Diabetes and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: CALGB 80405 (Alliance)

Abstract Background Diabetes is a prognostic factor for some malignancies, but its association with outcome in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is less clear. Methods This cohort study was nested within a randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy and bevacizumab and/or cetuximab for advanced or metastatic CRC. Patients were enrolled at 508 community and academic centers throughout the National Clinical Trials Network. The primary exposure was physician-documented diabetes at the time of enrollment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. Tests of statistical significance were two-sided. Results Among 2326 patients, 378 (16.3%) had diabetes. The median follow-up time was 6.0 years. We observed 1973 OS events and 2173 PFS events. The median time to an OS event was 22.7 months among those with diabetes and 27.1 months among those without diabetes (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.44; P < .001). The median time to a PFS event was 9.7 months among those with diabetes and 10.8 months among those without diabetes (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.30; P = .02). Patients with diabetes were more likely to experience no less than grade 3 hypertension (8.1% vs 4.4%; P = .054) but were not more likely to experience other adverse events, including neuropathy. Conclusions Diabetes is associated with an increased risk of mortality and tumor progression in patients with advanced or metastatic CRC. Patients with diabetes tolerate first-line treatment with chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies similarly to patients without diabetes.

Download Full-text

Pharmacogenetic Assessment of Toxicity and Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With LV5FU2, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI: FFCD 2000-05

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.25.2106 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 28 (15) ◽

pp. 2556-2564 ◽

Cited By ~ 108

Author(s):

Valérie Boige ◽

Jean Mendiboure ◽

Jean-Pierre Pignon ◽

Marie-Anne Loriot ◽

Marine Castaing ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Tumor Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Cancérologie Digestive

Purpose The aim was to investigate whether germline polymorphisms within candidate genes known or suspected to be involved in fluorouracil (FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan pathways were associated with toxicity and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods Blood samples from 349 patients included in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 2000-05 randomized trial, which compared FU plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) followed by FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) followed by FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; sequential arm) with FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI (combination arm) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, were collected. Twenty polymorphisms within the DPD, TS, MTHFR, ERCC1, ERCC2, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and UGT1A1 genes were genotyped. Results The ERCC2-K751QC allele was independently associated with an increased risk of FOLFOX-induced grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity (P = .01). In the sequential arm, TS-5′UTR3RG and GSTT1 alleles were independently associated with response to LV5FU2 (P = .009) and FOLFOX (P = .01), respectively. The effect of oxaliplatin on tumor response increased with the number of MTHFR-1298C alleles (test for trend, P = .008). The PFS benefit from first-line FOLFOX was restricted to patients with 2R/2R (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.68) or 2R/3R (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.82) TS-5′UTR genotypes, respectively. Conversely, patients with the TS-5′UTR 3R/3R genotype did not seem to benefit from the adjunction of oxaliplatin (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.40; trend between the three HRs, P = .006). Conclusion A pharmacogenetic approach may be a useful strategy for personalizing and optimizing chemotherapy in mCRC patients and deserves confirmation in additional prospective studies.

Download Full-text

Safety, efficacy, and time to clinical response with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e15138 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15138-e15138

Author(s):

