scholarly journals An analysis of galaxy cluster mis-centring using cosmological hydrodynamic simulations

2020 ◽  
Vol 493 (1) ◽  
pp. 1120-1129
Author(s):  
Z Yan ◽  
N Raza ◽  
L Van Waerbeke ◽  
A J Mead ◽  
I G McCarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
Mass Range ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Cumulative Distribution ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Hydrodynamic Simulations ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Cluster Density ◽  
Cluster Properties ◽  
Using Data

ABSTRACT The location of a galaxy cluster’s centroid is typically derived from observations of the galactic and/or gas component of the cluster, but these typically deviate from the true centre. This can produce bias when observations are combined to study average cluster properties. Using data from the BAryons and HAloes of MAssive Systems (BAHAMAS) cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, we study this bias in both two and three dimensions for 2000 clusters over the 1013–1015 M⊙ mass range. We quantify and model the offset distributions between observationally motivated centres and the ‘true’ centre of the cluster, which is taken to be the most gravitationally bound particle measured in the simulation. We fit the cumulative distribution function of offsets with an exponential distribution and a Gamma distribution fit well with most of the centroid definitions. The galaxy-based centres can be seen to be divided into a mis-centred group and a well-centred group, with the well-centred group making up about $60{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ of all the clusters. Gas-based centres are overall less scattered than galaxy-based centres. We also find a cluster-mass dependence of the offset distribution of gas-based centres, with generally larger offsets for smaller mass clusters. We then measure cluster density profiles centred at each choice of the centres and fit them with empirical models. Stacked, mis-centred density profiles fit to the Navarro–Frenk–White dark matter profile and Komatsu–Seljak gas profile show that recovered shape and size parameters can significantly deviate from the true values. For the galaxy-based centres, this can lead to cluster masses being underestimated by up to $10{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$.

scholarly journals Projection effects in galaxy cluster samples: insights from X-ray redshifts

2019 ◽  
Vol 626 ◽  
pp. A48 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Ramos-Ceja ◽  
F. Pacaud ◽  
T. H. Reiprich ◽  
K. Migkas ◽  
L. Lovisari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Information ◽  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Cluster Sample ◽  
Global Cluster ◽  
Sky Survey ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Flux Measurements ◽  
Cluster Properties

Presently, the largest sample of galaxy clusters selected in X-rays comes from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS). Although there have been many interesting clusters discovered with the RASS data, the broad point spread function of the ROSAT satellite limits the attainable amount of spatial information for the detected objects. This leads to the discovery of new cluster features when a re-observation is performed with higher-resolution X-ray satellites. Here we present the results from XMM-Newton observations of three clusters: RXC J2306.6−1319, ZwCl 1665, and RXC J0034.6−0208, for which the observations reveal a double or triple system of extended components. These clusters belong to the extremely expanded HIghest X-ray FLUx Galaxy Cluster Sample (eeHIFLUGCS), which is a flux-limited cluster sample (fX, 500 ≥ 5 × 10−12 erg s−1 cm−2 in the 0.1−2.4 keV energy band). For each structure in each cluster, we determine the redshift with the X-ray spectrum and find that the components are not part of the same cluster. This is confirmed by an optical spectroscopic analysis of the galaxy members. Therefore, the total number of clusters is actually seven, rather than three. We derive global cluster properties of each extended component. We compare the measured properties to lower-redshift group samples, and find a good agreement. Our flux measurements reveal that only one component of the ZwCl 1665 cluster has a flux above the eeHIFLUGCS limit, while the other clusters will no longer be part of the sample. These examples demonstrate that cluster–cluster projections can bias X-ray cluster catalogues and that with high-resolution X-ray follow-up this bias can be corrected.

scholarly journals Galaxies and clusters of galaxies as peak patches of the density field

2019 ◽  
Vol 490 (2) ◽  
pp. 1693-1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masataka Fukugita ◽  
Hans Böhringer
Keyword(s):  
Gravitational Lensing ◽  
Mass Density ◽  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
Mass Range ◽  
Mass Function ◽  
Clusters Of Galaxies ◽  
Density Fraction ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Consistent Picture ◽  
Low Mass

ABSTRACT The mass function of galaxies and clusters of galaxies can be derived observationally based on different types of observations. In this study we test if these observations can be combined to a consistent picture which is also in accord with structure formation theory. The galaxy data comprise the optical galaxy luminosity function and the gravitational lensing signature of the galaxies, while the galaxy cluster mass function is derived from the X-ray luminosity distribution of the clusters. We show the results of the comparison in the form of the mass density fraction that is contained in collapsed objects relative to the mean matter density in the Universe. The mass density fraction in groups and clusters of galaxies extrapolated to low masses agrees very well with that of the galaxies: both converge at the low mass limit to a mass fraction of about 28 per cent if the outer radii of the objects are taken to be r200. Most of the matter contained in collapsed objects is found in the mass range $M_{200} \sim 10^{12}\!-\!10^{14}\, h^{-1}_{70} \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$, while a larger amount of the cosmic matter resides outside of r200 of collapsed objects.

