scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 infectivity correlates with high viral loads and detection of viral antigen and is terminated by seroconversion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Buder ◽  
Markus Bauswein ◽  
Clara L Magnus ◽  
Franz Audebert ◽  
Henriette Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Viral Antigen ◽  
Virus Isolation ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Public Health Perspective ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Restrictive Measures

Abstract Background From a public health perspective, effective containment strategies for SARS-CoV-2 should be balanced with individual liberties. Methods We collected 79 respiratory samples from 59 patients monitored in an outpatient center or in the intensive care unit of the University Hospital Regensburg. We analyzed viral load by quantitative real-time PCR, viral antigen by point-of-care assay, time since onset of symptoms and presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the context of virus isolation from respiratory specimen. Results The odds ratio for virus isolation increased 1.9-fold for each log10 level of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and 7.4-fold with detection of viral antigen, while it decreased 6.3-fold beyond 10 days of symptoms and 20.0-fold with presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The latter was confirmed for B.1.1.7 strains. The positive predictive value for virus isolation was 60.0% for viral loads above 10 7 RNA copies/mL and 50.0% for the presence of viral antigen. Symptom onset before 10 days and seroconversion predicted lack of infectivity with 93.8% and 96.0%. Conclusions Our data support quarantining patients with high viral load and detection of viral antigen, and lifting restrictive measures with increasing time to symptom onset and seroconversion. Delay of antibody formation may prolong infectivity.

scholarly journals Feasibility and Effectiveness Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Antigenic Tests in Mass Screening of a Pediatric Population and Correlation with the Kinetics of Viral Loads

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2071
Author(s):  
Marcello Lanari ◽  
Giovanni Battista Biserni ◽  
Matteo Pavoni ◽  
Eva Caterina Borgatti ◽  
Marta Leone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Mass Screening ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Baseline Sensitivity ◽  
Viral Loads

The gold standard for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT). However, rapid antigen detection kits (Ag-RDTs), may offer advantages over NAAT in mass screening, generating results in minutes, both as laboratory-based test or point-of-care (POC) use for clinicians, at a lower cost. We assessed two different POC Ag-RDTs in mass screening versus NAAT for SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of pediatric patients admitted to the Pediatric Emergency Unit of IRCCS—Polyclinic of Sant’Orsola, Bologna (from November 2020 to April 2021). All patients were screened with nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2-RNA and for antigen tests. Results were obtained from 1146 patients. The COVID-19 Ag FIA kit showed a baseline sensitivity of 53.8% (CI 35.4–71.4%), baseline specificity 99.7% (CI 98.4–100%) and overall accuracy of 80% (95% CI 0.68–0.91); the AFIAS COVID-19 Ag kit, baseline sensitivity of 86.4% (CI 75.0–93.9%), baseline specificity 98.3% (CI 97.1–99.1%) and overall accuracy of 95.3% (95% CI 0.92–0.99). In both tests, some samples showed very low viral load and negative Ag-RDT. This disagreement may reflect the positive inability of Ag-RDTs of detecting antigen in late phase of infection. Among all cases with positive molecular test and negative antigen test, none showed viral loads > 106 copies/mL. Finally, we found one false Ag-RDTs negative result (low cycle thresholds; 9 × 105 copies/mL). Our results suggest that both Ag-RDTs showed good performances in detection of high viral load samples, making it a feasible and effective tool for mass screening in actively infected children.

scholarly journals A novel RT-LAMP workflow for rapid salivary diagnostics of COVID-19 and effects of age, gender and time from symptom onset

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerson Shigeru Kobayashi ◽  
Luciano Abreu Brito ◽  
Danielle De Paula Moreira ◽  
Angela May Suzuki ◽  
Gabriella Shih Ping Hsia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Rapid Diagnostics ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Peak Viral Load ◽  
Salivary Diagnostics

Objectives: Rapid diagnostics is pivotal to curb SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and saliva has emerged as a practical alternative to naso/oropharyngeal (NOP) specimens. We aimed to develop a direct RT-LAMP workflow for viral detection in saliva, and to provide more information regarding its potential in COVID-19 diagnostics. Methods: Clinical and contrived specimens were used to screen/optimize formulations and sample processing protocols. Salivary viral load was determined in symptomatic patients to evaluate clinical performance (n = 90) and to characterize saliva based on age, gender and time from onset of symptoms (n = 49). Results: The devised workflow achieved 93.2% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 0.895 Kappa for salivas containing >102 copies/μL. Further analyses in saliva showed peak viral load in the first days of symptoms and lower viral loads in females, particularly among young individuals (<38 years). NOP RT-PCR data did not yield relevant associations. Conclusions: This novel saliva RT-LAMP workflow can be applied to point-of-care testing. This work reinforces that saliva better correlates with transmission dynamics than NOP specimens, and reveals gender differences that may reflect higher transmission by males. To maximize detection, testing should be done immediately after symptom onset, especially in females.

