scholarly journals Predictors of Sustained Response With Tofacitinib Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J Sandborn ◽  
Alessandro Armuzzi ◽  
Giuseppina Liguori ◽  
Peter M Irving ◽  
Ala I Sharara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Sustained Response ◽  
Sustained Remission ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Robust Response

Abstract Background Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. We evaluate baseline characteristics as predictors of sustained response and remission in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving tofacitinib maintenance therapy. Methods Patients with clinical response following OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 entered OCTAVE Sustain and were rerandomized to receive tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or placebo. Baseline characteristics were stratified by week 52 efficacy endpoints (remission, sustained remission, clinical response, sustained clinical response). Associations between baseline characteristics and efficacy endpoints were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. Results Overall, 170 of 487 (34.9%) patients were in remission at week 52. In multivariable modeling, endoscopic subscore at baseline of OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 (2 vs 3; odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.44]), partial Mayo score (<2 vs ≥2; OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.27-2.90), and age (per 10-years; OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39) at baseline of OCTAVE Sustain (following 8 weeks’ tofacitinib induction therapy) were associated with higher odds of remission at week 52. Oral corticosteroid use (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.96) and C-reactive protein (per unit; OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99) at baseline of OCTAVE Sustain were associated with reduced likelihood of remission at week 52. In general, opposite associations were observed for time to loss of response. Conclusion Patients with greater clinical improvement after 8 weeks of tofacitinib induction therapy are more likely to maintain response or remission with tofacitinib regardless of dose received during maintenance, highlighting the importance of a robust response to induction therapy.

scholarly journals P663 Efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis after previous ineffective biological therapies

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S545-S546
Author(s):  
M Rutka ◽  
K Farkas ◽  
D Pigniczki ◽  
K Szántó ◽  
B Anita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background Tofacitinib (TFC) is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor, which was recently approved for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of the current real-life study was to determine efficacy of TFC induction therapy regarding the clinical response and remission in patients with active UC. We evaluated short-term efficacy data in a Hungarian cohort with prior exposure to other biological agents such as anti-TNF drugs and vedolizumab. Methods In this single-centre retrospective study, patients with TFC introduction were included. Since January 2019, a total of 16 patients received an oral TFC induction therapy in a dose of 10 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Endoscopic activity was evaluated by endoscopic Mayo (eMayo) score before the introduction of TFC and in case of an inadequate therapeutic response to the 5-mg-therapy to confirm therapeutic decision-making. Based on the evaluation of clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters, we either kept the dosage or reduced the dose to 5 mg according to local regulations. We also collected data from the 16. and 24. weeks of the therapy. Primary endpoints were a clinical response (as a reduction in partial Mayo Score [pMayo] by minimum 3 points) or remission (as a Mayo score of the maximum of 2 points and without blood in stool) at week 8. Results Sixteen patients had received the induction therapy (mean age: 36 years, 7 males and 9 females) in our centre. After 8 weeks, 12 (75%) patients responded to the TFC induction therapy and 6 (37.5%) of them were in remission. Four patients were primary non-responders (25%). Corticosteroid therapy (18 ± 7 mg) was required during the induction in 4 responder cases, which could be stepped down by week 8. As a continuous maintenance therapy, 4 patients have already reached the 16th week and 8 have completed the 24th week. By the end of the follow-up, 12 patients responded and 10 was in remission. During the observation period, 3 patients had to remain on 10 mg TFC dose, 6 patients required dose escalation from 5 mg to 10 mg and 5 mg was sufficient in case of only 3 patients after the introduction. Endoscopic activity showed a moderate decrease from 2.5 ± 0.5 eMayo score to 2 ± 1 (n = 7) until week 16. In respect the responder patients, CRP levels decreased from the mean of 7.23 to 5.02. No serious side-effects were observed during the follow-up. Conclusion After the 8-week TFC induction therapy, the response rate was high and only every fourth patients were non-responder. A low number of patients had adequate reactions to the 5 mg-therapy after the introduction, but TFC is effective with dose-escalation in respect of clinical response and remission in patients with UC, who have had an inadequate response to previous biological therapy.

scholarly journals Clinical Response and Complications are not Associated with Drug Levels in Patients with Severe Ulcerative Colitis on IV Cyclosporine Induction Therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1291-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parita Patel ◽  
Andres Yarur ◽  
Sushila Dalal ◽  
Atsuhi Sakuraba ◽  
David T Rubin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Drug Levels ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Steroid Refractory

