scholarly journals RONC-32. LOCAL CONTROL FOLLOWING PROTON THERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC CHORDOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii461-iii461
Author(s):  
Daniel Indelicato ◽  
Ronny Rotondo ◽  
Raymond Vega ◽  
Adam Holtzman ◽  
Wen Shen Looi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lumbosacral Spine ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract BACKGROUND Due to the location and high dose required for disease control, pediatric chordomas are theoretically well-suited for treatment with proton therapy, but their low incidence limits the clinical outcome data available in the literature. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2008 and 2019, 29 patients with a median age of 14.8 years (range, 3.8–21.8) received proton therapy for non-metastatic chordoma at a single institution. Twenty-four tumors arose in the clivus/cervical spine region and 5 in the lumbosacral spine. Twenty-six tumors demonstrated well-differentiated histology and 3 were dedifferentiated or not otherwise specified (NOS). Approximately half of the tumors underwent specialized testing: 14 were brachyury-positive and 10 retained INI-1. Seventeen patients had gross disease at the time of radiation. The median radiation dose was 73.8 GyRBE. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 4.3 years (range, 1.0–10.7), the 5-year estimates of local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85%, 82%, and 86%, respectively. Excluding 3 patients with dedifferentiated/NOS chordoma, the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 92%, 92%, and 91%, respectively. Serious toxicities included 3 patients with hardware failure or related infection requiring revision surgery, 2 patients with hormone deficiency, and 2 patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction causing chronic otitis media. CONCLUSION In pediatric patients with chordoma, proton therapy is associated with a low risk of serious toxicity and high efficacy, particularly in well-differentiated tumors. Complete resection may be unnecessary for local control and destabilizing operations requiring instrumentation may result in additional complications following therapy.

Stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive gynecological malignancies: a multi-institutional analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 865-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Onal ◽  
Melis Gultekin ◽  
Ezgi Oymak ◽  
Ozan Cem Guler ◽  
Melek Tugce Yilmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oligometastatic Disease

IntroductionData supporting stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients are increasing; however, the outcomes for gynecological cancer patients have yet to be fully explored. Our aim is to analyze the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent or oligometastatic ovarian cancer or cervical cancer.MethodsThe clinical data of 29 patients (35 lesions) with oligometastatic cervical cancer (21 patients, 72%) and ovarian carcinoma (8 patients, 28%) who were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sites were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had <5 metastases at diagnosis or during progression, and were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease. Patients with ≥5 metastases or with brain metastases and those who underwent re-irradiation for primary site were excluded. Age, progression time, mean biologically effective dose, and treatment response were compared for overall survival and progression-free survival.ResultsA total of 29 patients were included in the study. De novo oligometastatic disease was observed in 7 patients (24%), and 22 patients (76%) had oligoprogression. The median follow-up was 15.3 months (range 1.9–95.2). The 1 and 2 year overall survival rates were 85% and 62%, respectively, and the 1 and 2 year progression-free survival rates were 27% and 18%, respectively. The 1 and 2 year local control rates for all patients were 84% and 84%, respectively. All disease progressions were observed at a median time of 7.7 months (range 1.0–16.0) after the completion of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Patients with a complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis had a significantly higher 2 year overall survival and progression-free survival compared with their counterparts. In multivariate analysis, early progression (≤12 months) and complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis were the significant prognostic factors for improved overall survival. However, no significant factor was found for progression-free survival in the multivariable analysis. No patients experienced grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities.ConclusionsPatients with early detection of oligometastasis (≤12 months) and with complete response observed at the stereotactic body radiotherapy site had a better survival compared with their counterparts. Stereotactic body radiotherapy at the oligometastatic site resulted in excellent local control rates with minimal toxicity, and can potentially contribute to long-term survival.

