Comparing Warfarin and 4 Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Risk of Dementia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Ryoung Lee ◽  
Eue-Keun Choi ◽  
Sang-Hyun Park ◽  
Jin-Hyung Jung ◽  
Kyung-Do Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Weighting Method ◽  
Alzheimer Dementia

Background and Purpose: Atrial fibrillation is a risk factor for dementia, and oral anticoagulant use is associated with a decreased risk of dementia in patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of dementia would be different between patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with those with warfarin. Methods: Using the Korean nationwide claims database from January 2014 to December 2017, we identified oral anticoagulant–naive nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients aged ≥40 years. For the comparisons, warfarin and DOAC groups were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The primary outcome was incident dementia. Results: Among 72 846 of total study patients, 25 948 were treated with warfarin, and 46 898 were treated with DOAC (17 193 with rivaroxaban, 9882 with dabigatran, 11 992 with apixaban, and 7831 with edoxaban). During mean 1.3±1.1 years of follow-up, crude incidence of dementia was 4.87 per 100 person-years (1.20 per 100 person-years for vascular dementia and 3.30 per 100 person-years for Alzheimer dementia). Compared with warfarin, DOAC showed a comparable risks of dementia, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer dementia. In subgroup analyses, DOAC was associated with a lower risk of dementia than warfarin, particularly in patients aged 65 to 74 years (hazard ratio, 0.815 [95% CI, 0.709–0.936]) and in patients with prior stroke (hazard ratio, 0.891 [95% CI, 0.820–0.968]). When comparing individual DOACs with warfarin, edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of dementia (hazard ratio, 0.830 [95% CI, 0.740–0.931]). Conclusions: In this large Asian population with atrial fibrillation, DOAC showed a comparable risk of dementia with warfarin overall. DOACs appeared more beneficial than warfarin, in those aged 65 to 74 years or with a history of stroke. For specific DOACs, only edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of dementia than warfarin.

scholarly journals Comparison between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the risk of dementia in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.R Lee ◽  
E.K Choi ◽  
S.H Park ◽  
K.D Han ◽  
S Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Weighting Method ◽  
Alzheimer Dementia ◽  
Prior Stroke ◽  
Incidence Of Dementia

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for dementia and oral anticoagulant (OAC) use is associated with a decreased risk of dementia in patients with AF. Objective We sought to find whether the risk of dementia would be different between patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and those treated with warfarin. Methods Using the Korean National Health Insurance database from January 2014 to December 2017, we identified OAC naïve non-valvular AF patients aged 40 years or older. For the comparison, warfarin and NOAC groups were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method (IPTW). The primary outcome was incident dementia. Patients were censored at the occurrence of dementia, discontinuation of index treatment, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2018). Results Among 72,846 of total study patients, 25,948 were treated with warfarin and 46,898 were treated with NOAC (17,193 with rivaroxaban, 9,882 with dabigatran, 11,992 with apixaban, and 7,831 with edoxaban). Crude incidence of dementia was 4.65 per 100 person-years in warfarin group and 4.98 per 100 person years in NOAC group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced after IPTW (mean age 72 years, 93% CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2, 58% men). Compared to warfarin, NOAC showed a comparable risk of dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.944, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.934–1.059), vascular dementia (HR 0.921, 95% CI 0.814–1.043) and Alzheimer dementia (HR 1.101, 95% CI 1.019–1.191). When comparing individual NOACs with warfarin, edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of dementia (HR 0.830, 95% CI 0.740–0.931). Rivaroxaban (HR 0.767, 95% CI 0.648–0.907) and edoxaban (HR 0.786, 95% CI 0.620–0.996) were associated with a lower risk of vascular dementia than warfarin. In subgroup analyses, NOAC was associated with a lower incidence of dementia than warfarin particularly in patients with prior stroke (HR 0.891, 95% CI 0.820–0.968) and in patients aged 65–74 years (HR 0.815, 95% CI 0.709–0.936). Conclusion In this large Asian population with AF, NOAC showed a comparable result with warfarin on the risk of dementia. Edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of dementia. NOAC appeared more beneficial especially in those with AF who had a history of prior stroke and aged 65–74 years. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Switching to Another Oral Anticoagulant and Drug Discontinuation Among Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Different Direct Oral Anticoagulants

