scholarly journals 83. A Descriptive Analysis of a Multi-disciplinary Approach to Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Within an Infectious Diseases Clinic

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S173-S173
Author(s):  
Sarah R Blevins ◽  
Tiffany Stivers ◽  
Kathryn Sabitus ◽  
Ryan Weeks ◽  
J Zachary Porterfield ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Opioid overdose is the leading cause of injury-related death in the US. Kentucky ranks in the top 5 states for opioid overdose deaths. The rate of injection drug use-associated infections (IDU-AI) has risen; the University of Kentucky Infectious Diseases division (UKID) treated 401 endocarditis cases in 2018, of which 73% were IDU-AI. To curb overdose deaths, ease financial burden on healthcare, and improve patient outcomes, patients need tools for recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). Access to OUD treatment in Kentucky and much of the US is limited. Poverty, unemployment, and legal issues are barriers. Methods UKID implemented a multi-disciplinary approach to expand access to medication assisted treatment (MAT). This is an ongoing study. Any patient ≥18 years old with IDU-AI and OUD is eligible for enrollment unless pregnant or incarcerated. At enrollment and at three additional time points, patients complete both a study specific and Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) survey. Patients may start MAT and mental health counseling with UKID or be referred elsewhere and are eligible for transportation assistance and medical case management. Results To date, there have been 127 referrals. Of these, 87 (69%) were eligible and 54 enrolled (62% of eligible). Primary IVDU-AI includes HIV (n=4; 7%), HCV (n=5; 9%), HIV/HCV (n=3; 6%), endocarditis (n=32; 59%), and other (n=10; 19%). Patients are 48% male (n=26) and 91% white (n=91) with a median age of 34 years (IQR: 16); 35% are receiving MAT (n=19) with 14.8% (n=8) managed by UKID. Other service data are available for 51 patients. Naloxone was dispensed to 45 (88%) patients, 24 (47%) received relapse prevention services, 13 (25%) engaged in peer support, 9 (18%) participated in self-help groups, and 10 (20%) received transportation aid. Conclusion Increasing engagement in MAT and wrap-around services is an important touchpoint for OUD. We present a comprehensive program to achieve this for patients who would otherwise be discharged without follow-up for OUD. This program shows proof of concept that patients can be engaged in MAT by ID providers. Ongoing analysis will include longitudinal review of patient progress and outcomes, including hospital readmission, and a study to determine patients’ perceived impact on their quality of life. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S692-S692
Author(s):  
Sarah R Blevins ◽  
James A Grubbs ◽  
Tiffany Stivers ◽  
Kathryn Sabitus ◽  
Ryan Weeks ◽  
...  

Abstract Background On December 17, 2020, U.S. CDC released an advisory reporting the highest drug overdose rate on record. Kentucky ranks in the top 5 states for opioid overdose deaths. Retention in opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment is associated with decreased overdose deaths. University of Kentucky HealthCare’s infectious disease division (UKID) implemented a multi-disciplinary approach to expand access to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) for patients with injection drug use-associated infections (IDU-AI). This program is modelled after the Ryan White Cares Act to engage and retain patients. Methods . This ongoing project began enrollment in June 2019. Any patient ≥18 years old with IDU-AI and OUD is eligible for enrollment unless pregnant or incarcerated. Patients are eligible for transportation assistance, mental health services, and medical case management. They may start MOUD with UKID or be referred elsewhere. In this analysis, we describe our opioid use disorder care continuum and identify reasons for patient attrition and areas to improve Results Our continuum components are referral, eligible, enrolled, start MOUD, and retention at month 1, 3, and 6. To date, 533 patients have been referred. Of these, 383 (71.9%) were eligible and 150 (39%) enrolled. Reasons patients did not enroll: discharged stable (41.5%), left AMA (16.9%), declined (10.8%), deceased (6.7%), discharged to other hospital (3.6%), missed clinic visit (9.7%), hospice (1%), other (10.8%). Reasons patients declined: no reason (28.6%), refused to discuss (19.1%), no interest (14.3%), travel (4.8%), declined ID follow-up (4.8%), time limits (9.5%). Ninety-three patients have been enrolled ≥6 months; 83 are on MOUD. Sixty-seven, 29, and 20 patients were retained at month 1, 3, and 6, respectively. Conclusion UKID engages patients in OUD treatment, but retention rates are comparable to those described in non-ID settings. Most attrition occurs between eligibility and month 3, suggesting patients are most vulnerable when they consider change and start MOUD. These time points should be priority for patient engagement by clinic staff. Also our staff size struggles to meet the demand. The number of referrals is prohibitive for our small team to approach everyone in a timely manner. More programs like this one are needed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2020 ◽  
pp. 3-28
Author(s):  
L. Morgan Snell ◽  
Andrew J. Barnes ◽  
Peter Cunningham

