scholarly journals Left ventricular wall thickness assessed by cardiac computed tomography and cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Galand ◽  
Brian Ghoshhajra ◽  
Jackie Szymonifka ◽  
Saumya Das ◽  
Mary Orencole ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims  Up to 30% of selected heart failure patients do not benefit clinically from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (WT) analysed using computed tomography (CT) has rarely been evaluated in response to CRT and mitral regurgitation (MR) improvement. We examined the association of LVWT and the ability to reverse LV remodelling and MR improvement after CRT. Methods and results  Fifty-four patients scheduled for CRT underwent pre-procedural CT. Reduced LVWT was defined as WT <6 mm and quantified as a percentage of total LV area. Endpoints were 6-month clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LV end-systolic volume (LVESV)], MR improvement and 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Patients were divided into three groups according to the percentage of LVWT <6 mm area: ≤20%, 20–50%, and ≥50%. At 6 months, 75%, 71%, and 42% of the patients experienced NYHA improvement in the ≤20%, 20–50%, and ≥50% group, respectively. Additionally, ≤20% group presented higher LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (86%, 59%, and 83%, respectively). Both 20–50% and ≥50% groups exhibited a lower LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (52% and 42%; 47% and 45%; and 53% and 45%, respectively). Additionally, ≥25% of LVWT <6 mm inclusive of at least one papillary muscle insertion was the only predictor of lack of MR improvement. Lastly, ≥50% group experienced significantly lower 2-year MACE survival free probability. Conclusion  WT evaluated using CT could help to stratify the response to CRT and predict MR improvement and outcomes. Clinical trial registration NCT01097733.

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Galand ◽  
B G Ghoshhajra ◽  
J Szymonifka ◽  
S Das ◽  
M Orencole ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has provided benefit in selected heart failure (HF) patients. Unfortunately, up to 30% of device recipients do not benefit clinically from CRT. Left ventricular (LV) wall geometry analyzed using computed tomography (CT) has not been evaluated in the response to CRT. The objective of this study was to examine the association of LV wall thickness (WT) and the ability for reverse LV remodeling after CRT in non ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients. Methods In this prospective study, a total 54 patients (33 NICM) scheduled for CRT, underwent pre procedural CT. Reduced LV WT was defined as WT≤6mm and was quantified as a percentage of total LV area. End points were 6-month clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT (NYHA functional class, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and LV end-systolic volume (LVEDV)) and 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Of note, positive reduction was defined as in reduction LVESV and LVEDV by ≥15% and ≥10% respectively and ≥5% absolute increase in LVEF. Results The 33 NICM enrolled patients were divided in 3 groups according to the percentage of LV WT<6mm area: ≤20% (low LV WT area); 20–50% (moderate LV WT area) and ≥50% (high LV WT area). At 6 months, 78%, 67% and 25% of the patients experienced NYHA class improvement by ≥1 in the ≤20%, 20–50% and ≥50% group respectively. Furthermore, majority of patients in the ≤20% and 20–50% groups (92% and 75% respectively) had a significant improvement of their global assessment compared to only 38% in the ≥50% group. Additionally, low LV WT area group presented a significant LVEF, LVEDV and LVESV positive response rate (92%, 69% and 85% respectively). Patients included in the moderate and high groups exhibited gradually lower LVEF, LVEDV and LVESV positive response rate (42% and 50%; 67% and 50%; 75% and 50%, respectively). Notably, patients with the least LV WT (i.e ≥50% group) experienced significantly lower 2-years MACE survival free probability than other groups. Left ventriculat segmentation Conclusion LV WT evaluated using CT could help to stratify the response to CRT in NICM patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 835-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiko Nakai ◽  
Hiroaki Mano ◽  
Yukitoshi Ikeya ◽  
Yoshihiro Aizawa ◽  
Sayaka Kurokawa ◽  
...  

AbstractA prolonged QRS duration (QRSd) is promising for a response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The variation in human body sizes may affect the QRSd. We hypothesized that conduction disturbances may exist in Japanese even with a narrow (< 130 ms)-QRS complex; such patients could be CRT candidates. We investigated the relationships between QRSd and sex and body size in Japanese. We retrospectively analyzed the values of 338 patients without heart failure (HF) (controls) and 199 CRT patients: 12-lead electrocardiographically determined QRSd, left ventricular diastolic and systolic diameters (LVDd and LVDs), body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), and LVEF. We investigated the relationships between the QRSd and BSA, BMI, and LVD. The men’s and women’s BSA values were 1.74 m2 and 1.48 m2 in the controls (p < 0.0001), and 1.70 m2 and 1.41 m2 in the CRT patients (p < 0.0001). The men’s and women’s QRSd values were 96.1 ms and 87.4 ms in the controls (p < 0.0001), and 147.8 ms and 143.9 ms in the CRT group (p = 0.4633). In the controls, all body size and LVD variables were positively associated with QRSd. The CRT response rate did not differ significantly among narrow-, mid-, and wide-QRS groups (83.6%, 91.3%, 92.4%). An analysis of the ROC curve provided a QRS cutoff value of 114 ms for CRT responder. The QRSd appears to depend somewhat on body size in patients without HF. The CRT response rate was better than reported values even in patients with a narrow QRSd (< 130 ms). When patients are considered for CRT, a QRSd > 130 ms may not be necessary, and the current JCS guidelines appear to be appropriate.


EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Nunes Ferreira ◽  
P S Antonio ◽  
I Aguiar-Ricardo ◽  
T Rodrigues ◽  
J Rigueira ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Left ventricular (LV) lead placement is often the most challenging aspect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, with a failure rate up to 10% due to complex coronary anatomies. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of a modified snare technique in the LV lead implantation in cases of standard technique failure and to evaluate its impact in the response rate to CRT. Methods A prospective study was conducted of patients indicated for a CRT implant. When LV lead delivery to the target vessel failed using standard techniques, a modified snare technique was implemented, using a secondary coronary sinus delivery sheath introduced through the same venous puncture.  Patients were evaluated every 6 months. Efficacy was quantified by long-term surgical intervention rates. Patients were evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography before CRT implant and between 6-12 months post-implant. Patients with ejection fraction (EF) elevation ≥ 10% or LV end-systolic volume (ESV) reduction ≥ 15% were classified as responders. Patients with EF elevation ≥ 20% or LV ESV reduction ≥ 30% were classified as super-responders. Time to surgical revision and mortality were evaluated by the Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results From 2015-2019, 566 CRTs were implanted (26.1% female, 72 ± 10.2 years old, follow-up duration 18.9 ± 15.8 months). The standard LV implant technique failed in 94 cases (16.6%), of which the modified snare technique was successful in 92 (97.9%) with LV lead implant in a lateral vein in 94.7% of cases. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between patients who implanted LV lead with snare vs standard technique (p = NS). The 4-year surgical intervention rate was lower with the modified snare implant technique than with the standard technique (3.2% vs. 10.2%, HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.84, p &lt; 0.05), with a relative risk reduction of 74% and a number needed to treat to prevent one surgical intervention of 14. The intervention rate was also lower regarding LV lead implant failure or dislodgement rates (0% vs. 5.3%, p &lt; 0.05). Major complications were similar between groups. In addition, the response rate to CRT was higher in the modified snare technique than in the standard approach (71.1% vs 55.0%, p &lt; 0.05). In patients who implanted the LV lead with the snare technique, EF increased from 28.1 ± 8.2% to 36.1 ± 11.1% (p &lt; 0.05) and LV ESV decreased from 127.8 ± 64.0mL to 99.8 ± 61.1mL (p = 0.01). The super-response rate was similar between groups (33.3% vs 27.8%, p = NS). Conclusion For challenging coronary sinus anatomies that preclude LV lead placement by standard methods, this modified snare alternative was effective, with significantly lower surgical intervention rates and a higher response rate to resynchronization therapy. This higher than expected response rate with the snare technique, evaluated by remodeling criteria, may be explained by the implant of LV lead in the desired target lateral vein. Abstract Figure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 514
Author(s):  
Toshiko Nakai ◽  
Yukitoshi Ikeya ◽  
Rikitake Kogawa ◽  
Naoto Otsuka ◽  
Yuji Wakamatsu ◽  
...  

Background: The definition of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) varies across clinical trials. There are two main definitions, i.e., echocardiographic response and functional response. We assessed which definition was more reasonable. Methods: In this study of 260 patients who had undergone CRT, an echocardiographic response was defined as a reduction in a left ventricular end-systolic volume of greater than or equal to 15% or an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction of greater than or equal to 5%. A functional response was defined as an improvement of at least one class category in the New York Heart Association functional classification. We assessed the response to CRT at 6 months after device implantation, based on each definition, and investigated the relationship between response and clinical outcomes. Results: The echocardiographic response rate was 74.2%. The functional response rate was 86.9%. Non-responder status, based on both definitions, was associated with higher all-cause mortality. Cardiac death was only associated with functional non-responder status (hazard ratio (HR) 2.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19–5.46, p = 0.0186) and heart failure hospitalization (HR 2.78, 95% CI, 1.29–5.26, p = 0.0111). Conclusion: After CRT implantation, the functional response definition of CRT response is associated with a higher response rate and better clinical outcomes than that of the echocardiographic response definition, and therefore it is reasonable to use the functional definition to assess CRT response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document