RADT-13. SPARE TRIAL: SCALP-SPARING RADIATION WITH CONCURRENT TEMOZOLOMIDE AND TUMOR TREATING FIELDS FOR PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi43-vi44
Author(s):  
Ryan Miller ◽  
Andrew Song ◽  
Ayesha S Ali ◽  
Voichita Bar-Ad ◽  
Nina, L Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Dose Constraints ◽  
Topical Medications

Abstract INTRODUCTION Current adjuvant treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). We report our clinical trial evaluating feasibility and tolerability of scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and TTFields. METHODS Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with a KPS of ≥ 60 were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily) and TTFields (200 kHz). Maintenance therapy included temozolomide and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. The primary endpoint was safety and toxicity of tri-modality treatment within 30 days of completion of chemoradiation treatment. RESULTS Thirty patients were enrolled. Twenty were male and ten were female, with a median age of 58 years (range 19 to 77 years). Median follow-up was 10.8 months (range 1.6 to 21.3 months). Twenty (66.7%) patients had unmethylated MGMT promotor and ten (33.3%) patients had methylated promoter. Scalp dose constraints were achieved for all patients. Skin adverse events (erythema, dermatitis, irritation, folliculitis) were noted in 83.3% of patients, however, these were limited to Grade 1 or 2 events, which resolved spontaneously or with topical medications. No patient had radiation treatment interruption due to skin AEs. Other Grade 1 events included pruritus (33.3%), fatigue (30%), nausea (13.3%), headache (10%), dizziness (6.7%), and cognitive impairment (3.3%). Other Grade 2 events included headache (3.3%). The median PFS for the entire cohort was 9.1 months (at least 8.5 months, 95% confidence). The median PFS for patients with MGMT promoter methylation status was 11.4 months (at least 9.5 months, 95% confidence). Overall survival was not reached. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent TTFields with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trials are warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation.

Scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and tumor treating fields (SPARE) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2056-2056
Author(s):  
Ryan C Miller ◽  
Andrew Jehyun Song ◽  
Ayesha Ali ◽  
Voichita C Bar-Ad ◽  
Nina Leyson Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Dose Constraints ◽  
Topical Medications

2056 Background: Standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. We report our clinical trial evaluating safety and tolerability of scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and TTFields. Methods: This is a single arm pilot study. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a KPS of ≥ 60 were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily) and TTFields (200 kHz). Maintenance therapy included temozolomide and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. The primary endpoint was safety and toxicity of TTFields concurrent with chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in the trial. Twenty were male and ten were female, with a median age of 58 years (range 19 to 77 years). Median KPS was 90 (range 70 to 100). Median follow-up was 8.9 months (range 1.6 to 21.4 months). Twenty (66.7%) patients had unmethylated MGMT promotor status and ten (33.3%) patients had methylated promoter status. Median time from surgery to radiation was 34 days (26 to 49 days). Scalp dose constraints were achieved for all patients, with the mean dose having a median value of 8.3 Gy (range 4.3 to 14.8 Gy), the D20cc median was 26.1 Gy (range 17.7 to 42.8 Gy), and the D30cc median was 23.5 Gy (range 14.8 to 35.4 Gy). Skin adverse events (AEs; erythema, dermatitis, irritation, folliculitis) were noted in 83.3% of patients, however, these were limited to Grade 1 or 2 events, which resolved spontaneously or with topical medications. No patient had radiation treatment interruption due to skin AEs. Other Grade 1 events included pruritus (33.3%), fatigue (30%), nausea (13.3%), headache (10%), dizziness (6.7%), and cognitive impairment (3.3%). Other Grade 2 events included headache (3.3%). Nineteen patients (63.3%) had progression, with a median PFS of 7.6 months (range 1.6 to 12.7 months). Overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: Concurrent TTFields (200 kHz) with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is a safe and feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trials are warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation. Clinical trial information: NCT03477110.

scholarly journals CTNI-21. SCALP SPARING RADIATION WITH CONCURRENT TEMOZOLOMIDE AND TUMOR TREATMENT FIELDS (SPARE) FOR PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii46-ii47
Author(s):  
Ryan Miller ◽  
Andrew Song ◽  
Ayesha Ali ◽  
Voichita Bar-Ad ◽  
Nina Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Phase ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Constraints ◽  
Topical Medications

