Outcomes of supportive/palliative care (SPC) for advanced cancer patients (AdCa) in a general public hospital and a comprehensive cancer center.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 208-208
Author(s):  
Marvin Omar Delgado-Guay ◽  
Jeanette Ferrer ◽  
Jewel Ochoa ◽  
Hilda Cantu ◽  
Janet L. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Public ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Time Range ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

208 Background: AdCa experience severe physical, psychosocial and existential distress. Their needs might not be met only by standard care. We compared outcomes of AdCa receiving SPC at a General Public Hospital (GPH) and at a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). Methods: We reviewed 364 consecutive AdCa(182 at GPH and 182 at CCC). AdCa were managed by SPC-specialists with common clinical-pathways. We assessed symptoms(Edmonton Symptom Assessment System:ESAS) and outcomes at consult and first follow-up. Results: Race was White, African-American, and Hispanic in 42(23%), 70(39%), 63(35%) at GPH vs. 112(64%, p<0.0001), 30(17%, p<0.0001), 20(11%, p<0.0001) at CCC, respectively. Age, gender and cancer diagnoses were similar at both sites. 98(54%) at GPH vs. 181(99%) at CCC reported to have some health-insurance(p<0.0001). Symptoms at consult-time at GPH and CCC: Pain 133(85%) vs. 151(91%,p=0.0586); Fatigue 127(80%) vs. 153(94%,p<0.0001); Nausea 69(44%) vs. 89(55%,p=0.0438); Depression 79(51%) vs. 109(68%,p=0.0015); Anxiety 72(46%) vs. 121(75%,p<0.0001); Drowsiness 78(50%) vs. 119(76%, p<0.0001); Appetite 89(56%) vs. 146(91%, p<0.0001); Dyspnea 72(46%) vs. 107(65%,p=0.0004); Sleep 90(59%) vs. 142(88%,p<0.0001); and Well-Being 95(63%) vs. 132(93%,p<0.0001). Both SPC provided multiple not different interventions: opioid-management, medication review for polypharmacy, bowel-regimen, antiemetics, and interdisciplinary counseling. At follow-up ESAS-improvement(decrease ≥2 points) was: pain 21/80(26%) at GPH vs. 43/107(40%) at CCC(p=0.0469), anxiety 18/75(24%) vs. 40/98(41%,p=0.0202); appetite 15/74(20%) vs. 37/90(41%,p=0.0043); sleep 20/74(27%) vs. 42/95(44%,p=0.0215); nausea 23/77(30%) vs. 35/97(36%,p=0.3879); depression 18/74(24%) vs. 30/94(32%,p=0.2796). Median Time(range) from consult-to-follow-up at GPH 21 days(0-427) vs. 14 days(1-275,p=0.032), and from consult-to-death at GPH 53 days(1-699) vs. 51 days(1-898,p=0.8473). Conclusions: AdCa at GPH and CCC had frequent and severe-symptoms. Response-rate was lower and follow-up less-frequent at GPH. SPC needs to be more frequent and more resources are needed at GPH.

scholarly journals Changes in fatigue, barriers, and predictors towards physical activity in advanced cancer patients over a period of 12 months—a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Frikkel ◽  
M. Beckmann ◽  
N. De Lazzari ◽  
M. Götte ◽  
S. Kasper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Psychological Conditions ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose Physical activity (PA) is recommended to improve advanced cancer patients’ (ACP) physical functioning, fatigue, and quality of life. Yet, little is known about ACPs’ attitude towards PA and its influence on fatigue and depressiveness over a longer period. This prospective, non-interventional cohort study examined ACPs’ fatigue, depression, motivation, and barriers towards PA before and after 12 months of treatment among ACP Methods Outpatients with incurable cancer receiving treatment at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center reporting moderate/severe weakness/tiredness during self-assessment via MIDOS II were enrolled. Fatigue (FACT-F), depression (PHQ-8), cancer-related parameters, self-assessed PA behavior, motivation for and barriers against PA were evaluated (T0). Follow-up data was acquired after 12 months (T1) using the same questionnaire. Results At follow-up, fatigue (p=0.017) and depressiveness (p=0.015) had increased in clinical relevant extent. Physically active ACP did not show significant progress of FACT-F (p=0.836) or PHQ-8 (p=0.799). Patient-reported barriers towards PA remained stable. Logistic regression analyses identified motivation as a positive predictor for PA at both time points (T0, β=2.152, p=0.017; T1, β =2.264, p=0.009). Clinically relevant depression was a negative predictor for PA at T0 and T1 (T0, β=−3.187, p=0.044; T1, β=−3.521, p=0.041). Conclusion Our findings emphasize the importance of psychological conditions in physical activity behavior of ACP. Since psychological conditions seem to worsen over time, early integration of treatment is necessary. By combining therapy approaches of cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise in interdisciplinary care programs, the two treatment options might reinforce each other and sustainably improve ACPs’ fatigue, physical functioning, and QoL. Trial registration German Register of Clinical Trials, DRKS00012514, registration date: 30.05.2017