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 107602961987024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine L. Baker ◽  
Amol D. Dhamane ◽  
Jigar Rajpura ◽  
Jack Mardekian ◽  
Oluwaseyi Dina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Study Population

We compared the risks of switching to another oral anticoagulant (OAC) and discontinuation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were prescribed rivaroxaban or dabigatran versus apixaban. Patients (≥65 years of age) with NVAF prescribed DOACs (January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2017) were identified from the Humana research database and grouped into DOAC cohorts. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate whether the risk for switching to another OAC or discontinuing index DOACs differed among cohorts. Of the study population (N = 38 250), 55.9% were prescribed apixaban (mean age: 78.6 years; 49.8% female), 37.3% rivaroxaban (mean age: 77.4 years; 46.7% female), and 6.8% dabigatran (mean age: 77.0 years; 44.0% female). Compared to patients prescribed apixaban, patients prescribed rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-2.25; P < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 3.74; 95% CI, 3.35-4.18, P < .001) had a significantly higher risk of switching to another OAC during the follow-up; compared to patients prescribed apixaban, the risks of discontinuation were also higher for patients treated with rivaroxaban (HR: 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13, P < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23-1.35, P < .001).

scholarly journals Anticoagulant Utilization and Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscilla Shum ◽  
Gordon Klammer ◽  
Dale Toews ◽  
Arden Barry
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Renal Dialysis ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Fibrillation Auriculaire

ABSTRACTBackground: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated for prevention of stroke and embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). These agents have been shown to be non-inferior to warfarin in terms of efficacy and safety. However, their uptake in practice has been variable, and prescribed dosages may be inconsistent with manufacturer recommendations.Objectives: To evaluate patterns of oral anticoagulant use in patients with NVAF, including determination of patient characteristics associated with the prescribing of warfarin or DOACs and whether prescribed dosages of DOACs were concordant with manufacturer recommendations.Methods: This retrospective chart review was conducted from April to September 2017 at Abbotsford Regional Hospital, Abbotsford, British Columbia. Patients at least 18 years of age with NVAF and CHADS-65 score of 1 or higher were included. Patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulants, those with reversible atrial fibrillation, and those undergoing renal dialysis were excluded. The dosage of DOACs was categorized as too low, too high, or correct in relation to manufacturer recommendations for the Canadian product. Results: A total of 120 patients were included. At discharge, 83 (69%) of the patients had a prescription for DOAC, 25 (21%) had a prescription for warfarin, and 12 (10%) had no prescription for an oral anticoagulant. There were no statistically significant differences between the warfarin and DOAC groups with respect to patient characteristics. Among the 56 patients for whom a full DOAC dose was indicated, 7 (13%) received a dose that was too low. Among the 23 patients for whom a full DOAC dose was not indicated, 4 (17%) received a dose that was too high. Conclusions: At the study hospital, most patients with NVAF and CHADS-65 score of at least 1 had a discharge prescription for DOAC. Patient characteristics appeared to be similar between the warfarin and DOAC groups. For a notable proportion of patients who received a DOAC, the dosage was incorrect. Appropriate prescribing of oral anticoagulants could be further improved by education for prescribers and involvement of hospital pharmacists.RÉSUMÉContexte : Les anticoagulants oraux directs (AOD) sont indiqués pour prévenir les AVC et les embolies parmi les patients atteints de fibrillation auriculaire non valvulaire (FANV). Il a été démontré que l’efficacité et l’innocuité de ces agents n’étaient pas inférieures à la warfarine. Cependant, leur adoption dans la pratique est inégale, et les doses prescrites peuvent être contraires aux recommandations des fabricants.Objectifs : Évaluation des habitudes d’utilisation des anticoagulants oraux pour les patients atteints de FANV, y compris la définition des caractéristiques des patients associées à la prescription de la warfarine ou des AOD, ainsi que de la conformité des doses prescrites de ces derniers aux recommandations des fabricants.Méthodes : Cet examen rétrospectif des dossiers a été mené d’avril à septembre 2017 à l’Hôpital régional d’Abbotsford à Abbotsford, en Colombie-Britannique. Des patients âgés d’au moins 18 ans, atteints de FANV et ayant un score CHADS-65 d’au moins 1, ont été inclus dans l’étude. Les patients présentant une contre-indication aux anticoagulants oraux, ceux atteints de fibrillation auriculaire réversible et ceux soumis à une dialyse rénale en ont été exclus. La dose d’AOD destinés au marché canadien a été catégorisée comme trop faible, trop élevée ou correcte par rapport aux recommandations du fabricant.Résultats : Cent-vingt patients au total ont participé à l’étude. Au moment du congé, 83 (69 %) d’entre eux avaient une prescription d’AOD, 25 (21 %) avaient une prescription de warfarine et 12 (10 %) n’avaient pas de prescription d’anticoagulant oral. En ce qui concerne les caractéristiques des patients, il n’y avait aucune différence statistique notable entre les groupes ayant reçu une prescription de warfarine et ceux ayant reçu une prescription d’AOD. Des 56 patients qui avaient reçu une indication de dose complète d’AOD, sept (13 %) ont reçu une dose trop faible. Des 23 patients qui n’avaient pas reçu d’indication de dose complète d’AOD, quatre (17 %) ont reçu une dose trop élevée.Conclusions : À l’hôpital où s’est déroulée l’étude, la plupart des patients atteints de FANV et ceux ayant un score CHADS-65 d’au moins 1 recevaient une prescription d’AOD au moment du congé. Les caractéris-tiques des patients semblaient similaires entre les groupes ayant reçu une prescription de warfarine et ceux ayant reçu une prescription d’AOD. La dose d’AOD reçue par une proportion notable de patients était incorrecte. La prescription appropriée d’anticoagulants oraux pourrait encore être améliorée si on sensibilisait les prescripteurs avec la collaboration des pharmaciens d’hôpitaux.   

