CTNI-19. CONCURRENT CHEMORADIATION AND TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFields, 200 kHz) FOR PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA MAY INCREASE THE RATE OF DISTANT RECURRENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi63-vi63
Author(s):  
Ayesha S Ali ◽  
Muneeb Niazi ◽  
Voichita Bar-Ad ◽  
Maria Werner-Wasik ◽  
David Andrews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Distant Recurrence ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Current standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) along with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. Secondary analysis of EF14 trial demonstrated TTFields treatment may increase the rate of distant recurrence. We report our experience evaluating areas of progression in our pilot clinical trial of concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields. METHODS: This is a single arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with KPS ≥ 60 with newly diagnosed GBM were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions), standard concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily), and TTFields. Maintenance therapy included standard TMZ and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. Incidence and location of progression was documented. Distant recurrence was defined as recurrence more than 2 cm from primary enhancing lesion. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled on the trial. Twenty were male, and ten were female, with median age 58 years (19-77 years). Median KPS was 90 (70-100). Median follow-up was 11.6 months (1.7-22.1 months). Twenty (66.7%) patients had an unmethylated MGMT promotor status and ten (33.3%) patients had a methylated promoter status. Twenty patients (66.7%) had progression, with median PFS of 9.1 months (range 1.6 to 12.9 months). Five patients (26%) of patient presented with distant recurrence, with median distance from primary lesion of 5.1 cm (2.26-9.12 cm). One infratentorial progression was noted. Another patient transferred care and location of progression is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma may have increased incidence of distant recurrence. This finding is suggestive of improved local control of primary site. Further data are needed to validate this finding.

Scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and tumor treating fields (SPARE) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2056-2056
Author(s):  
Ryan C Miller ◽  
Andrew Jehyun Song ◽  
Ayesha Ali ◽  
Voichita C Bar-Ad ◽  
Nina Leyson Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Dose Constraints ◽  
Topical Medications

2056 Background: Standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. We report our clinical trial evaluating safety and tolerability of scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and TTFields. Methods: This is a single arm pilot study. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a KPS of ≥ 60 were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily) and TTFields (200 kHz). Maintenance therapy included temozolomide and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. The primary endpoint was safety and toxicity of TTFields concurrent with chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in the trial. Twenty were male and ten were female, with a median age of 58 years (range 19 to 77 years). Median KPS was 90 (range 70 to 100). Median follow-up was 8.9 months (range 1.6 to 21.4 months). Twenty (66.7%) patients had unmethylated MGMT promotor status and ten (33.3%) patients had methylated promoter status. Median time from surgery to radiation was 34 days (26 to 49 days). Scalp dose constraints were achieved for all patients, with the mean dose having a median value of 8.3 Gy (range 4.3 to 14.8 Gy), the D20cc median was 26.1 Gy (range 17.7 to 42.8 Gy), and the D30cc median was 23.5 Gy (range 14.8 to 35.4 Gy). Skin adverse events (AEs; erythema, dermatitis, irritation, folliculitis) were noted in 83.3% of patients, however, these were limited to Grade 1 or 2 events, which resolved spontaneously or with topical medications. No patient had radiation treatment interruption due to skin AEs. Other Grade 1 events included pruritus (33.3%), fatigue (30%), nausea (13.3%), headache (10%), dizziness (6.7%), and cognitive impairment (3.3%). Other Grade 2 events included headache (3.3%). Nineteen patients (63.3%) had progression, with a median PFS of 7.6 months (range 1.6 to 12.7 months). Overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: Concurrent TTFields (200 kHz) with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is a safe and feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trials are warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation. Clinical trial information: NCT03477110.

scholarly journals COT-19 TREATMENT EXPERIENCE OF AND TIPS FOR ADMINISTRATING NOVO TTF

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii44-ii44
Author(s):  
Daisuke Shimada ◽  
Keiichi Kobayashi ◽  
Kuniaki Saito ◽  
Yoshie Matsumoto ◽  
Yoshiaki Shiokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Medical Professions ◽  
Recommendation Grade

