scholarly journals BMET-09. BRAIN METASTASES FROM OVARIAN CARCINOMA: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND TREATMENT OUTCOME

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi28-vi28
Author(s):  
Zvi Cohen ◽  
Gil Kimhi
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma

Brain metastases from ovarian carcinoma: An evaluation of prognostic factors and treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZviR Cohen ◽  
Anton Wohl ◽  
Gil Kimchi ◽  
Jacob Korach ◽  
Tamar Perri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma

Prognostic factors associated with brain metastases from epithelial ovarian carcinoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1252-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.-J. Kim ◽  
S. Song ◽  
C. K. Kim ◽  
W. Y. Kim ◽  
C. H. Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Small Series

Brain metastasis from epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is managed by a multimodal treatment approach. Thus, to determine the prognostic factors associated with this situation is important for management decisions regarding the type of treatment and aggressiveness of treatment. From 1995 to 2005, 13 patients with brain metastases resulting from EOC underwent treatment at Samsung Medical Center. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records to determine prognostic factors and to evaluate treatment outcome. The median age at diagnosis for primary ovarian carcinoma and brain metastasis was 52 and 55 years, respectively. Median interval to brain metastases was 28 months after the diagnosis of EOC. At the time of analysis, nine patients had died of disease. The median survival from brain relapse was 7 months. A Karnofsky performance status of 70 or higher, primary control, solitary brain lesions, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, and treatment modality including gamma-knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were related to survival on univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment modality including GKRS was a more important prognostic factor than RPA class (P= 0.04). This small series demonstrated that GKRS can be a valuable modality for the management of brain metastasis in patients with EOC. Therefore, a better outcome can be achieved by choosing GKRS in their treatments in selected patients.

Brain Metastases in Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma: Prognostic Factors and Outcome

2004 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zvi R. Cohen ◽  
Dima Suki ◽  
Jeffrey S. Weinberg ◽  
Eric Marmor ◽  
Frederick F. Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma

Gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial metastatic melanoma: a 6-year experience

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 494-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Gonzalez-martinez ◽  
Laura Hernandez ◽  
Lucia Zamorano ◽  
Andrew Sloan ◽  
Kenneth Levin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial metastatic melanoma and to identify prognostic factors related to tumor control and survival that might be helpful in determining appropriate therapy. Methods. Twenty-four patients with intracranial metastases (115 lesions) metastatic from melanoma underwent radiosurgery. In 14 patients (58.3%) whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was performed, and in 12 (50%) chemotherapy was conducted before radiosurgery. The median tumor volume was 4 cm3 (range 1–15 cm3). The mean dose was 16.4 Gy (range 13–20 Gy) prescribed to the 50% isodose at the tumor margin. All cases were categorized according to the Recursive Partitioning Analysis classification for brain metastases. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival were performed to determine significant prognostic factors affecting survival. The mean survival was 5.5 months after radiosurgery. The analyses revealed no difference in terms of survival between patients who underwent WBRT or chemotherapy and those who did not. A significant difference (p < 0.05) in mean survival was observed between patients receiving immunotherapy or those with a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score of greater than 90. Conclusions. The treatment with systemic immunotherapy and a KPS score greater than 90 were factors associated with a better prognosis. Radiosurgery for melanoma-related brain metastases appears to be an effective treatment associated with few complications.

scholarly journals EP-1224 Re-Irradiation in Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment outcome and Prognostic factors

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. S675-S676
Author(s):  
M. Mukherjee ◽  
J. Bhattacharya ◽  
T. Shahid ◽  
V. Kontham ◽  
R. Rajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Recurrent Gliomas

Prognostic factors and survival after whole-brain radiotherapy for initial brain metastases arising from non-small cell lung cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Yukinori Okada ◽  
Mariko Kobayashi ◽  
Mio Shinozaki ◽  
Tatsuyuki Abe ◽  
Naoki Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy

Abstract Aim: To identify prognostic factors and investigate patient survival after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for initial brain metastases arising from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 1 January 2010 and 30 September 2019, and who received WBRT upon first developing a brain metastasis, were investigated. Overall survival was determined as related to age, sex, duration between initial examination and brain metastasis detection, stage at the first examination, presence of metastases outside the brain, blood analysis findings, brain metastasis symptoms, radiotherapy dose and completion, imaging findings, therapeutic course of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, histological type, and gene mutation status. Results: Thirty-one consecutive patients (20 men and 11 women) with a mean age of 63·8 years and median survival of 129 days were included. Multivariate analysis with stepwise testing was performed to investigate differences in survival according to gene mutation status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, irradiation dose, WBRT completion and Stage status. Of these, a statistically significant difference in survival was observed in patients with gene mutation status (hazard ratio: 0·31, 95% CI: 0·11–0·86, p = 0·025), LDH levels <230 vs. ≥230 IU/L (hazard ratio: 4·08, 95% CI: 1·45–11·5, p < 0·01) received 30 Gy, 30 Gy/10 fractions to 35 Gy/14 fractions, and 37·5 Gy/15 fractions (hazard ratio: 0·26, 95% CI: 0·09–0·71, p < 0·01), and stage IV versus non-stage IV (hazard ratio: 0·13, 95 CI:0·02–0·64, p < 0·01) Findings: Gene mutation, LDH, radiation dose and Stage are prognostic factors for patients with initial brain metastases who are treated with WBRT.

Outcome of patients with small-cell lung cancer: effect of changes in staging procedures and imaging technology on prognostic factors over 14 years.

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1042-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
M P Dearing ◽  
S M Steinberg ◽  
R Phelps ◽  
M J Anderson ◽  
J L Mulshine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
The Impact

In a study of 411 patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) entered on therapeutic clinical trials between 1973 and 1987, we analyzed whether changes in the prognostic importance of pretreatment factors had occurred during the 14-year time period. After adjusting for other prognostic factors, brain involvement was associated with shorter survival in patients treated before December 1979 (P = .024) but not in patients treated thereafter (P = .54). The patients diagnosed before 1979 had brain metastases documented by radionuclide scan while computed cranial tomography (CCT) was more commonly used after 1979. Patients who had brain metastases diagnosed by radionuclide scan lived a shorter period of time than patients who had the diagnosis made by the more sensitive CCT scan (P = .031). In contrast, Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that liver metastases in patients were associated with shorter survival in patients treated after 1979 (P = .0007) but not in patients treated before then (P = .30). A larger proportion of patients had a routine liver biopsy before 1979 than after 1979 when more patients had the liver staged with less sensitive imaging studies and biochemical parameters. Patients with SCLC whose cancer was confined to the thorax but had medical or anatomic contraindications to intensive chest radiotherapy had similar survival compared with patients with limited-stage SCLC who were treated with combination chemotherapy alone (P = .68). From these data we conclude: (1) the sensitivity of the staging procedures used can affect the impact on survival of cancer involvement of a given site; and (2) patients with cancer confined to their chest with medical or anatomic contraindications to chest radiotherapy do not have a shorter survival than patients with limited-stage disease treated with chemotherapy alone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document