Abstract INTRODUCTION Standard of care for glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) with tumor treatment fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiotherapy work synergistically. We report our experience evaluating toxicity of scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent TTFields. METHODS This is a single-arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Patients (age≥ 18 years) with KPS≥ 60 with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were eligible. Patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy/30 fx), standard TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily), and TTFields. Maintenance therapy included standard TMZ and TTFields continuation. Radiotherapy was delivered through TTFields arrays. Primary endpoint was safety and toxicity of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation. RESULTS We report the first eighteen patients on trial. Majority were male (66.7%) with median age 59 years (34 to 77). Median KPS was 90 (70–100). Median follow-up was 6.0 months (1.4 to 18.0). Twelve (66.6%) patients had unmethylated MGMT, five (27.8%) were methylated, and one patient’s status was not obtained. Scalp dose constraints were achieved, with mean dose having a median value of 7.4 Gy (4.3–13.2), D20cc median 23.2 Gy (17.7–36.8), and D30cc median 20.3 Gy (14.8–33.4). Only one possible Grade 3 toxicity was observed in a patient who experienced a seizure in month six of the maintenance phase. Skin toxicity (erythema or dermatitis) was limited to Grade 1 (83.3%) or 2 (5.6%) during the concurrent phase and resolved spontaneously or responded to topical medications. Other Grade 1 events included fatigue (47.3%), cognitive impairment (31.6%), pruritis (52.6%), headache (26.3%), dizziness (15.8%), and nausea (26.3%). Other Grade 2 events included fatigue (21.1%) and headache (10.5%). Nine patients (50%) had progression, with median PFS of 7.6 months (2.2–9.6 months). CONCLUSIONS Concurrent TTFields with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is a safe and feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trials are warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation.

scholarly journals P14.61 Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) combined with lomustine (CCNU) and temozolomide (TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients - a bi-centric analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii81-iii81
Author(s):  
L Lazaridis ◽  
N Schäfer ◽  
T Schmidt ◽  
A Stoppek ◽  
J Weller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract BACKGROUND TTFields combined with TMZ demonstrated significantly improved PFS, OS and long-term survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) patients, compared to TMZ monotherapy in the EF-14 trial; independent of MGMT-promotor methylation-status, age, grade of resection and performance status. Recently, improved efficacy of lomustine (CCNU)/TMZ compared to TMZ monotherapy in ndGBM patients with MGMT-promotor methylation was reported in the CeTeG trial (NOA-09). Taken into account that TTFields showed a strong safety profile as well as a high potential being combined with other modalities and the very encouraging results for methylated MGMT-promotor GBM patients in the CeTeG trial, there is a strong rationale in combining these treatment regimens. Here, we present a case series of patients receiving a combination of both modalities, TTFields and CCNU/TMZ. METHODS Patients with ndGBM and MGMT-promotor methylation underwent a combined therapy of TTFields plus CCNU/TMZ after surgery and radiochemotherapy. Safety, feasibility as well as first efficacy results of this combined therapy are reported at data cut-off (31.12.2018). Most recent data, including compliance to TTFields therapy, will be presented at the EANO annual meeting. RESULTS Twelve patients with MGMT-promotor methylated ndGBM (median, range: age 49.5, 26–69; KPS 90, 60–100) have been treated with a combination of TTFields plus CCNU/TMZ. The analysis included patients with complete resection (n=6), partial resection (n=5) as well as biopsy (n=1). CTCAE grade 3 hematotoxicities were observed in six patients, but were not considered to be related to the addition of TTFields to lomustine/TMZ. Medical device site reactions (low-grade skin reactions) were detected in five patients. At data cut-off, the analyzed patient population demonstrated a median PFS of 18.7 months, whereas the median OS was not yet reached. CONCLUSION The results of this analysis provide first indication that the combination of TTFields/lomustine/TMZ is safe and feasible. Moreover, the observed survival outcomes point to preliminary beneficial effects of the triple combination. Additional follow-up and a higher sample size is required and planned for further toxicity analysis and efficacy assessment of this combination.