scholarly journals Salivary SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection: a prospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Basso ◽  
Ada Aita ◽  
Andrea Padoan ◽  
Chiara Cosma ◽  
Filippo Navaglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Antigen Detection ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Pharyngeal Swab ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Optimal Value ◽  
Antigen Testing ◽  
Limited Sensitivity

AbstractBackgroundSARS-CoV-2 quick testing and reporting are now considered relevant for the containment of new pandemic waves. Antigen testing in self-collected saliva might be useful. We compared the diagnostic performance of salivary and naso-pharyngeal swab (NPS) SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection by a rapid chemiluminescent assay (CLEIA) and two different point-of-care (POC) immunochromatographic assays, with that of molecular testing.Methods234 patients were prospectively enrolled. Paired self-collected saliva (Salivette) and NPS were obtained to perform rRT-PCR, chemiluminescent (Lumipulse G) and POC (NPS: Fujirebio and Abbott; saliva: Fujirebio) for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection.ResultsThe overall agreement between NPS and saliva rRT-PCR was 78.7%, reaching 91.7% at the first week from symptoms onset. SARS-CoV-2 CLEIA antigen was highly accurate in distinguishing between positive and negative NPS (ROC-AUC=0.939, 95%CI:0.903-0.977), with 81.6% sensitivity and 93.8% specificity. This assay on saliva had an overall good accuracy (ROC-AUC=0.805, 95%CI:0.740-0.870), reaching the optimal value within 7 days from symptom onset (Sensitivity: 72%; Specificity: 97%). POC antigen in saliva had a very limited sensitivity (13%), performing better in NPS (Sensitivity: 48% and 66%; Specificity: 100% and 99% for Espline and Abbott respectively), depending on viral loads.ConclusionsSelf-collected saliva is a valid alternative to NPS for SARS-CoV-2 detection not only by molecular, but also by CLEIA antigen testing, for which the highest diagnostic accuracy was achieved in the first week from symptom onset. Saliva is not suitable for POC, although the accuracy of these tests appears satisfactory for NPS with high viral load.

scholarly journals Performance of the Innova SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid lateral flow test in the Liverpool asymptomatic testing pilot: population based cohort study

BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta García-Fiñana ◽  
David M Hughes ◽  
Christopher P Cheyne ◽  
Girvan Burnside ◽  
Mark Stockbridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Flow Test ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Lateral Flow Test

Abstract Objective To assess the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid lateral flow test (LFT) versus polymerase chain reaction testing in the asymptomatic general population attending testing centres. Design Observational cohort study. Setting Community LFT pilot at covid-19 testing sites in Liverpool, UK. Participants 5869 asymptomatic adults (≥18 years) voluntarily attending one of 48 testing sites during 6-29 November 2020. Interventions Participants were tested using both an Innova LFT and a quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test based on supervised self-administered swabbing at testing sites. Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of LFT compared with RT-qPCR in an epidemic steady state of covid-19 among adults with no classic symptoms of the disease. Results Of 5869 test results, 22 (0.4%) LFT results and 343 (5.8%) RT-qPCR results were void (that is, when the control line fails to appear within 30 minutes). Excluding the void results, the LFT versus RT-qPCR showed a sensitivity of 40.0% (95% confidence interval 28.5% to 52.4%; 28/70), specificity of 99.9% (99.8% to 99.99%; 5431/5434), positive predictive value of 90.3% (74.2% to 98.0%; 28/31), and negative predictive value of 99.2% (99.0% to 99.4%; 5431/5473). When the void samples were assumed to be negative, a sensitivity was observed for LFT of 37.8% (26.8% to 49.9%; 28/74), specificity of 99.6% (99.4% to 99.8%; 5431/5452), positive predictive value of 84.8% (68.1% to 94.9%; 28/33), and negative predictive value of 93.4% (92.7% to 94.0%; 5431/5814). The sensitivity in participants with an RT-qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) of <18.3 (approximate viral loads >10 6 RNA copies/mL) was 90.9% (58.7% to 99.8%; 10/11), a Ct of <24.4 (>10 4 RNA copies/mL) was 69.4% (51.9% to 83.7%; 25/36), and a Ct of >24.4 (<10 4 RNA copies/mL) was 9.7% (1.9% to 23.7%; 3/34). LFT is likely to detect at least three fifths and at most 998 in every 1000 people with a positive RT-qPCR test result with high viral load. Conclusions The Innova LFT can be useful for identifying infections among adults who report no symptoms of covid-19, particularly those with high viral load who are more likely to infect others. The number of asymptomatic adults with lower Ct (indicating higher viral load) missed by LFT, although small, should be considered when using single LFT in high consequence settings. Clear and accurate communication with the public about how to interpret test results is important, given the chance of missing some cases, even at high viral loads. Further research is needed to understand how infectiousness is reflected in the viral antigen shedding detected by LFT versus the viral loads approximated by RT-qPCR.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 Persistence in Immunocompromised Children