S. Tomao ◽

G. Spinelli ◽

L. Rossi ◽

G. Pasciuti ◽

G. Arcangeli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Clinical Response ◽

Median Time ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

First Line ◽

Ecog Ps

e15138 Background: Bevacizumab (BEV) has shown clinical activity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC)and randomised phase III trials have demonstrated that this agent significantly improves overall and/or progression-free survival when added to first-line irinotecan based chemotherapy (CT) regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BEV plus FOLFIRI (irinotecan, 5- fluorouracil, and leucovorin) as first line treatment in 27 consecutive metastatic colorectal cancer cases, with the primary end point to calculate the median time to clinical response with this chemotherapeutic schedule. Methods: Between October 2007 and January 2008 we collected the data on 27 patients with mCRC treated with first line chemotherapy with BEV plus FOLFIRI. Elegibility criteria had to be: mCRC; no prior CT for metastatic disease; ECOG PS 0/1, adequate organ function; no CNS metastases. The treatment consisted of a minimum of six cycles of irinotecan plus infusional 5-FU/LV according to the classical FOLFIRI schedule; BEV (5mg/kg) was given on day 1 with CT and then every 2 weeks until disease progression. Safety and response were assessed at the time of first CT and every 4 weeks thereafter. Results: 27 pts were evaluable (male 18; median age 61 years (range 45–77), ECOG PS 0: 52%, PS 1: 48%. The sites of metastases were: liver (15 pts), lung (5 pts), liver and lung (5 pts), peritoneal wall (2 pts).Median follow-up was 18 weeks. Two patients had complete response(CR) and 13 pts partial response (PR), with an overall response rate of 57.7%. Five patients had stable disease and 6 patients showed progressive disease. A clinical benefit was demonstrated in 77 % of pts. We observed a median time to clinical response of 11 weeks, evaluated with tumor markers and with CT/NMR/US examinations. A grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was detected in 39% of pts and grade 2 or 3 hypertension in 9%. We did’nt observe cases of thrombosis, bleeding and gastrointestinal perforation, sometimes related to the use of BEV. Conclusions: In this little experience the efficacy and safety of BEV associated with FOLFIRI schedule, a first line therapy in mCRC,is consistent with results from other previous studies, showing moreover a short time to clinical response with this association. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Apatinib combined with Raltitrexed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard therapy (AHEAD-311): A single-arm phrase II pilot trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e15008 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15008-e15008

Author(s):

Haiyan Si ◽

Miaomiao Gou ◽

Yong Zhang ◽

Huan Yan ◽

Niansong Qian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Objective Response ◽

Pilot Trial ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Tumor Location ◽

Nausea And Vomiting ◽

Grade 3

e15008 Background: To assess the safety and efficacy of apatinib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, combined with thymidylate synthase inhibitor raltitrexed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as a third- or later-line therapy. Methods: Patients with mCRC after at least 2 lines of chemotherapy were enrolled whenever they previously treated with bevacizumab or not. Apatinib was given orally at 250mg or 500mg daily. Raltitrexed was administered intravenously at 3 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: From August 2017 to November 2018, thirty-one patients were enrolled in Chinese PLA General Hospital. After a median follow-up of 6.4 months, the median treatment cycle was 4. four patient achieved partial response(PR), and 11 patients achieved stable disease (SD) and 16 achieved progression disease (PD) in accordance with RECIST version 1.0, illustrating a DCR of 48.4% and an ORR of 12.9% .The Median PFS was 2.4 months and the median OS was 6.4 months. The most common adverse events were hypertension (n=12, 38.7%), nausea and vomiting (n=11, 33.8%), myelosuppression (n=9, 29.0%). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were hypertension (n=2, 6.4%) and hand-foot syndrome (n=2, 6.4%). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were rare. One patient died from cardiac arrest after three days treatment. There was no significantly association between PFS or OS, and clinical features including tumor location, KRAS status, and prior surgery or not, and number of metastatic organs. There was no trend showing patients who experienced had hypertension or myelosuppression had longer PFS and OS. Compared to the patients never received bevacizumab, the patients who had previously bevacizumab had the similar PFS and OS (3.9 versus 2.3months, P=0.787; 6.1 versus 6.4months, P=0.287). Grade1-2 nausea and vomiting and age <57 were independent predictors for longer PFS and OS. Conclusions: Apatinib combined with raltitrexed had efficacy but had limited survival benefit in mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapy. This regime showed us a higher risk of adverse event incidence and warrant further exploring of benefit population. Clinical trial information: NCT03344614 .

Download Full-text

Randomized Phase III Study of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid Plus Oxaliplatin As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.14.9898 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 26 (12) ◽

pp. 2006-2012 ◽

Cited By ~ 532

Author(s):

Jim Cassidy ◽

Stephen Clarke ◽

Eduardo Díaz-Rubio ◽

Werner Scheithauer ◽

Arie Figer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Folinic Acid ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

First Line ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Hand Foot Syndrome ◽

Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate whether capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is noninferior to fluorouracil. folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).Patients and MethodsThe initial design of this trial was a randomized, two-arm, noninferiority, phase III comparison of XELOX versus FOLFOX-4. After patient accrual had begun, the trial design was amended in 2003 after bevacizumab phase III data became available. The resulting 2 × 2 factorial design randomly assigned patients to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to also receive either bevacizumab or placebo. We report here the results of the analysis of the XELOX versus FOLFOX-4 arms. The analysis of bevacizumab versus placebo with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is reported separately. The prespecified primary end point for the noninferiority analysis was progression-free survival.ResultsThe intent-to-treat population comprised 634 patients from the original two-arm portion of the study, plus an additional 1,400 patients after the start of the amended 2 × 2 design, for a total of 2,034 patients. The median PFS was 8.0 months in the pooled XELOX-containing arms versus 8.5 months in the FOLFOX-4–containing arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 97.5% CI, 0.93 to 1.16). The median overall survival was 19.8 months with XELOX versus 19.6 months with FOLFOX-4 (HR, 0.99; 97.5% CI, 0.88 to 1.12). FOLFOX-4 was associated with more grade 3/4 neutropenia/granulocytopenia and febrile neutropenia than XELOX, and XELOX with more grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than FOLFOX-4.ConclusionXELOX is noninferior to FOLFOX-4 as a first-line treatment for MCRC, and may be considered as a routine treatment option for appropriate patients.

Download Full-text

Comparison between the three oxaliplatin-based regimens with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.4_suppl.687 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 687-687

Author(s):

Yoshihito Ohhara ◽

Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽

Satoshi Matsusaka ◽

Eiji Shinozaki ◽

Nobuyuki Mizunuma ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Hand Foot Syndrome ◽

Chemotherapeutic Treatment ◽

Grade 3 ◽

First Line Treatment

687 Background: XELOX (capecitabine/L-OHP) therapy that includes orally administered ﬂuoropyrimidine instead of infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) was approved for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Sep 2009 in Japan. A pivotal trial (NO16966 study) demonstrated the non-inferiority of XELOX to FOLFOX (5-FU/L-OHP/LV) and the superiority of those L-OHP-based regimens plus bevacizumab (BV) to those without in the first-line treatment of mCRC. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of XELO+BV compared with FOLFOX4 or mFOLFOX6 plus BV in the first-line treatment for mCRC patients at a single institute. Methods: Between Jun 2007 and Nov 2008, 85 patients received FOLFOX4+BV (FF4 arm), between Dec 2008 and Sep 2009, 40 patients received mFOLFOX6+BV (FF6 arm), and between Oct 2009 and Sep 2010, 60 patients received XELOX+BV (XELOX arm). The best overall responses were evaluated using RECIST 1.0 during chemotherapeutic treatment, and adverse events were graded according to CTCAE ver.3.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Characteristics of patients of FF4 arm, FF6 arm, and XELOX arm were below: median age, 60 yr vs. 62 yr vs. 60.5 yr; gender (male), 48.2 % vs. 62.5 % vs. 58.3%. The overall response rates (CR+PR) were 61.1 %, 72.5 %, and 75 % (95% CI; 50.6-71.8%, 58.0-87.0%, and 63.7-86.3%). Median PFS were 17.0 months, 15.5 months, and 14.4 months, respectively (cut-off: Aug 31, 2011). There were no statistical significances not only between FF4 arm and FF6 arm (log-rank; p=0.641), but also between XELOX arm and FF4+FF6 (FOLFOX) arm (log-rank; p=0.138). FOLFOX arm was associated with higher incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia than XELOX arm. Grade3 diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) were more frequent in XELOX arm. Conclusions: This study suggests that XELOX arm was equal to FOLFOX arm, regardless of regimen, in tumor response and PFS. Further follow-up is necessary to confirm the benefit on survival.

Download Full-text

Phase II trial of combined chemotherapy with irinotecan, S-1, and bevacizumab (IRIS/Bev) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Update analysis—Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group (HGCSG) trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.3593 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3593-3593

Author(s):

Satoshi Yuki ◽

Yoshito Komatsu ◽

Takuto Miyagishima ◽

Takashi Kato ◽

Kazuteru Hatanaka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Performance Status ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3 ◽

