scholarly journals CTNI-34. INITIAL ANALYSIS OF PHASE-III TRIAL - STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY VS. CHEMOTHERAPY GUIDED BY A CANCER STEM CELL TEST IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (NCT03632135)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii50-ii50
Author(s):  
Tulika Ranjan ◽  
Ricky Chen ◽  
Dawit Aregawi ◽  
Rekha Chaudhary ◽  
Soma Sengupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cancer Stem Cell ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Initial Analysis ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract BACKGROUND ChemoID is a cancer stem cell (CSC) cytotoxicity assay for guiding personalized treatment in the clinical trial NCT03632135 using standard-of-care drugs for improving clinical outcomes. The ChemoID assay is a functional test that determines the response to chemotherapy treatments from a panel of FDA approved drugs or their combinations. The trial aims to determine the clinical utility of the ChemoID assay as a predictor of clinical response in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS The study has been designed as a parallel group controlled clinical trial where participants with recurrent GBM amenable to surgery or biopsy are randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to either standard-of-care chemotherapy chosen by the physician or ChemoID-guided therapy. Response to therapy is measured by MRI imaging (RANO 1.1). The primary endpoint is median overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints are OS at 6, 9, and 12 months, median progression-free survival (PFS), PFS at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months, objective tumor response, time to recurrence, and quality of life. RESULTS A total of 41 participants (29 males, 12 females) have been accrued to the trial thus far with a median age of 61yo. Data from 38 participants (27 males, 11 females) has reached maturity for analysis. 21 participants have been randomized to the assay-guided arm and 17 to the physician-choice arm. From an initial analysis, we observed that 71% (15/21) of the participants in the ChemoID-guided arm are alive and 29% (6/21) are deceased. We also observed that 41% (7/17) of the participants in the physician-choice arm are alive and 59% (10/17) are deceased. This gives the odds of death for the ChemoID-guided arm to be 72% lower than on the physician-guided arm (OR=0.28; (0.07–1.08); p=0.065). CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary results indicate that the ChemoID assay has the potential to improve survival of recurrent GBM patients.

scholarly journals ACTR-47. PHASE-III TRIAL OF STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY VS. CHEMOTHERAPY GUIDED BY CANCER STEM CELL TEST IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (NCT03632135)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi24-vi24
Author(s):  
Tulika Ranjan ◽  
Dawit Aregawi ◽  
Christine Lu-Emerson ◽  
Jason Schroeder ◽  
Mark Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Recurrence Time ◽  
Cell Kill ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract Stupp treatment protocol for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) has improved the median overall survival to 14.6 months. However, no investigations have defined effective strategies against recurrence and the prognosis of recurrent GBM patients remains poor. Personalized medicine with assay-guided treatment targeting chemotherapy resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) alongside the bulk tumor cells is a new paradigm in cancer treatment that may result in improved patient’s outcome. We are using ChemoID, a CLIA and CAP certified CSC cytotoxicity assay for predicting response to chemotherapeutic agents. Our prospective analysis of 61 GBM patients demonstrated that ChemoID-guided treatment significantly improved tumor response. For every 5% increase in cell kill of CSCs by assay-guided chemotherapy, 12-month patient response (non-recurrence of cancer) increased 2.5-fold, OR=2.3 (p=0.01). We also found that median recurrence time was 20-months versus 3-months for patients with a positive (>40% cell kill) CSC test versus negative, whereas median recurrence time was 13-months versus 4-months for patients with a positive (>55% cell kill) bulk test versus negative. We are conducting a multi-institutional phase-III clinical trial (NCT03632135) to determine the clinical validity of the ChemoID assay as a predictor of clinical response in recurrent GBM. The study has been designed as a parallel group controlled clinical trial and the participants are randomized to either standard of care chemotherapy chosen by the physician or ChemoID-guided therapy. Response to therapy will be measured by MRI imaging using RANO criteria. Primary endpoint of median overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints of OS at 6, 9, and 12 months, median progression free survival (PFS), PFS at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months, objective tumor response, time to recurrence, and quality of life will be measured. Trial is open and currently 22 subjects have been enrolled. Interim analysis of the trial will be conducted in approximately 12 months.