Abstract Background IV ciclosporin therapy is effective in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The optimal drug level to achieve response and minimize complications during induction therapy is not known. Aim The primary aim was to evaluate if serum ciclosporin drug levels are associated with increased risk of colectomy within 90 days of hospitalization. Secondary aims were to determine if ciclosporin levels are associated with avoidance of colectomy at 7 and 30 days, if ciclosporin levels are associated with drug-related and postoperative complications, and if patient-specific factors are associated with response to ciclosporin. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 81 hospitalized patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis treated with ciclosporin. Risk factors for colectomy within 7, 30, and 90 days, medication-specific and postoperative complications were compared by first, mean, and peak ciclosporin level during IV induction therapy. Results There were 47 patients (58%) who underwent surgery. There were no differences between initial, mean, and peak ciclosporin levels among responders and nonresponders and treatment-related or postoperative complications. Responders within 90 days had lower C-reactive-protein levels (20mg/L vs. 38mg/L, P = 0.01), lower serum albumin concentrations (3.4g/dL vs. 3.7g/dL, P = 0.03), and higher rates of kidney injury (50% vs 17%, P = 0.002). Conclusion Initial, mean, and peak serum levels of ciclosporin did not correlate with response or toxicity. However, C-reactive-protein levels levels and kidney injury may be helpful in predicting clinical response to ciclosporin.

scholarly journals OP24 Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib induction therapy in patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results from the phase 3 U-ACHIEVE study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S022-S024
Author(s):  
S Danese ◽  
S Vermeire ◽  
W Zhou ◽  
A Pangan ◽  
J Siffledeen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Remission ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Background An unmet therapeutic need remains in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). U-ACHIEVE is one of two phase 3 induction trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of the selective Janus kinase–1 inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) 45 mg once daily (QD) in adults with UC. Methods U-ACHIEVE is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo (PBO)–controlled trial (NCT02819635) that randomized patients with moderately to severely active UC 2:1 to UPA 45 mg QD or PBO for 8 weeks. Patients were stratified by response to biologic therapy (inadequate vs non–inadequate responder), baseline corticosteroid use (yes or no), and baseline adapted Mayo score (≤7 or >7). The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving clinical remission (per adapted Mayo Score) at week 8.Ranked secondary endpoints included endoscopic improvement, endoscopic remission, and clinical response per adapted Mayo Score at week 8; clinical response per partial adapted Mayo Score at week 2; and histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement at week 8. Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputations for missing data due to COVID-19 are reported. Safety was assessed through week 8. Results 474 patients were randomized (UPA, n=319; PBO, n=155). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups (Table 1). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving UPA (26.1%) vs PBO (4.8%) achieved clinical remission at week 8 (adjusted treatment difference [95% CI], 21.6% [15.8, 27.4]; P<0.001; Figure 1). For all ranked secondary endpoints, UPA was superior to PBO (P<0.001; Figure 1). A significant difference in clinical response favouring UPA vs PBO was seen as early as week 2 (60.1% vs 27.3%) and was sustained over 8 weeks (79.0% vs 41.6%; Figure 2). There were more serious adverse events (AEs), severe AEs, and AEs leading to study drug discontinuation with PBO (Table 2). The most common AEs were acne, creatine phosphokinase elevation, and nasopharyngitis with UPA and worsening of UC and anaemia with PBO. Incidence of serious infection was similar between UPA and PBO. Neutropenia and lymphopenia were reported more frequently with UPA vs PBO (Table 2).No adjudicated gastrointestinal perforation, major cardiovascular AEs, or thrombotic events and no active tuberculosis, malignancy, or deaths were reported. Conclusion In patients with moderately to severely active UC, UPA 45 mg QD induction therapy was superior to PBO in inducing clinical remission/response, and endoscopic remission/response over 8 weeks; responses were significant and rapid. UPA 45 mg QD was well tolerated; safety was comparable with the known safety profile of UPA, and no new safety signals were identified.