Frequency and characteristics of cancer-related drowsiness (CRD or excessive daytime sleepiness) in patients with advanced cancer: Results of a prospective survey at a tertiary cancer center.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 131-131
Author(s):  
Sriram Yennu ◽  
Dave Balachandran ◽  
Sandra L. Pedraza ◽  
Elyssa A Berg ◽  
Gary B. Chisholm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Opioid Dose ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

131 Background: CRD is extremely distressing but treatable symptom to the advanced cancer patients (ACP). There are limited studies to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of CRD. The aim of this study was to identify the frequency, and factors associated with severity of CRD. Secondary aim was to determine the screening performance Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)-drowsiness item against the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Methods: We prospectively assessed 180 consecutive ACP at a tertiary cancer hospital. After obtaining signed consent, the patients completed ESAS, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); ESS (≥10 diagnostic of CRD), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), STOP-Bang Screening Scale (SBS), and Screening tool for RLS. We determined epidemiological performance, spearman correlations, regression analysis, receiver operated characteristics of CRD. Results: Of the180 patients assessed, 51% were female, CRD was found in 50% ACP, median scores(IQR) ESS: 11(7-14); ESAS- drowsiness item was 5 (2-6); PSQI was 8(5-11); ISI (13 (5-19); SBS 3(2-4); HADS-D 6(3-10). Sleep apnea was found in 61%; and RLS in 38%. ESAS-D was associated with other ESAS items[r, p-value] Sleep (0.38, < 0.0001); pain (0.3, < 0.0001); fatigue(0.51, < 0.0001); depression(0.39, < 0.0001); anxiety(0.44, < 0.0001); shortness of breath(0.32, < 0.0001); anorexia(0.36, < 0.0001), FWB(0.41, < 0.0001), and ESS (0.24, 0.001), Opioid dose [MEDD] (0.19, 0.01). Multivariate analysis found no independent predictors except ISI (OR 2.35; 0.036), ESAS Fatigue (OR 9.08, <0.0001), ESAS Anxiety (3.0, 0.009); feeling of well-being (OR 2.27, p=0.04). An ESAS- drowsiness cut-off score of ≥ 3(of 10) resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 32% and of 70% and 44% in the training and validation samples, respectively. Conclusions: Clinically significant CRD was associated with increased fatigue, anxiety, sleep disturbance and worse feeling of well-being. These symptoms should be routinely assessed and treated in ACP with CRD. ESAS-drowsiness score of ≥3 of 10 is most useful for screening CRD.

Effects of Tai Chi and Qi Gong group class participation on self-reported symptoms in cancer patients and caregivers: A preliminary report.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 100-100
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez ◽  
Santhosshi Narayanan ◽  
Amie J Christie ◽  
Catherine Powers-James ◽  
M. Kay Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tai Chi ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Qi Gong ◽  
Class Participation ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Global Distress

100 Background: Tai chi and qi gong are movement-based, mind-body approaches offered as part of an integrative oncology program at a comprehensive cancer center. We explored the effects of tai chi and qi gong group class participation on cancer patient and caregiver self-reported symptoms. Methods: Patients and caregivers attending a tai chi and/or qi gong group class completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) immediately before and after participation. The ESAS assessed 10 symptoms (scale 0-10, 10 worst possible); ESAS subscales analyzed included global (GDS), physical (PHS), and psychosocial (PSS). Descriptive statistics; Chi-Squared test, Fisher’s exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for data analysis. Results: 304 participants (Oct 2017-April 2019; 184 patients, 120 caregivers; 72% women, 60% white; mean age 58) were included in the analysis. For patients (symptom reduction by class type: tai chi -4.5 SD 7.6; qi gong -6.1 SD 7.9) and caregivers (tai chi -3.7 SD 6.3; qi gong -4.0 SD 7.8), both class types contributed to clinically and statistically significant improvement (ESAS GDS decrease ≥3; p’s ≤0.0001) in global distress. Patients (-2.07 SD 5.49) and caregivers (-2.34 SD 3.71) participating in tai chi experienced clinically and statistically significant improvement in physical distress (ESAS PHS decrease ≥2; p’s ≤0.0001). For the individual symptom of well-being, we observed clinically and statistically significant improvement for caregivers participating in qi gong (-1.2 SD 2) and patients participating in tai chi (-1.0 SD 1.8) (p’s ≤0.0001). For fatigue, patients (-1.4) and caregivers (-1.0) participating in qi gong experienced clinically and statistically significant improvement (p’s ≤0.0001). Conclusions: Patients and caregivers participating in both class types experienced significant improvement in physical and global distress. Additional research is warranted to learn more about how differences in class content (tai chi vs qi gong) and participants may contribute to observed differences in symptom change.

