scholarly journals 75. Less is More: A Physician-Driven Quality Improvement Stewardship Initiative to Reduce Excessive Duration of Antibiotic Therapy in Veterans Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S55-S56
Author(s):  
Lea M Monday ◽  
Omid Yazdanpanah ◽  
Caleb Sokolowski ◽  
Joseph Sebastian ◽  
Ryan Kuhn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Less Is More ◽  
Historic Control ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The IDSA and American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) guidelines recommend 5 days of therapy for clinically stable patients that defervesce, however, duration of therapy (DOT) is often longer. Pharmacists curb this via antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), but budgetary constraints are barriers to robust AMS programs in some hospitals. Physicians are increasingly encouraged to participate in quality improvement (QI) and are a potential resource to improve AMS. We sought to determine the impact of a prospective, physician-driven stewardship intervention on DOT and clinical outcomes in hospitalized veterans with CAP, with the goal to reduce the median DOT by at least 1 day within 5 months. Methods This single center, quasi-experimental QI study evaluated two concurrent physician-driven interventions over a 5-month period in an inner-city Veterans Affairs Hospital. Using DMAIC (Define, measure, analyze, improve, and control) methodology, the Chief Resident in Quality and Safety (CRQS) provided monthly education and daily audit and feedback with patient-specific DOT recommendations. Clinical outcomes were followed until 30 days post discharge. Results A total of 123 patients with CAP were included (57 in the historic control group and 66 in the AMS intervention group). The AMS intervention significantly increased the proportion of CAP patients treated with a 5-day treatment course (56% versus 5.3%, p< 0.0001), and reduced the proportion of patients treated beyond 7 days (12.1% versus 70.2%, p< 0.0001). Median DOT per patient was reduced significantly (5 versus 8 days, p< 0.0001). Median excess antibiotic days were significantly reduced (0 versus 3, p< 0.0001) and 118 days of unnecessary antibiotics were avoided (62 versus 180). 30-day all-cause mortality, all-cause readmission, and Clostridium difficile infection were similar between groups. Median LOS was similar between groups (p=0.246). DOT in the Historic Control Group Versus Stewardship Intervention Group Conclusion A physician driven QI stewardship intervention in hospitalized CAP patients significantly reduced the total antibiotic DOT and excess antibiotic days without adversely affecting patient outcomes. Providers can be educated through physician driven interventions resulting in substantial improvements in appropriate antibiotic use. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals A Physician-Driven Quality Improvement Stewardship Intervention Using Lean Six Sigma Improves Patient Care for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea M. Monday ◽  
Omid Yazdanpaneh ◽  
Caleb Sokolowski ◽  
Jane Chi ◽  
Ryan Kuhn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Six Sigma ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Lean Six Sigma ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Control Group ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Introduction The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends a minimum of 5 days of antibiotic therapy in stable patients who have community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, excessive duration of therapy (DOT) is common. Define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC) is a Lean Six Sigma methodology used in quality improvement efforts, including infection control; however, the utility of this approach for antimicrobial stewardship initiatives is unknown. To determine the impact of a prospective physician-driven stewardship intervention on excess antibiotic DOT and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with CAP. Our specific aim was to reduce excess DOT and to determine why some providers treat beyond the IDSA minimum DOT. Methods A single-center, quasi-experimental quality improvement study evaluating rates of excess antimicrobial DOT before and after implementing a DMAIC-based antimicrobial stewardship intervention that included education, prospective audit, and feedback from a