First Line Treatment

3593 Background: The FIRIS study (Muro K et al. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:853–860) previously demonstrated the non-inferiority of Irinotecan plus S-1(IRIS) to FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC), with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. We previously reported that IRIS plus bevacizumab(IRIS/bev) is very effective as first-line treatment (Komatsu Y et al. ESMO 2010). We now report the updated results of this study. Methods: Eligible patients had to have mCRC with a confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, an age of >20 years, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-1, and no history of prior chemotherapy. S-1 40-60 mg twice daily p.o. was given on days 1-14 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg i.v. were given on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints included overall response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The target number of 53 patients was enrolled as of March 2009. The results are reported for 52 patients with evaluable lesions. The clinical characteristics of the patients were as follows. The median age was 63.5 years (range, 48 to 82). The male:female ratio was 3:2. The performance status on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale was 0. In January 2012, on safety analysis, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 27%. The incidences of other grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were as follows: diarrhea, 17%; anorexia, 4%; stomatitis, 2%; hypertension, 21%; and gastrointestinal perforation, 0%. The overall response rate was 63.5%. Three patients had complete response. Thirty patients had partial response, 16 had stable disease, none had progressive disease, and 3 were not evaluable. Median progression-free survival was 17.0 months and median survival time was 39.6 months. Conclusions: IRIS/Bev is a remarkably active and generally well-tolerated first-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Randomized control trial comparing this regimen with oxaliplatin containing regimen(XELOX or mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab) is being planned.

Download Full-text

Addition of bevacizumab to first-line FOLFOX4 and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.4_suppl.610 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 610-610 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽

Satoshi Matsusaka ◽

Nobuyuki Mizunuma ◽

Eiji Shinozaki ◽

Mariko Ogura ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

First Line Treatment

610 Background: In our previous report, addition of bevacizumab (BV) to the FOLFOX4 regimen appeared to significantly improve response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (Suenaga M, et al. ASCO-GI 2011 [abstr 588]). Update results met median overall survival, and statistical analysis of survival was performed. Methods: An observational cohort study was carried out on all eligible patients scheduled to receive FOLFOX4 (n = 128) or FOLFOX4+BV (n = 85) between 2005 and 2007, 2007 and 2009, with a median follow-up time of 20.4 months vs. 30.2 months, respectively. Predefined efficacy endpoints were treatment characteristics, response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival in the periods of time observed. Results: Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI, 8.4-11.4) in the FOLFOX4- and 17 months (95% CI, 11.8-22.3) in the FOLFOX4+BV-treated patients (p=0.002). Median overall survival times were 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.9-24) and 38.8 months (95% CI, 32.9-44.8) in the two groups, respectively (p<0.001). In the ECOG PS 0 population, progression-free survival in the FOLFOX4 and FOLFOX4+BV groups was 11 months and 17 months with a hazard ratio of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.44-0.89) in favour of FOLFOX4+BV, similarly in OS with a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.36-0.77). Subgroup population received 5-FU plus leucovorin (FL) as maintenance during oxaliplatin discontinuation due to adverse events had longer PFS or OS in both groups, though no significance. PFS were 14.7 and 21.6 months, and OS were 29 and 45.9 months, respectively. Secondary resection was performed more in FOLFOX4+BV (11.8%) than FOLFOX4 (3.9%) patients. Conclusions: These data indicate potential survival benefits from the addition of BV to the FOLFOX4 regimen as first-line treatment for mCRC. Maintenance using FL after discontinuation of oxaliplatin due to adverse events appeared to be an essential factor for better survival.

Download Full-text

A phase II study on third-line chemotherapy combined bevacizumab with S-1 for metastatic colorectal cancer with mutated KRAS: SAVIOR study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.552 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 552-552

Author(s):

Akinori Takagane ◽

Yasuhiro Miyake ◽

Kouji Kobayashi ◽

Naoki Nagata ◽

Atsushi Sato ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Antitumor Effects ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Line Chemotherapy

552 Background: Anti-Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy is expected to be effective in treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with wild-type KRAS, but for mCRC with mutated KRAS, no salvage treatment has been established. We performed a phase II clinical study on 3rd-line chemotherapy combined bevacizumab with S-1, an oral fluorinated pyrimidine preparation containing a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, and bevacizumab for mCRC resistant to oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Methods: Subjects were mCRC patients with mutated KRAS, who showed aggravation even after 2 regimens with oxaliplatin and irinotecan. S-1 (80-120 mg/body) was administered for 4 weeks and withdrawn for 2 weeks. The dose of S-1 was decided according to the subjects’ body surface area. Bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) was administered on Days 1, 15, and 29. This treatment was provided until progression. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), and secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), median progression free survival (mPFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse event (AE). Results: A total of 31 subjects mutated KRAS were enrolled between August 2009 and July 2011. An independent review committee evaluated antitumor effects in eligible 29 of the 31 subjects in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Two subjects in whom antitumor effects could not be evaluated were excluded. The DCR was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-84.7%), RR 0% (95% CI, 0-12.3%), mPFS 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.5 months), OS 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.5-12.0 months), and the median observation period 9.0 months. In 30 subjects for safety evaluation, the incidence of Grade 3 or greater adverse events was 50%. There was no treatment-related death. Major adverse events were anorexia (Grade 3 or greater, 20%), diarrhea (Grade 3, 10%), and decreased hemoglobin (Grade 3 or greater, 16.7%). Conclusions: The results suggest that 3rd-line chemotherapy combined bevacizumab with S-1 is safe and may delay the progression of mCRC resistant to oxaliplatin and irinotecan with mutated KRAS. Clinical trial information: NCT00974389.