P403 Post hoc examination of VISIBLE 1 data for baseline predictors of response to 2 or 3 IV doses of vedolizumab for adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S372-S373
Author(s):  
W Sandborn ◽  
E V Loftus ◽  
F Baert ◽  
J Jansson ◽  
J Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Severe Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Disease Characteristics ◽  
Predictors Of Response ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Disease Location ◽  
Baseline Demographic

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective α 4β 7 integrin monoclonal antibody approved for IV administration for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The phase 3 VISIBLE 1 study evaluated SC VDZ for UC maintenance therapy. After 2 IV doses, 56.1% patients had a clinical response at week 6; among patients who received a third induction infusion, clinical response rates were 79.7%. In this post hoc analysis, we examined baseline characteristics as predictors of clinical response to IV induction with VDZ. Methods In the VISIBLE 1 study (NCT02611830; EudraCT 2015-000480-14), patients (patients) received IV VDZ 300 mg at Weeks 0 and 2. At Week 6, clinical responders were randomised to maintenance SC therapy; nonresponders were given a third IV dose and reassessed at Week 14. As endoscopy was only available at Week 6, the clinical response at Week 6 was defined as ≥3 points and ≥30% reduction in complete Mayo score from Week 0 and at Week 14 as a ≥2 points and ≥25% reduction in partial Mayo score from Week 0. Both definitions also included an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 or absolute subscore ≤1. Results Overall, 383 patients received ≥1 dose of IV VDZ. Of these, 56.1% responded at Week 6 after 2 VDZ doses. Of the 143 patients who received 3 IV doses, 79.7% responded at Week 14. No clinically meaningful differences in baseline demographic and disease characteristics were observed between patients who responded after 2 or 3 IV doses (Table). Differences in disease location and partial Mayo score (< or ≥6) were observed between the responders and nonresponders in the 3 IV dose group. Baseline characteristics were evaluated descriptively to assess predictors of clinical response after 2 or 3 IV VDZ doses. Conclusion Clinical response was achieved by most patients after either 2 or 3 IV VDZ infusions in the VISIBLE 1 trial. Post hoc analyses revealed no clinically meaningful differences in baseline characteristics or disease characteristics that could serve as predictors of response following 2 or 3 VDZ infusions. Further real-world experience may elucidate potential predictors of response to VDZ.

scholarly journals DOP01 Efficacy and safety of the IL-6 trans-signalling inhibitor olamkicept: a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial in moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S041-S042
Author(s):  
B Chen ◽  
S Zhang ◽  
B Wang ◽  
H Chen ◽  
Y Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Active Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background Total inhibition of IL-6 or its receptor represents a potent anti-inflammatory therapy with considerable side effects. Selective targeting IL-6 trans-signalling may have safety advantages that differentiates it from current pan-IL-6 inhibitors. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of olamkicept, a soluble gp130-Fc fusion protein that binds to the IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor complex, as induction therapy for active ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods This multi-national, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (NCT03235752) enrolled patients with active UC (full Mayo score ≥5, rectal bleeding (RB) score ≥1, endoscopy score (ES) ≥2) with an inadequate response to at least conventional therapy, in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either placebo, olamkicept 300 mg or 600 mg biweekly for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response (decrease in Mayo score from baseline ≥3 and ≥30%, including RB ≤1 or RB decrease ≥1) at week 12. Secondary endpoints were mucosal healing (ES 0 or 1) and clinical remission (Mayo score ≤2, with no subscore >1 and RB=0). The efficacy endpoints were analysed by logistic regression. All p-values were 2-sided without adjustment for multiplicity. Results Of 91 treated patients (30 in placebo, 31 in olamkicept 300 mg group and 30 in 600 mg group), 88 patients (29:30:29) were evaluable for efficacy. Baseline disease and demographic characteristics were similar among the groups (Table 1). Most patients (94.5%) were bio-naïve. The percentage of patients achieving clinical response at week 12 was significantly greater for olamkicept 600 mg than placebo (58.6% vs 34.5%, P=0.032). Clinical remission at week 12 occurred in 0% (placebo), 6.7% (olamkicept 300 mg) and 20.7% (olamkicept 600 mg, P<0.001) of patients. Mucosal healing at week 12 occurred in 3.4%, 10% and 34.5% (P<0.001) of patients, respectively (Figure 1). Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar across the groups. The most common TEAEs included upper respiratory tract infection, increased AST levels, and increased urine bilirubin levels, which were mild to moderate and mostly transient. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 6.7%, 3.2% and 3.3% of patients, respectively. There were no deaths, or other severe AEs associated with current IL-6 inhibitors, such as perforations, severe infections, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Conclusion Biweekly 600 mg olamkicept induction therapy demonstrated clinical efficacy with respect to achieving clinical response, clinical remission and mucosal healing in patients with active UC. Olamkicept was well tolerated with a favourable safety profile. The positive results of this phase 2 study support further development of olamkicept in IBD.

