RTID-05. THE MULTI-ARM GLIOBLASTOMA AUSTRALASIA (MAGMA) TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi193-vi194
Author(s):  
Benjamin Kong ◽  
Hao-Wen Sim ◽  
Eng-Siew Koh ◽  
Hui Gan ◽  
Elizabeth H Barnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Future Design ◽  
Multiple Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract BACKGROUND Survival outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma have not changed significantly since the introduction of concurrent temozolomide with post-surgical radiation followed by adjuvant temozolomide. METHODS Multi-Arm Glioblastoma Australasia (MAGMA) is a recently initiated phase III multi-arm, multi-centre randomized trial for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, led by the Australian Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (COGNO), that will concurrently test multiple treatment questions. Initially, a partial factorial design will be implemented to compare the current standard of care with either or both of (1) neoadjuvant temozolomide and (2) aduvant temozolomide continued beyond six months until progression. MAGMA will transition to a multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) design as additional tratment question are introduced. Treatment allocation to each question will be balanced (1:1) using minimisation over several stratification factors, including study site, age, IDH-mutation status, surgical extent and randomization to the prior treatment question(s). The primary outcome is overall survival. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival (measured by mRANO), time to first non-temozolomide systemic treatment, clinically significant toxicity as measured by Grade 2/4 adverse events, and health-related quality of life measures. Parsimonious data collection and a streamlined assessment schedule have been incorporated to mitigate the burden of data collection (such as low grade toxicity from temozolomide), and to encourage participation in regional and rural settings. A consortium model has been adopted to foster neuro-oncology expertise and infrastructure and share academic credit and future design opportunities. PROGRESS Recruitment commenced in September 2020. To date, 60 patients have been recruited from an initial sample size target of 250 patients for each of these initial two treatment questions. Of these 60 patients, 45 have been randomized in Question 1 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) whilst 50 randomized in Question 2 (prolonged adjuvant chemotherapy). To date, 14 of the 27 intended sites are open to recruitment.

Treatment of glioblastoma in Venezuela: Limitations using the current standard of care

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13036-e13036
Author(s):  
E. I. Arbona-Roche ◽  
C. Sucre ◽  
R. Vera-Gimón ◽  
A. Vera-Gimón ◽  
R. Vera-Vera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Grade 3

e13036 Background: The EORTC/NCIC phase III clinical trial using chemoirradiation with temozolomide (TMZ) 75 mg m-2 x 42d, followed by adyuvant TMZ 150–200 mg m-2 daily x 5d q28d x six cycles set a new standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). The applicability of this regimen in developing countries can be problematic. Objectives: To review our experience in Venezuela, contrasting overall survival (OS), 6-month progression-free survival (6PFS), and toxicity in our patients with corresponding outcomes from the EORTC/NCIC trial. Methods: We treated 30 patients with this regimen from March 2001 through July 2004. Results: The median age was 51 years; 17 (60%) were men; 27 (90%) had biopsy or partial resection; 27 (90%) took prophylactic anticonvulsants; and 23 (77%) had prophylaxis against P. jiroveci. Most patients (83%) took the full TMZ treatment during radiation, 7% interrupted TMZ during RT, and 10% could not afford the drug. One patient had Stevens-Johnson syndrome and did not complete RT. Twelve (40%) patients had stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent disease during the adjuvant phase. The 24-month OS was 30%, median OS was 7.5 months, median PFS was 5 months, and 6PFS was 41%. SRS did not have any effect on OS (p = 0.17, logrank). Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity was seen in two patients (7%). Conclusions: Except for differences in median OS (7.1 mo) and in 6-PFS (12.6 percentage points) all other measures were reasonably close to the EORTC/NCIC trial. Of concern is the high rate of anticonvulsant prophylaxis using enzyme-inducing drugs and the difficult access to TMZ. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Characterizing benefit from temozolomide in MGMT promoter unmethylated and methylated glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iyad Alnahhas ◽  
Mouaz Alsawas ◽  
Appaji Rayi ◽  
Joshua D Palmer ◽  
Raju Raval ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Prospective Data ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract Background The current standard of care for the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). While it is well established that TMZ has better efficacy in patients with MGMT promoter methylation, it remains an area of debate whether TMZ should be omitted when treating GBM patients with unmethylated MGMT. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide separate estimates of median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with methylated and unmethylated GBM treated with RT with or without TMZ. We searched multiple databases from inception to January 13, 2020. Results The median OS for patients with unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ pooled from 5 phase III studies (N = 655) was 14.11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.18–15.04) with a median PFS of 4.99 months (95% CI, 4.25–5.72). In contrast, the median OS for patients with methylated GBM pooled from 6 studies (N = 753) was 24.59 months (95% CI, 22.19–26.99) with a median PFS pooled from 7 studies (N = 805) of 9.51 months (95% CI, 7.41–11.61). There is a paucity of prospective data pertaining to OS/PFS in unmethylated patients treated with RT only and therefore a direct comparison was not possible. Conclusions This meta-analysis provides estimates of survival for patients with MGMT methylated or unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ. Further research is needed to delineate whether TMZ should be withheld for patients with unmethylated GBM outside of the setting of clinical trials.