Nearly 3 million Americans have a current or previous opioid use disorder, and recent data indicate that 10.2% of US adults have ever misused pain relievers. In 2015, approximately 800,000 individuals used heroin, while 4 million misused prescription opioids. Although use of other drugs such as alcohol and cannabis is more prevalent, opioid use contributes to significant morbidity, mortality, and social and economic costs. While the current US opioid overdose epidemic began with prescription opioids, since 2015, heroin and synthetic opioids (e.g., fentanyl) have driven continued increases in opioid overdose deaths, contributing to a recent decline in overall life expectancy in the United States. Policies to address the opioid epidemic by changing clinical practice include provider education, monitoring prescribing practices, and expanding the clinical workforce necessary to treat opioid use disorders. The opioid epidemic appears to be largely a US phenomenon and a consequence of both structural challenges in the US healthcare system and growing socioeconomic disparities, and thus it will require policies including and beyond delivery system reforms to resolve it.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 428-432
Author(s):  
Amer Raheemullah, MD ◽  
Neal Andruska, MD, PhD

Fentanyl overdoses are growing at an alarming rate. Fentanyl is often mixed into heroin and counterfeit prescription opioid pills without the customer’s knowledge and only detected upon laboratory analysis. This is problematic because fentanyl analogues like carfentanil are 10,000 times more potent than morphine and pose new challenges to opioid overdose management. A 62-year-old male with an overdose from a rare fentanyl analogue, acrylfentanyl, was given two doses of intranasal 2 mg naloxone with improvements in respiratory rate. In lieu of more naloxone, his trachea was intubated and he was admitted to the intensive care unit. He subsequently developed ventilator-associated pneumonia and then a pulmonary embolism. He did not receive any opioid use disorder treatment and returned back to the emergency department with an opioid overdose 21 days after discharge.We are encountering an unprecedented rise in synthetic opioid overdose deaths as we enter the third decade of the opioid epidemic. Thus, it is imperative to be aware of the features and management of overdoses from fentanyl and its analogues. This includes protecting against occupational exposure, administering adequate doses of naloxone, and working with public health departments to respond to fentanyl outbreaks. Additionally, fentanyl overdoses represent a critical opportunity to move beyond acute stabilization, start buprenorphine or methadone for opioid use disorder during hospitalization, link patients to ongoing addiction treatment, and distribute naloxone into the community to help curb the overdose epidemic.