scholarly journals OP34 AJM300, an Oral Antagonist of α4-Integrin, as induction therapy for patients with Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S031-S032
Author(s):  
M Watanabe ◽  
K Matsuoka ◽  
T Ohmori ◽  
K Nakajima ◽  
T Ishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Active Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Endoscopic Remission ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background AJM300 (INN; carotegrast methyl), an orally active small molecule antagonist of the α4 subunit of α4β1/α4β7 integrins, demonstrated the efficacy and safety in patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC) in a phase 2 study. The phase 3 study (NCT 03531892) of AJM300 as induction therapy was conducted in patients with moderately active UC. Methods Eligible patients were moderately active Japanese UC, defined as total Mayo Clinic scores (MCS) of 6–10, endoscopic subscores (ES) ≥2, and rectal bleeding subscores (RBS) ≥1, who had inadequate response or intolerance to oral 5-ASA. Followed by a 2-week single-blind placebo (PBO) run-in phase, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive AJM300 960 mg or PBO 3 times daily for 8 weeks. Responders or remitters were allowed to receive AJM300 960 mg again at the subsequent relapse (open-label). The primary endpoint was clinical response at week 8, defined as reduction of the MCS of ≥3-pts and ≥30%, reduction in RBS of ≥1-pt or RBS of ≤1, and ES ≤1. Results The randomized 203 patients had moderately active endoscopic evidence at baseline with median UC duration of 6.1 years and MCS of 7.8. For the primary endpoint, 45.1% (46/102) and 20.8% (21/101) of patients in the AJM300 and PBO groups, respectively, achieved clinical response at week 8 (OR=3.30 [95% CI, 1.73–6.29]; p=0.0003). Symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement and endoscopic remission were also statistically significant for AJM300 vs PBO (Table). In case of episodic AJM300 treatment, AJM300 exhibited similar response to initial treatment. Overall, the incidence of AEs and serious AEs were similar between AJM300 and PBO. There were no deaths or cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Conclusion AJM300 induced clinical response as well as endoscopic remission with good tolerability. AJM300 may become a novel therapeutic option for patients who had inadequate response or intolerance to oral 5-ASA.

scholarly journals MODERATE TO SEVERE ENDOSCOPIC INFLAMMATION IS FREQUENT AFTER ACHIEVING CLINICAL REMISSION IN PEDIATRIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S13-S13
Author(s):  
Chen Sarbagili-Shabat ◽  
Dror Weiner ◽  
Joram Wardi ◽  
Lee Abramas ◽  
Michal Yaakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Sustained Remission ◽  
High Relapse Rate ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by low sustained remission rates and frequent extension of disease even if clinical remission is obtained with therapy. Moderate to severe endoscopic activity is a risk factor for relapse while evidence regarding early mucosal healing or persistence of inflammation after remission in children is not available. Our aim was to evaluate if persistence of significant inflammation is common and could explain the high relapse rate in pediatric UC. Methods Pediatric UC patients with clinical remission, defined as pediatric UC activity index (PUCAI) scores < 10, were prospectively assessed for mucosal healing by endoscopy 3–5 months after remission was documented. Mayo score was assessed for each segment by a blinded adult gastroenterologist using central reading. Symptomatic patients prior to sigmoidoscopy were excluded Sustained remission was assessed retrospectively at 18 months follow-up. Results Forty-six children were enrolled, 28 children in continuous clinical remission at time of sigmoidoscopy were included in the final analysis. Mayo 0 was present in 12/28 (42.86%), Mayo 1 in 2/28 (7.1%) and Mayo 2–3 in 14/28 (50.0%) endoscopies. Among 23/28 patients with follow-up through 18 months, remission was sustained in 2/11 (18.18%) of patients with Mayo 2 and 3 versus 6/12 (50.0%) with Mayo score 0–1. Conclusion Over 50% of children assessed for mucosal healing 3–5 months after clinical remission is obtained have residual disease activity, primarily moderate to severe inflammation which was associated with lower sustained remission. Early sigmoidoscopy after clinical remission for assessment of mucosal disease should be considered in pediatric UC.

scholarly journals P325 Real-World Effectiveness And Safety Of Ustekinumab In Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Multi-Centre Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S349-S350
Author(s):  
D Parakkal ◽  
A Johnson ◽  
M Fenster ◽  
G Ramos ◽  
M Zulqarnain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Real World ◽  
Drug Level ◽  
Previous Exposure ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Endoscopic Remission