scholarly journals PC3 - 155 Phase II Study of Dianhydrogalactitol in Patients with MGMT-Unmethylated, Bevacizumab-Naïve Recurrent Glioblastoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (S4) ◽  
pp. S18-S18
Author(s):  
B.J. O'Brien ◽  
J.A. Bacha ◽  
D.M. Brown ◽  
A. Steino ◽  
R. Schwartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Interstrand Cross Links ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common brain cancer. Most GBM tumors have unmethylated promoter status for O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT); a validated biomarker for MGMT protein-expression and ensuing temozolomide-resistance. Second-line treatment with bevacizumab has not improved overall survival (OS). Dianhydrogalactitol (VAL-083) is a bi-functional alkylating agent targeting N7-Guanine, thus MGMT-independently inducing interstrand cross-links, DNA double-strand breaks and cell-death in GBM cell-lines and cancer stem cells. VAL-083 is currently in Phase I/II clinical trial for recurrent GBM, post-TMZ and post-bevacizumab. In this Phase II clinical trial, the main goal is to assess the 9-month OS in MGMT-unmethylated, recurrent, bevacizumab-naive GBM. RATIONALE: The vast majority of GBM patients experience recurrent/progressive disease within a year from initial diagnosis and median survival after recurrence is 3-9 months. Chemotherapy regimens for these patients are lacking and there is a significant unmet medical need. Given VAL-083’s novel alkylating mechanism, promising clinical benefit, and favorable safety profile, a trial studying VAL-083 in MGMT-unmethylated recurrent GBM is warranted. METHOD: Randomized, non-comparative biomarker-driven Phase II clinical trial in MGMT-unmethylated GBM patients at first recurrence/progression, prior to bevacizumab. 48 patients will be randomized to receive VAL-083 or “standard-of-care” salvage drug lomustine. 32 patients will receive VAL-083 40mg/m2/day on days 1,2,3 of a 21-day cycle. 16 patients will receive lomustine 90 mg/m2/day on day 1 of a 42-day cycle. Patients will be followed until death or for at least 9 months from enrollment, whichever occurs earlier. Survival will be compared to the BELOB trial for recurrent MGMT-unmethylated GBM patients treated with lomustine.

Industry Watch

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 1468-1482
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cancer Drugs ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trial ◽  
Chinese Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

Arana Therapeutics Completes Project with CSL. Biotech Capital to Invest $2.2 Million in Generic Health Pty Ltd. Phase III Clinical Trial for “Dual Opioid” Therapy. Beijing Med-Pharm Announces Exclusive Agreement to Market Enablex in China. Genesis Pharmaceuticals Collaborates with the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. NPIL and Merck Collaborate on Cancer Drugs. LifeCell Launches First Stem Cell Center in Tamil Nadu. Japan's Bioventures Today — BCS, Inc. Bio-Rad Launches In2it A1C Analyzer for Point-Of-Care Diabetes Testing.

Cyto-KIK: A phase II trial of cytoreductive surgery in kidney cancer plus immunotherapy (nivolumab) and targeted kinase inhibition (cabozantinib).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4598-TPS4598
Author(s):  
Karie Runcie ◽  
Eric A. Singer ◽  
Moshe Chaim Ornstein ◽  
Christopher B. Anderson ◽  
Matthew Dallos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Orthotopic Mouse Model