Download Full-text

Pooled Safety and Efficacy Analysis Examining the Effect of Performance Status on Outcomes in Nine First-Line Treatment Trials Using Individual Data From Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2008.20.2879 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (12) ◽

pp. 1948-1955 ◽

Cited By ~ 100

Author(s):

Daniel J. Sargent ◽

Claus Henning Köhne ◽

Hanna Kelly Sanoff ◽

Brian M. Bot ◽

Matthew T. Seymour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Performance Status ◽

Individual Data ◽

First Line ◽

Increased Risk ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Grade 3

Purpose Performance status (PS) is a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clinical trials typically enroll less than 10% of patients with a PS of 2 (PS2); thus, the benefit of systemic chemotherapy in PS2 patients is uncertain. Patients and Methods Individual data from 6,286 patients (509 PS2 patients) from nine clinical trials were used to compare treatment efficacy by PS. Progression-free survival (PFS), grade ≥ 3 adverse events, 60-day all-cause mortality, overall survival (OS), and response rate (RR) were explored in the full set of nine trials and in the five trials comparing first-line monotherapy with combination therapy. Results Compared with patients with PS of 0 or 1, PS2 patients had significantly higher rates of grade ≥ 3 nausea (8.5% v 16.4%, respectively; P < .0001) and vomiting (7.6% v 11.9%, respectively; P = .006) and 60-day all-cause mortality (2.8% v 12.0%, respectively; P < .0001). PS2 was prognostic for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.52; P < .0001; median PFS, 7.6 months for PS 0 or 1 v 4.9 months for PS2), OS (HR = 2.18; P < .0001; median OS, 17.3 months for PS 0 or 1 v 8.5 months for PS2), and RR (odds ratio = 0.61; P < .0001; 43.8% for PS 0 or 1 v 32.0% for PS2). The relative benefit and toxicity of experimental versus control treatment and monotherapy versus combination therapy were not different in PS 0 or 1 patients versus PS2 patients. Conclusion In clinical trials, PS2 patients derive similar benefit from superior treatment as patients with PS of 0 to 1 but with an increased risk of toxicities and 12% 60-day mortality. Although current treatment provides benefit, new approaches are required to approach 1-year median survival for PS2 patients.

Download Full-text

Clinical utility of PEG-G-CSF for preventing severe neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab: A single centor retrospective study

10.21203/rs.2.14923/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Kitagawa Yusuke ◽

Hiroki Osumi ◽

Eiji Shinozaki ◽

Yumiko Ota ◽

Izuma Nakayama ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Evaluation Criteria ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Severe Neutropenia ◽

Free Survival ◽

The Common ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: This study aimed to evaluate in clinical practice the efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol conjugated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) for preventing neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients that received fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab (Bev). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed mCRC patients who received FOLFOXIRI plus Bev between December 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated the efficacy of PEG-G-CSF for treating neutropenia, the overall response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events of FOLFOXIRI plus Bev based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: A total of 26 patients (median age 53.5 years) were included. The ORR rate was 65.3%, the median PFS was 9.6 months (7.2–16.9), and the median OS was 24.2 months (13.6–NA). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 53.8% of the patients and febrile neutropenia occurred in 7.7%. PEG-G-CSF was given to 77.0% of the patients, including prophylactically (n = 9) and after the development of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (n = 11). No patients experienced grade 3 or higher neutropenia after the administration of PEG-G-CSF. In seven of the nine patients who received PEG-G-CSF prophylactically (77.7%), no dose adjustment was required.Conclusions: PEG-G-CSF was useful in preventing severe neutropenia in mCRC patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus Bev.

Download Full-text