Abstract Background Pivotal trials have shown that ustekinumab (UST) is effective in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the population included in these trials do not always represent the cohort of patients treated in the “real world”. In this study, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of UST in a clinical cohort of patients with UC Methods We performed a multi-center cohort study and included patients with active UC starting UST. Variables collected included demographics, previous and current UC medications, disease activity (measured using partial and endoscopic Mayo score [PMS and EMS]) at 8 weeks, 6 months and end of follow-up. We also abstracted UST drug level and anti-UST antibodies (AUA), albumin and C-reactive protein levels. Primary outcomes were clinical response at week 8 defined as a reduction of 3 points in the PMS or PMS<2. Secondary outcomes were clinical remission defined as a PMS <2 and endoscopic remission defined as a MES ≤1, and the development of an adverse event (AE) attributed to UST. Results Ninety-five patients were included with a median age of 42 years (IQR:32-57) and 53 (56%) were female. Median follow-up was 5 months (IQR:2.2-7.4). Only 4 (4.3%) were naïve to biologics or tofacitinib and 62 (66%) had previous exposure to at least 2 other biologics. No variables were found to be associated with response at week 8 (Figure 2). Those patients who responded at week 8 had higher median albumin levels vs those who did not (median of 4.4 [IQR: 4.1-4.6] vs 4.1 g/dL [IQR:3.8-4.3]; p=0.02). There were no differences in baseline CRP levels (1mg/dL [IQR:0.6-2.8] vs 0.6 mg/dL [0.3-1.5]; p=0.06). Among the 33 patients who had follow-up endoscopic assessment, 7 (21.2%) had achieved endoscopic remission and 4 (12%) achieved histologic remission. Median UST level was 4.1 mcg/ml (IQR:2.5-5.1) and no patients had detectable AUA. Five patients underwent colectomy (5.3%). Only 6 patients (6.6%) presented with an AE (all minor that included, rash, headaches, arthralgias and infection). Conclusion In a population enriched with refractory UC, UST was well tolerated and induce response and remission in a significant number of patients. The rate of response was lower in obese patients and those with extensive colitis but was not associated with previous exposure to biologics and/or tofacitinib. Larger studies with a longer follow-up are warranted. Figure 1: Rates of clinical response and remission in patients with UC receiving ustekinumab Figure 2: Association between several baseline characteristics and response to ustekinumab in UC

scholarly journals OP33 Oral ritlecitinib and brepocitinib in patients with Moderate to Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis: Data from the VIBRATO umbrella study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S030-S031
Author(s):  
W Sandborn ◽  
S Danese ◽  
J Leszczyszyn ◽  
J Romatowski ◽  
E Altintas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Rectal Bleeding ◽  
Active Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Dose Response Relationship ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Adult Participants ◽  
Respective Treatment ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of oral ritlecitinib (JAK3/TEC inhibitor) and brepocitinib (TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor) were assessed in a 32-week Phase 2b induction-maintenance umbrella study (VIBRATO) in participants with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis who had inadequate or loss of response, or intolerance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, or biologic therapies. We report efficacy and safety results from the 8-week induction period of the VIBRATO study. Methods Adult participants with Total Mayo Score ≥6 and centrally-read Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥1 were randomised to receive oral ritlecitinib 20, 70, or 200 mg; brepocitinib 10, 30, or 60 mg; or placebo once-daily (QD) for 8 weeks. Participants then continued in their respective treatment cohorts to receive ritlecitinib 50 mg or brepocitinib 30 mg QD for 24 weeks. The proportions of patients who achieved remission (Total Mayo Score ≤2; no individual subscore >1; rectal bleeding subscore 0), modified remission (Modified Mayo Score: Total Mayo without Physician’s Global Assessment; stool frequency subscore ≤1; rectal bleeding subscore 0; endoscopic subscore ≤1), or endoscopic improvement (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1) were analysed. Results 319 participants were randomised: baseline mean (standard deviation [SD]) age 40.3 (13.8) years; mean (SD) Total Mayo Score 9.0 (1.5); and median (range) disease duration 4.8 (0.24, 36.5) years. Ritlecitinib and brepocitinib were generally safe and well tolerated. At Week 8, a dose–response relationship was observed across all efficacy endpoints for ritlecitinib and brepocitinib. The proportions of participants achieving remission were significantly higher (P<0.05) with ritlecitinib 70 and 200 mg and brepocitinib 30 and 60 mg vs placebo (Figure 1). The proportions of participants achieving endoscopic improvement and modified remission were significantly higher in all ritlecitinib and brepocitinib groups vs placebo (Figures 2 and 3). Conclusion Ritlecitinib 70 and 200 mg QD and brepocitinib 30 and 60 mg QD demonstrated significant improvement in remission, modified remission, and endoscopic improvement in participants with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document