scholarly journals Control of Ribosomal Protein L1 Synthesis in Mesophilic and Thermophilic Archaea

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 152 (4) ◽  
pp. 1363-1372
Author(s):  
Alexander Kraft ◽  
Christina Lutz ◽  
Arno Lingenhel ◽  
Peter Gröbner ◽  
Wolfgang Piendl
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Structural Gene ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Halophilic Archaea ◽  
Peptide Bond ◽  
Target Site ◽  
Start Codon ◽  
23S Rrna ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Synthesis

Abstract The mechanisms for the control of ribosomal protein synthesis have been characterized in detail in Eukarya and in Bacteria. In Archaea, only the regulation of the MvaL1 operon (encoding ribosomal proteins MvaL1, MvaL10, and MvaL12) of the mesophilic Methanococcus vannielii has been extensively investigated. As in Bacteria, regulation takes place at the level of translation. The regulator protein MvaL1 binds preferentially to its binding site on the 23S rRNA, and, when in excess, binds to the regulatory target site on its mRNA and thus inhibits translation of all three cistrons of the operon. The regulatory binding site on the mRNA, a structural mimic of the respective binding site on the 23S rRNA, is located within the structural gene about 30 nucleotides downstream of the ATG start codon. MvaL1 blocks a step before or at the formation of the first peptide bond of MvaL1. Here we demonstrate that a similar regulatory mechanism exists in the thermophilic M. thermolithotrophicus and M. jannaschii. The L1 gene is cotranscribed together with the L10 and L11 gene, in all genera of the Euryarchaeota branch of the Archaea studied so far. A potential regulatory L1 binding site located within the structural gene, as in Methanococcus, was found in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum and in Pyrococcus horikoshii. In contrast, in Archaeoglobus fulgidus a typical L1 binding site is located in the untranslated leader of the L1 gene as described for the halophilic Archaea. In Sulfolobus, a member of the Crenarchaeota, the L1 gene is part of a long transcript (encoding SecE, NusG, L11, L1, L10, L12). A previously suggested regulatory L1 target site located within the L11 structural gene could not be confirmed as an L1 binding site.

scholarly journals Mutations within therplDGene of Linezolid-Nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains Isolated in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 2459-2462 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Dong ◽  
S. Chochua ◽  
L. McGee ◽  
D. Jackson ◽  
K. P. Klugman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Binding Pocket ◽  
The United States ◽  
Target Site ◽  
23S Rrna ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACTThree invasiveStreptococcus pneumoniaestrains nonsusceptible to linezolid were isolated in the United States between 2001 and 2012 from the CDC's Active Bacterial Core surveillance. Linezolid binds ribosomal proteins where structural changes within its target site may confer resistance. Our study identified mutations and deletions near the linezolid binding pocket of two of these strains within therplDgene, which encodes ribosomal protein L4. Mutations in the 23S rRNA alleles or therplVgene were not detected.

scholarly journals Halobacterium cutirubrum ribosomes. Properties of the ribosomal proteins and ribonucleic acid

1972 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. P. Visentin ◽  
C. Chow ◽  
A. T. Matheson ◽  
M. Yaguchi ◽  
F. Rollin
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Soluble Fraction ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
23S Rrna ◽  
Core Particle ◽  
Fractionation Procedure ◽  
Additional Protein ◽  
70S Ribosome ◽  
Low Ionic Strength

1. The 30S ribosomal subunit of the extreme halophile Halobacterium cutirubrum is unstable and loses 75% of its ribosomal protein when the 70S ribosome is dissociated into the two subunits. A stable 30S subunit is obtained if the dissociation of the 70S particle is carried out in the presence of the soluble fraction. 2. A fractionation procedure was developed for the selective removal of groups of proteins from the 30S and 50S subunits. When the ribosomes, which are stable in 4m-K+ and 0.1m-Mg2+, were extracted with low-ionic-strength buffer 75–80% of the 30S proteins and 60–65% of the 50S proteins as well as the 5S rRNA were released. The proteins in this fraction are the most acidic of the H. cutirubrum ribosomal proteins. Further extraction with Li+–EDTA releases additional protein, leaving a core particle containing either 16S rRNA or 23S rRNA and about 5% of the total ribosomal protein. The amino acid composition, mobility on polyacrylamide gels at pH4.5 and 8.7, and the molecular-weight distribution of the various protein fractions were determined. 3. The s values of the rRNA are 5S, 16S and 23S. The C+G contents of the 16S and 23S rRNA were 56.1 and 58.8% respectively and these are higher than C+G contents of the corresponding Escherichia coli rRNA (53.8 and 54.1%).