CTNI-19. CONCURRENT CHEMORADIATION AND TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFields, 200 kHz) FOR PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA MAY INCREASE THE RATE OF DISTANT RECURRENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi63-vi63
Author(s):  
Ayesha S Ali ◽  
Muneeb Niazi ◽  
Voichita Bar-Ad ◽  
Maria Werner-Wasik ◽  
David Andrews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Distant Recurrence ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Current standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) along with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. Secondary analysis of EF14 trial demonstrated TTFields treatment may increase the rate of distant recurrence. We report our experience evaluating areas of progression in our pilot clinical trial of concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields. METHODS: This is a single arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with KPS ≥ 60 with newly diagnosed GBM were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions), standard concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily), and TTFields. Maintenance therapy included standard TMZ and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. Incidence and location of progression was documented. Distant recurrence was defined as recurrence more than 2 cm from primary enhancing lesion. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled on the trial. Twenty were male, and ten were female, with median age 58 years (19-77 years). Median KPS was 90 (70-100). Median follow-up was 11.6 months (1.7-22.1 months). Twenty (66.7%) patients had an unmethylated MGMT promotor status and ten (33.3%) patients had a methylated promoter status. Twenty patients (66.7%) had progression, with median PFS of 9.1 months (range 1.6 to 12.9 months). Five patients (26%) of patient presented with distant recurrence, with median distance from primary lesion of 5.1 cm (2.26-9.12 cm). One infratentorial progression was noted. Another patient transferred care and location of progression is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma may have increased incidence of distant recurrence. This finding is suggestive of improved local control of primary site. Further data are needed to validate this finding.

CTNI-09. TRIDENT PHASE 3 TRIAL (EF-32): FIRST-LINE TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFields; 200 KHZ) CONCOMITANT WITH CHEMO-RADIATION, FOLLOWED BY MAINTENANCE TTFIELDS/TEMOZOLOMIDE IN NEWLY-DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi60-vi61
Author(s):  
Wenyin Shi ◽  
Lawrence Kleinberg ◽  
Suriya Jeyapalan ◽  
Samuel Goldlust ◽  
Seema Nagpal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Methylation Status ◽  
Type I ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Triple Combination ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract INTRODUCTION Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields; 200 kHz; non-invasive, loco-regional antimitotic treatment) is approved for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). In the Phase 3 EF-14 trial, post-surgical radiotherapy/temozolomide, followed by maintenance TTFields/temozolomide significantly increased overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ndGBM versus TMZ alone. Addition of maintenance TTFields did not increase systemic toxicity; and related adverse events (AEs) were mainly dermatological. In preclinical models, addition of TTFields increased the benefit of radiotherapy. Two pilot studies showed that TTFields concomitant with radiotherapy/temozolomide is feasible and well-tolerated. The benefit of TTFields concomitant with radiotherapy/temozolomide will be investigated in the TRIDENT trial. METHODS TRIDENT (EF-32; NCT04471844) is an international, pivotal, phase 3 randomized trial comparing triple-combination of TTFields/radiotherapy/temozolomide versus standard radiotherapy/temozolomide. Patients in both arms will receive maintenance TTFields/TMZ. Arrays of the Optune® System will be used to deliver TTFields (200 KHz) for ≥18 hours/day concomitant with radiotherapy. TTFields treatment will be continued until second disease progression (RANO) or 24 months, whichever occurs first. Patients with pathologically-confirmed ndGBM, ≥ 18 years of age (≥ 22 years of age; US), KPS ≥ 70, post-surgery/biopsy, and amenable for radiotherapy/temozolomide will be stratified by extent-of-resection and MGMT promoter methylation status. The primary endpoint is median OS. Secondary endpoints include median PFS (RANO), 1-year and 2-year survival rates, overall radiological response (ORR; RANO), PFS (PFS-6M, PFS-12M, PFS-2Y), severity and frequency of AEs (CTCAE V5.0), pathological post-treatment changes in resected GBM tumors, quality-of-life (EORTC QLQ-C30), and OS correlation to TTFields duration-of-usage. The hypothesis is that first-line TTFields/RT/TMZ triple-combination will significantly improve OS compared to radiotherapy/temozolomide; each followed by maintenance TTFields/temozolomide. Sample size (N=950; 475/arm) was powered for a HR < 0.8 with 5% type I error. Survival will be measured from time-of-randomization. The TRIDENT trial is currently enrolling patients. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS N/A TiP.