scholarly journals COT-19 TREATMENT EXPERIENCE OF AND TIPS FOR ADMINISTRATING NOVO TTF

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii44-ii44
Author(s):  
Daisuke Shimada ◽  
Keiichi Kobayashi ◽  
Kuniaki Saito ◽  
Yoshie Matsumoto ◽  
Yoshiaki Shiokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Medical Professions ◽  
Recommendation Grade

Abstract BACKGROUNDS Current standard of care for glioblastoma, consists of postoperative temozolomide (TMZ) concomitant with radiotherapy, followed by adjuvant TMZ monotherapy. Recently, an international phase 3 trial (EF-14) demonstrated that addition of tumor-treating fields (TTF) to adjuvant TMZ after completion of chemoradiotherapy extended median progression-free survival and overall survival by 2.7 months and 4.8 months, respectively, compared with TMZ alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. TTF is now considered as a part of its initial treatment in the guideline in Japan (recommendation grade B). However,distinct from anticancer drugs,little is known or experienced using TTF as a therapeutic device so far, especially in management and handling. METHODS First six patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who underwent TTF were analyzed with special interest in medical and social supports to execute TTF at home. RESULTS TTF was first introduced in our institution in May 2016, but no patients were treated because of no coverage by medical insurance until December 2017. We further needed to wait to initiate TTF treatment until January 2019 when the contract to use TTF systems was finally made between the company and institution. Since then six patients were registered in five months. For its introduction to clinical practice,it is essential to establish new in-house environment with medical professions division in the facility including documentations of calculating instruction fees and usage guidance for home care application of TTF. It is also important to initiate providing information of TTF such as timing of visit by specific practitioners and potential medical and psychologic burdens to patients and their families during and after chemoradiotherapy to better understand this new modality leading to the consent acquisition. CONCLUSIONS Introducing TTF into clinical practice should accompany improvement of management in not only medical equipment and documentations but also patient care in hospital and home.

scholarly journals P14.124 EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8: A phase III trial of marizomib in combination with standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy versus standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii98-iii98 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Roth ◽  
J Reijneveld ◽  
T Gorlia ◽  
F Dhermain ◽  
F De Vos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract BACKGROUND The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes maximal debulking surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT), and concomitant as well as maintenance therapy with the alkylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ). However, the prognosis remains poor and novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Targeting the proteasome has been considered a promising anti-cancer approach for several years. Marizomib is a novel, irreversible and pan-proteasome inhibitor, which crosses the blood-brain barrier and has been assessed in phase I trials in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 is a randomized, controlled, open label phase III superiority trial. Patients with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a performance status >70 are eligible. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard of care (TMZ/RT→TMZ) alone or TMZ/RT→TMZ plus marizomib. The study aims at enrolling 750 patients. Stratification factors include study site, age, performance status and extent of resection. The primary objective of this trial is to compare overall survival in patients receiving marizomib in addition to standard of care with those receiving standard treatment only. The testing strategy specifies the determination of this objective in the intent-to-treat population as well as the subgroup of patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, neurocognitive function and quality of life. A translational research program has been set up. The study will be activated at approximately 50 EORTC sites across Europe, 25 sites in Canada and additional sites in the US. Patient recruitment started in June 2018 and as of April 29, 2019, a total of 164 patients have been randomized. An update on the enrolment status will be provided at the EANO meeting. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345095

