scholarly journals Primary Care Physicians' Dementia Care Practices: Evidence of Geographic Variation

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Fortinsky ◽  
I. Zlateva ◽  
C. Delaney ◽  
A. Kleppinger
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Geographic Variation ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Care Practices

scholarly journals Understanding primary care-oncology relationships within a changing healthcare environment

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Tsui ◽  
Jenna Howard ◽  
Denalee O’Malley ◽  
William L. Miller ◽  
Shawna V. Hudson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Care Transitions ◽  
Formal System ◽  
The United States ◽  
Comparative Case Study ◽  
Health Care Environment ◽  
Optimal Care ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Abstract Background Management of care transitions from primary care into and out of oncology is critical for optimal care of cancer patients and cancer survivors. There is limited understanding of existing primary care-oncology relationships within the context of the changing health care environment. Methods Through a comparative case study of 14 innovative primary care practices throughout the United States (U.S.), we examined relationships between primary care and oncology settings to identify attributes contributing to strengthened relationships in diverse settings. Field researchers observed practices for 10–12 days, recording fieldnotes and conducting interviews. We created a reduced dataset of all text related to primary care-oncology relationships, and collaboratively identified patterns to characterize these relationships through an inductive “immersion/crystallization” analysis process. Results Nine of the 14 practices discussed having either formal or informal primary care-oncology relationships. Nearly all formal primary care-oncology relationships were embedded within healthcare systems. The majority of private, independent practices had more informal relationships between individual primary care physicians and specific oncologists. Practices with formal relationships noted health system infrastructure that facilitates transfer of patient information and timely referrals. Practices with informal relationships described shared commitment, trust, and rapport with specific oncologists. Regardless of relationship type, challenges reported by primary care settings included lack of clarity about roles and responsibilities during cancer treatment and beyond. Conclusions With the rapid transformation of U.S. healthcare towards system ownership of primary care practices, efforts are needed to integrate strengths of informal primary care-oncology relationships in addition to formal system driven relationships.

Educating primary care physicians in the management of Alzheimer's disease: using practice guidelines to set quality benchmarks

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S44-S52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra L. Cherry ◽  
Carol Hahn ◽  
Barbara G. Vickrey
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Care Providers

ABSTRACTThis paper presents a strategy for training primary care physicians in the identification, diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. The strategy uses evidence-based practice guidelines to establish quality benchmarks and then provides training and other interventions to improve the quality of care received by these patients. The three projects described in this paper assumed that training of primary care physicians alone would not be sufficient to achieve the quality benchmarks derived from guidelines. The projects used creative training strategies supplemented by provider “tool kits”, provider checklists, educational detailing, and endorsement from organizational leadership to reinforce what the primary care providers learned in educational sessions. Each project also implemented a system of dementia care management to “wrap around” traditional primary care to ensure that quality benchmarks would be achieved. Outcomes of two completed studies support the premise that it is possible to improve quality of dementia care through physician education that occurs in association with a coordinated system of dementia care management and in collaboration with community agencies to access guideline-recommended social services.

scholarly journals Practice Constraints, Behavioral Problems, and Dementia Care: Primary Care Physicians’ Perspectives

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1487-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ladson Hinton ◽  
Carol E. Franz ◽  
Geetha Reddy ◽  
Yvette Flores ◽  
Richard L. Kravitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Behavioral Problems ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Dementia Care

Primary Care Physicians’ Perceived Barriers to Optimal Dementia Care: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. e697-e708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise Mansfield ◽  
Natasha Noble ◽  
Rob Sanson-Fisher ◽  
Danielle Mazza ◽  
Jamie Bryant
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
System Level ◽  
Optimal Care ◽  
Quantitative Studies ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Patient Nonadherence

Abstract Background and Objectives Primary care physicians (PCPs) have a key role in providing care for people with dementia and their carers, however, a range of barriers prevent them from delivering optimal care. We reviewed studies on PCPs’ perceptions of barriers to providing optimal dementia care, including their methodological quality, whether they focused on barriers related to diagnosis and/or management, and the patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers identified. Research Design and Methods Studies were included if they were quantitative studies published since 2006 which reported on PCPs’ perceptions of the barriers to providing dementia care. The methodological quality of identified studies was assessed using an adapted version of accepted rating criteria for quantitative studies. Data were extracted from studies which were rated as “moderate” or “strong” quality. Results A total of 20 studies were identified, 16 of which were rated as “moderate” or “strong” methodological quality. Patient-related barriers included a reluctance to acknowledge cognitive decline and patient nonadherence to management plans. Provider-related barriers included a lack of training and confidence. System-related barriers included a lack of time during consultations and lack of support services. Discussion and Implications This review highlights a range of barriers to dementia diagnosis and management from studies rated as being methodologically adequate. Future studies should also utilize theory-driven approaches to exploring a comprehensive range of barriers to optimal dementia care across the care trajectory.

Geographic Variation in Medicaid Acceptance Across Michigan Primary Care Practices in the Era of the Affordable Care Act

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 633-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renuka Tipirneni ◽  
Karin V. Rhodes ◽  
Rodney A. Hayward ◽  
Richard L. Lichtenstein ◽  
HwaJung Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Geographic Variation ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Lower Baseline ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
The Affordable Care Act ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Coverage and access have improved under the Affordable Care Act, yet it is unclear whether recent gains have reached those regions within states that were most in need of improved access to care. We examined geographic variation in Medicaid acceptance among Michigan primary care practices before and after Medicaid expansion in the state, using data from a simulated patient study of primary care practices. We used logistic regression analysis with time indicators to assess regional changes in Medicaid acceptance over time. Geographic regions with lower baseline (<50%) Medicaid acceptance had significant increases in Medicaid acceptance at 4 and 8 months post-expansion, while regions with higher baseline (≥50%) Medicaid acceptance did not experience significant changes in Medicaid acceptance. As state Medicaid expansions continue to be implemented across the country, policy makers should consider the local dynamics of incentives for provider participation in Medicaid.