TPS4598 Background: Despite recent therapeutic advancements in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), only 5-10% of patients will achieve a complete response (CR) to therapy. Cytoreductive nephrectomy removes a large portion of the tumor which may be a source of immunosuppression driven by tumor cell-intrinsic factors in the tumor microenvironment. A pre-clinical orthotopic mouse model of aggressive metastatic triple negative breast cancer showed that neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibition generated enhanced and sustained antitumor immune responses with improved survival compared to adjuvant therapy (Liu J et al. Cancer Discov. 2016:1382). Clinical validation of improved outcomes with neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors has been demonstrated in trials for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, advanced melanoma, and recurrent glioblastoma (Forde, P.M., et al. N Engl J Med. 2018:1976; Amaria, R.N., et al Nat Med. 2018:1649; Cloughesy T.F., et al. Nat Med 2019:477). Recent data from a phase III trial in subjects with untreated mRCC, demonstrated the superiority of combination cabozantinib and nivolumab over sunitinib and established a new standard of care for mRCC (Choueiri T.K., et al. Annals of Onc, 2020;31 (suppl; abstr 6960). We hypothesize that if tumor specific immune responses to immunotherapy are greatest prior to nephrectomy, then treatment with nivolumab (nivo) and cabozantinib (cabo) prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy will lead to maximal peripheral and intra-tumoral specific immune responses and higher rates of CR during the course of treatment. Methods: This is an open label phase II, multicenter clinical trial of combination nivo and cabo prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with mRCC (NCT04322955). 48 treatment- naïve subjects with radiological or histological diagnosis of mRCC will be enrolled with the primary endpoint of CR rate according to RECIST version 1.1. Subjects will receive cabo (40mg) daily and nivo (480mg) every 4 weeks for 12 weeks prior to nephrectomy and a 3+3 design will be used to evaluate the safety of the interval (21 or 14 days) between the discontinuation of cabo and nephrectomy. Post-operatively, subjects will resume treatment with cabo and nivo until evidence of disease progression. Secondary endpoints include median size reduction of the primary tumor, response rate, PFS, OS, and surgical outcomes using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Tissue based assays will quantify treatment related changes in the renal tumor microenvironment through polychromatic immunofluorescence, single cell RNA sequencing of the biopsy and nephrectomy specimen, and multiplex assessment of circulating serum cytokines. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI will be performed in a subset of subjects to assess radiologic correlates of response. The study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04322955.

Phase II trial of cytoreductive surgery in kidney cancer plus immunotherapy (nivolumab) and targeted kinase inhibition (cabozantinib) (Cyto-KIK).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS371-TPS371
Author(s):  
Karie Runcie ◽  
Eric A. Singer ◽  
Moshe Chaim Ornstein ◽  
Christopher B. Anderson ◽  
Matthew Dallos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Orthotopic Mouse Model

TPS371 Background: Despite recent therapeutic advancements in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), only 5-10% of patients will achieve a complete response (CR) to therapy. Cytoreductive nephrectomy removes a large portion of the tumor which may be a source of immunosuppression driven by tumor cell-intrinsic factors in the tumor microenvironment. A pre-clinical orthotopic mouse model of aggressive metastatic triple negative breast cancer showed that neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibition generated enhanced and sustained antitumor immune responses with improved survival compared to adjuvant therapy (Liu J et al. Cancer Discov. 2016:1382). Clinical validation of improved outcomes with neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors has been demonstrated in trials for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, advanced melanoma, and recurrent glioblastoma (Forde, P.M., et al. N Engl J Med. 2018:1976; Amaria, R.N., et al Nat Med. 2018:1649; Cloughesy T.F., et al. Nat Med 2019:477). Recent data from a phase III trial in subjects with untreated mRCC, demonstrated the superiority of combination cabozantinib and nivolumab over sunitinib and established a new standard of care for mRCC (Choueiri T.K., et al. Annals of Onc, 2020;31 (suppl; abstr 6960). We hypothesize that if tumor specific immune responses to immunotherapy are greatest prior to nephrectomy, then treatment with nivolumab (nivo) and cabozantinib (cabo) prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy will lead to maximal peripheral and intra-tumoral specific immune responses and higher rates of CR during the course of treatment. Methods: This is an open label phase II, multicenter clinical trial of combination nivo and cabo prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with mRCC (NCT04322955). 48 treatment- naïve subjects with radiological or histological diagnosis of mRCC will be enrolled with the primary endpoint of CR rate according to RECIST version 1.1. Subjects will receive cabo (40mg) daily and nivo (480mg) every 4 weeks for 12 weeks prior to nephrectomy and a 3+3 design will be used to evaluate the safety of the interval (21 or 14 days) between the discontinuation of cabo and nephrectomy. Post-operatively, subjects will resume treatment with cabo and nivo until evidence of disease progression. Secondary endpoints include median size reduction of the primary tumor, response rate, PFS, OS, and surgical outcomes using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Tissue based assays will quantify treatment related changes in the renal tumor microenvironment through polychromatic immunofluorescence, single cell RNA sequencing of the biopsy and nephrectomy specimen, and multiplex assessment of circulating serum cytokines. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI will be performed in a subset of subjects to assess radiologic correlates of response. The study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: AAAS6927 .

scholarly journals Phase II clinical trial of metformin as a cancer stem cell-targeting agent in ovarian cancer

JCI Insight ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R Brown ◽  
Daniel K. Chan ◽  
Jessica J Shank ◽  
Kent A. Griffith ◽  
Huihui Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cancer Stem Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Cell Targeting

