546 Management of Pediatric Pavement Burns

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S121-S122
Author(s):  
Syed F Saquib ◽  
Paul J Chestovich ◽  
Joseph T Carroll ◽  
Carmen E Flores
Keyword(s):  
Ambient Temperature ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
High Ambient Temperature ◽  
Unknown Etiology ◽  
Oral Antibiotic ◽  
Superficial Infection ◽  
Plantar Aspect

Abstract Introduction Pavement burns are common in a dry high heat climate. This study reviews the etiology, management and outcome of pavement burns in children. Methods All patients age < 18 who suffered contact burns from hot pavement from Jan 1, 2014 to Dec 31, 2019 were reviewed. A total of 45 patient charts met inclusion criteria. High ambient temperature on each date, and zip code of each injury was extracted from Weather Underground (www.wunderground.com) Results In this study, 45 patients met criteria and were reviewed, of whom 27 patients (60%) were male. Average age was 3.29 years (SD 0.69), made up two discrete age groups: age under 3 (n= 40, 89%) and 14+ (n=5, 11%). 38 patients (84%) had no known medical history. All had 2nd degree burns and one patient (2%) had third degree burns. Mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 2.5% (SD 1.4%, range 0.75% to 5.5%). Burn etiology included 31 patients (69%) walking barefoot on pavement, 6 (13%) falling onto pavement, and other/unknown etiology for the remaining 8 patients (18%). 30 patients (67%) had injuries on the plantar aspect of bilateral feet, 2 (4%) to bilateral palms of hands, 4 (9%) to other parts of upper extremities and 10 (22%) to other parts of lower extremities. Thirty-four (34) patients (76%) were managed without any hospitalization. Those that were hospitalized had an average length of stay (LOS) of 2.72 days (range 1–9 days). All burns were managed non-operatively with topical therapy alone. 35 patients (78%) were managed initially with Silvadene, and 6 (13%) with bacitracin. Aquacel was utilized in 10 patients at a follow-up visit (22%). Three patients (6.7%) were treated with collagenase enzyme therapy. One patient developed a superficial infection requiring oral antibiotic therapy. There were no mortalities in this group. The high ambient temperature on date and location of each injury was 101 F (SD 1.10 F, range 73F-111F). Of the thirty that continued to follow up in clinic, the average time to the burn being 95% healed was 10.50 days (SD 8.97 days, range 2–40 days). Conclusions Pavement burns in children are partial thickness and are safely managed with topical therapy alone, with good outcomes. Patients age 3 and under are a vulnerable population and therefore at particular risk of injury.

Pilonidal Sinus: How to Choose Between Excision and Open Granulation Versus Excision and Primary Closure?

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perruchoud ◽  
Vuilleumier ◽  
Givel
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Primary Healing

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure as treatments for pilonidal sinus. Subjects and methods: We evaluated a group of 141 patients operated on for a pilonidal sinus between 1991 and 1995. Ninety patients were treated by excision and open granulation, 34 patients by excision and primary closure and 17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus. Results: The first group, receiving treatment of excision and open granulation, experienced the following outcomes: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time; 72 days; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 40; average off-work delay, 38 days; and average follow-up time, 43 months. There were five recurrences (6%) in this group during the follow-up period. For the second group treated by excision and primary closure, the corresponding outcome measurements were as follows: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time, 23 days; primary healing failure rate, 9%; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 6; average off-work delay, 21 days. The average follow-up time was 34 months, and two recurrences (6%) were observed during the follow-up period. In the third group, seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases. Discussion and conclusion: This series of 141 patients is too limited to permit final conclusions to be drawn concerning significant advantages of one form of treatment compared to the other. Nevertheless, primary closure offers the advantages of quicker healing time, fewer post-operative visits and shorter time off work. When a primary closure can be carried out, it should be routinely considered for socio-economical and comfort reasons.

scholarly journals High ambient temperature and child emergency and hospital visits in New York City

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Niu ◽  
Maria Teresa Herrera ◽  
Blean Girma ◽  
Bian Liu ◽  
Leah Schinasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
Ambient Temperature ◽  
York City ◽  
High Ambient Temperature ◽  
Hospital Visits

662 Single Surgeon Experience Using a Polyactide-based Copolymer Dressing to Over and Secure Split Thickness Skin Grafts in Burn Patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S186-S187
Author(s):  
Eduardo Navarro ◽  
Tera Thigpin ◽  
Joshua S Carson
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Outer Layer ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Pain Outcomes ◽  
Total Body ◽  
Operative Notes