scholarly journals P14.71 Tumor Treating Fields combined with radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: final safety and efficacy results from a pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii84-iii84
Author(s):  
R Grossman ◽  
F Bokstein ◽  
D Blumenthal ◽  
C Ben Harush ◽  
D Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Sensitizing Effect

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, loco-regional, anti-mitotic treatment consisting of low intensity alternating electric fields. The combination of TTFields with maintenance temozolomide significantly improved survival versus temozolomide alone in the phase 3 EF-14 study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). In preclinical studies, TTFields increased the number of glioma cells undergoing cellular death following radiotherapy (RT) by inhibiting DNA damage repair, suggesting a radio-sensitizing effect of TTFields. This pilot study is the first to evaluate the safety and feasibility of administering TTFields concomitant to RT and TMZ in ndGBM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with ndGBM were treated with TTFields/RT/TMZ followed by maintenance TMZ and TTFields for up to 24 months. TTFields (200kHz) were delivered for >18 hours/day while the transducer arrays were removed during delivery of RT. TMZ was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2/daily for 6 weeks and RT at a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was safety of the combined TTFields/RT/TMZ; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to CTCAE V4.0. RESULTS 10 ndGBM patients that recovered from maximal debulking surgery or biopsy were enrolled at a single center in Israel between April and December 2017. Five patients (50%) had undergone gross total resection while the rest had biopsy only. Eight of the patients were male, median age was 59, median KPS was 80 and median dose of RT was 60 Gy. Six patients (60%) reported at least one AE. The most common AE was TTFields-related skin toxicity, reported in four patients (40%), all of which were grade 1–2 in severity. Two patients reported serious AEs (seizures and general deterioration) that were considered unrelated to TTFields. Median PFS with RT/TMZ/TTFields was 10.5 months. Median OS has not yet been reached. CONCLUSION The proportion of patients with TTFields-related skin toxicity was similar to that reported in ndGBM patients in the randomized Phase III study (52%), where patients started TTFields at least 4 weeks after RT. No other TTFields-related toxicities were reported and there were no increase in RT- or TMZ-related toxicities as a result of combining TTFields with RT in addition to TMZ. Based on the safety and preliminary efficacy results of this pilot study, a phase II randomized study has been initiated to investigate the efficacy of concomitant RT/TMZ/TTFields in 60 ndGBM patients.

Combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide (TMZ) for patients with MGMT methylated (m-MGMT) glioblastoma (GBM): Results of cellworks omics biosimulation—MyCare-015.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14501-e14501
Author(s):  
Michael Castro ◽  
Nirjhar Mundkur ◽  
Anusha Pampana ◽  
Aftab Alam ◽  
Aktar Alam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Drug Effects ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Experimental Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard

e14501 Background: UKT-03 evaluated TMZ plus Lomustine in a single arm phase II trial in newly diagnosed GBM patients. An overall survival of 23 months was a substantial improvement over historical experience. Patients with m-MGMT v. unmethylated tumors had a 2-yr survival of 75% and median survival not reached compared to 20% and 12.5 months, respectively. These data formed the basis for NOA-9, a randomized phase III trial in newly diagnosed, m-MGMT GBM which randomized 141 patients to standard therapy or experimental therapy with Lomustine and TMZ every 6 weeks. A superiority for the combination was observed: 48.1 v. 31.4 months for the standard arm in the ITT analysis. Nevertheless, many neurooncologists are reluctant to adopt this approach. The current standard of care uses single biomarker, m-MGMT, in contrast to comprehensive pathway analysis (CPA). We sought to determine if CPA could discriminate more effectively among each patient’s likelihood of benefiting from combination treatment. Methods: Cellworks Singula employs a novel Cellworks Omics Biology Model (CBM) to predict patient-specific biomarker and phenotype response of personalized GBM avatars to drug agents, radiation, and targeted therapies. The CBM was developed and validated using PubMed to generate protein network maps of patient-specific activated and inactivated disease pathways. CBM was used to simulate the TMZ and TMZ-Lomustine therapies for each patient in a TCGA cohort of 368 GBM patients. Omics data including methylation, whole exome sequencing, and copy number alterations were input into CBM. The Singula Composite Inhibition Score (CIS) was calculated based on the measured quantitative drug effects. Results: Though incremental gain from the combination was seen in all patients, CIS varied across the population with relative scores ranging from 32-82, with best responders have more than twice the benefit. Conclusions: CPA shows that m-MGMT is an excellent biomarker for determining the likelihood of benefit from TMZ and lomustine, with the caveat that CBM identifies 18% could be spared from TMZ exposure and would benefit from Lomustine alone. Otherwise, these data lend support for evolving the standard of care with combination therapy for patients with m-MGMT GBM and should help overcome a reluctance to employing combination therapy. Additionally, CBM has utility to individualize clinical decision making. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A Review of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Oronsky ◽  
Tony R. Reid ◽  
Arnold Oronsky ◽  
Navjot Sandhu ◽  
Susan J. Knox
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Genetic Characteristics ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Temozolomide Chemotherapy

Glioblastoma is an aggressive and inevitably recurrent primary intra-axial brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. The current mainstay of treatment involves maximally safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy over a 6-week period with concomitant temozolomide chemotherapy followed by temozolomide maintenance. This review provides a summary of the epidemiological, clinical, histologic and genetic characteristics of newly diagnosed disease as well as the current standard of care and potential future therapeutic prospects.

scholarly journals CTNI-38. PriCoTTF TRIAL: A PHASE I/II TRIAL OF TTFIELDS PRIOR AND CONCOMITANT TO RADIOTHERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi68-vi68
Author(s):  
Sied Kebir ◽  
Daniela Pierscianek ◽  
Martin Proescholdt ◽  
Peter Hau ◽  
Anca-Ligia Grosu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract TTFields therapy is applied at 200 kHz by arrays that are placed at the patients’ scalp. In the phase 3 EF-14 trial, survival rates were significantly improved when adding tumor-treating fields (TTFields) to adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM). Preclinical studies showed that combination of TTFields and radiotherapy synergistically impaired glioblastoma cell growth. Here, we present the PriCoTTF trial, which is enrolling nGBM patients and will assess the safety and efficacy of TTFields initiated prior and concomitant to radiochemotherapy. Following surgery and wound-healing, TTFields therapy is initiated in adult nGBM patients. TTFields therapy continues throughout radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for a total of approximately 9 months. During radiotherapy, the arrays - through which TTFields is delivered - remain on the patients’ scalp. Totally, thirty-three patients are planned to be enrolled in two treatment arms. In arm A, 20 patients receive normo-fractionated radiotherapy, whereas in the elderly arm, arm B, 13 patients receive hypo-fractionated radiotherapy. The primary endpoint of this trial is safety and tolerance that will be gauged by a set of pre-specified treatment-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints include the frequency of adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The trial is currently enrolling patients at four sites in Germany. At the time of abstract submission, 9 patients enrolled in Arm B. Patient recruitment for arm A has been completed with. We will present initial practical experiences as well as preliminary safety and tolerance data. There is a biological rationale for combining TTFields and radiotherapy to further improve survival of GBM patients. In the presented phase I/II trial, the safety and efficacy of TTFields initiated prior and concomitant to RT in nGBM will be assessed. In addition, initial efficacy data (phase II) may serve as a rationale for a putative randomized phase III trial.