2021 ◽  
pp. 009145092110521
Author(s):  
Brandon del Pozo

From 2017 to early 2020, the US city of Burlington, Vermont led a county-wide effort to reduce opioid overdose deaths by concentrating on the widespread, low-barrier distribution of medications for opioid use disorder. As a small city without a public health staff, the initiative was led out of the police department—with an understanding that it would not be enforcement-oriented—and centered on a local adaptation of CompStat, a management and accountability program developed by the New York City Police Department that has been cited as both yielding improvements in public safety and overemphasizing counterproductive police performance metrics if not carefully directed. The initiative was instrumental to the implementation of several novel interventions: low-threshold buprenorphine prescribing at the city’s syringe service program, induction into buprenorphine-based treatment at the local hospital emergency department, elimination of the regional waiting list for medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and the de-facto decriminalization of diverted buprenorphine by the chief of police and county prosecutor. An effort by local legislators resulted in a state law requiring all inmates with opioid use disorder be provided with MOUD as well. By the end of 2018, these interventions were collectively associated with a 50% (17 vs. 34) reduction in the county’s fatal overdose deaths, while deaths increased 20% in the remainder of Vermont. The reduction was sustained through the end of 2019. This article describes the effort undertaken by officials in Burlington to implement these interventions. It provides an example that other municipalities can use to take an evidence-based approach to reducing opioid deaths, provided stakeholders assent to sustained collaboration in the furtherance of a commitment to save lives. In doing so, it highlights that police-led public health interventions are the exception, and addressing the overdose crisis will require reform that shifts away from criminalization as a community’s default framework for substance use.


SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A278-A278
Author(s):  
M Finlay ◽  
M Wilson ◽  
J A Erwin ◽  
D A Hansen ◽  
M E Layton ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction A well-established consequence of opiate use is respiratory depression during sleep, with a high prevalence of central sleep apneas. Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is a widely used therapy for opioid use disorder (OUD) designed to reduce withdrawal symptoms and drug cravings. We investigated the presence of respiratory depression during sleep in patients receiving methadone-based opioid replacement treatment as part of a MAT program for OUD. Methods N=6 individuals (5 females, ages 43.8±12.8y, BMI 27.2±4.1kg/m2), who were within 90 days of methadone initiation, underwent in-laboratory overnight polysomnography (8h TIB, 22:00-06:00). Apneaic and hypopneic events were determined using AASM criteria. Results The average Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was 16.5±9.0 events/h, with 2 individuals exceeding the threshold of moderate sleep apnea (>15 events/h). 89.5% of the observed apnea-hypopnea events occurred during NREM sleep. Of all events, 57.1±16.3% were central apneas; and of all obstructive, central, and mixed apnea events, 93.0±14.3% were central apneas. Conclusion Individuals with OUD receiving methadone-based MAT may be at risk of respiratory depression during sleep, as evidenced by the frequent occurrence of central sleep apneas. Such risk could be a contributing factor in opioid overdose deaths. Currently, performing respiratory assessments during sleep is not considered standard of care in MAT programs. Our preliminary data suggest that monitoring and treatment of respiratory depression during sleep may be indicated in OUD patients on methadone-based MAT. Support Supported in part by a seed grant from the Washington State University Office of Research Advancement and Partnerships.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 219-219
Author(s):  
Sweta Tewary ◽  
Ariel Kidron ◽  
Naushira Pandya ◽  
Jim Howell ◽  
Marie Florent-Caree ◽  
...  

Abstract The rise of the opioid epidemic over the last two decades has increased the mortality rate, healthcare cost, and drug overdose deaths across the country. Practicing physicians are lacking in education regarding non-opioid alternatives to pain management, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Existing literature suggest a link between knowledge discrepancy and opioid use among clinicians resulting in patient’s abuse of opioids. Therefore, it is important to educate medical students at the start of their career. This preliminary study assesses the current knowledge and perceived skills of medical students regarding (OUD)/opioid misuse and related content in order to identify gaps and provide necessary education. The study used a pre-post survey method to understand the demographics, medical, and clinical knowledge about opioid use, abuse, and clinical knowledge regarding patient opioid overdose. The self-administered survey was administered to all students 18 years or older, M1- M4 enrolled in NSU-KPCOM. A total of 1164 students met these criteria. However, only 137 students participated in the Pre-survey collected from August 2019 to September 2019. Approximately 12% of the eligible students participated in the pre-survey. Data was analyzed using frequencies and percentages. Results of the pre-survey suggest a progressive increase in opioid knowledge from M1 to M4 years. Results of the study suggest investigating a relationship between medical education and knowledge of opioid usage, with a specific lens aimed at assessing the efficacy of opioid education during second and third years of medical school


