scholarly journals SURG-03. The effect of surgery on radiation necrosis in irradiated brain metastases: extent of resection and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii23-iii24
Author(s):  
William Newman ◽  
Jacob Goldberg ◽  
Sergio Guadix ◽  
Samantha Brown ◽  
Anne Reiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Necrosis ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Whole Brain Irradiation ◽  
Full Cohort ◽  
Steroid Dependency

Abstract Objective Radiation therapy is a cornerstone of brain metastasis (BrM) management but carries the risk of radiation necrosis (RN), which can require resection for palliation or diagnosis. We sought to determine the relationship between extent of resection (EOR) of pathologically-confirmed RN and postoperative radiographic and symptomatic outcomes. Methods A single-center retrospective review was performed at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center to identify all surgically-resected, previously-irradiated necrotic BrM without admixed recurrent malignancy from 2003–2018. Clinical, pathologic and radiographic parameters were collected. Volumetric analysis determined EOR and longitudinally evaluated perilesional T2-FLAIR signal preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months postoperatively when available. Rates of time to 50% T2-FLAIR reduction was calculated using cumulative incidence in the competing risks setting with last follow-up and death as competing events. The Spearman method was used to calculate correlation coefficients, and continuous variables for T2-FLAIR signal change, including EOR, were compared across groups. Results Forty-six patients were included. Most underwent prior stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole-brain irradiation (n=42, 91%). Twenty-seven operations resulted in gross-total resection (59%; GTR). For the full cohort, T2-FLAIR edema decreased by a mean of 78% by 6 months postoperatively that was durable to last follow-up (p<0.05). EOR correlated with edema reduction at last follow-up, with significantly greater T2-FLAIR reduction with GTR versus subtotal resection (p<0.05). There was a trend towards decreased steroid use, from 8mg daily dexamethasone-equivalent (range 2–36) preoperatively to 3mg 12-months postoperatively (range 1–8; p=0.063). Conclusions RN resection conferred both durable T2-FLAIR reduction, which correlated with EOR, and reduced steroid dependency.

scholarly journals Predictors of Treatment Response and Survival Outcomes in Meningioma Recurrence with Atypical or Anaplastic Histology

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 824-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad O Chohan ◽  
Christopher T Ryan ◽  
Ranjodh Singh ◽  
Ryan M Lanning ◽  
Anne S Reiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Anaplastic Histology ◽  
First Recurrence

Abstract BACKGROUND Recurrence rates for atypical and anaplastic meningiomas range between 9% and 50% after gross total resection and between 36% and 83% after subtotal resection. Optimal treatment of recurrent meningiomas exhibiting atypical/anaplastic histology is complicated because they are often refractory to both surgery and radiation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical determinants of recurrence and treatment-specific outcomes in patients with recurrent meningiomas exhibiting atypical/anaplastic histology at our institution. METHODS A cohort study was conducted using clinical data of all patients treated for meningiomas with atypical/anaplastic histology at first recurrence between January 1985 and July 2014 at a tertiary cancer center. Predictors of second recurrence were analyzed using competing risks regression models. RESULTS Nine hundred eighteen patients with meningioma were screened, of whom 60 (55% female) had recurrent disease with atypical/anaplastic histology at a median age of 58.1 yr at diagnosis. The median follow-up from the time of first recurrence was 36.7 mo, with 32 (53%) patients alive at last follow-up. There was no effect of extent of resection at first recurrence on time to a subsequent recurrence. Inclusion of radiation as primary or adjuvant therapy at first recurrence reduced the risk of progression or subsequent recurrence compared to surgery alone (P = .07). CONCLUSION Treatment of recurrent meningiomas with atypical/anaplastic histology remains challenging. Our data, from one of the largest cohorts, suggest better tumor control with the addition of radiation and challenges the importance of extent of resection at first recurrence. A multicenter effort is needed to confirm these findings and propose treatment guidelines.

scholarly journals SURG-04. SALVAGE RESECTION OF RECURRENT PREVIOUSLY-IRRADIATED BRAIN METASTASES: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii203-ii204
Author(s):  
Jessica Wilcox ◽  
William Newman ◽  
Anne Reiner ◽  
Samantha Brown ◽  
Robert Young ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Radiation Necrosis ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Viable Tumor ◽  
Local Progression ◽  
Salvage Resection