scholarly journals Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): Selection of the Most Massive Clusters

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (S308) ◽  
pp. 215-216
Author(s):  
Héctor J. Ibarra-Medel ◽  
Maritza Lara-López ◽  
Omar López-Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
Mass Range ◽  
Clusters Of Galaxies ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Sunyaev Zel'dovich Effect ◽  
Point Correlation ◽  
Point Correlation Function ◽  
Mass Assembly ◽  
Massive Clusters ◽  
Selection Of

AbstractWe have developed a galaxy cluster finding technique based on the Delaunay Tessellation Field Estimator (DTFE) combined with caustic analysis. Our method allows us to recover clusters of galaxies within the mass range of $10^{12}$ to $10^{16}\ \mathcal{M}_{\odot}$. We have found a total of 113 galaxy clusters in the Galaxy and Mass Assembly survey (GAMA). In the corresponding mass range, the density of clusters found in this work is comparable to the density traced by clusters selected by the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich Effect; however, we are able to cover a wider mass range. We present the analysis of the two-point correlation function for our cluster sample.

scholarly journals Metal Enrichment Processes in the ICM – Starbursts and Galactic Winds

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (S235) ◽  
pp. 212-212
Author(s):  
W. Kapferer ◽  
T. Kronberger ◽  
W. Domainko ◽  
S. Schindler ◽  
E. van Kampen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Formation ◽  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
Metal Enrichment ◽  
Formation Model ◽  
Hydrodynamic Simulations ◽  
Galactic Winds ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Ideal Tool ◽  
High Metallicity ◽  
Metallicity Distribution

AbstractWe present an investigation of the metal enrichment of the intra-cluster medium (ICM) by galactic winds and merger-driven starbursts. We use combined N-body/hydrodynamic simulations with a semi-numerical galaxy formation model. The inhomogeneities in the metal distribution caused by these processes are an ideal tool to reveal the dynamical state of a galaxy cluster. We show that X-ray weighted metal maps distinguish between pre- or post-merger galaxy clusters by comparing the metallicity distribution with the galaxy-density distribution: pre-mergers have a metallicity gap between the subclusters, post-mergers a high metallicity between subclusters.

scholarly journals The Three Hundred Project: The evolution of galaxy cluster density profiles

2018 ◽  
Vol 483 (3) ◽  
pp. 3390-3403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Mostoghiu ◽  
Alexander Knebe ◽  
Weiguang Cui ◽  
Frazer R Pearce ◽  
Gustavo Yepes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
Cluster Density

scholarly journals Radio Galaxy Zoo: new giant radio galaxies in the RGZ DR1 catalogue

2020 ◽  
Vol 499 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-76
Author(s):  
H Tang ◽  
A M M Scaife ◽  
O I Wong ◽  
A D Kapińska ◽  
L Rudnick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radio Galaxy ◽  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
Radio Galaxies ◽  
Selection Method ◽  
Cluster Galaxy ◽  
Science Project ◽  
New Radio ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Citizen Science Project

ABSTRACT In this paper, we present the identification of five previously unknown giant radio galaxies (GRGs) using Data Release 1 of the Radio Galaxy Zoo citizen science project and a selection method appropriate to the training and validation of deep learning algorithms for new radio surveys. We associate one of these new GRGs with the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) in the galaxy cluster GMBCG J251.67741+36.45295 and use literature data to identify a further 13 previously known GRGs as BCG candidates, increasing the number of known BCG GRGs by $\gt 60$ per cent. By examining local galaxy number densities for the number of all known BCG GRGs, we suggest that the existence of this growing number implies that GRGs are able to reside in the centres of rich (∼1014 M⊙) galaxy clusters and challenges the hypothesis that GRGs grow to such sizes only in locally underdense environments.

scholarly journals Reconstruction of Gas Temperature and Density Profiles of the Galaxy Cluster RX J1347.5–1145

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 671-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Yuan ◽  
Tong-Jie Zhang ◽  
Bao-Quan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
Gas Temperature ◽  
Density Profiles ◽  
The Galaxy

scholarly journals The role of AGN activity in the building up of the BCG at z ∼ 1.6