scholarly journals In Vitro Selection of Resistance in Haemophilus influenzae by Amoxicillin-Clavulanate, Cefpodoxime, Cefprozil, Azithromycin, and Clarithromycin

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 2956-2962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Clark ◽  
Bülent Bozdogan ◽  
Mihaela Peric ◽  
Bonifacio Dewasse ◽  
Michael R. Jacobs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Haemophilus Influenzae ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
In Vitro Selection ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Single Step ◽  
23S Rrna ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanate

ABSTRACT Abilities of amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, azithromycin, and clarithromycin to select resistant mutants of Haemophilus influenzae were tested by multistep and single-step methodologies. For multistep studies, 10 random strains were tested: 5 of these were β-lactamase positive. After 50 daily subcultures in amoxicillin-clavulanate, MICs did not increase more than fourfold. However, cefprozil MICs increased eightfold for one strain. Clarithromycin and azithromycin gave a >4-fold increase in 8 and 10 strains after 14 to 46 and 20 to 50 days, respectively. Mutants selected by clarithromycin and azithromycin were associated with mutations in 23S rRNA and ribosomal proteins L4 and L22. Three mutants selected by clarithromycin or azithromycin had alterations in ribosomal protein L4, while five had alterations in ribosomal protein L22. Two mutants selected by azithromycin had mutations in the gene encoding 23S rRNA: one at position 2058 and the other at position 2059 (Escherichia coli numbering), with replacement of A by G. One clone selected by clarithromycin became hypersusceptible to macrolides. In single-step studies azithromycin and clarithromycin had the highest mutation rates, while amoxicillin-clavulanate had the lowest. All resistant clones were identical to parents as observed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The MICs of azithromycin for azithromycin-resistant clones were 16 to >128 μg/ml, and those of clarithromycin for clarithromycin-resistant clones were 32 to >128 μg/ml in multistep studies. For strains selected by azithromycin, the MICs of clarithromycin were high and vice versa. After 50 daily subcultures in the presence of drugs, MICs of amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefpodoxime against H. influenzae did not rise more than fourfold, in contrast to cefprozil, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, whose MICs rose to variable degrees.

scholarly journals Resistance to Linezolid Caused by Modifications at Its Binding Site on the Ribosome

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 603-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine S. Long ◽  
Birte Vester
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Resistance Mechanism ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Drug Binding ◽  
23S Rrna ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Linezolid Resistance ◽  
Almost All

ABSTRACTLinezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic in clinical use for the treatment of serious infections of resistant Gram-positive bacteria. It inhibits protein synthesis by binding to the peptidyl transferase center on the ribosome. Almost all known resistance mechanisms involve small alterations to the linezolid binding site, so this review will therefore focus on the various changes that can adversely affect drug binding and confer resistance. High-resolution structures of linezolid bound to the 50S ribosomal subunit show that it binds in a deep cleft that is surrounded by 23S rRNA nucleotides. Mutation of 23S rRNA has for some time been established as a linezolid resistance mechanism. Although ribosomal proteins L3 and L4 are located further away from the bound drug, mutations in specific regions of these proteins are increasingly being associated with linezolid resistance. However, very little evidence has been presented to confirm this. Furthermore, recent findings on the Cfr methyltransferase underscore the modification of 23S rRNA as a highly effective and transferable form of linezolid resistance. On a positive note, detailed knowledge of the linezolid binding site has facilitated the design of a new generation of oxazolidinones that show improved properties against the known resistance mechanisms.

scholarly journals Effect of heat shock on ribosome synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster.