Abstract BACKGROUND The management of brain metastasis (BrM) recurrence after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) poses a clinical challenge. The efficacy of salvage resection is undefined, and the role of adjuvant resection cavity reirradiation is unclear given the compounded risk of radiation injury. METHODS Retrospective analysis of previously-irradiated BrM that underwent resection between March 2003 and February 2020 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center was performed. Only cases with histopathologic evidence of viable malignancy were included, and specimens were classified by the gross proportion of viable tumor versus treatment effect. Clinical and radiographic parameters were collected. Post-operative recurrence and radiation necrosis were based on RANO-BM criteria and distinguished by histopathologic, radiographic and clinical characteristics. Equivocal cases were adjudicated by a blinded neuroradiologist. RESULTS One-hundred fifty-five resected recurrent BrM following SBRT in 135 patients were evaluated. Seventeen received additional prior whole-brain radiation. Metastases derived from non-small-cell lung (36.8%), melanoma (27.1%), breast (21.3%), renal (3.9%), colorectal (1.9%) and other (9.0%) primary malignancies. Forty-eight (31.0%) had only microscopic malignant disease with extensive necrosis, 44 (28.4%) had mixed or unspecified tumor with treatment effect, and 63 (40.6%) were reported as purely viable tumor by histopathologic report. Thirty-nine (25.2%) post-operative cavities underwent adjuvant reirradiation within 60 days. At 6 and 12 months, local tumor recurrence occurred in 31.6% (95% CI: 24.4%-39.1%) and 40.4% (95% CI: 32.5%-48.2%), respectively, with a proportion of these lesions displaying mixed tumor plus treatment effect. Median overall survival was 13.4 months (95% CI: 10.5-17.7) from salvage resection. CONCLUSIONS Salvage of previously-irradiated BrM remains challenging. This represents the largest known series correlating salvage resection and histopathologically-confirmed viable recurrent BrM with long-term outcomes. Tumor recurrence risk remains high at one year. Further exploration will stratify local progression and radiation necrosis rates by features including extent of resection, degree of viable tumor and adjuvant reirradiation use.

scholarly journals Changes in fatigue, barriers, and predictors towards physical activity in advanced cancer patients over a period of 12 months—a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Frikkel ◽  
M. Beckmann ◽  
N. De Lazzari ◽  
M. Götte ◽  
S. Kasper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Psychological Conditions ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose Physical activity (PA) is recommended to improve advanced cancer patients’ (ACP) physical functioning, fatigue, and quality of life. Yet, little is known about ACPs’ attitude towards PA and its influence on fatigue and depressiveness over a longer period. This prospective, non-interventional cohort study examined ACPs’ fatigue, depression, motivation, and barriers towards PA before and after 12 months of treatment among ACP Methods Outpatients with incurable cancer receiving treatment at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center reporting moderate/severe weakness/tiredness during self-assessment via MIDOS II were enrolled. Fatigue (FACT-F), depression (PHQ-8), cancer-related parameters, self-assessed PA behavior, motivation for and barriers against PA were evaluated (T0). Follow-up data was acquired after 12 months (T1) using the same questionnaire. Results At follow-up, fatigue (p=0.017) and depressiveness (p=0.015) had increased in clinical relevant extent. Physically active ACP did not show significant progress of FACT-F (p=0.836) or PHQ-8 (p=0.799). Patient-reported barriers towards PA remained stable. Logistic regression analyses identified motivation as a positive predictor for PA at both time points (T0, β=2.152, p=0.017; T1, β =2.264, p=0.009). Clinically relevant depression was a negative predictor for PA at T0 and T1 (T0, β=−3.187, p=0.044; T1, β=−3.521, p=0.041). Conclusion Our findings emphasize the importance of psychological conditions in physical activity behavior of ACP. Since psychological conditions seem to worsen over time, early integration of treatment is necessary. By combining therapy approaches of cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise in interdisciplinary care programs, the two treatment options might reinforce each other and sustainably improve ACPs’ fatigue, physical functioning, and QoL. Trial registration German Register of Clinical Trials, DRKS00012514, registration date: 30.05.2017

Perceptions of barriers to patient financial hardship screening differ by provider role within gynecologic oncology outpatient care.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 317-317
Author(s):  
Jhalak Dholakia ◽  
Maria Pisu ◽  
Warner King Huh ◽  
Margaret Irene Liang
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Financial Hardship ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Patient Barriers