scholarly journals NIMG-37. DELAYED PSEUDOPROGRESSION IN TWO PATIENTS UNDERGOING TTFIELDS TREATMENT FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii155-ii156
Author(s):  
Allison Lowman ◽  
Sarah Hurrell ◽  
Samuel Bobholz ◽  
Jennifer Connelly ◽  
Elizabeth Cochran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Specific Effects ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Abstract PURPOSE Tumor treatment fields (TTFields) are approved by the FDA for newly diagnosed as well as recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). TTFields have been shown to extend survival by 4.9 months in newly diagnosed GBM, and a landmark overall survival rate of 13% at 5 years. However, the specific effects remain widely unknown, which has prevented widespread clinical use of this treatment. METHODS This case study examines two glioblastoma patients, IDH-1 wildtype, MGMT unmethylated, that received TTFields (Optune) in addition to maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) following radiation (RT). Both cases were followed using standard MR imaging. Second resections were performed due to radiographic progression of contrast enhancement. RESULTS Although imaging was concerning for tumor progression, pathology showed only treatment effect, ultimately leading to the diagnosis of pseudoprogression. Both patients fell outside the normal expected timeline for chemo-radiation induced pseudoprogression. Based on the pathology, both patients resumed treatment with TMZ/TTFields. One patient expired at 25 months and one is still alive. CONCLUSIONS Pathologic confirmation was essential for guiding further treatment and allowed patients to continue treatment that was effective despite contrary indications on imaging. These findings suggest that pathological confirmation should be strongly considered in patients receiving TMZ/TTFields who develop radiographic progression, potentially with a less invasive biopsy procedure. Future studies should look to characterize the underlying mechanism of interaction between TTFields/TMZ and quantify the prevalence, associated risk factors and whether there is a genotype more susceptible. Both patients reported here had O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated GBM, and while about 60% of glioblastomas are diagnosed likewise, it is possible that MGMT methylation status plays a role in TTFields response. Better characterization of this phenomenon will improve treatment guidance, potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries and the discontinuance of successful therapies.

scholarly journals Limited role for extended maintenance temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Neurology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (15) ◽  
pp. 1422-1430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothee Gramatzki ◽  
Philipp Kickingereder ◽  
Bettina Hentschel ◽  
Jörg Felsberg ◽  
Ulrich Herrlinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Clinical Patient ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Objective:To explore an association with survival of modifying the current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma of surgery followed by radiotherapy plus concurrent and 6 cycles of maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy (TMZ/RT → TMZ) by extending TMZ beyond 6 cycles.Methods:The German Glioma Network cohort was screened for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who received TMZ/RT → TMZ and completed ≥6 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy without progression. Associations of clinical patient characteristics, molecular markers, and residual tumor determined by magnetic resonance imaging after 6 cycles of TMZ with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model were performed to assess associations of prolonged TMZ use with outcome.Results:Sixty-one of 142 identified patients received at least 7 maintenance TMZ cycles (median 11, range 7–20). Patients with extended maintenance TMZ treatment had better PFS (20.5 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.7–23.3, vs 17.2 months, 95% CI 10.2–24.2, p = 0.035) but not OS (32.6 months, 95% CI 28.9–36.4, vs 33.2 months, 95% CI 25.3–41.0, p = 0.126). However, there was no significant association of prolonged TMZ chemotherapy with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.8, 95% CI 0.4–1.6, p = 0.559) or OS (HR = 1.6, 95% CI 0.8–3.3, p = 0.218) adjusted for age, extent of resection, Karnofsky performance score, presence of residual tumor, O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, or isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status.Conclusion:These data may not support the practice of prolonging maintenance TMZ chemotherapy beyond 6 cycles.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class III evidence that in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, prolonged TMZ chemotherapy does not significantly increase PFS or OS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document