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Dolan ◽  
Jean Mulcahy Levy ◽  
Angla Moss ◽  
Kelly Pearce ◽  
Samuel Dominguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Immunosuppressive Treatment ◽  
Viral Persistence ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Mild Disease ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Diagnostic Panel ◽  
Event Times

Introduction/Objectives: We evaluated the length of time immunocompromised children (ICC) remain positive for SARS-CoV-2, identified factors associated with viral persistence and determined cycle threshold (CT) values of children with viral persistence as a surrogate of viral load. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ICC at a pediatric hospital from March 2020-2021. Immunocompromised status was defined as primary, secondary or acquired due to medical comorbidities/immunosuppressive treatment. The primary outcome was time to first-of-two consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests at least 24 hours apart. Testing of sequential clinical specimens from the same subject was conducted using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel assay. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curve median event times and log-rank-sum tests were used to compare outcomes between groups. Results: Ninety-one children met inclusion criteria. Median age was 15.5 years (IQR 8-18 yrs), 64% were male, 58% were white, and 43% were Hispanic/Latinx. Most (67%) were tested in outpatient settings and 58% were asymptomatic. The median time to two negative tests was 42 days (IQR 25.0,55.0), with no differences in median time by illness presentation or level of immunosuppression. Seven children had >1 sample available for repeat testing, and 5/7 (71%) children had initial CT values of <30, (moderate to high viral load); 4 children had CT values of <30 3-4 weeks later, suggesting persistent moderate to high viral loads. Conclusions: Most ICC with SARS-CoV-2 infection had mild disease, with prolonged viral persistence >6 weeks and moderate to high viral load.

scholarly journals Clinical performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in point of care usage in comparison to RT-qPCR

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabell Wagenhaeuser ◽  
Kerstin Knies ◽  
Vera Rauschenberger ◽  
Michael Eisenmann ◽  
Miriam McDonogh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Protein Variant ◽  
Atypical Symptoms

Background Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 are fast, broadly available, and inexpensive. Despite this, reliable clinical performance data is sparse. Methods In a prospective performance evaluation study, RDT from three manufacturers (NADAL, Panbio, MEDsan) were compared to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in 5 068 oropharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a hospital setting. Viral load was derived from standardized RT-qPCR Cycle threshold (Ct) values. The data collection period ranged from November 12, 2020 to February 28, 2021. Findings Overall, sensitivity of RDT compared to RT-qPCR was 42.57% (95% CI 33.38%-52.31%), and specificity 99.68% (95% CI 99.48%-99.80%). Sensitivity declined with decreasing viral load from 100% in samples with a deduced viral load of 10^8 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per ml to 8.82% in samples with a viral load lower than 104 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per ml. No significant differences in sensitivity or specificity could be observed between the three manufacturers, or between samples with and without spike protein variant B.1.1.7. The NPV in the study cohort was 98.84%; the PPV in persons with typical COVID-19 symptoms was 97.37%, and 28.57% in persons without or with atypical symptoms. Interpretation RDT are a reliable method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in persons with high viral load. RDT are a valuable addition to RT-qPCR testing, as they reliably detect infectious persons with high viral loads before RT-qPCR results are available. Funding German Federal Ministry for Education and Science (BMBF), Free State of Bavaria

scholarly journals Evaluation of saliva sampling procedures for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics reveals differential sensitivity and association with viral load

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter Mestdagh ◽  
Michel Gillard ◽  
Marc Arbyn ◽  
Jean-Paul Pirnay ◽  
Jeroen Poels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Sampling Procedure ◽  
Differential Sensitivity ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Saliva Collection ◽  
Sampling Procedures