Abstract BACKGROUNDS Current standard of care for glioblastoma, consists of postoperative temozolomide (TMZ) concomitant with radiotherapy, followed by adjuvant TMZ monotherapy. Recently, an international phase 3 trial (EF-14) demonstrated that addition of tumor-treating fields (TTF) to adjuvant TMZ after completion of chemoradiotherapy extended median progression-free survival and overall survival by 2.7 months and 4.8 months, respectively, compared with TMZ alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. TTF is now considered as a part of its initial treatment in the guideline in Japan (recommendation grade B). However,distinct from anticancer drugs,little is known or experienced using TTF as a therapeutic device so far, especially in management and handling. METHODS First six patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who underwent TTF were analyzed with special interest in medical and social supports to execute TTF at home. RESULTS TTF was first introduced in our institution in May 2016, but no patients were treated because of no coverage by medical insurance until December 2017. We further needed to wait to initiate TTF treatment until January 2019 when the contract to use TTF systems was finally made between the company and institution. Since then six patients were registered in five months. For its introduction to clinical practice,it is essential to establish new in-house environment with medical professions division in the facility including documentations of calculating instruction fees and usage guidance for home care application of TTF. It is also important to initiate providing information of TTF such as timing of visit by specific practitioners and potential medical and psychologic burdens to patients and their families during and after chemoradiotherapy to better understand this new modality leading to the consent acquisition. CONCLUSIONS Introducing TTF into clinical practice should accompany improvement of management in not only medical equipment and documentations but also patient care in hospital and home.

scholarly journals ACTR-49. INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH SCALP PRESERVATION AND RADIATION PLUS CONCURRENT ALTERNATING ELECTRIC TUMOR-TREATING FIELDS (SPARE) FOR GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi24-vi24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Song ◽  
Michele Ly ◽  
Voichita Bar-Ad ◽  
Maria Werner-Wasik ◽  
Jon Glass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiation ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Idh Mutations ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract INTRODUCTION Standard of care for glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide with electric tumor treatment fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. We report our initial experience evaluating toxicity and tolerability of scalp-preserving radiation with concurrent TTFields. METHODS We conducted a single arm pilot study. Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with KPS ≥ 60 with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were included. All patients received concurrent scalp-preserving radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions), standard temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily), and TTFields (200 kHz; ≥ 18 hr daily). Maintenance therapy included standard temozolomide and TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. Our primary endpoint was safety and toxicity for concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. RESULTS Here we report the first seven patients on the trial. Five were male, and 2 female, with median age 58 y/o (range 49–73). Median KPS was 90. Median follow-up was 5.2 months (range 1.4–11.2). MGMT status was unmethylated for 6 patients, and one unknown, and no IDH mutations. Four (57.1%) received gross total resection and three (42.9%) had subtotal resection. All patients completed concurrent chemoradiation plus TTFields without radiation or TTFields treatment interruption or discontinuation. There was no related Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Skin toxicity (erythema, dermatitis, pruritus) was noted in all patients, however, limited to Grade 1 or 2 which resolved spontaneously or responded to topical medications. All patients were alive at time of writing. Two (28.6%) patients had progression, of which one (at 9 months) continued TTFields and temozolomide with bevacizumab, while the other (at 4 months) discontinued TTFields and underwent re-resection with bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent TTFields with scalp-preserving chemoradiation is a safe and feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trial is warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation.

RADT-13. SPARE TRIAL: SCALP-SPARING RADIATION WITH CONCURRENT TEMOZOLOMIDE AND TUMOR TREATING FIELDS FOR PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi43-vi44
Author(s):  
Ryan Miller ◽  
Andrew Song ◽  
Ayesha S Ali ◽  
Voichita Bar-Ad ◽  
Nina, L Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Dose Constraints ◽  
Topical Medications

