scholarly journals 94. Clinical Correlates of Cdc’s Hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event Surveillance Definition and Association with Reportable Healthcare-associated Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S178-S178
Author(s):  
Brady Page ◽  
Michael Klompas ◽  
Christina Chan ◽  
Michael Filbin ◽  
Sayon Dutta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Clinical Correlates ◽  
Nosocomial Sepsis ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Background Hospital-onset (HO) sepsis is associated with substantial mortality but is not tracked or reported by most hospitals. CDC’s Adult Sepsis Event (ASE) definition may facilitate standardized surveillance but little is known about the clinical correlates of HO-ASEs and their association with currently reportable healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Methods In this retrospective study of all adult patients admitted to an academic medical center between June 2015–2018, we assessed the overlap between HO-ASEs and HAIs reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and reviewed a random subset of 110 HO-ASE cases to determine their clinical correlates. Results The cohort included 168,249 hospitalized patients, including 2,139 (1.3%) with HO-ASE and 2,133 (1.3%) with NHSN HAIs. Amongst the 2,139 HO-ASE patients, 480 (22.4%) had ≥1 HAI: 8.1% VAE, 6.2% CLABSI, 6.1% C.difficile, 3.1% CAUTI, 1.3% MRSA bacteremia, and 0.8% SSI. HO-ASE was associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates than HAIs (28.6% vs 14.6%, p< 0.001). HO-ASE associated mortality was high even when NHSN-reportable HAIs were absent (26.5%) whereas NHSN-reportable HAI mortality was relatively low when HO-ASE was absent (8.4%). Amongst the 110 reviewed HO-ASE cases, 102 (93%) were possible or confirmed infections, most commonly pneumonia (39%, of which 35% were ventilator-associated), non-C.difficile intra-abdominal infections (15%), febrile neutropenia (14%), urinary tract infection (7%, of which 88% were catheter-associated), and skin/soft tissue infection (7%). Most (86%) infections flagged by HO-ASEs were acquired in the hospital rather than the community. The most common non-infectious events flagged by HO-ASE were pulmonary edema and periprocedural blood loss associated with blood cultures and empiric antibiotics. Conclusion CDC’s hospital-onset ASE definition accurately identifies patients with nosocomial sepsis who have very high mortality rates and are generally not captured by currently reportable HAI metrics. Routine hospital-onset ASE surveillance could provide a broader window into serious nosocomial infections, identify new targets for prevention, and further improve outcomes for hospitalized patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 2424. Shedding of Viable Clostridiodes difficile in Patients Admitted to a Medical Intensive Care Unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S837-S838
Author(s):  
Vincent B Young ◽  
Micah Keidan ◽  
Rachel D Yelin ◽  
Thelma E Dangana ◽  
Pamela B Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Specific Pcr ◽  
Patient Admissions ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Record Review

Abstract Background Hospitalized patients are at risk of colonization with a range of healthcare-associated bacterial pathogens, including C. difficile. In patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), in whom C. difficile infection (CDI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To understand the risk for acquisition of C. difficile and development of CDI, we monitored ICU patients daily for shedding of C. difficile by culture. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of daily rectal/fecal swab samples collected from medical ICU patients of a 720-bed academic medical center in Chicago, IL. Selective culture for C. difficile was performed on swab samples from patients who had 2 or more samples obtained using selective media. Confirmation of putative C. difficile isolates was done by specific PCR assays for the 16S rRNA-encoding gene and the toxin genes tcdA, tcdB, cdtA and cdtB. Clinical testing for CDI was performed using the Xpert® C. difficile PCR assay (Cepheid). Clinical and demographic metadata were collected at bedside and by electronic medical record review. Results Culture was attempted on 2106 swab samples from 451 patients (486 ICU admissions) (Figure 1). A mean of 4.33 samples was obtained from each patient. C. difficile was isolated from 211 (10%) samples from 79 patients (Table 1). The first sample was positive by culture for 48 (9.9%) of patient admissions to the ICU. 31 (6.4%) patients who were initially negative by culture had a subsequent sample from which C. difficile was isolated. Persistence of culture-positivity varied from patient to patient (Figure 2). Of 80 patients who were tested for CDI based on physician suspicion, 12 patients had a positive Cepheid PCR test; 9 had diarrhea and were treated for CDI. Conclusion Surveillance for shedding of C. difficile by daily culture reveals that patients admitted to the ICU can shed the pathogen intermittently without attributable disease. This can be in the form patients who are admitted carrying the organism as well as those who appear to acquire the organism during their stay. It is unclear whether patient or microbiome factors underlie the differences seen in patterns of shedding. Furthermore, intermittent shedding may reflect multiple episodes of exposure to C. difficile spores and asymptomatic shedding without stable colonization. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Implementation of computerized add-on testing for hospitalized patients in a large academic medical center