317 Background: Although approximately half of patients with gynecologic malignancy experience financial hardship (FH) during treatment, best practices to identify and assist patients with FH are lacking. To develop such practices, we assessed oncology provider and staff perspectives about FH screening and provision of assistance. Methods: An anonymous survey was conducted electronically within the Gynecologic Oncology outpatient office at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Potential barriers to patient FH screening and follow-up were assessed within 2 domains: 1) logistic barriers to incorporating FH screening and follow-up into outpatient workflow and 2) perceived patient barriers to FH screening. Responses were elicited on a 5-point Likert scale from ‘very’ to ‘not at all’ significant and dichotomized into significant and not significant barriers. Results: Of 43 providers approached, 37 responded (86% response rate) of which 14 were physicians (MD)/nurse practitioners (NP) and 23 were other staff members (i.e., clinical and research nurses, social workers, pharmacists, care coordinators, lay navigators, and financial counselors). Altogether, 38% worked in their current position for >5 years (n=14), 11% for 3-5 years (n=4), and 51% for <3 years (n=19). For logistic barriers to implementing FH screening and follow-up, the most frequently reported significant barriers included lack of personnel training (69%) and lack of available staff (62%), training regarding follow-up (72%), and case tracking infrastructure (67%). The most frequent significant perceived patient barriers were lack of knowledge of whom to contact (72%), concerns about impact on treatment if FH needs were identified (72%), and lack of patient readiness to discuss financial needs (62%.) Compared to MD/NP, staff members more often indicated the following as significant barriers: difficulty incorporating FH screening into initial visit workflow (31 % vs. 57%, p=0.03), overstretched personnel (29% vs 73%, p=0.005), and patient concerns about influence on treatment (62% vs 86%, p=0.01). Conclusions: Care team members identified barriers to patient FH screening across logistic and patient-centered domains, although MD/NP less so than other staff possibly reflecting different exposures to patient financial needs during clinical encounters or burden of workflow. Implementation of universal FH screening, dedicated personnel, convenient tracking mechanisms, and multi-disciplinary provider and staff training may improve recognition of patient FH and facilitate its integration into oncology care plans.

Outcomes of BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma (MM) patients (pts) after cessation of targeted therapy (TT) with BRAF or BRAF/MEK inhibitor(i).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9564-9564
Author(s):  
Natalie Jackson ◽  
Theresa Rodgers ◽  
Ida John ◽  
Denai R. Milton ◽  
Lauren Elaine Haydu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Full Cohort ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Braf Mutant ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

9564 Background: Since their introduction into the clinic a decade ago, BRAF and BRAF/MEKi have dramatically changed the outcomes of pts with BRAF mutant MM. While typically, these agents are administered until progression (PD), other reasons for stopping TT include unacceptable toxicity, complete response to treatment, or pt/physician decision or preference. The outcomes for MM pts that stop TT for reasons other than PD are largely unknown. Here we report the clinical features and outcomes of the largest cohort of MM pts who stopped TT for reasons other than PD to date. Methods: Under an institutionally approved database, we identified MM pts treated at the MD Anderson Cancer Center with BRAF±MEK inhibitors, and their records were reviewed to identify pts that stopped TT for reasons other than PD. Pts demographics, treatment information and clinical outcomes were recorded. Overall survival (OS) time was computed from three start dates (initial diagnosis, initial unresectable stage III melanoma, 1st dose of TT) to last known vital sign. Pts alive at the last follow-up date were censored. Time to recurrence was computed from date of 1st dose of TT to recurrence. Pts who did not experience disease recurrence were censored The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and time to recurrence. Results: A total of 58 pts were identified, 32 (55%) were male. Most pts had a BRAF V600E (n = 49) or V600K (n = 6) mutation. At TT initiation median age was 59.5 years (range 29- 95), LDH was within normal range in 46 (85%), median number of prior systemic therapies was 1 (range 0-5), with 50% of pts receiving prior systemic therapy. Most (n = 33; 57%) pts were treated with single agent BRAFi (12 with dabrafenib, 11 vemurafenib). Among pts treated with combination TT (n = 25), most received dabrafenib with trametinib (n = 21; 84%). Median TT treatment duration was 9.5 months (range 0.03-80.5 months). Reasons for TT discontinuation were unacceptable toxicity (n = 29; 50%) and pt or physician decision/preference in responding patients (n = 23; 40%). At time of TT discontinuation, 48% of pts had achieved a complete response (CR), 28% a partial response (PR), and 22% stable disease (SD), 1 patient had unknown disease status. With standard follow-up, after stopping TT, 40 pts (69%) have recurred or experienced PD, with a median time to recurrence of 14.9 months (95% CI:7.8-26.3 months). At PD, 32 (76%) of pts had new metastatic sites. After PD 26 pts (63%) pts received BRAF/MEKi, 11 (44%) achieved a CR and 6 (24%) a PR, and 5 (20%) for a response rate of 88%; while 3 (12%) pt had PD as best response and 1 was unknown. For the full cohort, the median OS from time of 1st dose of TT was 6.4 years. Conclusions: Among MM pts who stopped TT for reasons other than PD, the majority of pts recurred, but most responded to re-introduction of TT. This information can help to inform discussion with pts regarding cessation of, or re-challenge with, TT.