Spiritual and psychological distress in older and the oldest-old living with advanced cancer patients (O-OOAdCa) in a comprehensive cancer center.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23041-e23041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Omar Delgado-Guay ◽  
Maxine Grace Jaucian De La Cruz ◽  
Linda Pang ◽  
Janet L. Williams ◽  
Eduardo Bruera
Keyword(s):  
Financial Distress ◽  
Oldest Old ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Spiritual Distress ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Living With Cancer

e23041 Background: Older adults living with cancer may experience multiple physical, emotional and spiritual symptoms. Limited literature describing the frequency of psychological and spiritual distress in O-OOAdCa. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients seen by the Palliative Care team from January 2013 to December 2016. We randomly sampled 200 patients aged < 65, 200 patients aged 65 - < 85) and 41 consecutive patients ≥85). Using the ESAS-FS, determined the frequency, and correlates of self-reported Spiritual Pain (SP) and Anxiety (Anx) and Depression (Dep) among these patients. Psycho-spiritual distress was defined as the presence of SP ≥1/10, Anx ≥2/10, and Dep ≥2/10. Results: 52% were female, 61% white, and 48% with ECOG of 2 in the group < 65, 48% were female, 61% white, and 43% an ECOG of 2 from group 65 to 84, and 49% were female, and 83% white, and 49% an ECOG of 3 from the group > 85 years. Spiritual Pain was present in 101/200 (51%) in the group < 65 vs. 61/187 (36%) in group 65-84 vs. 15/54 (29%) in ≥85, p = 0.004. Anxiety was present in 130/200 (65%), vs. 120/187 (65%), vs. 35/54(65%) per group respectively, p = NS. Depression was present in 109/200 (55%), vs. 100/187 (54%), vs. 29/54 (54%), respectively per group, p = NS. Psycho-spiritual distress was present in 65/200 (33%), vs. 44/187 (24%), vs. 11/54 (20%) per group respectively, P = NS. Logistic regression showed gender female correlated with higher psycho-spiritual distress (OR:2.08, p = 0.012), fatigue OR:1.32, p = 0.01, Well-Being OR:1.32, p = 0.02, Financial Distress OR:1.63, p = 0.00, age group < 65, OR:9.24, p = 0.03. Conclusions: High prevalence of Anxiety, Depression and Spiritual Pain in O-OOAdCa. Less frequency of Spiritual Pain in the Oldest-Old when compared with the rest of the population. Highlights the importance of an integrative Psycho-spiritual care to this population. More research is needed.

scholarly journals Group Yoga Effects on Cancer Patient and Caregiver Symptom Distress: Assessment of Self-reported Symptoms at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1087-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez ◽  
Alejandro Chaoul ◽  
Catherine Powers-James ◽  
Carol A Eddy ◽  
Smitha Mallaiah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Psychosocial Health ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Yoga Group ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background. Complementary and integrative health approaches such as yoga provide support for psychosocial health. We explored the effects of group-based yoga classes offered through an integrative medicine center at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods. Patients and caregivers had access to two yoga group classes: a lower intensity (YLow) or higher intensity (YHigh) class. Participants completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS; scale 0-10, 10 most severe) immediately before and after the class. ESAS subscales analyzed included global (GDS; score 0-90), physical (PHS; 0-60), and psychological distress (PSS; 0-20). Data were analyzed examining pre-yoga and post-yoga symptom scores using paired t-tests and between types of classes using ANOVAs. Results. From July 18, 2016, to August 8, 2017, 282 unique participants (205 patients, 77 caregivers; 85% female; ages 20-79 years) attended one or more yoga groups (mean 2.3). For all participants, we observed clinically significant reduction/improvement in GDS, PHS, and PSS scores and in symptoms (ESAS decrease ≥1; means) of anxiety, fatigue, well-being, depression, appetite, drowsiness, and sleep. Clinically significant improvement for both patients and caregivers was observed for anxiety, depression, fatigue, well-being, and all ESAS subscales. Comparing yoga groups, YLow contributed to greater improvement in sleep versus YHigh (−1.33 vs −0.50, P = .054). Improvement in fatigue for YLow was the greatest mean change (YLow −2.12). Conclusion. A single yoga group class resulted in clinically meaningful improvement of multiple self-reported symptoms. Further research is needed to better understand how yoga class content, intensity, and duration can affect outcomes.