scholarly journals Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Concomitant Hyperthyroidism

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. 2893-2904
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsin Chan ◽  
Lung-Sheng Wu ◽  
Lai-Chu See ◽  
Jia-Rou Liu ◽  
Shang-Hung Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Asian Patients

Abstract Objective Patients with hyperthyroidism were excluded from the randomized clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods We performed a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We enrolled 3213 and 1181 NVAF patients with hyperthyroidism who were taking DOACs and warfarin, respectively, from June 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017. We also enrolled 53 591 and 16 564 NVAF patients without hyperthyroidism, taking DOACs and warfarin, respectively. We used propensity score stabilized weights (PSSWs) to balance covariates across the study groups. We also used 1:4 matching on both taking DOACs, with (n = 3213) and without hyperthyroidism (n = 12 852); and both taking warfarin, with (n = 1181) and without hyperthyroidism (n = 4724). Results After PSSW, DOAC had a comparable risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) and a lower risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; 95% confidential interval [CI], 0.44–0.96; P = 0.0295) than warfarin among patients with hyperthyroidism. There were comparable risks of IS/SE and major bleeding between those patients with and without hyperthyroidism. However, among patients taking warfarin, those with hyperthyroidism had a lower risk of IS/SE than those without hyperthyroidism (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.86; P = 0.0050). Conclusion Among NVAF Asian patients with concomitant hyperthyroidism, DOACs may be an effective and safer alternative to warfarin. Thromboprophylaxis with DOACs may be considered for such patients, and it is important to validate this finding in further prospective study.

scholarly journals Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 2066-2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Ganse ◽  
Nicolas Danchin ◽  
Isabelle Mahé ◽  
Olivier Hanon ◽  
Flore Jacoud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Large Population ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Safety Effectiveness