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Bell ◽  
L Neilson ◽  
M Pellegrini
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Culture ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Culture Cells ◽  
Tissue Culture Cells ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Synthesis ◽  
Correct Processing

In Drosophila tissue culture cells, the synthesis of ribosomal proteins was inhibited by a 1-h 37 degrees C heat shock. Ribosomal protein synthesis was repressed to a greater extent than that of most other proteins synthesized by these cells at 25 degrees C. After a 1-h heat shock, when the cells were returned to 25 degrees C, the ribosomal proteins were much slower than most other 25 degrees C proteins to return to pre-heat shock levels of synthesis. Relative to one another, all the ribosomal proteins were inhibited and later recovered to normal levels of synthesis at the same rate and to the same extent. Unlike the ribosomal proteins, the precursor to the large rRNAs was continually synthesized during heat shock, although at a slightly reduced level, but was not processed. It was rapidly degraded, with a half-life of approximately 16 min. Pre-heat shock levels of synthesis, stability, and correct processing were restored only when ribosomal protein synthesis returned to at least 50% of that seen in non-heat-shocked cells.

Regulation of Ribosomal Protein mRNA Content and Translation in Growth-Stimulated Mouse Fibroblasts

1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 685-693
Author(s):  
Pamela K. Geyer ◽  
Oded Meyuhas ◽  
Robert P. Perry ◽  
Lee F. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Growth Stimulation ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Resting Cells ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
Mrna Content ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Synthesis ◽  
Polyadenylated Mrna

When resting (G 0 ) mouse 3T6 fibroblasts are serum stimulated to reenter the cell cycle, the rates of synthesis of rRNA and ribosomal proteins increase, resulting in an increase in ribosome content beginning about 6 h after stimulation. In this study, we monitored the content, metabolism, and translation of ribosomal protein mRNA (rp mRNA) in resting, exponentially growing, and serum-stimulated 3T6 cells. Cloned cDNAs for seven rp mRNAs were used in DNA-excess filter hybridization studies to assay rp mRNA. We found that about 85% of rp mRNA is polyadenylated under all growth conditions. The rate of labeling of rp mRNA relative to total polyadenylated mRNA changed very little after stimulation. The half-life of rp mRNA was about 11 h in resting cells and about 8 h in exponentially growing cells, values which are similar to the half-lives of total mRNA in resting and growing cells (about 9 h). The content of rp mRNA relative to total mRNA was about the same in resting and growing 3T6 cells. Furthermore, the total amount of rp mRNA did not begin to increase until about 6 h after stimulation. Since an increase in rp mRNA content did not appear to be responsible for the increase in ribosomal protein synthesis, we determined the efficiency of translation of rp mRNA under different conditions. We found that about 85% of pulse-labeled rp mRNA was associated with polysomes in exponentially growing cells. In resting cells, however, only about half was associated with polysomes, and about 30% was found in the monosomal fraction. The distribution shifted to that found in growing cells within 3 h after serum stimulation. Similar results were obtained when cells were labeled for 10.5 h. About 70% of total polyadenylated mRNA was in the polysome fraction in all growth states regardless of labeling time, indicating that the shift in mRNA distribution was species specific. These results indicate that the content and metabolism of rp mRNA do not change significantly after growth stimulation. The rate of ribosomal protein synthesis appears to be controlled during the resting-growing transition by an alteration of the efficiency of translation of rp mRNA, possibly at the level of protein synthesis initiation.

scholarly journals Regulation of Ribosomal Protein mRNA Content and Translation in Growth-Stimulated Mouse Fibroblasts

1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 685-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela K. Geyer ◽  
Oded Meyuhas ◽  
Robert P. Perry ◽  
Lee F. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Growth Stimulation ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Resting Cells ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
Mrna Content ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Synthesis ◽  
Polyadenylated Mrna

