Management of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD)

The number of patients with advanced kidney disease requiring dialysis is increasing in all parts of the world. Managing patients as they transition onto dialysis and providing support and guidance as they make important treatment choices are essential components of a nephrologist’s job. Ensuring timely preparation for dialysis, allowing patients the opportunity to explore all options, including conservative care, and managing individual expectations of dialysis are increasingly important. All nephrologists will manage patients treated with dialysis and therefore it is imperative that they have a sound understanding of different dialysis modalities, how to assess the adequacy of dialysis, and the commonly encountered medical problems dialysis patients experience.

Written for the busy nephrologist and internist who need easy to access information on the diagnosis, investigation, and treatment of patients with kidney disease, the Oxford Desk Reference Nephrology is presented in a way that is not only easy to read and digest but also is detailed enough to allow an in depth understanding of the complex mix of metabolic, immunological, and genetic causes of both acute and chronic kidney disease. The kidneys are rarely affected by disease in isolation; the book comprehensively covers the multisystem disorders that require a multidisciplinary approach, including the cardiological, rheumatological, haematological, infectious, oncological, and urological aspects of kidney disease. In parallel, it extensively describes the myriad multisystem complications of progressive chronic kidney disease with practical advice on how these should be investigated and managed. The importance of understanding the evolution of kidney disease in children and young adults is covered, as in many parts of the world there is no distinction between adult and paediatric nephrology. Therefore, it is important that nephrologists have a sound grasp of both paediatric and adult kidney diseases. The number of patients with advanced kidney disease treated with a kidney transplant or receiving dialysis is increasing in all parts of the world. All nephrologists will manage patients on dialysis or who have a kidney transplant and all internists will encounter these patients. Thus, it is imperative that they have an understanding of these treatments and the commonly encountered medical problems such patients experience.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter R. Verberne ◽  
Janneke Dijkers ◽  
Johannes C. Kelder ◽  
Wilbert T. Jellema ◽  
Johannes J. M. van Delden ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Non-dialytic conservative care is argued to be a reasonable treatment alternative for dialysis in selected older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. We evaluated patient-relevant outcomes including health-related quality of life in a previous study. However, the scoring algorithm we used to calculate the physical and mental component summary scores of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) turned out to differ from comparable studies on this topic. The aim of this critical appraisal was to reanalyze the SF-36 summary scores in our patient cohort (≥ 70 years) using the more widely used scoring algorithm. Results Patients on conservative care (n = 23) had lower physical and mental component summary scores compared to patients not yet started on dialysis (n = 39), but similar compared to patients on dialysis (n = 34). These findings were similar to our original findings and did not change the conclusions. Several scoring algorithms are used for the SF-36 summary scores. Researchers should be aware of this fact and should use the same scoring algorithm across similar studies in a specific field to increase comparability. Using the more widely used scoring algorithm, the recalculated SF-36 summary scores of our patient cohort can now be compared to other studies.


Author(s):  
Emma Murphy ◽  
Aine Burns ◽  
Fliss E M Murtagh ◽  
Leila Rooshenas ◽  
Fergus J Caskey

Abstract Shared decision making in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires unbiased information on survival and person-centred outcomes known to matter to patients: quality of life, symptom burden and support from family and healthcare professionals. To date, when deciding between dialysis and conservative care, patients have had to rely on evidence from small observational studies. Clinicians recognize that like is not being compared with like in these studies, and interpret the results differently. Furthermore, support differs considerably between renal units. What patients choose therefore depends on which renal unit they attend. To address this, a programme of work has been underway in the UK. After reports on survival and symptoms from a small number of renal units, a national, mixed-methods study—the Conservative Kidney Management Assessment of Practice Patterns Study—mapped out conservative care practices and attitudes in the UK. This led to the Prepare for Kidney Care study, a randomized controlled trial comparing preparation for dialysis versus preparation for conservative care. Although powered to detect a positivist 0.345 difference in quality-adjusted life years between the two treatments, this trial also takes a realist approach with a range of person-centred secondary outcomes and embedded qualitative research. To understand generalizability, it is nested in an observational cohort study, which is nested in a CKD registry. Challenges to recruitment and retention have been rapidly identified and addressed using an established embedded mixed methods approach—the QuinteT recruitment intervention. This review considers the background to and progress with recruitment to the trial.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-291
Author(s):  
Yeleine Martínez Echevers ◽  
Néstor Gabriel Toapanta Gaibor ◽  
Nathasha Nava Pérez ◽  
Francisco Barbosa Martin ◽  
Rafael Montes Delgado ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Torres ◽  
Rachel Sippy ◽  
Kevin Louis Bardosh ◽  
Ramya Bhargava ◽  
Martín Lotto-Batista ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundThe absence of a chronic kidney disease (CKD) registry in Ecuador makes it difficult to assess the burden of disease, but there is an anticipated increase in the incidence of end-stage kidney disease along with increasing diabetes, hypertension and population age. From 2008, augmented funding for renal replacement treatment expanded dialysis clinics and patient coverage.MethodsWe conducted 73 in-depth interviews with healthcare providers in eight provinces. Findings were analyzed using qualitative methods and triangulated with quantitative data on patients with CKD diagnoses from six national-level databases between 2015 and 2018. We also reviewed grey and scientific literature on CKD and health systems in Ecuador.ResultsDatasets show a total of 17 484 dialysis patients in 2018, or 567 patients per million population (pmp), with an annual cost exceeding 11% of Ecuador’s public health budget. Each year, there were 139—162 pmp new dialysis patients, while doctors report waiting lists. The number of patients on peritoneal dialysis was stable; those on hemodialysis increased over time. Only 13 of 24 provinces have dialysis services, and nephrologists are in major cities, which limits access, delays medical attention, and adds a travel burden on patients. Prevention and screening programs are scarce, while hospitalization is an important reality of CKD patients.ConclusionCKD is an emerging public health crisis that has increased dramatically over the last decade in Ecuador and is expected to continue, making coverage for all patients impossible and the current structure, unsustainable. A patient registry would permit to estimate the demand and progression of patients with consideration for comorbidities, requirements and costs, and mortality, and identify where to focus prevention efforts. Health policy should clearly state CKD definitions and required patient data, including cause, disease stage and follow-up statistics. Organized monitoring of patients would benefit from improvements in patient referral.


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2164
Author(s):  
Anna Adamska-Wełnicka ◽  
Marcin Wełnicki ◽  
Artur Mamcarz ◽  
Ryszard Gellert

Is advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) a cardiac “no man’s land”? Chronic heart failure (HF) is widely believed to be one of the most serious medical challenges of the 21st century. Moreover, the number of patients with CKD is increasing. To date, patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 have frequently been excluded from large, randomized clinical trials. Although this situation is slowly changing, in everyday practice we continue to struggle with problems that are not clearly addressed in the guidelines. This literature review was conducted by an interdisciplinary group, which comprised a nephrologist, internal medicine specialists, and cardiologist. In this review, we discuss the difficulties in ruling out HF for patients with advanced CKD and issues regarding the cardiotoxicity of dialysis fistulas and the occurrence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with CKD. Due to the recent publication of the new HF guidelines by the European Society of Cardiology, this is a good time to address these difficult issues. Contrary to appearances, these are not niche issues, but problems that affect many patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter R. Verberne ◽  
Janneke Dijkers ◽  
Johannes C. Kelder ◽  
Anthonius B. M. Geers ◽  
Wilbert T. Jellema ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document