physician peer, and daily tracking of excess DOT on a Kaizen board. The baseline period included retrospective CAP cases that occurred between October 2018 and February 2019 (control group). The intervention period included CAP cases between October 2019 and February 2020 (intervention group). Results A total of 123 CAP patients were included (57 control and 66 intervention). Median antibiotic DOT per patient decreased (8 versus 5 days; p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients treated for the IDSA minimum increased (5.3% versus 56%; p < 0.001) after the intervention. No differences in mortality, readmission, length of stay, or incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection were observed between groups. Almost half of the caregivers surveyed were aware that as few as 5 days of antibiotic treatment could be appropriate. Conclusions A physician-driven antimicrobial quality improvement initiative designed using DMAIC methodology led to reduced DOT and increased compliance with the IDSA treatment guidelines for hospitalized patients with CAP reduced without negatively affecting clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals A Multicenter Stewardship Initiative to Decrease Excessive Duration of Antibiotic Therapy for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S63-S64
Author(s):  
Farnaz Foolad ◽  
Angela Huang ◽  
Cynthia Nguyen ◽  
Lindsay Colyer ◽  
Megan Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Duration Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Hospitals have implemented multifaceted approaches to quickly identify CAP, start timely therapy, and reduce hospital readmission, yet there has been minimal focus on providing appropriate duration of therapy. The IDSA CAP guidelines recommend 5 days of antibiotic therapy for patients that are clinically stable and quickly defervesce. However, previous publications suggest duration of therapy for CAP may be unnecessarily prolonged. Methods The objective of this multicenter, quasi-experimental study of hospitalized patients with CAP was to assess the impact of a prospective 6-month stewardship intervention on total duration of antibiotic therapy and associated clinical outcomes. All centers updated institutional CAP guidelines to promote IDSA-concordant durations of therapy and provided education to pharmacists and prescribers. Daily patient-specific prospective audit and feedback was provided by infectious diseases stewardship pharmacists to optimize compliance with guideline recommendations. Results A total of 600 patients were included (307 in the historic control group and 293 in the stewardship intervention group). The stewardship intervention led to significantly increased rates of compliance with IDSA duration of therapy recommendations (5.6% vs. 41.4%, P< < 0.01) and significantly reduced the duration of therapy for CAP (9 vs. 6 days, P < 0.01). Inappropriate days of antibiotic therapy was reduced in the intervention group (4 vs. 1.6 days, P < 0.01), and total avoidance of 720 excessive days of antibiotic therapy. Clinical outcomes, including mortality, length of hospitalization, readmission to hospital with pneumonia, presentation to the ER/clinic with pneumonia within 30 days of discharge, and incidence of C. difficilecolitis, were not different between groups. Conclusion This multicenter evaluation of a prospective stewardship intervention in hospitalized CAP patients reduced the total duration of antibiotic therapy and increased compliance with guideline-concordant duration of therapy without adversely affecting patient outcomes. This project was funded through a competitive stewardship grant provided by Merck & Co. Disclosures A. Huang, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; C. Nguyen, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; J. Grieger, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; S. Revolinski, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; J. Li, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; M. Mack, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; J. N. Wainaina, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; G. Eschenauer, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; T. Patel, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; V. Marshall, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; J. Nagel, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant

scholarly journals 756. Impact of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists as Part of an Interdisciplinary OPAT Team Managing Vancomycin

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S337-S338
Author(s):  
Meagan L Adamsick ◽  
Ronak G Gandhi ◽  
Samantha N Steiger ◽  
Monique R Bidell ◽  
Sandra B Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Massachusetts General Hospital ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) is a growing area of Infectious Diseases (ID) that allows for the treatment of severe infections in the ambulatory setting. Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) incorporated inpatient ID pharmacists into the OPAT team in June 2017 to assist with vancomycin monitoring and dosing. Laboratory results were received and documented by the OPAT nurse and forwarded to the pharmacists for assessment via the electronic medical record (EMR). Pharmacists then sent clinical recommendations to the physician. This study aimed to determine the impact of pharmacists’ involvement in OPAT vancomycin management. Methods An EMR-generated report identified patients in the OPAT program from June 2016 through May 2017 as the control group and June 2017 through May 2018 as the intervention group. One hundred patients were randomly selected during each period. Patients were excluded from the intervention group if no pharmacist documentation was present. The primary outcome was to evaluate the proportion of vancomycin levels within the patient-specific goal range and secondary outcomes included the proportion of (1) pharmacists’ recommendations accepted by the ID physician and (2) patients who experienced adverse drug events. Results A total of 200 patients were evaluated. The most common indication for enrollment was osteomyelitis (46%). No differences in baseline characteristics were noted, and the median age was 67 years. The percentage of vancomycin levels within goal was significantly higher in the pharmacist-managed group compared with the control group (66.8% vs. 54.2%; P < 0.0001). The number of patients who experienced adverse drug events was similar between the two groups (39% vs. 43%; P = 0.66); however, fewer patients in the pharmacist group experienced acute kidney injury (5% vs. 13%; P = 0.08). Finally, 100% of pharmacist recommendations were accepted by ID physicians. Conclusion Leveraging inpatient ID pharmacists at MGH in the management of OPAT vancomycin provided improved percentage of vancomycin in therapeutic range and high acceptance rate of interventions. Further evaluation is necessary to assess the inpatient ID pharmacists’ workflow for implementation into other OPAT programs. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Impact of a Personalized Audit and Feedback Intervention on Antibiotic Prescribing Practices for Outpatient Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 988-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Carmen G. Diaz ◽  
Lori K. Handy ◽  
James H. Crutchfield ◽  
Adriana Cadilla ◽  
Jobayer Hossain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Impact ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
The Impact

Antibiotic choice for pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) varies widely. We aimed to determine the impact of a 6-month personalized audit and feedback program on primary care providers’ antibiotic prescribing practices for CAP. Participants in the intervention group received monthly personalized feedback. We then analyzed enrolled providers’ CAP antibiotic prescribing practices. Participants diagnosed 316 distinct cases of CAP (214 control, 102 intervention); among these 316 participants, 301 received antibiotics (207 control, 94 intervention). In patients ≥5 years, the intervention group had fewer non–guideline-concordant antibiotics prescribed (22/103 [21.4%] control; 3/51 [5.9%] intervention, P < .05) and received more of the guideline-concordant antibiotics (amoxicillin and azithromycin). Personalized, scheduled audit and feedback in the outpatient setting was feasible and had a positive impact on clinician’s selection of guideline-recommended antibiotics. Audit and feedback should be combined with other antimicrobial stewardship interventions to improve guideline adherence in the management of outpatient CAP.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Impact of Treatment Care Planning on Quality Measures

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e271-e276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle B. Rocque ◽  
Courtney P. Williams ◽  
Amanda R. Hathaway ◽  
Karina I. Halilova ◽  
Carrie T. Stricker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Quality Measures ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Improved Performance ◽  
The Impact

PURPOSE: The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation Oncology Care Model (OCM) requires documentation of a 13-point Institute of Medicine care management plan for Medicare patients. In addition, OCM includes evaluation of quality using key performance measures that align with the ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI). Both efforts are designed to improve patient-centered care and foster patients’ engagement in their care plan. METHODS: A multicenter quality improvement project was conducted to develop a strategy to meet the OCM treatment planning (TP) requirement (Plan), pilot clinician education coupled with use of electronic TP in early-stage breast cancer (Do), evaluate the impact of TP on QOPI measures (Study), and develop recommendations for future implementation (Act). RESULTS: Thirty-three clinical providers and 171 women with breast cancer were included. Improved performance on several QOPI measures was observed for the intervention group compared with the historical control group. CONCLUSION: Meeting the OCM TP requirement through incorporating a technology solution provided an opportunity for quality improvement and preparation for full-scale TP within the OCM. TP delivery was associated with improved performance on select ASCO QOPI measures, which is likely to correspond with improved performance on quality measures within OCM.

scholarly journals Impact of reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment on the long-term prognosis of community acquired pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ane Uranga MD ◽  
Amaia Artaraz MD ◽  
Amaia Bilbao MD ◽  
Jose María Quintana MD ◽  
Ignacio Arriaga MD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Cardiovascular Complications ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Long Term Prognosis ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Clinical Stability