Abstract Introduction In both partial thickness burns and skin graft donor sites, coverage with Polylactide-based copolymer dressing (PLBC dressing) has been shown to result in expedited healing and improved pain outcomes when compared to more traditional techniques. These advantages are generally attributed to the way in which PLBC remains as an intact coating over the wound bed throughout the healing process, protecting wounds from the contamination and microtraumas associated with changes more conventional dressings. At our institution, we began selectively utilizing PLBC as a means of securing and protecting fresh skin graft, in hopes that we would find similar benefits in this application. Methods Clinical Protocol-- The PLBC dressing was used at the attending surgeon’s discretion. In these cases, meshed STSG was placed over prepared wound beds. Staples were not utilized. PLBC dressing was then placed over the entirety of the graft surface, securing graft in place by adhering to wound bed through intercises. (Staples were not used.) The graft and PLBC complex was further dressed with a layer of non-adherent cellulose based liner with petroleum based lubricant, and an outer layer of cotton gauze placed as a wrap or bolster. Post operatively, the outer layer (“wrap”) of gauze was replaced as needed for saturation. The PLBC and adherent “inner” liner were left in place until falling off naturally over the course of outpatient follow-up. Retrospective Review-- With IRB approval, patients treated PLBC over STSG between April 2018 to March 2019 were identified via surgeon’s log and pulled for review. Documentation gathered from operative notes, progress notes (inpatient and outpatient) and clinical photography was used to identify demographics, mechanism of injury, depth, total body surface area percentage (TBSA%), size of area treated with PLBC dressing, graft loss, need for re-grafting, signs of wound infection, antibiotic treatment, and length of stay. Results Twenty-two patients had STSG secured and dressed with PLBC. Median patient age was 36.5 years. Median TBSA was 5.1%, and median treated area 375 cm2. Follow up ranged from 21 to 232 days post-operatively, with two patients lost to follow up. All patients seen in outpatient follow up were noted to have “complete graft take” or “minimal” graft. None of the areas treated with PLBC dressing required re-grafting. There were no unplanned readmissions, and no wound infections were diagnosed or treated. Practitioners in in-patient setting and in follow up clinic reported satisfaction with the PLBC dressing. Conclusions The PLBC dressing was a feasible solution for securing and dressings STSGs. Future work is needed to determine whether its use is associated with an improvement in patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Neonatal brain abscess development following fetal scalp electrode placement: a rare complication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Fick ◽  
P. A. Woerdeman
Keyword(s):  
Brain Abscess ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Superficial Infection ◽  
Skin Site ◽  
Scalp Electrode ◽  
Large Brain ◽  
Fetal Scalp ◽  
Asymmetric Growth ◽  
Clinical Illness

AbstractA fetal scalp electrode (FSE) is a frequently used investigation during labor. However, it is an invasive procedure which can lead to complications. Our patient developed a very large brain abscess after initial superficial infection of the skin site due to an FSE. The patient was admitted to the hospital after an asymmetric growth of the skull was noticed with no further signs of clinical illness. MRI showed a very large brain abscess which was aspirated and treated with antibiotics for 10 weeks. A 2-year follow-up showed only a slight developmental delay in gross motor skills. Only once before a similar case has been described at which the patient developed a brain abscess after superficial infection of the scalp following an FSE. In both cases, the brain abscess was noticed due to an asymmetric growth of the skull without any further signs of clinical illness. A brain abscess has a high mortality and morbidity rate, and early diagnosis is vital for the optimal outcome. We therefore recommend to organize an out-patient clinical follow-up for every infant with a superficial infection of the skin site after placement of an FSE.

