scholarly journals Lead-Related Infective Endocarditis in Latvia: A Single Centre Experience

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 566
Author(s):  
Nesterovics ◽  
Nesterovics ◽  
Stradins ◽  
Kalejs ◽  
Ansabergs ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Over the last five decades cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) have become established as the mainstay for the treatment of permanent bradycardias, chronic heart failure and dangerous heart rhythm disturbances. These devices improve survival and quality of life in many patients. However, infections associated with CIED implantation, particularly lead-related infective endocarditis (LRIE), can offset all benefits and make more harm than good for the patient. To date, there are no other studies in Latvia, addressing patients with lead-related infective endocarditis. The objective of this study was to identify the most common pathogens associated with LRIE and their antimicrobial resistance and to identify possible risk factors of patients who present with LRIE. Materials and Methods: The study was performed retrospectively at Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital (PSCUH). The study included patients who were referred to PSCUH due to LRIE for lead extraction. Patients were identified from procedural journals. Information about isolated microorganisms, patient comorbidities and visual diagnostics data was taken from patient records. Results: Forty-nine patients with CIED related infective endocarditis were included in the study, 34 (69.4%) were male, median age of all patients was 65.0 (50.5–73.0) years, median hospital stay was 15.5 (22.0–30.5) days. Successful and complete lead extraction was achieved in all patients. Thirty-two (65.3%) had received antibiotics prior to blood sample. Only in 31 (63.3%) positive culture results were seen. The most common isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (23.5%) and coagulase negative staphylococci (23.5%). Other bacteria were isolated considerably less often. The atrial lead was most common location for lead vegetations, seen in 50.0% of cases. Five (10.2%) patients have died due to the disease. Conclusions: Lead-related infective endocarditis is a major complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices with considerable morbidity and mortality, which in our study was as high as 10.2%.

Hearts ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-212
Author(s):  
Giulia Massaro ◽  
Igor Diemberger ◽  
Matteo Ziacchi ◽  
Andrea Angeletti ◽  
Giovanni Statuto ◽  
...  

In recent decades there has been a relevant increase in the implantation rate of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), albeit with relevant geographical inhomogeneities. Despite the positive impact on clinical outcomes, the possibility of major complications is not negligible, particularly with respect to CIED infections. CIED infections significantly affect morbidity and mortality, especially in instances of delayed diagnosis and appropriate treatment. In the present review, we will start to depict the factors underlying the development of CIED infection as well as the difficulties related to its diagnosis and treatment. We will explain the reasons underlying the need to focus on prophylaxis rather than treatment, in view of the poor outcomes despite improvements in lead extraction procedures. This will lead to the consideration of management of this complication in a hub-spoke manner, and to our analysis of the several technological and procedural improvements developed to minimize this complication. These include prolongation of CIED longevity, the development of leadless devices, and integrated prophylactic approaches. We will conclude with a discussion regarding new devices and strategies under development. This complete excursus will provide the reader with a new perspective on how a major complication can drive technological improvements.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (47) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
Lidia Chmielewska-Michalak ◽  
Ewelina Konstanty ◽  
Przemysław Mitkowski

The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), who require oncological management including radiotherapy (RT) is still increasing. According to current knowledge the most frequent device dysfunction related to exposition to ionizing radiation is reprogramming to emergency mode (soft reset). There are uncommon cases of complete, irreversible device damage. CIED dysfunction during RT can be observed in approximately 3% of patients. In majority of cases they are asymptomatic, although in literature there are descriptions of deterioration of clinical status due to bradycardia or exacerbation of heart failure. The most important factor of device malfunction is radiotherapy with photons of energy >10 MV or protons despite energy used. So far there were no cases published with inadequate ICD therapies due to the presence of electromagnetic field interference during RT. Because patients with CIED undergoing RT need complex care to achieve high level of safety, experts of Heart Rhythm Society establish document, published in 2017 which summarized current knowledge about this group of patients. The document contains guidelines on peri-radiotherapy care of patients with CIED.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1723-1726
Author(s):  
Maria Grazia Bongiorni ◽  
Andrea Di Cori

Infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices is a severe disease associated with high mortality. Coagulase-negative staphylococci account for 70% of cases. Definite cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) diagnosis is particularly difficult and echocardiography and blood cultures are the cornerstones of diagnosis. Prognosis is poor and a definite treatment is mandatory. CDRIE must be treated by prolonged antibiotic therapy and complete device removal. Transvenous lead extraction is the gold standard, also in the presence of large vegetations. After extraction, the indication to reimplantation has to be reconsidered carefully and immediate reimplantation should be avoided.


EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1876-1889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal Nof ◽  
Maria Grazia Bongiorni ◽  
Angelo Auricchio ◽  
Christian Butter ◽  
Nikolaos Dagres ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims The present study sought to determine predictors for success and outcomes of patients who underwent cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) extraction indicated for systemic or local CIED related infection in particular where complete lead removal could not be achieved. Methods and results ESC-EORP ELECTRa (European Lead Extraction ConTRolled Registry) is a European prospective lead extraction registry. Out of the total cohort, 1865/3510 (52.5%) patients underwent removal due to CIED related infection. Predictors and outcomes of failure were analysed. Complete removal was achieved in 1743 (93.5%) patients, partial (<4 cm of lead left) in 88 (4.7%), and failed (>4 cm of lead left) in 32 (1.8%) patients. Removal success was unrelated to type of CIED infection (pocket or systemic). Predictors for failure were older leads and older patients [odds ratio (OR) 1.14 (1.08–1.19), P < 0.0001 and OR 2.68 (1.22–5.91), P = 0.0146, respectively]. In analysis by lead, predictors for failure were: pacemaker vs. defibrillator removal and failure to engage the locking stylet all the way to the tip [OR 0.20 (0.04–0.95), P = 0.03 and OR 0.32 (0.13–0.74), P = 0.008, respectively]. Significantly higher complication rates were noted in the failure group (40.6% vs. 15.9 for partial and 8.7% for success groups, P < 0.0001). Failure to remove a lead was a strong predictor for in hospital mortality [hazard ratio of 2.05 (1.01–4.16), P = 0.046]. Conclusion A total of 6.5% of infected CIED patients failed attempted extraction. Only were >4 cm of lead remained resulted in higher procedural complications and mortality rates.


EP Europace ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hernandez-Madrid ◽  
T. Lewalter ◽  
A. Proclemer ◽  
L. Pison ◽  
G. Y. H. Lip ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Damlin ◽  
Katarina Westling ◽  
Eva Maret ◽  
Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg ◽  
Kenneth Caidahl ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract Background The diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) is based on microbiological analyses and diagnostic imaging of cardiac manifestations. Echocardiography (ECHO) is preferred for direct visualization of IE-induced cardiac manifestations. We investigated correlations between bacterial infections and IE manifestations diagnosed by ECHO. Methods In this cohort study, data from patients aged 18 years or above, with definite or possible IE admitted at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2008-2017 were obtained from Swedish National Registry of Endocarditis. Bacteria registered as pathogen were primarily selected from positive blood culture and for patients with negative blood culture, bacteria found in culture or PCR from postoperative material was registered as pathogen. Patients with negative results from culture or PCR were excluded. IE manifestations diagnosed by ECHO and risk factors were obtained from the registry. Chi-squared test and two-sided Fisher’s exact test was used for comparisons between categorical variables, and student’s ttest was used for continuous numerical variables; two-sided and skewed variables were log-transformed before these analyses. Multivariable analyses were performed using logistic regression. Associations and the strength between the variables were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P< 0.05 was considered significant. Results The most common bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus(n= 268, 47%) and viridans group streptococci (n= 127, 22%). The most common manifestations were vegetation in the mitral (n = 222, 36%), aortic (n = 214, 34%), and tricuspid valves (n = 117, 19%). Correlations were seen between aortic valve vegetation and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Enterococcus faecalis, between mitral valve vegetation and group B streptococci, tricuspid valve vegetation, andS.aureus, and between perivalvular abscesses and CoNS (all P< 0.05). Conclusions Correlations were found between certain bacteria and specific ECHO manifestations. Our study contributes to a better understanding of IE manifestations and their underlying bacterial etiology, which pathogens can cause severe infections and might require close follow-up and surgical treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document