Soft tissue sarcoma of the vulva: A clinical study

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. C. Ulutin ◽  
R. C. Zellars ◽  
D. Frassica
Keyword(s):  
Epithelioid Sarcoma ◽  
Surgical Margins ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Clinical Aspects ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Mean Time

The purpose of this study is to report clinical aspects and treatment results of patients seen at Johns Hopkins. A search of the tumor registry of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center found 453 patients with malignancies of the vulva registered between 1977 and 1997. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment methods, and follow-up were obtained from charts. Seven patients were identified with sarcoma of the vulva. Of these, one was removed from analysis due to histology. Three patients had leiomyosarcoma, two had fibrosarcoma, and one had epithelioid sarcoma. The mean age was 41. Mean time to diagnosis was 6 months. All but one of the tumors was located on the labia majora. Median tumor size was 3.5 cm. Surgery varied from wide local excision to radical vulvectomy with inguinal lymph node dissection. Surgical margins were microscopically negative in five of the six cases. Two patients had received adjuvant external beam radiation. One of them had a tumor greater than 5 cm and close surgical margins and the other had high-grade tumor, which recurred after previous surgery. Mean follow-up was 127.8 months. There have been no recurrences to date.

Intracranial Hemangiopericytoma

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 624-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol J. Ghia ◽  
Eric L. Chang ◽  
Pamela K. Allen ◽  
Anita Mahajan ◽  
Marta Penas-Prado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Unknown Status ◽  
Meningeal Hemangiopericytoma ◽  
The University

Abstract BACKGROUND: Meningeal hemangiopericytoma (M-HPC) is a rare entity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize our institutional experience in treating M-HPC. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with M-HPC evaluated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1979 and 2009. RESULTS: We identified 63 patients diagnosed between 1979 and 2009 with M-HPC treated with surgery alone or with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). The majority were male (59%) and with a median age of 40.9 years (range, 0-71). Gross total resection (GTR) predominated (n = 31, 49%) followed by subtotal resection (n = 23, 37%) and unknown status (n = 9, 14.3%). PORT was delivered to 39 of the 63 patients (62%). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival were 90%, 68%, and 28%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year local control (LC) were 70%, 37%, and 20%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year metastasis-free survival were 85%, 39%, and 7%. PORT resulted in improved LC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, P = .008). Radiotherapy (RT) dose ≥60 Gy correlated with improved LC relative to &lt;60 Gy (HR 0.12, P = .045). GTR correlated with improved LC (HR 0.40, P = .03). On multivariate analysis, PORT (HR 0.33, P = .003), GTR (HR = 0.33, P = .008), and RT dose ≥60 Gy (HR 0.33, P = .003) correlated with improved LC. Among those with GTR, PORT resulted in improved LC (HR 0.18, P = .027). Extent of resection and PORT did not correlate with improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: In M-HPC, both PORT and GTR independently correlate with improved LC. PORT improves LC following GTR. We recommend RT dose ≥60 Gy to optimize LC.

