scholarly journals Prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio in patients with gastric cancer after surgery: a multicentre study

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 1141-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan-bing Cheng ◽  
Qu-xia Zhang ◽  
Lv-Ping Zhuang ◽  
Jian-wei Sun

Abstract Objective The immune inflammation-based score is recognized as a prognostic marker for cancer. However, the most accurate prognostic marker for patients with gastric cancer remains undetermined. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio for outcomes in gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy. Methods A total of 607 gastric cancer patients treated at three Chinese institutions were included. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated, and the areas under the curve were calculated to compare the predictive value among the inflammation-based score, lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin and neutrophil-lymphocyte, platelet-lymphocyte and lymphocyte-monocyte ratios. Cox regression was performed to determine the prognostic factors for overall survival. Results The median follow-up time was 63 months (range: 1–84 months). The optimal cut-off value for lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio was 0.63. The patients were divided into the LCR <0.63 (LLCR, n = 294) group and the LCR ≥0.63 (HLCR, n = 313) group. LLCR was significantly correlated with poor clinical characteristics. Compared with inflammation-based score, lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio had the highest areas under the curve (0.695). Patients with LLCR experienced more post-operative complications than the HLCR group (20.4 vs. 12.1%, P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (HR: 0.545, 95%CI: 0.372–0.799, P = 0.002) was associated with better overall survival. The HLCR group had higher 5-year overall survival rate than the LLCR group (80.5 vs. 54.9%, P < 0.001). Conclusions Preoperative lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio levels can effectively predict the short-term and oncological efficacy of gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy with a predictive value significantly better than other inflammation-based score.

In Vivo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 482-489
Author(s):  
TORU AOYAMA ◽  
MASATO NAKAZANO ◽  
SHINSUKE NAGASAWA ◽  
KENTARO HARA ◽  
KEISUKE KOMORI ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Ping Shi ◽  
Xiao-Yue Liu ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Qi Zhang ◽  
Guo-Tian Ruan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Systemic inflammatory responses caused by tumor cells play an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors. Most of these responses are accompanied by a decrease in muscle mass. The aim of this study was to identify biomarkers that most accurately predict prognoses in patients with non-metastatic cancer and to evaluate their clinical significance when combined with muscle markers. Methods This study retrospectively evaluated 2,797 cancer patients diagnosed with cancer at TNM stages I, II, and III. Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) in conjunction with calf circumference (CC) were used (or chosed) after evaluating the predictive value of 13 inflammatory marker combinations and five anthropometric indicators for patient outcomes using the C-index. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox’s proportional hazards regression modeling were used to analyze the individual and combined effects of these two potential biomarkers on overall survival. Results This study enrolled 1,604 men (57.3%) and 1,193 women (42.7%) with a mean age of 58.75 years. Among the 13 inflammatory nutritional indicators, the LCR was the most accurate predictor of prognoses in patients with non-metastatic cancer. The optimal threshold for the LCR was 2,500. After multifactorial adjustment, we found that low LCR had an adverse effect on overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.17, 2.88; P<0.001). Low LCR combined with low CC was also shown to be an independent risk factor for poor overall survival (HR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.80, 2.83; P<0.001). In non-metastatic cancer patients of different ages, stages, surgery history, and tumor types (for example, upper gastrointestinal cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer), patients with a low LCR combined with a low CC had statistically significantly reduced overall survival. Compared with LCR or CC alone, the combination of the two had greater prognostic value for patients with non-metastatic cancer. Conclusions The LCR can be implemented as a useful biomarker to predict prognoses in patients with non-metastatic cancer, its predictive value is superior to the other evaluated indicators of inflammation. CC is the best anthropometric indicator of muscle loss in patients with non-metastatic cancer. The combination of LCR and CC can better predict the prognosis of patients with non-metastatic cancer, and can provide important information for clinicians to formulate diagnosis and treatment plans.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-jun Fu ◽  
Ke-zhi Li ◽  
Xin-qiang Liang ◽  
Zhi-qing Liang ◽  
Bai jihong

Abstract Background C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) is a novel prognostic biomarker in several malignancies. This study was aimed to evaluate the clinical significance and prognostic value of CAR in patients with gastric cancer. Methods The data of 205 gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery was retrospectively reviewed. The association with the clinical features and prognostic value of CAR in gastric cancer was analyzed. The data of this study was combined with previous studies to further determine the prognostic value of CAR in patients with gastric cancer. Results Cox analysis revealed that preoperative CAR was an independent prognosis indicator in patients with gastric cancer. High expression of CAR indicated a shorter survival time than those with lower expression. CAR has a higher prognostic value in the 1-, 3-, 5-years of overall survival in patients with gastric cancer. However, CAR has no significant difference regarding the gastric cancer patients’ age, gender and TNM stage. The discriminated value of CAR in TNM stage of gastric cancer was moderate. A meta-analysis by combining previous data and our data showed that preoperative CAR was significantly associated with the overall survival of patients with gastric cancer. Conclusions This study demonstrated that preoperative CAR was an independent prognostic indicator in the patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. S187
Author(s):  
Yuji Toiyama ◽  
Yasuhiko Mohri ◽  
Tadanobu Shimura ◽  
Hiromi Yasuda ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujikawa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. vi140
Author(s):  
Takayuki Shimizu ◽  
Mitsuru Ishizuka ◽  
Takao Arakawa ◽  
Takashi Suzuki ◽  
Kazuma Tago ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Attila CSENDES J. ◽  
Andrea MUÑOZ Ch. ◽  
Ana María BURGOS L.

BACKGROUND: The complete blood count (CBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are useful inflammatory parameters for ruling out acute postoperative inflammatory complications. AIM: To determine their changes in gastric cancer patients submitted to total gastrectomy. METHODS: This is a prospective study, with 36 patients with gastric cancer who were submitted to elective total gastrectomy. On the first, third and fifth postoperative day (POD), blood count and CRP changes were assessed. Patients with postoperative complications were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-one (58%) were men and 15 (42%) women. The mean age was 65 years. The leukocytes peaked on the 1st POD with a mean of 13,826 u/mm³, and decreased to 8,266 u/mm³ by the 5th POD. The bacilliforms peaked on the 1st POD with a maximum value of 1.48%. CRP reached its maximum level on the 3rd POD with a mean of 144.64 mg/l±44.84. Preoperative hematocrit (HCT) was 35% and 33.67% by the 5th POD. Hemoglobin, showed similar values. CONCLUSIONS: Leukocytes increased during the 1st POD but reached normal values by the 5th POD. CRP peaked on the 3rd POD but did not reach normal values by the 5th POD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S294
Author(s):  
Yoshinaga Okugawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujikawa ◽  
Yusuke Omura ◽  
Akira Yamamoto ◽  
Takahito Kitajima ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document