Outpatient acupuncture effects on patient self-reported symptoms in oncology care: A retrospective analysis of real-world data.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 135-135
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez ◽  
M. Kay Garcia ◽  
Wenli Liu ◽  
Michael Spano ◽  
Susan Underwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Hot Flashes ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Poor Sleep ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Clinically Significant

135 Background: Increased access to complementary therapies such as acupuncture at academic medical centers has created new opportunities for management of cancer and cancer treatment related symptoms. Methods: Patients presenting for acupuncture treatment during calendar year 2016 at an outpatient integrative medicine clinic in a comprehensive cancer center were asked to complete a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS; 16 symptoms, score 0-10, 10 worst possible) before and after each visit. ESAS subscales analyzed included global (GDS; score 0-90), physical (PHS, 0-60), and psychological distress (PSS, 0-20). ESAS symptom score change pre/post treatment and from baseline visit to first follow up were evaluated by paired t-test. Results: Of 375 participants [mean age 55.6, 68.3% female, 73.9% white, most common cancer diagnosis of breast (32.8%) and thoracic/head&neck (25.9%)], 73.3% had at least one follow-up treatment [mean 4.6 (SD 5.1) treatments]. Highest/worst symptoms at baseline were poor sleep (3.92), fatigue (3.43), well-being (3.31), and pain (3.29). Statistically significant reduction/improvement (pre/post) was observed for all ESAS symptoms and subscales for the initial treatment (p <0.001). Hot flashes had the highest mean reduction (-1.93), followed by fatigue (-1.72), numbness/tingling (-1.70), and nausea (-1.67). Clinically significant reductions were also observed for ESAS subscales of GDS (-12.2), PHS (-8.5), and PSS (-2.6). For symptom change from initial treatment to first follow-up (pre/pre), statistically and clinically significant improvement was observed for spiritual pain (-1.10; p<0.001) and ESAS subscale of GDS (-6.09; p=0.048). Clinical response rates (reduction ≥1) on follow-up were highest for symptoms of spiritual pain (58.9%), dry mouth (57.8%) and nausea (57.3%). Conclusions: Outpatient acupuncture was associated with immediate and longitudinal significant improvement across a range of symptoms commonly experienced by individuals during cancer care. Further research is needed to better understand frequency of treatments needed in clinical practice to help maintain benefit.

scholarly journals Fears, beliefs, and quality of life of patients with cancer vs the general population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Lombardy

2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162110228
Author(s):  
Carla Ida Ripamonti ◽  
Giacomo Massa ◽  
Daniela Insolvibile ◽  
Mauro Guglielmo ◽  
Guido Miccinesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
General Population ◽  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Psychological Consequences ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Fear Of Cancer

Aim: To understand how patients with cancer reacted to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and whether their quality of life (QoL) was affected. Methods: In June 2020, 111 patients with cancer treated in the supportive care unit of a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Milan and 201 healthy controls from the general population were enrolled and assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively for fears and COVID-19–related beliefs as well as for QoL. Results: Fear of COVID-19 was significantly lower among patients (41% vs 57.6%; p = 0.007), as was fear of cancer (61.5% vs 85.6%; p < 0.001) and other diseases. The perceived risk of getting COVID-19 was lower among patients (25.2% vs 52.7%; p < 0.001), as was the belief of having been exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (18.1% vs 40.8%; p < 0.001). The physical component of QoL was better among the population (54.5 vs 43.8; p < 0.001); the reverse was true for patients’ psychological well-being (44.6 vs 39.6; p < 0.001). The qualitative data supported such results, showing a reduced psychological effect on the patients with cancer compared to the controls. Various reasons explain this result, including the awareness of being treated for cancer and nevertheless protected against getting infected in a cancer center of public health reorganized to continue treating patients by protecting them and personnel from the risk of infection. Conclusions: The experience of a cancer diagnosis, together with proper hospital reorganization, may act as protective factors from fears and psychological consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document