Abstract Background The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is not well established. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment on long-term prognosis in patients hospitalized with CAP. Methods This was a multicenter study assessing complications developed during 1 year of patients previously hospitalized with CAP who had been included in a randomized clinical trial concerning the duration of antibiotic treatment. Mortality at 90 days, at 180 days and at 1 year was analyzed, as well as new admissions and cardiovascular complications. A subanalysis was carried out in one of the hospitals by measuring C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and proadrenomedullin (proADM) at admission, at day 5 and at day 30. Results A total of 312 patients were included, 150 in the control group and 162 in the intervention group. Ninety day, 180 day and 1-year mortality in the per-protocol analysis were 8 (2.57%), 10 (3.22%) and 14 (4.50%), respectively. There were no significant differences between both groups in terms of 1-year mortality (p = 0.94), new admissions (p = 0.84) or cardiovascular events (p = 0.33). No differences were observed between biomarker level differences from day 5 to day 30 (CRP p = 0.29; PCT p = 0.44; proADM p = 0.52). Conclusions Reducing antibiotic treatment in hospitalized patients with CAP based on clinical stability criteria is safe, without leading to a greater number of long-term complications.

scholarly journals 230. Impact of 10-day versus 5-day Duration Default on Length of Antibiotic Outpatient Prescriptions from the Emergency Department

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S116
Author(s):  
Amber M Watts ◽  
Shannon Holt
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Transitions Of Care ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dental Infections ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Outpatient Prescriptions

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) traditionally focus on inpatient care; however there is a growing effort to optimize antibiotic prescribing at transitions of care. Longer than necessary discharge prescriptions increase risk of antimicrobial resistance, C. difficile infection and adverse events. In order to minimize unnecessary antibiotic exposure, the health system updated the electronic medical record (EMR) outpatient antibiotic prescription default from 10 days to 5 days. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a 10-day versus 5-day EMR antibiotic outpatient prescriptions default on length of therapy for patients discharged from the Emergency Department (ED). Methods This is a retrospective, single-system cohort study evaluating ED discharge prescriptions before and after transition from a default duration of 10 days to 5 days. Discharge prescriptions were collected and screened from December 2019 through January 2020 in the control group and March 2020 through April 2020 in the intervention group. Outpatient prescriptions were included for primary diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), diverticulitis, or dental infections. The primary outcome was the incidence of prescriptions written for a &lt; 5 day duration. Results The study included 3060 of 9651 (32%) prescriptions in the control group and 1610 of 4938 (33%) prescriptions in the intervention group. The mean age was 38 years old with 61% female. The most common primary diagnoses were SSTI (n=1633, 35%) and UTI (n=1633, 32%). The mean duration for discharge prescriptions was similar between groups (8.44 vs. 8.30 days). The incidence of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions for &lt; 5 days was not significantly different between groups (10.72% vs 10.56%, p=0.996). There was an improvement in duration of therapy, with more prescriptions &lt; 5 days for SSTI (2.96% vs. 7.64%, p=0.860) and dental infections (3.30% vs. 10.86%, p=0.808). Conclusion Implementation of a shorter default duration for antibiotic outpatient prescriptions from the ED did not significantly increase the incidence of prescriptions written for &lt; 5 days. There was an improvement in duration for SSTI and dental infections after implementation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The effect of the implementation of a good medical practice booklet on nursing home residents’ drug prescriptions: a difference-in-differences analysis based on data from electronic pill dispensers (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Sanchez ◽  
Cécile Payet ◽  
Marie Herr ◽  
Anne Dazinieras ◽  
Caroline Blochet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Medical Practice ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multilevel Regression ◽  
Difference In Differences ◽  
Good Medical Practice ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND The elderly are particularly exposed to adverse events from medication. Among the various strategies to reduce polypharmacy, educational approaches have shown promising results. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the impact of the implementation of a good medical practice booklet on polypharmacy in nursing homes. METHODS We identified nursing homes belonging to a geriatric care provider that had launched a policy of proper medication use using a good medical practice booklet delivered to prescribers and pharmacists. Data were derived from electronic pill dispensers. The effect of the intervention on polypharmacy was assessed with multilevel regression models, with a control group to account for natural trends over time. The main outcomes were the average daily number of times when medication was administered and the number of drugs with different presentation identifier codes per resident per month. RESULTS 96,216 residents from 519 nursing homes were included between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2014. The intervention group and the control group both decreased their average daily use of medication (-0.05 and -0.06). The good medical practice booklet did not have a statistically significant effect (exponentiated difference-in-differences coefficient 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.02, P=.45). CONCLUSIONS Although the good medical practice booklet itself did not seem effective in decreasing medication use, our data show the effectiveness of a higher-level policy to decrease polypharmacy.

