scholarly journals Implementing treatment guidelines for ambulance services in a low- and middle income setting

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Carlsson ◽  
V Blaku ◽  
H Lidberg ◽  
R Hodza-Beganovic ◽  
P Berggren

Abstract Background The use of clinical practice guidelines in clinical and organizational decision-making improves the care of patients and patient safety. Guidelines make healthcare consistent and efficient. In many low- and middle income countries healthcare workers depend on guidelines developed in higher income countries. For these to be useful and accepted they need to be adapted to the local setting. The aim of the study was to implement pre-hospital treatment guidelines into an organization that was not currently using guidelines. The study was partnership between a Swedish pre-hospital training organization and local ambulance service organizations in Kosovo. Methods An iterative process of implementing the guidelines was used: Identify guidelines appropriate for the local organization.In sets of five, have the guidelines translated into Albanian.Adapt the guidelines to the local conditions and context.Approval of guidelines by an expert group.Begin using the guidelines within the target organization. Results The first set of five guidelines was translated, approved, and implemented into the organizations. To improve acceptance, both practitioners and decision-makers were involved in the process. Seven workshops were held, with a total of 104 participants. In follow-up discussions participants said they accepted the guidelines and that they would be useful in their daily work. Conclusions It is important to evaluate to what extent the guidelines have been accepted, understood, and used. The success and acceptance is due to the flexible procedure managing the full implementation process. Adapting guidelines to fit with local needs and requirements using local experts made the guidelines accessible and useful. The workshop discussions established justification and approval. Key messages Involve local experts in contextualising guidelines to increase acceptance from the start. Support building a robust local implementation organization to assist and administer change.

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nofisat Ismaila ◽  
Omolola Salako ◽  
Jimoh Mutiu ◽  
Oladeji Adebayo

Purpose There is a paucity of data about current usage of oncology guidelines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), specifically in terms of the availability and quality of those guidelines. Our objective was to determine usage of oncology guidelines and the barriers and facilitators to their usage among radiation oncologists in LMICs. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among practicing radiation oncologists in Nigeria via e-mail and the social media database of the Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncologists of Nigeria. In addition, paper questionnaires were administered at regional clinical meetings. Results The survey response rate was 53.4% in a sample of 101 radiation oncologists from the database. Sixty-nine percent of respondents were consultants and 30% were residents. Approximately 43% had < 5 years’ experience. All of the respondents were involved in administering chemotherapy during the treatment of patients with cancer, whereas approximately half were involved in diagnosing cancer. Ninety-three percent reported using guidelines in treating patients, the top two guidelines being those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (90%) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (50%). The two major barriers to guideline usage were that facilities were inadequate for proper guideline implementation and that the information in guidelines were too complex to understand. Potential facilitators included providing adequate facilities, developing local guidelines, and increasing awareness of guideline usage. Conclusion Our study shows that clinicians involved in the treatment of patients with cancer in LMICs are aware of cancer treatment guidelines. However, implementation of these guidelines hinders their usage because the facilities are inadequate, guidelines are not applicable to the local setting, and the information in the guidelines is too complex.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisreen Amayiri ◽  
Ariane Spitaels ◽  
Mohamed Zaghloul ◽  
Anthony Figaji ◽  
Sergio Cavalheiro ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. e26737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laila Hessissen ◽  
Jeannette Parkes ◽  
Nisreen Amayiri ◽  
Naureen Mushtaq ◽  
Nongnuch Sirachainan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18211-e18211
Author(s):  
Nofisat Ismaila ◽  
Omolola Salako ◽  
Adebayo Oladeji