NRG Oncology HN006: Randomized phase II/III trial of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection for early-stage oral cavity cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS6093-TPS6093
Author(s):  
Stephen Yenzen Lai ◽  
Pedro A. Torres-Saavedra ◽  
Neal E. Dunlap ◽  
Beth Michelle Beadle ◽  
Steven S. Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Oral Cavity Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Elective Neck Dissection ◽  
Pet Ct

TPS6093 Background: Since patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer (OCC; T1-2N0M0; AJCC 8th ed) have a 20-30% rate of occult nodal metastases despite clinical and radiographic assessment, standard of care treatment includes elective neck dissection (END). Many patients have comprehensive surgical management of the regional cervical nodal basin even though the majority of those necks (70-80%) will not contain disease. Assessment of draining first echelon lymph nodes by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (Bx), a less invasive surgical procedure, may provide an alternative to END, while potentially reducing morbidity and cost. A decisive clinical trial comparing SLN Bx versus END can focus the HNC clinical and research community and resources on establishing the standard of care for management of the neck in early-stage OCC. Methods: In order to address the efficacy of SLN Bx in this population, we recently activated an international multi-institutional phase II/III prospective trial randomizing patients to two surgical arms: SLN Bx and END. PET/CT is an integral imaging biomarker in this trial. A node-negative PET/CT study with central read is required before randomization. Patients with a positive PET/CT central result will remain in a registry to compare imaging findings with final neck pathology. Given the current evidence available regarding morbidity for SLN Bx versus END, the phase II will determine if patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related QOL at 6 months after surgery using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) shows a signal of superiority of SLN Bx compared to END. A total of 228 randomized patients with negative PET/CT for potential evaluation of shoulder-related morbidity with difference in 6-month NDII scores (minimum important difference ³7.5; one-sided a = 0.10; 90% power) will serve as the “Go/No-Go” decision to move forward into phase III. The phase III portion is a non-inferiority (NI) trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint (NI margin hazard ratio 1.34 based on a 5% absolute difference in 2-year DFS; one-sided alpha 0.05; 80% power, and an interim look for efficacy at 67% of the events based on an O’Brien-Fleming boundary). The NDII at 6 months after surgery is a hierarchical co-primary endpoint for the phase III. Target accrual of phase III is 618 PET/CT negative patients, including those randomized in phase II (297 DFS events required for the final analysis). In addition to radiotherapy and imaging credentialing, quality assurance will include central pathology review of all negative SLN Bx cases and surgeon credentialing through an education course and SLN Bx and END case review by the surgical co-chairs. A surgical quality assurance working group will review all trial SLN Bx and END outcomes. As of 02/15/21, 7 patients have been screened and 6 of the planned 228 randomized patients in phase II have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04333537.

scholarly journals P14.15 Benefit of Bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. Results of 81 patients from a single institution

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii69-iii69
Author(s):  
O Absalyamova ◽  
G Kobiakov ◽  
G Agabekyan ◽  
A Poddubsky ◽  
A Belyashova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
Concomitant Disease ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Continuous Application

Abstract BACKGROUND No standard of care has been established for patients with progressive glioblastoma (rGBM). Previous studies suggested that bevacizumab (BEV) is safe and produces responses that result in a decreased use of glucocorticoids and increased progression-free survival (PFS) with an unclear effect on overall survival (OS). Crossover to BEV in the control arm is the possible reason why the advantage of BEV has not been proven in Phase III trials. We retrospectively analyzed own results of BEV treatment in rGBM. MATERIAL AND METHODS 81 patients progressed after radiotherapy plus concomitant and maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) and undergo BEV as monotherapy (BevMo, 11 patients) or in combinations (Irinotecan (BevI) - 53, lomustine (BevL)- 11, TMZ (BevT) - 6. Median age 54 years. Among them 33 patients were re-irradiated: 11 - radiosurgery (RS), 20 fractionated irradiation (RT), 2 - RS+RT. 33 patients continued BEV after progression with changing or adding cytostatic. PFS was calculated from the date of verification, PFS1 - from the date of 1-st progression, PFS2 - from the date of 2-nd progression. RESULTS Median PFS was 9.0 ([CI] 7.0–10.9) months. Median PFS1 was 10.5 ([CI] 8.1–12.9) months. In the BevMo, BevI, BevL, BevT group PFS1 was 15.7, 10.1, 10.5, 13.2 months, respectively, p=0.7. Objective response (OR) was reached in 34%, stable disease (SD) in 28%, progression (PD) in 37% patients. 16 patients stopped BEV without progression (4-patient`s decision, 7- doctor`s decision, 2 - adverse event, 3 - concomitant disease). Median time of BEV treatment was 11.6 months. Median BEV-free interval till progression was 3.7 months. 33 patients continued or restarted BEV after progression. Median PFS2 was 8.0 ([CI] 4.9–11.1) months. The median OS from the date of 1-st progression was 23.5 months ([CI] 18.7–27.4). In groups with RT, RS, RS+RT and no re-irradiarion OS was 24.6 ([CI] 17.6–31.5), 35.4 ([CI] 35.0–35.8), 17.8, 20.6 ([CI] 15.2–26.0), respectively, p=0.2. CONCLUSION OS in our group is outrageously high. Maintaining BEV after progression was effective. In our group BEV discontinuation led to rapid progression. The resumption of Bev with progression was effective, which indicates the advisability of its continuous application.