scholarly journals Why do frail patients with chronic heart failure die and become hospitalised?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sze ◽  
P Pellicori ◽  
J Zhang ◽  
J Weston ◽  
A.L Clark
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Frailty is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A better understanding of the causes of hospitalisations and death in frail patients might help to tailor interventional strategies for these at-risk patients. Purpose We studied the cause of death and hospitalisations in ambulatory patients with HF and frailty. Methods We assessed frailty using the clinical frailty scale (CFS) in consecutive HF patients attending a routine follow-up visit. Those with CFS ≥5 were classified as frail. Mortality and hospitalisations were ascertained from medical records (updated systematically using an NHS electronic database), discharge letters, autopsy reports and death certificates. We studied the primary cause of death and hospitalisations within one year of enrolment. Results 467 patients (67% male, median (IQR) age 76 (69–82) years, median (IQR) NT-proBNP 1156 (469–2463) ng/L) were enrolled. 206 (44%) patients were frail. Frail patients were more likely to not receive or receive suboptimal doses of ACEi/ARB and Beta-blockers; while non-frail patients were more likely to be treated with optimal doses. At 1-year follow up, there were 56 deaths and 322 hospitalisations, of which 46 (82%) and 215 (67%) occurred in frail patients. Frailty was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR (95% CI): 4.27 (2.60–7.01)) and combined mortality/ hospitalisation (HR (95% CI): 2.85 (2.14–3.80)), all p<0.001. 57% (n=26) of frail patients died of cardiovascular causes (of which 58% were due to HF progression); although deaths due to non-cardiovascular causes (43%, n=20), especially severe infections, were also common (26%, n=12). (Figure 1) The proportion of frail patients who had non-elective hospital admissions within 1 year was more than double that of non-frail patients (46% (n=96) vs 21% (n=54); p<0.001). Compared to non-frail patients, frail patients had more recurrent (≥2) hospitalisations (28% (n=59) vs 9% (n=24); p<0.001) but median (IQR) average length of hospital stay was not significantly different (frail: 6 (4–11) vs non-frail: 6 (2–12) days, p=0.50). A large proportion of hospitalisations (64%, n=137) in frail patients were due to non-cardiovascular causes (of which 34%, 30% and 20% were due to infections, falls and comorbidities respectively). Of cardiovascular hospitalisations (36%, n=78), the majority were due to decompensated HF (67%, n=46). (Figure 1) Conclusion Frailty is common in patients with HF and is associated with an increased risk of mortality and recurrent hospitalisations. A significant proportion suffered non-cardiovascular deaths and hospitalisations. This implies that interventions targeted at HF alone can only have limited impact on outcomes in frail patients. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Profile vs Tubular Plate in Unimalleolar or Bimalleolar Fractures: is There a Real Difference in Wound complications?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0015
Author(s):  
Paolo Ceccarini ◽  
Rosario Petruccelli ◽  
Michele Bisaccia ◽  
Giuseppe Rinonapoli ◽  
Auro Caraffa
Keyword(s):  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Superficial Infection ◽  
Operative Care ◽  
Group B

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The aim of our study is to compare two types of plates, one third tubular plate and LCP distal fibula plate, evaluating the clinical outcome and the skin complications associated with their use. Methods: We collected the data of 122 consecutive unimalleolar or bimalleolar fractures treated by internal fixation for a closed, displaced distal closed fibular fracture. Exclusion criteria were: 1) open ankle fractures,2) trimalleolar fractures, 3) previous ankle fractures 4) severe venous insufficiency, 5) ankleosteoarthritis previous to surgery, 6) associated ankle dislocation. After this selection, 93 patients were included in our study and assigned in two groups, based on using of different implant: in group A48 patients were treated with one-third tubular and in group B 45 patients were treated with LCP distalfibula plate. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics. Patients received the same surgical procedure and the same post-operative care, then they were radiologically evaluated at1-3-12 months and clinical examination was made at 24 (range 15-36) months using AOFAS clinical rating system. All data were evaluated using chi-square test. Results: At the final 24-month follow-up a comparison between the two groups showed no statistical significant differences in reduction accuracy and bone union ratio at radiological examination. The wound complications rate of the overall study group was 7.6%. There were no statistical differences in the rate of wound complications between the two groups. There were no differences between both group in percentage of hardware removal at follow-up (overall 5.4%). In the group A occurred 1 deep infection, 2 superficial infection, no wound dehiscence; in group B occured 1 deep infection, 1 superficial infection and 2 wound dehiscence. There were no statistical differences in the rate of wound complications between the two groups (p=0.70; Fisher exact test). Conclusion: Our study has shown no difference in radiographic bone union rate, no significant differences in terms of clinical outcomes, in time of bone reduction and wound complication rate between the LCP distalfibula plate and conventional one-third tubular plate. RCT or metanalasys are in this case useful to improve scientific evidence and give more information for the correct surgical treatment of ankle fractures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document