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 287-289
Author(s):  
Shuang Ouyang ◽  
Troy Moore

Abstract Opioid overdose–related morbidity and mortality remain one of the most pressing public health crises. Overdose education and naloxone distribution have emerged as an effective initiative for mitigating overdose deaths. This case highlights areas of patient education essential to optimizing treatment outcome when using a naloxone reversal kit. The patient is a 46-year-old white male with a past medical history significant for opioid use disorder, alcohol use disorder, stimulant use disorder, sedative-hypnotic use disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder. The patient received an intranasal naloxone kit during residential substance abuse treatment. Five months later, the patient requested a new kit and was asked about the disposition of his previous kit. The patient recounted how he was telephoned to pick up an unconscious friend (and fellow veteran) from a nonresidential location. Upon arrival, the patient recognized opioid products near his friend and took steps to reverse the suspected opioid overdose with his 2 mg/2 mL naloxone intranasal kit. The reversal was successful, but many critical rescue response steps were omitted. This case report may guide future changes to educating patients on appropriate responses to opioid overdoses with naloxone. A PubMed search located one other case report of successful naloxone reversal of opioid overdose in the veteran population, which involved fentanyl sold as heroin. In our case report, a veteran successfully used his naloxone kit to reverse a suspected opioid overdose in another veteran, but he incompletely provided the rescue response. This experience may influence content changes for future overdose education and naloxone distribution training.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis Bone ◽  
Lindsay Eysenbach ◽  
Kristen Bell ◽  
Declan T. Barry

The opioid epidemic has claimed the lives of more than 183,000 individuals since 1999 and is now the leading cause of accidental death in the United States. Meanwhile, rates of incarceration have quadrupled in recent decades, and drug use is the leading cause of incarceration. Medication-assisted treatment or MAT (i.e. methadone, buprenorphine) is the gold standard for treatment of opioid use disorder. Incarcerated individuals with opioid use disorder treated with methadone or buprenorphine have a lower risk of overdose, lower rates of hepatitis C transmission, and lower rates of re-incarceration. Despite evidence of improved outcomes, many jails and prisons do not offer MAT to individuals with opioid use disorder. This seems partly due to a scientifically unjustified preference for an abstinence-only treatment approach. The absence of MAT in prisons and jails results in poor outcomes for individuals and poses a public health threat to communities. Furthermore, it disproportionately harms poor communities and communities of color. Health care providers in prisons and jails have an ethical obligation to offer MAT to individuals with opioid use disorder to mitigate risk of infectious diseases, opioid overdose and health disparities associated with incarceration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215013272093172
Author(s):  
Mark Deyo-Svendsen ◽  
Matthew Cabrera Svendsen ◽  
James Walker ◽  
Andrea Hodges ◽  
Rachel Oldfather ◽  
...  

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. Although efforts are being made to limit access to prescription opioids, the use of heroin and synthetic opioids as well as death due to opioid overdose has increased. Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is the pairing of psychosocial intervention with a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved medication (methadone, buprenorphine plus naltrexone) to treat OUD. MAT has resulted in reductions in overdose deaths, criminal activity, and infectious disease transmission. Access to MAT in rural areas is limited by shortages of addiction medicine-trained providers, lack of access to comprehensive addiction programs, transportation, and cost-related issues. Rural physicians express concern about lack of mentorship and drug diversion as reasons to avoid MAT. The prescribing of MAT with buprenorphine requires a Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) waiver that can easily be obtained by Family Medicine providers. MAT can be incorporated into the outpatient practice, where patient follow-up rates and number needed to treat to effect change are similar to that of other chronic medical conditions. We describe a case of opioid overdose and a suggested protocol for the induction of MAT with buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone) for OUD in a rural family medicine outpatient practice. Treatment access is facilitated by utilizing the protocol, allowing office staff work to the extent allowed by their licensure, promoting teamwork and minimizing physician time commitment. We conclude that improved access to MAT can be accomplished in a rural family medicine outpatient clinic by staff that support and mentor one another through use of a MAT protocol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document