scholarly journals The Effect of Javanese Language Videos with a Community Based Interactive Approach Method as an Educational Instrument for Knowledge, Perception, and Adherence amongst Tuberculosis Patients

Pharmacy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Fauna Herawati ◽  
Yuni Megawati ◽  
Aslichah ◽  
Retnosari Andrajati ◽  
Rika Yulia
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Group ◽  
Personal Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Interactive Approach ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Tuberculosis Patients ◽  
Level Of Knowledge ◽  
The Impact

The long period of tuberculosis treatment causes patients to have a high risk of forgetting or stopping the medication altogether, which increases the risk of oral anti-tuberculosis drug resistance. The patient’s knowledge and perception of the disease affect the patient’s adherence to treatment. This research objective was to determine the impact of educational videos in the local language on the level of knowledge, perception, and adherence of tuberculosis patients in the Regional General Hospital (RSUD) Bangil. This quasi-experimental study design with a one-month follow-up allocated 62 respondents in the intervention group and 60 in the control group. The pre- and post-experiment levels of knowledge and perception were measured with a validated set of questions. Adherence was measured by pill counts. The results showed that the intervention increases the level of knowledge of the intervention group higher than that of the control group (p-value < 0.05) and remained high after one month of follow-up. The perceptions domains that changed after education using Javanese (Ngoko) language videos with the Community Based Interactive Approach (CBIA) method were the timeline, personal control, illness coherence, and emotional representations (p-value < 0.05). More than 95% of respondents in the intervention group take 95% of their pill compared to 58% of respondents in the control group (p-value < 0.05). Utilization of the local languages for design a community-based interactive approach to educate and communicate is important and effective.

Investigating the Impact of Cognitive Training for Individuals With Bothersome Tinnitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982199474
Author(s):  
Maggie Xing ◽  
Dorina Kallogjeri ◽  
Jay F. Piccirillo
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cognitive Training ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Functional Index ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Impact

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive training in improving tinnitus bother and to identify predictors of patient response. Study Design Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial. Setting Online. Methods Participants were adults with subjective idiopathic nonpulsatile tinnitus causing significant tinnitus-related distress. The intervention group trained by using auditory-intensive exercises for 20 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks. The active control group trained on the same schedule with non–auditory intensive games. Surveys were completed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Results A total of 64 participants completed the study. The median age was 63 years (range, 25-69) in the intervention group and 61 years (34-68) in the control group. Mixed model analysis revealed that within-subject change in Tinnitus Functional Index in the intervention group was not different than the control group, with marginal mean differences (95% CI): 0.24 (–11.20 to 10.7) and 2.17 (–8.50 to 12.83) at 8 weeks and 2.33 (–8.6 to 13.3) and 3.36 (–7.91 to 14.6) at 12 weeks, respectively. When the 2 study groups were compared, the control group had higher Tinnitus Functional Index scores than the intervention group by 10.5 points at baseline (95% CI, –0.92 to 29.89), 8.1 at 8 weeks (95% CI, –3.27 to 19.42), and 9.4 at 12 weeks (95% CI, –2.45 to 21.34). Conclusion Auditory-intensive cognitive training was not associated with changes in self-reported tinnitus bother. Given the potential for neuroplasticity to affect tinnitus, we believe that future studies on cognitive training for tinnitus remain relevant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document