Significance of c-myc Rearrangements in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2030-2030
Author(s):  
Philip Bierman ◽  
Fausto Loberiza ◽  
Bhavana Dave ◽  
Warren Sanger ◽  
R. Gregory Bociek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Rearrangements of the c-myc oncogene can be seen in 5–10% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, studies examining the significance of this finding have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis to determine the clinical significance of c-myc rearrangements in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The results of classical cytogenetic studies and FISH analyses were used to identify diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cases in the database of the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group with or without c-myc rearrangements. Patients who were HIV positive and those with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease were excluded. We identified 16 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and c-myc rearrangements. All patients were initially treated with doxorubicin- or mitoxantrone-containing chemotherapy regimens. The median age of these 16 patients was 61 years (range 40 to 80), and 5 (31%) were males. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) was 0–2 at diagnosis in 9 patients (56%), and 3–5 in 7 patients (44%). Eleven patients (69%) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm) at diagnosis. No significant differences in outcome were identified when the 16 c-myc positive patients were compared with 97 c-myc negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the same age range. The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for the c-myc positive patients was 23% (95% CI 6% to 46%), as compared with 38% (95% CI 29% to 48%) for c-myc negative patients (p=0.17). The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 36% (95% CI 14% to 59%) and 47% (95% CI 36% to 56%), respectively (p=0.19). Classical cytogenetics and FISH analyses were also used to examine the 16 c-myc positive cases for bcl-2 rearrangements. Eight (50%) cases had rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc rearrangements. These patients were similar to the c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients except for a higher likelihood of an elevated LDH level at diagnosis (88% vs. 25%; p=0.03). The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients was 0%, as compared to 33% (95% CI 6% to 66%) for patients with rearrangements of c-myc alone, and 37% (95% CI 28% to 47%) for c-myc negative patients. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 12% (95% CI 1% to 42%), 47% (95% CI 12% to 76%), and 41% (95% CI 31% to 51%), respectively. A multivariate analysis, adjusting for IPI score, demonstrated that the relative risk (RR) of treatment failure was significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.32–6.23; p=0.008). Similarly, mortality was also significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.18–6.11; p=0.02). In contrast, no significant differences in treatment failure or overall survival were demonstrated when c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients were compared with c-myc negative patients. Our results demonstrate that the c-myc rearrangement is not associated with poorer survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, patients with rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc had significantly worse progression-free survival and overall survival.

Long-Term Survival Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin, With Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Bladder Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 4602-4608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans von der Maase ◽  
Lisa Sengelov ◽  
James T. Roberts ◽  
Sergio Ricci ◽  
Luigi Dogliotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Visceral Metastases ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Purpose To compare long-term survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) or methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC). Patients and Methods Efficacy data from a large randomized phase III study of GC versus MVAC were updated. Time-to-event analyses were performed on the observed distributions of overall and progression-free survival. Results A total of 405 patients were randomly assigned: 203 to the GC arm and 202 to the MVAC arm. At the time of analysis, 347 patients had died (GC arm, 176 patients; MVAC arm, 171 patients). Overall survival was similar in both arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.34; P = .66) with a median survival of 14.0 months for GC and 15.2 months for MVAC. The 5-year overall survival rates were 13.0% and 15.3%, respectively (P = .53). The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months for GC and 8.3 months for MVAC, with an HR of 1.09. The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 9.8% and 11.3%, respectively (P = .63). Significant prognostic factors favoring overall survival included performance score (> 70), TNM staging (M0 v M1), low/normal alkaline phosphatase level, number of disease sites (≤ three), and the absence of visceral metastases. By adjusting for these prognostic factors, the HR was 0.99 for overall survival and 1.01 for progression-free survival. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients with and without visceral metastases were 6.8% and 20.9%, respectively. Conclusion Long-term overall and progression-free survival after treatment with GC or MVAC are similar. These results strengthen the role of GC as a standard of care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TCC.

scholarly journals RONC-24. PROTON THERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC EPENDYMOMA: MATURE OUTCOMES FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA AND MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii460-iii460
Author(s):  
Daniel J Indelicato ◽  
Myrsini Ioakeim-Ioannidou ◽  
Julie Bradley ◽  
Raymond Mailhot-Vega ◽  
Christopher Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Massachusetts General Hospital ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
University Of Florida ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pediatric Ependymoma ◽  
The University

Abstract OBJECTIVE Report long-term efficacy and toxicity of proton therapy for pediatric ependymoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2000–2017, 318 children with nonmetastatic grade II/III intracranial ependymoma received proton therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Florida. Median age was 3.5 years (range, 0.7–21.3 years); 56% were male. Most (69%) tumors were in the posterior fossa and classified as WHO grade III (64%). Eighty-four percent had a gross total or near total tumor resection before radiotherapy and 30% received chemotherapy. Median radiation dose was 55.8 CGE (range, 50.4–59.4 CGE). RESULTS Median follow-up was 6 years (range, 0.6–19.2 years). Seven-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 77.1% (95% CI 71.7–81.7%), 64.4% (95% CI 58.6–69.8%), and 82% (76.9–86.2%), respectively. Subtotal resection was associated with inferior local control (60% vs 80%; p&lt;0.01), progression-free survival (49% vs 67%; p&lt;0.01), and overall survival (69% vs 84%; p&lt;0.05). Male gender was associated with inferior progression-free (59% vs 71%; p&lt;0.01) and overall survival (77% vs 89%; p&lt;0.05). Twenty patients (6.2%) require hearing aids; of these, 12/20 received cisplatin. Grade 3+ brainstem toxicity rate was 1.6% and more common in patients who received &gt;54 CGE. The rate of second malignancy was 0.9%. CONCLUSION Proton therapy offers commensurate disease control to modern photon therapy without unexpected toxicity. The high rate of long-term survival justifies efforts to reduce radiation exposure in this young population with brain tumors. Independent of modality, this large series confirms extent of resection as the most important modifiable factor for survival.