Abstract INTRODUCTION Current adjuvant treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). We report our clinical trial evaluating feasibility and tolerability of scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and TTFields. METHODS Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with a KPS of ≥ 60 were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily) and TTFields (200 kHz). Maintenance therapy included temozolomide and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. The primary endpoint was safety and toxicity of tri-modality treatment within 30 days of completion of chemoradiation treatment. RESULTS Thirty patients were enrolled. Twenty were male and ten were female, with a median age of 58 years (range 19 to 77 years). Median follow-up was 10.8 months (range 1.6 to 21.3 months). Twenty (66.7%) patients had unmethylated MGMT promotor and ten (33.3%) patients had methylated promoter. Scalp dose constraints were achieved for all patients. Skin adverse events (erythema, dermatitis, irritation, folliculitis) were noted in 83.3% of patients, however, these were limited to Grade 1 or 2 events, which resolved spontaneously or with topical medications. No patient had radiation treatment interruption due to skin AEs. Other Grade 1 events included pruritus (33.3%), fatigue (30%), nausea (13.3%), headache (10%), dizziness (6.7%), and cognitive impairment (3.3%). Other Grade 2 events included headache (3.3%). The median PFS for the entire cohort was 9.1 months (at least 8.5 months, 95% confidence). The median PFS for patients with MGMT promoter methylation status was 11.4 months (at least 9.5 months, 95% confidence). Overall survival was not reached. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent TTFields with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trials are warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation.

scholarly journals A Review of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Oronsky ◽  
Tony R. Reid ◽  
Arnold Oronsky ◽  
Navjot Sandhu ◽  
Susan J. Knox
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Genetic Characteristics ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Temozolomide Chemotherapy

Glioblastoma is an aggressive and inevitably recurrent primary intra-axial brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. The current mainstay of treatment involves maximally safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy over a 6-week period with concomitant temozolomide chemotherapy followed by temozolomide maintenance. This review provides a summary of the epidemiological, clinical, histologic and genetic characteristics of newly diagnosed disease as well as the current standard of care and potential future therapeutic prospects.

RTID-05. THE MULTI-ARM GLIOBLASTOMA AUSTRALASIA (MAGMA) TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi193-vi194
Author(s):  
Benjamin Kong ◽  
Hao-Wen Sim ◽  
Eng-Siew Koh ◽  
Hui Gan ◽  
Elizabeth H Barnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Future Design ◽  
Multiple Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract BACKGROUND Survival outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma have not changed significantly since the introduction of concurrent temozolomide with post-surgical radiation followed by adjuvant temozolomide. METHODS Multi-Arm Glioblastoma Australasia (MAGMA) is a recently initiated phase III multi-arm, multi-centre randomized trial for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, led by the Australian Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (COGNO), that will concurrently test multiple treatment questions. Initially, a partial factorial design will be implemented to compare the current standard of care with either or both of (1) neoadjuvant temozolomide and (2) aduvant temozolomide continued beyond six months until progression. MAGMA will transition to a multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) design as additional tratment question are introduced. Treatment allocation to each question will be balanced (1:1) using minimisation over several stratification factors, including study site, age, IDH-mutation status, surgical extent and randomization to the prior treatment question(s). The primary outcome is overall survival. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival (measured by mRANO), time to first non-temozolomide systemic treatment, clinically significant toxicity as measured by Grade 2/4 adverse events, and health-related quality of life measures. Parsimonious data collection and a streamlined assessment schedule have been incorporated to mitigate the burden of data collection (such as low grade toxicity from temozolomide), and to encourage participation in regional and rural settings. A consortium model has been adopted to foster neuro-oncology expertise and infrastructure and share academic credit and future design opportunities. PROGRESS Recruitment commenced in September 2020. To date, 60 patients have been recruited from an initial sample size target of 250 patients for each of these initial two treatment questions. Of these 60 patients, 45 have been randomized in Question 1 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) whilst 50 randomized in Question 2 (prolonged adjuvant chemotherapy). To date, 14 of the 27 intended sites are open to recruitment.

scholarly journals Treatment of Glioblastoma (GBM) with the Addition of Tumor-Treating Fields (TTF): A Review

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Fabian ◽  
Maria Guillermo Prieto Eibl ◽  
Iyad Alnahhas ◽  
Nikhil Sebastian ◽  
Pierre Giglio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Brain Tumor ◽  
Aggressive Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Concomitant Chemoradiation ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor. Despite aggressive treatment, GBM almost always recurs. The current standard-of-care for treatment of newly diagnosed GBM has remained relatively unchanged since 2005: maximal safe resection followed by concomitant chemoradiation (CRT) with temozolomide (TMZ), and subsequent adjuvant TMZ. In 2011, the first-generation tumor treating fields (TTF) device, known at the time as the NovoTTF-100A System (renamed Optune), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of recurrent GBM. The TTF device was subsequently approved as an adjuvant therapy for newly-diagnosed GBM in 2015. The following is a review of the TTF device, including evidence supporting its use and limitations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document