scholarly journals Days gained response discriminates treatment response in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab-based therapies

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle W Singleton ◽  
Alyx B Porter ◽  
Leland S Hu ◽  
Sandra K Johnston ◽  
Kamila M Bond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Response ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Cytotoxic Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract Background Accurate assessments of patient response to therapy are a critical component of personalized medicine. In glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive form of brain cancer, tumor growth dynamics are heterogenous across patients, complicating assessment of treatment response. This study aimed to analyze days gained (DG), a burgeoning model-based dynamic metric, for response assessment in patients with recurrent GBM who received bevacizumab-based therapies. Methods DG response scores were calculated using volumetric tumor segmentations for patients receiving bevacizumab with and without concurrent cytotoxic therapy (N = 62). Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were implemented to examine DG prognostic relationship to overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the onset of treatment for recurrent GBM. Results In patients receiving concurrent bevacizumab and cytotoxic therapy, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significant differences in OS and PFS at DG cutoffs consistent with previously identified values from newly diagnosed GBM using T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (T1Gd). DG scores for bevacizumab monotherapy patients only approached significance for PFS. Cox regression showed that increases of 25 DG on T1Gd imaging were significantly associated with a 12.5% reduction in OS hazard for concurrent therapy patients and a 4.4% reduction in PFS hazard for bevacizumab monotherapy patients. Conclusion DG has significant meaning in recurrent therapy as a metric of treatment response, even in the context of anti-angiogenic therapies. This provides further evidence supporting the use of DG as an adjunct response metric that quantitatively connects treatment response and clinical outcomes.

TJ-107 for the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: Results of a phase II randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 567-567
Author(s):  
Toru Kono ◽  
Taishi Hata ◽  
Yoshinori Munemoto ◽  
Takanori Matsui ◽  
Hiroshi Kojima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Patient Reported

567 Background: Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OPN) continues to be a substantial problem for many cancer patients. In light of the promising data on TJ-107 from a previous pilot study (ASCO-GI, 2009), the present clinical trial was conducted to evaluate its efficacy for the prevention of OPN. To determine whether TJ-107 given as an adjuvant therapy effectively prevents oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy Methods: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in colorectal cancer patients undergoing therapy with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). TJ-107 (7.5g) or matching placebo was orally administered three times daily. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2 or greater OPN according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; version 3) criteria after 8 cycles of chemotherapy. Patient-reported neurotoxicity symptoms were also assessed using the neurotoxicity subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group–Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx, version 4). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of all grades of OPN after each cycle and chemotherapy response rates. Results: A total of 93 patients were enrolled from May 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010 at 37 participating GONE trial institutions in Japan. Eighty-nine evaluable patients were randomized to either the TJ-107 group (n = 44) or the placebo group (n = 45). Placebo patients showed a significantly higher rate of neurotoxicity than that of TJ-107 patients (p < 0.001), with the median difference in NTX-12 score of 3 and 3.5 at the 8th week and 26th week, respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in response to chemotherapy (55.5% in TJ-107, 39.1% in placebo). In addition, TJ-107 treatment was well tolerated overall. Conclusions: TJ-107 shows promise in reducing the incidence of OPN. Further investigation in a larger phase III trial is necessary before any conclusions can be drawn. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document