2. Legal systems and sources of law

2020 ◽  
pp. 35-70
Author(s):  
Scott Slorach ◽  
Judith Embley ◽  
Peter Goodchild ◽  
Catherine Shephard

This chapter focuses on the sources of law in England & Wales, and is organised as follows. Section 2.1 describes the key jurisdictions relevant to lawyers in England and Wales. Section 2.2 deals with the issue of where the law comes from: sources of law. Section 2.3 reviews the development of the two ‘traditional’ sources of law in England and Wales: case law and statutes. Sections 2.4 and 2.5 consider the status and operation of EU and international law, including the potential effect of Brexit. Section 2.7 goes on to discuss public and private law, common law, and civil law, and other classifications used by lawyers. This is followed by a discussion of legal systems and their cultures across the world.

Author(s):  
Scott Slorach ◽  
Judith Embley ◽  
Peter Goodchild ◽  
Catherine Shephard

This chapter focuses on the sources of law in England and Wales, and is organised as follows. Section 2.1 describes the key jurisdictions relevant to lawyers in England and Wales. Section 2.2 deals with the issue of where the law comes from: sources of law. Section 2.3 reviews the development of the two ‘traditional’ sources of law in England and Wales: case law and statutes. Sections 2.4 and 2.5 consider the status and operation of EU and international law, including the potential effect of Brexit. Section 2.7 goes on to discuss public and private law, common law, and civil law, and other classifications used by lawyers. This is followed by a discussion of legal systems and their cultures across the world.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azamat Omarov ◽  
Asylbek Kultasov ◽  
Kanat Abdilov

The article discusses the features of civil law in different countries. The authors studied the origins of the modern tradition of civil law, comparing the legal systems of two European countries. One of the traditional classifications of duties in civil law is analyzed, the conclusion is made about the inappropriateness of the allocation of personal and universal duties. In comparative law, there are many situations where the same legal term has different meanings, or where different legal terms have same legal effect. This confusion most often occurs when civil lawyers have to deal with common law, or vice versa, when common law lawyers deal with civil law issues. While there are many issues which are dealt with in the same way by the civil law and common law systems, there remain also significant differences between these two legal systems related to legal structure, classification, fundamental concepts, terminology, etc. As lawyers know, legal systems in countries around the world generally fall into one of two main categories: common law systems and civil law systems. There are roughly 150 countries that have what can be described as primarily civil law systems, whereas there are about 80 common law countries. The main difference between the two systems is that in common law countries, case law – in the form of published judicial opinions – is of primary importance, whereas in civil law systems, codified statutes predominate.


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara McLaughlin Mitchell ◽  
Emilia Justyna Powell

This paper explores the relationship between domestic legal systems and the design of commitments to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Empirical analyses demonstrate that civil law states are more willing to recognize the compulsory and compromissory jurisdiction of the World Court than common law or Islamic law states. Common law states place the highest number of reservations on their optional clause declarations, with the majority of those restrictions relating to specific areas of international law. Civil law states typically embed compromissory clauses in multilateral treaties, while common and Islamic law states prefer recognition of the ICJ's jurisdiction through bilateral treaties.


Teisė ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 76-91
Author(s):  
Agnė Jakaitė

Straipsnyje analizuojama šiuo laikotarpiu aktuali sąžiningumo imperatyvo, kaip neteisėtų veiksmų nustatymo ikisutartiniuose santykiuose, taikymo problematika Lietuvos civilinės teisės ir lyginamų skirtingų jurisdikcijų kontekste. Įvertinusi šiandienes Lietuvos praktikos realijas, straipsnio autorė atskleidžia ikisutartinio sąžiningumo turinį, daug dėmesio skirdama dviejų elementų – draudimo vesti derybas neturint tikslo sudaryti sutartį ir reikalavimo nenutraukti toli pažengusių derybų be pakankamos priežasties – analizei. Kadangi Lietuvos doktrinoje šie klausimai plačiau nenagrinėti, temos analizei ir formuojamoms išvadoms pagrįsti remiamasi užsienio autorių darbais bei kitų valstybių suformuota ilgalaike teismų praktika.The author examines the imperative of good faith as the concept determining the illegal actions during the pre-contractual phase in the content of Lithuanian civil law and different continental and common law legal systems. In the view of nowadays Lithuanian realities the article defines the content of pre-contractual good faith and focuses on the analysis of two elements – the prohibition to negotiate without no real intention to conclude a contract and the requirement not to breach off the negotiations without the reasonable cause when one of the parties has a good reason to believe that the contract will be concluded. Since these issues have not been dealt before in Lithuanian doctrine, the research refers to the foreign legal articles and case law.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-180
Author(s):  
Lucas Alves Edmundo Gomes