When resting (G0) mouse 3T6 fibroblasts are serum stimulated to reenter the cell cycle, the rates of synthesis of rRNA and ribosomal proteins increase, resulting in an increase in ribosome content beginning about 6 h after stimulation. In this study, we monitored the content, metabolism, and translation of ribosomal protein mRNA (rp mRNA) in resting, exponentially growing, and serum-stimulated 3T6 cells. Cloned cDNAs for seven rp mRNAs were used in DNA-excess filter hybridization studies to assay rp mRNA. We found that about 85% of rp mRNA is polyadenylated under all growth conditions. The rate of labeling of rp mRNA relative to total polyadenylated mRNA changed very little after stimulation. The half-life of rp mRNA was about 11 h in resting cells and about 8 h in exponentially growing cells, values which are similar to the half-lives of total mRNA in resting and growing cells (about 9 h). The content of rp mRNA relative to total mRNA was about the same in resting and growing 3T6 cells. Furthermore, the total amount of rp mRNA did not begin to increase until about 6 h after stimulation. Since an increase in rp mRNA content did not appear to be responsible for the increase in ribosomal protein synthesis, we determined the efficiency of translation of rp mRNA under different conditions. We found that about 85% of pulse-labeled rp mRNA was associated with polysomes in exponentially growing cells. In resting cells, however, only about half was associated with polysomes, and about 30% was found in the monosomal fraction. The distribution shifted to that found in growing cells within 3 h after serum stimulation. Similar results were obtained when cells were labeled for 10.5 h. About 70% of total polyadenylated mRNA was in the polysome fraction in all growth states regardless of labeling time, indicating that the shift in mRNA distribution was species specific. These results indicate that the content and metabolism of rp mRNA do not change significantly after growth stimulation. The rate of ribosomal protein synthesis appears to be controlled during the resting-growing transition by an alteration of the efficiency of translation of rp mRNA, possibly at the level of protein synthesis initiation.

scholarly journals A novel stress response pathway regulates rRNA biogenesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Witold Szaflarski ◽  
Mateusz Sowiński ◽  
Marta Leśniczak ◽  
Sandeep Ojha ◽  
Anaïs Aulas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Response ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Protein Translation ◽  
Rrna Processing ◽  
Stress Response Pathway ◽  
Cellular Translation ◽  
Response To Stress ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Synthesis

ABSTRACTProduction of ribosomes is an energy-intensive process owing to the intricacy of these massive macromolecular machines. Each human ribosome contains 80 ribosomal proteins and four non-coding RNAs. Accurate assembly requires precise regulation of protein and RNA subunits. In response to stress, the integrated stress response (ISR) rapidly inhibits global translation. How rRNA is coordinately regulated with the rapid inhibition of ribosomal protein synthesis is not known. Here we show that stress specifically inhibits the first step of rRNA processing. Unprocessed rRNA is stored within the nucleolus, and, when stress resolves, it re-enters the ribosome biogenesis pathway. Retention of unprocessed rRNA within the nucleolus aids in the maintenance of this organelle. This response is independent of the ISR or inhibition of cellular translation but represents an independent stress-response pathway that we term Ribosome Biogenesis Stress Response (RiBiSR). Failure to coordinately regulate ribosomal protein translation and rRNA production results in nucleolar fragmentation. Our study unveils a novel stress response pathway that aims at conserving energy, preserving the nucleolus, and prevents further stress by regulation of rRNA processing.

scholarly journals Hierarchy of elements regulating synthesis of ribosomal proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 1016-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
D R Kief ◽  
J R Warner
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribonucleic Acid ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Messenger Ribonucleic Acid ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Synthesis ◽  
Stimulation Of

Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells respond to a heat shock by temporarily slowing the synthesis of ribosomal proteins (C. Gorenstein and J. R. Warner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73:1574-1551, 1976). When cultures growing oxidatively on ethanol as the sole carbon source were shifted from 23 to 36 degrees C, the synthesis of ribosomal proteins was coordinately inhibited twice as rapidly and 45% more severely than in comparable cultures growing fermentatively on glucose. Within 15 min, the relative rates of synthesis of at least 30 ribosomal proteins declined to less than one-sixth their initial values, whereas the overall rate of protein synthesis increased at least threefold. We suggest that this is due primarily to controls at the level of synthesis of messenger ribonucleic acid for ribosomal proteins but may also involve changes in messenger ribonucleic acid stability. In contrast, a nutritional shift-up causes a stimulation of the synthesis of ribosomal proteins. Experiments designed to determine the hierarchy of stimuli affecting the synthesis of these proteins demonstrated that temperature shock was dominant to glucose stimulation. When a culture growing on ethanol was shifted from 23 to 36 degrees C and glucose was added shortly afterward, the decline in ribosomal protein synthesis continued unabated. However, in wild-type cells ribosomal protein synthesis began to recover within 15 min. In mutants temperature sensitive for ribosome synthesis, e.g., rna2, there was no recovery in the synthesis of most ribosomal proteins, suggesting that the product of rna2 is essential for the production of these proteins under all vegetative conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document