Enhancing the Safe and Effective Management of Chronic Pain in Accountable Care Organization Primary Care Practices in Kentucky

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selam Wubu ◽  
Laura Lee Hall ◽  
Paula Straub ◽  
Matthew J. Bair ◽  
Jill A. Marsteller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Accountable Care ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Chronic pain is a prevalent chronic condition with significant burden and economic impact in the United States. Chronic pain is particularly abundant in primary care, with an estimated 52% of chronic pain patients obtaining care from primary care physicians (PCPs). However, PCPs often lack adequate training and have limited time and resources to effectively manage chronic pain. Chronic pain management is complex in nature because of high co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders and other medical comorbidities in patients. This article describes a quality improvement initiative conducted by the American College of Physicians (ACP), in collaboration with the Kentucky ACP Chapter, and the Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, to enhance chronic pain management in 8 primary care practices participating in Accountable Care Organizations in Kentucky, with a goal of enhancing the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with chronic pain.

scholarly journals Processes and outcomes of diabetes mellitus care by different types of team primary care models

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0241516
Author(s):  
Fangjian Guo ◽  
Yu-Li Lin ◽  
Mukaila Raji ◽  
Bruce Leonard ◽  
Lin-Na Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Preventable Hospitalizations ◽  
Team Care ◽  
Outcomes Of Care ◽  
Care Practices

Background Team care improves processes and outcomes of care, especially for patients with complex medical conditions that require coordination of care. This study aimed to compare the processes and outcomes of care provided to older patients with diabetes by primary care teams comprised of only primary care physicians (PCPs) versus team care that included nurse practitioners (NPs) or physician assistants (PAs). Methods We studied 3,524 primary care practices identified via social network analysis and 306,741 patients ≥66 years old diagnosed with diabetes in or before 2015 in Medicare data. Guideline-recommended diabetes care included eye examination, hemoglobin A1c test, and nephropathy monitoring. High-risk medications were based on recommendations from the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. Preventable hospitalizations were defined as hospitalizations for a potentially preventable condition. Results Compared with patients in the PCP only teams, patients in the team care practices with NPs or PAs received more guideline-recommended diabetes care (annual eye exam: adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00–1.08), 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03–1.13), and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05–1.15), and HbA1C test: aOR: 1.11 (95% CI: 1.04–1.18), 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02–1.20), and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.06–1.25) for PCP/NP, PCP/NP/PA, and PCP/PA teams). Patients in the PCP/NP and the PCP/PA teams had a slightly higher likelihood of being prescribed high-risk medications (aOR: 1.03 (95% CI: 1.00–1.07), and 1.06 (95% CI: 1.02–1.11), respectively). The likelihood of preventable hospitalizations was similar among patients cared for by various types of practices. Conclusion The team care practices with NPs or PAs were associated with better adherence to clinical practice guideline recommendations for diabetes compared to PCP only practices. Both practices had similar outcomes. Further efforts are needed to explore new and cost-effective team-based care delivery models that improve process, outcomes, and continuity of care, as well as patient care experiences.

scholarly journals Strategies to implement SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care testing into primary care settings: a qualitative secondary analysis guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Kierkegaard ◽  
Timothy Hicks ◽  
A. Joy Allen ◽  
Yaling Yang ◽  
Gail Hayward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Professional Education ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Behaviour Change Wheel ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Willingness To Use ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Abstract Background The purpose of this study is to develop a theory-driven understanding of the barriers and facilitators underpinning physicians’ attitudes and capabilities to implementing SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care (POC) testing into primary care practices. Methods We used a secondary qualitative analysis approach to re-analyse data from a qualitative, interview study of 22 primary care physicians from 21 primary care practices across three regions in England. We followed the three-step method based on the Behaviour Change Wheel to identify the barriers to implementing SARS-CoV-2 POC testing and identified strategies to address these challenges. Results Several factors underpinned primary care physicians’ attitudes and capabilities to implement SARS-CoV-2 POC testing into practice. First, limited knowledge of the SARS-CoV-2 POC testing landscape and a demanding workload affected physicians’ willingness to use the tests. Second, there was scepticism about the insufficient evidence pertaining to the clinical efficacy and utility of POC tests, which affected physicians’ confidence in the accuracy of tests. Third, physicians would adopt POC tests if they were prescribed and recommended by authorities. Fourth, physicians required professional education and training to increase their confidence in using POC tests but also suggested that healthcare assistants should administer the tests. Fifth, physicians expressed concerns about their limited workload capacity and that extra resources are needed to accommodate any anticipated changes. Sixth, information sharing across practices shaped perceptions of POC tests and the quality of information influenced physician perceptions. Seventh, financial incentives could motivate physicians and were also needed to cover the associated costs of testing. Eighth, physicians were worried that society will view primary care as an alternative to community testing centres, which would change perceptions around their professional identity. Ninth, physicians’ perception of assurance/risk influenced their willingness to use POC testing if it could help identify infectious individuals, but they were also concerned about the risk of occupational exposure and potentially losing staff members who would need to self-isolate. Conclusions Improving primary care physicians’ knowledgebase of SARS-CoV-2 POC tests, introducing policies to embed testing into practice, and providing resources to meet the anticipated demands of testing are critical to implementing testing into practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document