First-line use of cabazitaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A three-arm study in comparison with docetaxel.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4696-TPS4696
Author(s):  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Lisa Sengelov ◽  
Paul N. Mainwaring ◽  
Antoine Thiery- Vuillemin ◽  
Christine Theodore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Ecog Ps

TPS4696^ Background: Docetaxel (D) in combination with prednisone (P) as first-line (1L) chemotherapy in patients (pts) with mCRPC is the current standard of care. However, treatment is not curative and D-resistant disease typically develops. Cabazitaxel (Cbz) is a novel taxane active in D-sensitive and -resistant tumor models. Clinical activity of Cbz plus P (CbzP) was demonstrated in the Phase III TROPIC study in mCRPC pts previously treated with a D-containing regimen; CbzP showed a significant overall survival (OS) benefit vs mitoxantrone plus prednisone (median OS 15.1 vs 12.7 months; HR 0.70; P < 0.0001). Therefore, it is of interest to determine if CbzP provides an OS advantage vs DP in 1L mCRPC pts. Methods: The phase III FIRSTANA study (NCT01308567) is a randomized, open-label, multinational trial in 1L mCRPC pts, designed to compare the efficacy of Cbz 25 mg/m² IV Q3W (Arm A) and Cbz 20 mg/m² IV Q3W (Arm B) vs D 75 mg/m2 IV Q3W (Arm C). P 10 mg PO QD is to be given concomitantly. Pts are stratified by ECOG PS (0–1 vs 2), measurable disease (yes/no) and region (depending on availability of Cbz as 2L). Pts with ECOG PS ≤ 2, histologically/cytologically confirmed metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma, with no prior chemotherapy and with disease progression following medical or surgical castration are eligible. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) (PCWG2 criteria), radiologic PFS, tumor response in measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), PSA response and PSA PFS, pain response and pain PFS, time to occurrence of any skeletal-related events, safety profile and health-related quality of life. Cbz pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics will be assessed in pt subgroups. Pts will be treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity or pt request. Planned enrollment is 1,170 pts; study size was calculated to achieve 90% power for OS. Study start was in May 2011; at January 2012, 219 pts were enrolled. The first DMC meeting recommended continuing the study without change.

CTNI-19. CONCURRENT CHEMORADIATION AND TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFields, 200 kHz) FOR PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA MAY INCREASE THE RATE OF DISTANT RECURRENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi63-vi63
Author(s):  
Ayesha S Ali ◽  
Muneeb Niazi ◽  
Voichita Bar-Ad ◽  
Maria Werner-Wasik ◽  
David Andrews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Distant Recurrence ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Current standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) along with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. Secondary analysis of EF14 trial demonstrated TTFields treatment may increase the rate of distant recurrence. We report our experience evaluating areas of progression in our pilot clinical trial of concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields. METHODS: This is a single arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with KPS ≥ 60 with newly diagnosed GBM were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions), standard concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily), and TTFields. Maintenance therapy included standard TMZ and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. Incidence and location of progression was documented. Distant recurrence was defined as recurrence more than 2 cm from primary enhancing lesion. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled on the trial. Twenty were male, and ten were female, with median age 58 years (19-77 years). Median KPS was 90 (70-100). Median follow-up was 11.6 months (1.7-22.1 months). Twenty (66.7%) patients had an unmethylated MGMT promotor status and ten (33.3%) patients had a methylated promoter status. Twenty patients (66.7%) had progression, with median PFS of 9.1 months (range 1.6 to 12.9 months). Five patients (26%) of patient presented with distant recurrence, with median distance from primary lesion of 5.1 cm (2.26-9.12 cm). One infratentorial progression was noted. Another patient transferred care and location of progression is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma may have increased incidence of distant recurrence. This finding is suggestive of improved local control of primary site. Further data are needed to validate this finding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document