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (S356) ◽  
pp. 280-284
Author(s):  
Angela Bongiorno ◽  
Andrea Travascio
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
Cluster Galaxy ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Groups Of Galaxies ◽  
Star Forming ◽  
The Core ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Multi Wavelength

AbstractXDCPJ0044.0-2033 is one of the most massive galaxy cluster at z ∼1.6, for which a wealth of multi-wavelength photometric and spectroscopic data have been collected during the last years. I have reported on the properties of the galaxy members in the very central region (∼ 70kpc × 70kpc) of the cluster, derived through deep HST photometry, SINFONI and KMOS IFU spectroscopy, together with Chandra X-ray, ALMA and JVLA radio data.In the core of the cluster, we have identified two groups of galaxies (Complex A and Complex B), seven of them confirmed to be cluster members, with signatures of ongoing merging. These galaxies show perturbed morphologies and, three of them show signs of AGN activity. In particular, two of them, located at the center of each complex, have been found to host luminous, obscured and highly accreting AGN (λ = 0.4−0.6) exhibiting broad Hα line. Moreover, a third optically obscured type-2 AGN, has been discovered through BPT diagram in Complex A. The AGN at the center of Complex B is detected in X-ray while the other two, and their companions, are spatially related to radio emission. The three AGN provide one of the closest AGN triple at z > 1 revealed so far with a minimum (maximum) projected distance of 10 kpc (40 kpc). The discovery of multiple AGN activity in a highly star-forming region associated to the crowded core of a galaxy cluster at z ∼ 1.6, suggests that these processes have a key role in shaping the nascent Brightest Cluster Galaxy, observed at the center of local clusters. According to our data, all galaxies in the core of XDCPJ0044.0-2033 could form a BCG of M* ∼ 1012Mȯ hosting a BH of 2 × 108−109Mȯ, in a time scale of the order of 2.5 Gyrs.

scholarly journals DeepChandraobservation of the galaxy cluster WARPJ1415.1+3612 atz=1

2012 ◽  
Vol 539 ◽  
pp. A105 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Santos ◽  
P. Tozzi ◽  
P. Rosati ◽  
M. Nonino ◽  
G. Giovannini
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
The Galaxy

scholarly journals Anisotropy of the galaxy cluster X-ray luminosity–temperature relation

2018 ◽  
Vol 611 ◽  
pp. A50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Migkas ◽  
Thomas H. Reiprich
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Clusters ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cosmological Parameters ◽  
Galaxy Cluster ◽  
Luminosity Distance ◽  
Temperature Relation ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Group A

We introduce a new test to study the cosmological principle with galaxy clusters. Galaxy clusters exhibit a tight correlation between the luminosity and temperature of the X-ray-emitting intracluster medium. While the luminosity measurement depends on cosmological parameters through the luminosity distance, the temperature determination is cosmology-independent. We exploit this property to test the isotropy of the luminosity distance over the full extragalactic sky, through the normalization a of the LX–T scaling relation and the cosmological parameters Ωm and H0. To this end, we use two almost independent galaxy cluster samples: the ASCA Cluster Catalog (ACC) and the XMM Cluster Survey (XCS-DR1). Interestingly enough, these two samples appear to have the same pattern for a with respect to the Galactic longitude. More specifically, we identify one sky region within l ~ (−15°, 90°) (Group A) that shares very different best-fit values for the normalization of the LX–T relation for both ACC and XCS-DR1 samples. We use the Bootstrap and Jackknife methods to assess the statistical significance of these results. We find the deviation of Group A, compared to the rest of the sky in terms of a, to be ~2.7σ for ACC and ~3.1σ for XCS-DR1. This tension is not significantly relieved after excluding possible outliers and is not attributed to different redshift (z), temperature (T), or distributions of observable uncertainties. Moreover, a redshift conversion to the cosmic microwave background (CMB) frame does not have an important impact on our results. Using also the HIFLUGCS sample, we show that a possible excess of cool-core clusters in this region, is not able to explain the obtained deviations. Furthermore, we tested for a dependence of the results on supercluster environment, where the fraction of disturbed clusters might be enhanced, possibly affecting the LX–T relation. We indeed find a trend in the XCS-DR1 sample for supercluster members to be underluminous compared to field clusters. However, the fraction of supercluster members is similar in the different sky regions, so this cannot explain the observed differences, either. Constraining Ωm and H0 via the redshift evolution of LX–T and the luminosity distance via the flux–luminosity conversion, we obtain approximately the same deviation amplitudes as for a. It is interesting that the general observed behavior of Ωm for the sky regions that coincide with the CMB dipole is similar to what was found with other cosmological probes such as supernovae Ia. The reason for this behavior remains to be identified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document