AbstractMost legal scholars assume that there are only two “families” of legal systems in the world: common law and civil law. Briefly, common law is applied in all countries that speak the English language and has its origination from the “habits of society.” On the other hand, civil law is applied just about everywhere else, with a few exceptions, such as in tribal law areas, jurisdictions that follow Islamic law, and a few other smaller legal systems. Brazil's New Code of Civil Procedure was promulgated in 2015 and brought innovations to Brazilian law. Elements of common law were incorporated into the Brazilian legal system, particularly that of using precedent. The application of common law elements in Brazilian law is being studied by various legal specialists. This present study explains how common law can be applied in civil law jurisdictions, similar to the way it is being adapted and applied in Brazil.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav B. Panichkin ◽  
◽  
Elena V. Panichkina ◽  

The article shows three models of calculating time in relation to civil law relations on the example of several jurisdictions representing the main private legal systems of the world. The author proves that adherence to the particular order of time computation is strongly related to the reception of one of the three traditional doctrines: Roman civil, Roman natural and Anglo-American. All three procedures of use of the order of time calculating are analyzed on the example of the institute of commorientes (heirs in simultaneous death and death in quick succession). Also author depicts the evolution of Russian Law and its transition from civil to natural time calculation in relation to the rules of succession by heirs in simultaneous death and death in quick succession.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Ma - Junyu

The world is increasingly without borders which has an impact on legal services such as the world of civilization, especially notary. However, in reality there are still many intersections of legal systems that are increasingly widespread in the notary world that are included in civil law, for example, the practice of international trade has made the boundaries between legal systems increasingly thin. Including differences in the use of legal systems such as Civil Law and Common Law in each country also affects the development and type of civil law system. For example, the bookkeeping and business taxation system will be built based on certain legal systems across jurisdictional boundaries including land lease agreements for industries with foreign investors.


Author(s):  
Daniel Berkowitz ◽  
Karen B. Clay

Although political and legal institutions are essential to any nation's economic development, the forces that have shaped these institutions are poorly understood. Drawing on rich evidence about the development of the American states from the mid-nineteenth to the late twentieth century, this book documents the mechanisms through which geographical and historical conditions—such as climate, access to water transportation, and early legal systems—impacted political and judicial institutions and economic growth. The book shows how a state's geography and climate influenced whether elites based their wealth in agriculture or trade. States with more occupationally diverse elites in 1860 had greater levels of political competition in their legislature from 1866 to 2000. The book also examines the effects of early legal systems. Because of their colonial history, thirteen states had an operational civil-law legal system prior to statehood. All of these states except Louisiana would later adopt common law. By the late eighteenth century, the two legal systems differed in their balances of power. In civil-law systems, judiciaries were subordinate to legislatures, whereas in common-law systems, the two were more equal. Former civil-law states and common-law states exhibit persistent differences in the structure of their courts, the retention of judges, and judicial budgets. Moreover, changes in court structures, retention procedures, and budgets occur under very different conditions in civil-law and common-law states. This book illustrates how initial geographical and historical conditions can determine the evolution of political and legal institutions and long-run growth.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Padraic Kenna

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to outline and examine the growing corpus of housing rights and assess their relevance and applicability to complex contemporary housing systems across the world.Design/methodology/approachThe paper sets out the principal instruments and commentaries on housing rights developed by the United Nations, regional and other bodies. It assesses their relevance in the context of contemporary analysis of housing systems, organized and directed by networks of legal and other professionals within particular domains.FindingsHousing rights instruments are accepted by all States across the world at the level of international law, national constitutions and laws. The findings suggest that there are significant gaps in the international law conception and framework of housing rights, and indeed, human rights generally, which create major obstacles for the effective implementation of these rights. There is a preoccupation with one element of housing systems, that of subsidized or social housing. However, effective housing rights implementation requires application at meso‐, micro‐ and macro‐levels of modern, dynamic housing systems as a whole. Epistemic communities of professionals develop and shape housing law and policy within these domains. The housing rights paradigm must be further fashioned for effective translation into contemporary housing systems.Research limitations/implicationsThe development of housing rights precedents, both within international and national law, is leading to a wide and diffuse corpus of legislation and case law. More research is needed on specific examples of effective coupling between housing rights and elements of housing systems.Originality/valueThis paper offers housing policy makers and lawyers an avenue into the extensive jurisprudence and writings on housing rights, which will inevitably become part of the lexicon of housing law across the world. It also highlights the limitations of housing rights implementation, but offers some new perspectives on more effective application of these rights.


Global Jurist ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Terranova

AbstractLegal transplants are considered a significant factor in the evolution of legal systems. One example of transplant of a legal institution through its prestige is the diffusion of the trust from the English legal system to other common law systems and to many civil law countries. One of these is China that in 2001 enacted the Trust Law of the People’s Republic of China. This paper wants to analyse the trust under the Trust Law and to compare it with the original model in the English legal system, understanding how far or how close it is from the original one.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document