Use of diagnostic testing for patients with early-stage breast cancer in a multi-hospital quality collaborative in Michigan.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 242-242
Author(s):  
Tara M. Breslin ◽  
James Kubus ◽  
Haythem Y. Ali ◽  
T. Trevor Singh ◽  
Paul T. Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Imaging ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Bone Scans

242 Background: In 2012, ASCO identified five opportunities to improve the quality of cancer care and reduce costs. Two of these recommendations focused on limiting use of advanced diagnostic imaging with computed tomography (CT), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), and radionuclide bone scans (BS) at diagnosis and during surveillance for women with early stage breast cancer with a low risk of metastasis. We describe the use of diagnostic imaging among patients with early stage breast cancer treated at hospitals in Michigan. Methods: The Michigan Breast Oncology Quality Initiative is a collaboration between Michigan hospitals, the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). This collaborative collects longitudinal demographic, staging, treatment, and follow up data using the NCCN Breast Outcomes Database platform. We analyzed use of advanced diagnostic testing with CT, PET, BS and contrast it with use of traditional imaging (mammography/ultrasound) at diagnosis and during follow up in patients with stage 0, I, II breast cancer between 1998 to 2009. Patients who died or recurred were excluded. Results: The cohort included 7,632 patients (19.6% stage 0, 48.1% stage I, 32.3% stage II) treated at 17 hospitals. Use of traditional imaging was documented in nearly 100% of patients at diagnosis and throughout the follow up period. With respect to advanced diagnostic imaging, 20.3 % underwent CT, 4.7% underwent PET, and 11.6% underwent BS at diagnosis. Advanced testing use decreased over time (Table). Conclusions: Despite published guidelines, which recommend against their routine use, advanced diagnostic imaging use was prevalent among patients treated for early breast cancer at MiBOQI hospitals. Education efforts should target physicians and patients on the lack of proven benefit and potential risks of using advanced diagnostic imaging in this population. [Table: see text]

Outcomes of supportive/palliative care (SPC) for advanced cancer patients (AdCa) in a general public hospital and a comprehensive cancer center.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 208-208
Author(s):  
Marvin Omar Delgado-Guay ◽  
Jeanette Ferrer ◽  
Jewel Ochoa ◽  
Hilda Cantu ◽  
Janet L. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Public ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Time Range ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

208 Background: AdCa experience severe physical, psychosocial and existential distress. Their needs might not be met only by standard care. We compared outcomes of AdCa receiving SPC at a General Public Hospital (GPH) and at a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). Methods: We reviewed 364 consecutive AdCa(182 at GPH and 182 at CCC). AdCa were managed by SPC-specialists with common clinical-pathways. We assessed symptoms(Edmonton Symptom Assessment System:ESAS) and outcomes at consult and first follow-up. Results: Race was White, African-American, and Hispanic in 42(23%), 70(39%), 63(35%) at GPH vs. 112(64%, p<0.0001), 30(17%, p<0.0001), 20(11%, p<0.0001) at CCC, respectively. Age, gender and cancer diagnoses were similar at both sites. 98(54%) at GPH vs. 181(99%) at CCC reported to have some health-insurance(p<0.0001). Symptoms at consult-time at GPH and CCC: Pain 133(85%) vs. 151(91%,p=0.0586); Fatigue 127(80%) vs. 153(94%,p<0.0001); Nausea 69(44%) vs. 89(55%,p=0.0438); Depression 79(51%) vs. 109(68%,p=0.0015); Anxiety 72(46%) vs. 121(75%,p<0.0001); Drowsiness 78(50%) vs. 119(76%, p<0.0001); Appetite 89(56%) vs. 146(91%, p<0.0001); Dyspnea 72(46%) vs. 107(65%,p=0.0004); Sleep 90(59%) vs. 142(88%,p<0.0001); and Well-Being 95(63%) vs. 132(93%,p<0.0001). Both SPC provided multiple not different interventions: opioid-management, medication review for polypharmacy, bowel-regimen, antiemetics, and interdisciplinary counseling. At follow-up ESAS-improvement(decrease ≥2 points) was: pain 21/80(26%) at GPH vs. 43/107(40%) at CCC(p=0.0469), anxiety 18/75(24%) vs. 40/98(41%,p=0.0202); appetite 15/74(20%) vs. 37/90(41%,p=0.0043); sleep 20/74(27%) vs. 42/95(44%,p=0.0215); nausea 23/77(30%) vs. 35/97(36%,p=0.3879); depression 18/74(24%) vs. 30/94(32%,p=0.2796). Median Time(range) from consult-to-follow-up at GPH 21 days(0-427) vs. 14 days(1-275,p=0.032), and from consult-to-death at GPH 53 days(1-699) vs. 51 days(1-898,p=0.8473). Conclusions: AdCa at GPH and CCC had frequent and severe-symptoms. Response-rate was lower and follow-up less-frequent at GPH. SPC needs to be more frequent and more resources are needed at GPH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document