scholarly journals Towards routine determination of focal mechanisms obtained from first motion P-wave arrivals

2017 ◽  
Vol 212 (3) ◽  
pp. 1665-1686 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Lentas
Keyword(s):  
P Wave ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1655-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umesh Chandra

abstract A method has been proposed for the combination of P-wave first-motion directions and S-wave polarization data for the numerical determination of earthquake focal mechanism. The method takes into account the influence of nearness of stations with inconsistent P-wave polarity observations, with respect to the assumed nodal planes. The mechanism solutions for six earthquakes selected from different geographic locations and depth ranges have been determined. Equal area projections of the nodal planes together with the P-wave first-motion and S-wave polarization data are presented for each earthquake. The quality of resolution of nodal plane determination on the basis of P-wave data, S-wave polarization, and the combination of P and S-wave data according to the present method, is discussed.


1991 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 1726-1736
Author(s):  
Susan L. Beck ◽  
Howard J. Patton

Abstract Surface waves recorded at regional distances are used to study the source parameters for three of the larger aftershocks of the 18 October 1989, Loma Prieta, California, earthquake. The short-period P-wave first-motion focal mechanisms indicate a complex aftershock sequence with a wide variety of mechanisms. Many of these events are too small for teleseismic body-wave analysis; therefore, the regional surface-waves provide important long-period information on the source parameters. Intermediate-period Rayleigh- and Love-wave spectra are inverted for the seismic moment tensor elements at a fixed depth and repeated for different depths to find the source depth that gives the best fit to the observed spectra. For the aftershock on 19 October at 10:14:35 (md = 4.2), we find a strike-slip focal mechanism with right lateral motion on a NW-trending vertical fault consistent with the mapped trace of the local faults. For the aftershock on 18 October at 10:22:04 (md = 4.4), the surface waves indicate a pure reverse fault with the nodal planes striking WNW. For the aftershock on 19 October at 09:53:50 (md = 4.4), the surface waves indicate a strike-slip focal mechanism with a NW-trending vertical nodal plane consistent with the local strike of the San Andreas fault. Differences between the surface-wave focal mechanisms and the short-period P-wave first-motion mechanisms are observed for the aftershocks analyzed. This discrepancy may reflect the real variations due to differences in the band width of the two observations. However, the differences may also be due to (1) errors in the first-motion mechanism due to incorrect near-source velocity structure and (2) errors in the surface-wave mechanisms due to inadequate propagation path corrections.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Lanza ◽  
Tobias Diehl ◽  
Nicholas Deichmann ◽  
Frederick Massin ◽  
John Clinton ◽  
...  

<p>Seismotectonic models that combine all the relevant seismotectonic data (e.g., hypocenter locations and velocity models, focal mechanisms and moment-tensors, faults, geodetic data, and in-situ/regional stress data) constitute a pre-requisite to better understand the interplay between stress, faulting and seismicity of a region. This study is a contribution to the multiannual project SeismoTeCH funded by the Swiss Geophysical Commission (SGPK) and coordinated by the University of Bern to produce an integrative seismotectonic model for the entire territory of Switzerland. In this context, our aim is to provide an up-to-date, high-quality, and consistent catalog of first-motion focal mechanisms computed by the Swiss Seismological Service (SED) since 1976. For this purpose, we developed a quality classification scheme for existing mechanisms based on a priori independent information (mainly applied to the oldest mechanisms in the catalog) combined with statistical methods such as HASH (Hardebeck and Shearer, 2002) and probabilistic source mechanisms scanner algorithms (Massin and Malcom, 2018) to probe the solution space and translate probability density functions to a discrete quality rating.</p><p>Tests on selected problematic mechanisms are also carried out in order to assess the sensitivity of the focal mechanisms to the velocity models used to calculate location and take-off angles. In particular, we compare existing solutions using the standard 3D P-wave model of the SED with solutions based on recently derived high-resolution 3D Pg+Sg models. These tests are functional to understand the benefits of developing an updated full crustal velocity model for first-motion focal mechanisms calculations, in particular in relations to the focal depths and the accuracy of take-off angles.</p><p>Finally, to improve the completeness of the existing catalog, we explore new methodologies that would incorporate automated (possibly real-time) and semi-automated techniques for expanding the calculation of first-motion focal mechanisms (and moment tensors) to events of smaller magnitude. The Anzere/Sanetschpass sequence of November 2019 is used to assess and develop these new methods. As a preliminary result of these combined efforts, we present here a high-resolution map of strain-based deformation across Switzerland. This work represents a benchmark for future regional-scale stress inversion and sets the basis for the development of a consistent, fully accessible, and dynamic focal mechanisms database for Switzerland.</p>


1964 ◽  
Vol 54 (6B) ◽  
pp. 2199-2208 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Stauder ◽  
G. A. Bollinger

Abstract The Department of Geophysics of Saint Louis University has instituted a routine program for the determination of the focal mechanism of the larger earthquakes of each year using methods developed for the use of S waves in focal mechanism studies. Suites of records from selected stations are assembled from the WWSS microfilm file for each earthquake of interest. A combination of P-wave first motion and S-wave polarization data is then used to determine graphically the mechanism of the earthquakes. Thirty-six earthquakes of 1962 were selected for study. The focal mechanism solutions are presented for twenty-three of these shocks. There is evidence of patterns characteristic of the focal mechanism of earthquakes occurring in Kamchatka, the Aleutian Islands and South America. A complete presentation of all the data and of all the solutions is available in a more lengthy report.


1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 470-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Horng Lin ◽  
S. W. Roecker

Abstract Seismograms of earthquakes and explosions recorded at local, regional, and teleseismic distances by a small-aperture, dense seismic array located on Pinyon Flat, in southern California, reveal large (±15°) backazimuth anomalies. We investigate the causes and implications of these anomalies by first comparing the effectiveness of estimating backazimuth with an array using three different techniques: the broadband frequency-wavenumber (BBFK) technique, the polarization technique, and the beamforming technique. While each technique provided nearly the same direction as a most likely estimate, the beamforming estimate was associated with the smallest uncertainties. Backazimuth anomalies were then calculated for the entire data set by comparing the results from beamforming with backazimuths derived from earthquake locations reported by the Anza and Caltech seismic networks and the Preliminary Determination of Epicenters (PDE) Bulletin. These backazimuth anomalies have a simple sinelike dependence on azimuth, with the largest anomalies observed from the southeast and northwest directions. Such a trend may be explained as the effect of one or more interfaces dipping to the northeast beneath the array. A best-fit model of a single interface has a dip and strike of 20° and 315°, respectively, and a velocity contrast of 0.82 km/sec. Application of corrections computed from this simple model to ray directions significantly improves locations at all distances and directions, suggesting that this is an upper crustal feature. We confirm that knowledge of local structure can be very important for earthquake location by an array but also show that corrections computed from simple models may not only be adequate but superior to those determined by raytracing through smoothed laterally varying models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document