AbstractNasopharyngeal sampling has been the preferential collection method for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. Alternative sampling procedures that are less invasive and do not require a healthcare professional would be more preferable for patients and health professionals. Saliva collection has been proposed as such a possible alternative sampling procedure. We evaluated the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 testing on two different saliva collection devices (spitting versus swabbing) compared to nasopharyngeal swabs in over 2500 individuals that were either symptomatic or had high-risk contacts with infected individuals. We observed an overall poor sensitivity in saliva for SARS-CoV-2 detection (30.8% and 22.4% for spitting and swabbing, respectively). However, when focusing on individuals with medium to high viral load, sensitivity increased substantially (97.0% and 76.7% for spitting and swabbing, respectively), irrespective of symptomatic status. Our results suggest that saliva cannot readily replace nasopharyngeal sampling for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics but may enable identification of cases with medium to high viral loads.

scholarly journals High Resolution Analysis of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection In Vivo

Viruses ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Aljabr ◽  
Stuart Armstrong ◽  
Natasha Y. Rickett ◽  
Georgios Pollakis ◽  
Olivier Touzelet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Respiratory Syncytial Virus ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Label Free ◽  
Respiratory Problems ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
High Resolution Analysis ◽  
Syncytial Virus

Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) is a major cause of pediatric infection and also causes disease in the elderly and those with underlying respiratory problems. There is no vaccine for HRSV and anti-viral therapeutics are not broadly applicable. To investigate the effect of HRSV biology in children, nasopharyngeal aspirates were taken from children with different viral loads and a combined high throughput RNAseq and label free quantitative proteomics approach was used to characterize the nucleic acid and proteins in these samples. HRSV proteins were identified in the nasopharyngeal aspirates from infected children, and their abundance correlated with viral load (Ct value), confirming HRSV infection. Analysis of the HRSV genome indicated that the children were infected with sub-group A virus and that minor variants in nucleotide frequency occurred in discrete clusters along the HRSV genome, and within a patient clustered distinctly within the glycoprotein gene. Data from the samples were binned into four groups; no-HRSV infection (control), high viral load (Ct < 20), medium viral load (Ct = 20–25), and low viral load (Ct > 25). Cellular proteins associated with the anti-viral response (e.g., ISG15) were identified in the nasopharyngeal aspirates and their abundance was correlated with viral load. These combined approaches have not been used before to study HRSV biology in vivo and can be readily applied to the study the variation of virus host interactions.

scholarly journals Factors Associated With Viral Load Kinetics of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus During the 2015 Outbreak in South Korea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Sun Yang ◽  
Min-Gyu Yoo ◽  
Hye-Ja Lee ◽  
Han Byul Jang ◽  
Hee-Dong Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Respiratory Specimens

Abstract We conducted a retrospective study of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) viral load kinetics using data from patients hospitalized with MERS-CoV infection between 19 May and 20 August 2015. Viral load trajectories were considered over the hospitalization period using 1714 viral load results measured in serial respiratory specimens of 185 patients. The viral load levels were significantly higher among nonsurvivors than among survivors (P = .003). Healthcare workers (P = .001) and nonspreaders (P &lt; .001) had significantly lower viral loads. Viral RNA was present on the day of symptom onset and peaked 4–10 days after symptom onset.

scholarly journals Colorimetric RT-LAMP SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic sensitivity relies on color interpretation and viral load

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateus Nóbrega Aoki ◽  
Bruna de Oliveira Coelho ◽  
Luiz Gustavo Bentim Góes ◽  
Paola Minoprio ◽  
Edison Luiz Durigon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Reaction Time ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Rna Virus ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Respiratory Viruses ◽  
Lamp Reaction ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Naked Eye

AbstractThe use of RT-LAMP (reverse transcriptase—loop mediated isothermal amplification) has been considered as a promising point-of-care method to diagnose COVID-19. In this manuscript we show that the RT-LAMP reaction has a sensitivity of only 200 RNA virus copies, with a color change from pink to yellow occurring in 100% of the 62 clinical samples tested positive by RT-qPCR. We also demonstrated that this reaction is 100% specific for SARS-CoV-2 after testing 57 clinical samples infected with dozens of different respiratory viruses and 74 individuals without any viral infection. Although the majority of manuscripts recently published using this technique describe only the presence of two-color states (pink = negative and yellow = positive), we verified by naked-eye and absorbance measurements that there is an evident third color cluster (orange), in general related to positive samples with low viral loads, but which cannot be defined as positive or negative by the naked eye. Orange colors should be repeated or tested by RT-qPCR to avoid a false diagnostic. RT-LAMP is therefore very reliable for samples with a RT-qPCR Ct < 30 being as sensitive and specific as a RT-qPCR test. All reactions were performed in 30 min at 65 °C. The use of reaction time longer than 30 min is also not recommended since nonspecific amplifications may cause false positives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document