scholarly journals Effects of Concurrent Expression of Myc and Bcl-2 on the Treatment and Prognosis in Extranodal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 34s-34s
Author(s):  
M. Sonmez ◽  
C. Konca
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Aim: We aimed to investigate the effects of immunohistochemical and molecular presence of double-hit lymphomas (DHL) (combined expression of myc and bcl-2) on overall and progression-free survival rates of patients with extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods: A total of 31 patients (17 female, 14 male; mean age 57 years) with diagnosis of extranodal DLBCL were included into the study. Patients transforming from low grade B cell lymphoma, and patients with HIV positivity were not included. In a retrospective manner, patient characteristics were noted (age at diagnosis, sex, sites of extranodal involvement, stage, high-risk group, histopathological diagnosis, IPI score, LDH level at diagnosis, bone marrow involvement, and treatment modalities). Histopathological specimens underwent immunohistochemical (bcl-6, bcl-2, myc, CD10, Mum-1) and molecular (bcl-2 and myc, by means of PCR) analysis. All patients was treatment with R-CHOP protocol. Results: DHL was observed immunohistochemically in only one patient, while molecular studies found 6 cases. Three-month overall survival rates were 50% and 88% in DHL positive and negative groups, respectively. Six-month overall survival rates were 16% and 76% in DHL positive and negative groups, respectively. Progression-free 3-month survival rates were 51% and 88% in DHL positive and negative groups, respectively. Progression-free 6-month survival rates were 33% and 76% in DHL positive and negative groups, respectively. No relation with histopathological type of the disease was noted. Conclusion: We conclude that DHL presence in patients with extranodal DLBCL was an independent factor leading to shortened overall or progression-free survival.

Updated 12-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing standard-dose to high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with more than three positive nodes (LN+)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 549-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Gianni ◽  
G. Bonadonna ◽  
G. Michelangelo
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Advantage ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intent To Treat

549 Aims: We conducted a multicenter randomized trial comparing sequential adjuvant standard-dose with high-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer patients younger than 60 years, with 4 or more positive nodes. Patients: Following surgery, patients were stratified by number of positive nodes (4–9 or 9), and randomly assigned to either conventional Epi–CMF (3 courses of epirubicin 120 mg/m2, followed by 6 courses of CMF), or high-dose chemotherapy (HDS) with stem cells support (one course of cyclophosphamide 7 g/m2, followed by one course of methotrexate 8 g/m2 with leukovorin rescue, by two courses of epirubicin 120 mg/m2, and by one course of thiotepa 600 mg/m2 plus melphalan 160–180 mg/m2 with stem cell autografting). Tamoxifen (20 mg/d × 5 yr) was also planned regardless of menopausal and receptor status. The study was designed with a power of 80% to detect a 15% increase in progression-free survival at 5 years in the HDS arm. Results: Of the initially enrolled 398 patients, 16 were ineligible, and the remaining 382 patients (Epi–CMF: 197 patients, HDS: 185 patients) were analyzed according to intent-to- treat. One patient treated with HDS (0.5%) died of interstitial pneumonia. With a median follow-up of 136 months, the 12-year progression-free survival rates were 44% and 52% for the Epi–CMF and the HDS groups, respectively, and the overall survival rates were 51% and 60%, respectively. However, among the 68 patients younger than 36 years, and the 189 patients with 4–9 LN+, those in the HDS group showed a trend for a progression-free survival advantage (HR 0.76 and 0.74, respectively). Conclusions: In the intent-to-treat analysis the 9% overall survival advantage associated with the HDS regimen failed to reach statistical significance in a study powered to detect a 15% difference. To reliably define the role of high-dose therapy, meta-analysis of patient data from all relevant randomized trials (such as that planned by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group) is needed. Supported in part by AIRC and Pharmacia & Upjohn, Milano, Italy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

High-grade glioma of central nervous system: Single center treatment experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14040-e14040
Author(s):  
Nur Olgun ◽  
Deniz Kızmazoğlu ◽  
Batuhan Özdoğar ◽  
Emre Çeçen ◽  
Ceren Kızmazoğlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
One Year ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