Background and Purpose: The effects of direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation should be assessed in actual conditions of use. France has near-universal healthcare coverage with a unified healthcare information system, allowing large population-based analyses. NAXOS (Evaluation of Apixaban in Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation) aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and mortality of apixaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, in oral anticoagulant-naive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Methods: This was an observational study using French National Health System claims data and including all adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulant between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes of interest were major bleeding events leading to hospitalization (safety), stroke and systemic thromboembolic events (effectiveness), and all-cause mortality. Four approaches were used for comparative analyses: matching on propensity score (PS; 1:n); as a sensitivity analysis, matching on high-dimensional PS; adjustment on PS; and adjustment on known confounders. For each outcome, cumulative incidence rates accounting for competing risks of death were estimated. Results: Overall, 321 501 patients were analyzed, of whom 35.0%, 27.2%, 31.1%, and 6.6% initiated VKAs, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Apixaban was associated with a lower PS–matched risk of major bleeding compared with VKAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.40–0.46]) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63–0.72]), but not dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81–1.08]). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolic event compared with VKAs (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.56–0.65]), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.97–1.15]) or dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.78–1.11]). All-cause mortality was lower with apixaban than with VKAs, but not lower than with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. Conclusions: Apixaban was associated with superior safety, effectiveness, and lower mortality than VKAs; with superior safety than rivaroxaban and similar safety to dabigatran; and with similar effectiveness when compared with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. These observational data suggest potentially important differences in outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants, which should be explored in randomized trials.

scholarly journals Early Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Onset of Stroke and Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 883-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadataka Mizoguchi ◽  
Kanta Tanaka ◽  
Kazunori Toyoda ◽  
Sohei Yoshimura ◽  
Ryo Itabashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background and Purpose— We aimed to compare outcomes of ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation between earlier and later initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) after stroke onset. Methods— From data for 1192 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in a prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients who started DOACs during acute hospitalization were included and divided into 2 groups according to a median day of DOAC initiation after onset. Outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death at 3 months, as well as those at 2 years. Results— DOACs were initiated during acute hospitalization in 499 patients in median 4 (interquartile range, 2–7) days after onset. Thus, 223 patients (median age, 74 [interquartile range, 68–81] years; 78 women) were assigned to the early group (≤3 days) and 276 patients (median age, 75 [interquartile range, 69–82] years; 101 women) to the late (≥4 days) group. The early group had lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and smaller infarcts than the late group. The rate at which DOAC administration persisted at 2 years was 85.2% overall, excluding patients who died or were lost to follow-up. Multivariable Cox shared frailty models showed comparable hazards between the groups at 2 years for stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.47–1.57]), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.42–4.60]), and death (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.28–1.33]). Outcome risks at 3 months also did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusions— Risks for events including stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death were comparable whether DOACs were started within 3 days or from 4 days or more after the onset of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation–associated ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01581502.

Abstract P021: Oral Anticoagulant Use and Risk of Incident Dementia in Persons With Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nemin Chen ◽  
Richard F MacLehose ◽  
Lin Y Chen ◽  
Faye L Norby ◽  
Lindsay G Bengtson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Incident Dementia

Background: Current guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding than warfarin and, therefore, may reduce risk of dementia among patients with AF. Hypothesis: AF patients initiating DOACs for stroke prevention will have lower risk of dementia than patients initiating warfarin. Methods: We used data from two US healthcare claim databases, MarketScan (2007-2015) and Optum Clinformatics (2009-2015). Using validated algorithms, we identified patients with AF who initiated oral anticoagulation. Dementia was defined as having an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code of 290.xx, 294.xx, or 331.0. Comorbidities and use of other medications were defined based on inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims. We performed a series of head-to-head comparisons of different oral anticoagulants (warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) in propensity score-matched cohorts. In each database, multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident dementia for each comparison of propensity score-matched cohorts, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, use of other medications, and markers of socioeconomic status (in the Optum database only). We meta-analyzed database-specific results using a random-effects model. Results: The analysis included 307,099 AF patients from the MarketScan database and 161,346 from the Optum database, of which 6,572 and 4,391 respectively had a diagnosis of incident dementia. Mean follow up ranged between 0.7 to 2.3 years and incident of diagnosed dementia between 7 to 14 cases per 1000 person-years across different oral anticoagulant initiator groups. Patients initiating DOACs had a lower risk of incident dementia than those initiating warfarin (dabigatran: HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.71, 1.01; rivaroxaban: HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.76, 0.94; apixaban: HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.65, 0.97). There were no differences in risk of incident dementia comparing DOAC user groups (dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban: HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.79, 1.32; dabigatran vs. apixaban: HR 0.92, 95%CI 0.63, 1.36; apixaban vs. rivaroxaban: HR 1.01, 95%CI 0.86, 1.19). Conclusions: Patients with AF initiating DOACs experienced lower rates of incident dementia than warfarin users. No obvious benefit was observed for any particular DOAC in relation to dementia rates.

