful to enhance device surveillance in young patients. The majority of events were not clinically relevant, and the remaining led to timely management of problems.

Download Full-text