e14040 Background: To evaluate characteristics and treatment responses of patients with high grade gliomas (HGG) in our center Methods: Medical files of patients with malignant CNS tumors between 1987-2020 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 44 patients with HGG. Results: Diagnosis of patients as follows: 21 pons glioma, 2 anaplastic astrocytoma, 11 anaplastic ependimoma, 7 glioblastoma multiforme, 1 glioblastoma, 2 gliomatosis cerebri. The median age at diagnosis was 6,5 yrs (7 – 17 yrs), M/F:25/19. Age distrubution: <5 yrs 12 patients, 5-10 yrs 18 patients, 10-18 yrs 14 patients. The most frequent complaints for pons gliomas: cranial nerve paralysis (52%), visial impairment (48%), headache (38%), power loss (43%) and speech disorder (30%). Surgery was performed to extrinsic component of mass in 3 patients of pons gliomas. For other HGG: 7 subtotal resection and 16 gross total resection had performed. Seven patients died before RT. And other 37 patients received radiotherapy. RT total doses varied between 50-60 Gy. Seven patients were not received chemotherapy, 3 of them died before chemo, and others received only RT. Chemotherapy protocoles were changed over the years: For pons gliomas, MOPP (Mechlorethamine, vincristine, prednisone, procarbazine) in 3 patients, NOPP (nitrosourea, vincristine, prednisone, procarbazine) in 2 patients, only ICE (Ifosfamide, carboplatin, cisplatin) in five patients, oral cyclophosphamide in one patient, temozolamide in one patient and temo + bevacizumab in one patient. Last 3 patients received nimotuzumab-vinorelbine after ICE and temo. For other HGGs, platin based regimens used fort he first line treatment. Temozolamide-bevacizumab, irinotecan-temsirolimus combinations were the other options as second and also third line treatments. Median progression free survival time was 6 mos (2 weeks -25 mos) for pons gliomas, for other gliomas median progression free survival time was 14 mos (0 -74 mos). For pons gliomas: Event free survival rate for 6 mos was 75%, for one year was 17%, One year, 18 mos, and two years overall survival rates were 84%, 52% and 10% respectively. For other HGGs: Event free survival rate for one year and two years were 57% and 17% respectively. One year and two years overall survival rates were 73% and 36% respectively. Conclusions: High grade glioma is a group of tumor in which still the helplessness experienced in treatment. Despite radiotherapy and chemotherapy, prognosis is very poor. The progression free and overall survival rates of patients were similar to literature. With new developments in molecular pathology, as the use of molecular target therapies, the progression free survival rates newly will improve.

PP146 Cost-Effectiveness Of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab In Advanced Melanoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 123-123
Author(s):  
Birol Tibet
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Dutch Health ◽  
Overall Survival Rates ◽  
Health System Perspective

Introduction:This study was done to assess the cost effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIV+IPI) versus nivolumab alone (NIV) for previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma (AM) from the Dutch health system perspective.Methods:A Markov model was constructed with a lifetime horizon. Future effects and costs were discounted at 1.5 and four percent, respectively. Risks of progression and death were based on progression-free survival rates obtained from a phase III clinical trial (NIV+IPI and NIV versus ipilimumab). Conjectural overall survival rates were calculated indirectly by using progression-free survival and overall survival rates from another trial (NIV versus dacarbazine), and were extrapolated later using the Weibull distribution. Utility values of health states and disutility values of adverse events were derived from the literature. Unit costs were derived from the Dutch Diagnosis Treatment Combination Care Products Tariff, Erasmus University Medical Center prices, and Dutch pharmacy purchase prices. Chronic management costs of AM and treatment costs of adverse events were calculated based on the results of a survey of clinicians that determined the necessary healthcare services and their utilization rates.Results:On average, over a lifetime an AM patient treated with NIV+IPI was estimated to live 4.2 years and 2.6 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at a discounted net cost of EUR 262,824 per patient, while a patient treated with NIV was estimated to live 3.3 years and 2.0 QALYs at a discounted net cost of EUR 195,341 per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was EUR 70,770 per life-year saved, and the incremental cost-utility ratio was EUR 115,533 per QALY gained.Conclusions:At a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 80,000 per QALY gained, NIV+IPI may not be a cost-effective tool, compared with NIV, for preventing the high mortality and morbidity associated with AM from the Dutch health system perspective.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of proton beam therapy for liver metastatic recurrence in gastric cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 903-908
Author(s):  
Hisashi Yamaguchi ◽  
Michitaka Honda ◽  
Koichi Hamada ◽  
Hiroshi Kobayashi ◽  
Yukitoshi Todate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Proton Beam ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Proton Beam Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Recurrence ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Abstract Objective The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy for liver metastatic recurrence in gastric cancer patients. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent proton beam therapy from 2010 to 2015 were isolated from our institutional database. Patients with extrahepatic metastatic lesions were excluded. Seven patients were enrolled. The median diameter of target lesions was 31 mm (13–68 mm). The most frequent dosage was 72.6 Gy equivalent in 22 fractions. The effectiveness was assessed based on the local control, overall survival and progression-free survival rates. The local control, overall survival and progression-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adverse events were described according to the patients’ medical records. Results The median follow-up period was 41.7 months (20.7–66.3 months). The 3-year local control, overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 85.7, 68.6 and 43%, respectively. All patients completed proton beam therapy without interruption. No grade ≥3 adverse events were observed. Conclusions Proton beam therapy might be a treatment option for patients with liver metastasis of gastric cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document