Abstract 14354: Persistence to Oral Anticoagulation Treatment in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the United States

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol Dhamane ◽  
Manuela Di Fusco ◽  
Cynthia Gutierrez ◽  
Mauricio Ferri ◽  
Cristina Russ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Time Varying Covariates

Background: Studies have shown that nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients who discontinue direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are at higher risk of complications, such as stroke. This analysis compared the risk of non-persistence of OACs among NVAF patients. Methods: Adult NVAF patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin were identified using 01JAN2013-31MAR2019 data from the IQVIA commercial claims database. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuation (no evidence of index OAC use for 60 days from the last days’ of supply) or switch to another OAC. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were generated to illustrate time-to-non-persistence along with cumulative incidences of non-persistence. Adjusted cox proportional hazards models, including time-varying covariates (e.g., major bleeding, stroke), were used to evaluate non-persistence risk. Results: A total of 32,103 apixaban, 5,906 dabigatran, 29,385 rivaroxaban, and 21,420 warfarin patients were included; mean age: 63. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence compared to dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.56), rivaroxaban (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.78-0.81), and warfarin (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.65-0.68). Dabigatran was associated with a higher risk of non-persistence compared to warfarin (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.19-1.28) and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.42-1.52), and rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk compared to warfarin (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.82-0.86). KM curves and cumulative incidences are presented below (Figure). Conclusions: In this group of NVAF patients, apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of non-persistence compared to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence compared to warfarin and dabigatran. Such differences are critical as persistence with OACs is essential to prevent thromboembolic complications.

scholarly journals DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS AND WARFARIN: EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OUTCOMES AMONG NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PATIENTS WITH MULTIMORBIDITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 1501
Author(s):  
Amol Dhamane ◽  
Mauricio Ferri ◽  
Allison Keshishian ◽  
Cristina Russ ◽  
Ruth Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Safety Outcomes

Abstract 17301: Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Hage ◽  
Daniel Dolan ◽  
Viviane G Nasr ◽  
Luis Castelo-Branco ◽  
Daniel Motta-Calderon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Systemic Embolization

Introduction: The evidence for use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the management of post-operative cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation (POAF) is limited and mostly founded on clinical trials that excluded this patient population. Hypothesis: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and observational studies to evaluate the hypothesis that DOACs are safe compared to warfarin for the anticoagulation of patients with POAF. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library for clinical trials and observational studies comparing DOAC with warfarin in patients ≥18 years old who had post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation. Primary outcomes included stroke, systemic embolization, bleeding, and mortality, with secondary outcome of hospital readmission. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: We found 3 clinical trials, 1 prospective and 12 retrospective cohort studies eligible for inclusion with a total of 10,538 patients (3,207 DOAC patients and 7,331 warfarin patients). The meta-analysis for the primary outcomes showed significantly lower risk of stroke with DOAC use (6 studies, 7143 patients, RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.81, I2: 0.0%) compared to warfarin, a trend towards lower risk of systemic embolization (4 studies, 7289 patients, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.01, I2: 31.99%) and similar risks of bleeding (14 studies, 10182 patients, RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.10, I2: 26.6%) and mortality (12 studies, 9843 patients, relative risk [RR] 1.01; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.37, I2: 26.5%) The secondary outcome of hospital readmission had similar risk between groups. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that DOACs, compared to warfarin, in the management of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery is associated with lower risk of stroke and a strong trend for lower risk of systemic embolization, and no evidence of increased risk for hospital readmission, bleeding or mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document