e18211 Background: Healthcare providers often rely on clinical practice guidelines to help inform and optimize patient care. However, most of these guidelines are from reputable organizations that are based in developed countries. There is a paucity of data about the status of guidelines in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), specifically in terms of their availability, usage and quality. Objective: To determine utilization of oncology guideline and potential barriers to usage in a LMIC among clinical and radiation oncologist (RADONCS) Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with the use of an online questionnaire that was administered to practicing RADONCS in Nigeria via the Association’s email and social media database. In addition, paper questionnaires were administered in person at regional clinical meetings. Results: Survey response rate was 53.4% in a sample of 101 RADONCS from the database. Sixty-nine percent of respondents were consultants and 30% were residents. About 17% had greater than ten years’ experience managing cancer patients, while 43% had less than five years’ experience. All of the respondents are involved in the chemotherapy administration while only about half are involved in the screening and diagnosis of cancer patients. Ninety-three percent report using guidelines in managing patients and the top 3 guidelines used were National Comprehensive Cancer Network (90%), American Society of Clinical Oncology (50%) and European Society of Medical Oncology (46%). The major three barriers to guideline utilization were inadequate facilities for proper guideline implementation, the guideline is not applicable to setting and information in guideline is overwhelming. Potential facilitators include providing adequate facilities, developing local guidelines and increase awareness on the use of guidelines. Almost all respondents are in favour of using guidelines that are adapted to their practice setting. Conclusions: Our study shows that clinicians involved in the management of cancer patients in a LMIC are aware of cancer treatment guidelines. However, issues like inadequate facilities, inapplicability of guideline to local setting and complexity of information in guidelines hinder their usage.


Author(s):  
Jo M Wilmshurst

Children in low and middle income countries are 16 times more likely to die before 5 years of age compared to children in high-income countries. More than 200 million children under five in the developing world do not fulfil their potential, the major reasons appear to be poor nutrition, and limited access to education in the setting of extreme poverty. Three major factors with multiple sub-headings result in threats to the child’s brain. Namely, the background setting the child is born into and grows up in, the acquired influences of the local setting, and the available interventions for the child. The following text is an overview of these key issues and their subheadings, for children residing in low and middle income countries. Whilst many influencers are beyond the control of health practitioners, such as conflicts of war and impact of famine, there are relatively cost effective interventions which can have a massive ripple effect in reducing diseases of high burden such as effective vaccination programs, insectide immerced nets for beds, and effective pigs pens. There is need for viable protocols to be adapted for the local setting, for simple, cost effective diagnostic tools to be developed and for health practitioners to be equipped with the skills to cope with neurological disorders, especially those prevalent in and specific to low and middle income countries. 


2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1305-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nehal S. Parikh ◽  
Scott C. Howard ◽  
Guillermo Chantada ◽  
Trijn Israels ◽  
Mohammed Khattab ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Dorcas B.C. Gandhi ◽  
Sureshkumar Kamalakannan ◽  
Manigandan Chockalingam ◽  
Ivy A. Sebastian ◽  
Gerard Urimubenshi ◽  
...  

Background: People with neurological dysfunction have been significantly affected by the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis in receiving adequate and quality rehabilitation services. There are no clear guidelines or recommendations for rehabilitation providers in dealing with patients with neurological dysfunction during a pandemic situation especially in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of this paper was to develop consensus-based expert recommendations for in-hospital based neurorehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic for low- and middle-income countries based on available evidence.  Methods: A group of experts in neurorehabilitation consisting of neurologists, physiotherapists and occupational therapists were identified for the consensus groups. A scoping review was conducted to identify existing evidence and recommendations for neurorehabilitation during COVID-19. Specific statements with level 2b evidence from studies identified were developed. These statements were circulated to 13 experts for consensus. The statements that received ≥80% agreement were grouped in different themes and the recommendations were developed.  Results: 75 statements for expert consensus were generated. 72 statements received consensus from 13 experts. These statements were thematically grouped as recommendations for neurorehabilitation service providers, patients, formal and informal caregivers of affected individuals, rehabilitation service organizations, and administrators.  Conclusions: The development of this consensus statement is of fundamental significance to neurological rehabilitation service providers and people living with neurological disabilities. It is crucial that governments, health systems, clinicians and stakeholders involved in upholding the standard of neurorehabilitation practice in low- and middle-income countries consider conversion of the consensus statement to minimum standard requirements within the context of the pandemic as well as for the future.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joop de Jong ◽  
Mark Jordans ◽  
Ivan Komproe ◽  
Robert Macy ◽  
Aline & Herman Ndayisaba ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document