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Yeon Kim ◽  
Irina K. Kamis ◽  
Balaji Singh ◽  
Shalini Batra ◽  
Roberta H. Dixon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Academic Medical

scholarly journals 2101. Impact of “Code Sepsis” on Antimicrobial Utilization at an Academic Medical Center

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S710-S710
Author(s):  
Minji Kang ◽  
Francesca J Torriani ◽  
Rebecca Sell ◽  
Shira Abeles
Keyword(s):  
Organ Dysfunction ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Sepsis Bundle ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Infectious Source

Abstract Background Balancing antimicrobial stewardship with sepsis management is a challenge. At our academic medical center, a “Code Sepsis” was implemented as a nursing driven initiative to improve early recognition and management of sepsis. Per protocol, Code Sepsis is activated in patients who meet two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria due to a suspected infection to allow for early implementation of the sepsis bundle, which includes laboratory testing, fluid resuscitation, and antibiotic administration (Figure 1). We analyzed the impact that Code Sepsis had on antimicrobial use among hospitalized patients over a six month period. Methods We reviewed the electronic medical records of hospitalized patients with Code Sepsis activation between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2018 to determine whether antibiotics were “escalated” or “not escalated.” Among patients who had antibiotic escalation, escalation was classified as “indicated” or “not indicated” (Figure 2). A logistic regression model was used to identify characteristics, SIRS or organ dysfunction criteria predictive of indicated antimicrobial escalation. Results Code Sepsis was activated in 529 patients with antibiotics escalated in 247 (47%) and not escalated in 282 (53%) (Table 1). Among patients whose antibiotics were escalated, 64% (152) had an indication. In 36% (89), escalation was not indicated as Code Sepsis was due to a suspected noninfectious source, known infectious source already on appropriate antimicrobials, or a suspected infectious source in which diagnostic results had already shown the absence of the infection (Figure 2). Odds of indicated antibiotic escalation increased with the number of SIRS and organ dysfunction criteria (Table 2). Conclusion In our efforts to improve sepsis outcomes, we focused on early recognition (Code Sepsis) and intervention (sepsis bundle). However, our Code Sepsis inadvertently led to antibiotic overutilization. By refocusing Code Sepsis on early recognition of severe sepsis and septic shock, we hope to optimize resource utilization and improve patient outcomes. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Relationship between dental loss and health outcomes among hospitalized patients with and without diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-673
Author(s):  
Kenneth Izuora ◽  
Ammar Yousif ◽  
Gayle Allenback ◽  
Civon Gewelber ◽  
Michael Neubauer
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Dental Health ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
The Impact

There is mixed evidence regarding the impact of poor dental health on cardiovascular disease and other health outcomes. Our objective was to determine the outcomes associated with poor dental health among hospitalized patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) at our institution. We enrolled a consecutive sample of adult patients admitted to an academic medical center. We gathered demographic, health and dental information, reviewed their medical records and then examined their teeth. We analyzed data using SPSS V.24. There was a high prevalence of dental loss among all hospitalized patients. Older age (p<0.001), smoking (p=0.034), having DM (p=0.001) and lower frequency of teeth brushing (p<0.001) were predictors of having a lower number of healthy teeth. Among DM and non-DM patients, fewer remaining healthy teeth was associated with presence of heart disease (p=0.025 and 0.003, respectively). Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) had a higher prevalence of stroke (p=0.006) while patients without DM had a higher number of discharge medications (p=0.001) associated with having fewer number of healthy teeth. There was no correlation between number of healthy teeth and the length or frequency of hospitalization. Patients with DM are more likely to have fewer number of healthy teeth compared with non-DM patients. Fewer number of healthy teeth was associated with higher prevalence of heart disease in both DM and non-DM patients and with more discharge medications in non-DM patients.

Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections: Hospital-Onset Adult Sepsis Events versus Current Reportable Conditions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brady Page ◽  
Michael Klompas ◽  
Christina Chan ◽  
Michael R Filbin ◽  
Sayon Dutta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Record ◽  
Pay For Performance ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Urinary Infections ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Record Review

Abstract Background U.S. hospitals are required by CMS to publicly report CLABSI, CAUTI, C.diffficile, MRSA bacteremia, and selected SSIs for benchmarking and pay-for-performance programs. It is unclear, however, to what extent these conditions capture the full breadth of serious healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). CDC’s hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event (HO-ASE) definition could facilitate more comprehensive and efficient surveillance for serious HAIs, but the overlap between HO-ASE and currently reportable HAIs is unknown. Methods We retrospectively assessed the overlap between HO-ASEs and reportable HAIs among adults hospitalized between June 2015-June 2018 in 3 hospitals. Medical record reviews were conducted for 110 randomly selected HO-ASE cases to determine clinical correlates. Results Amongst 282,441 hospitalized patients, 2,301 (0.8%) met HO-ASE criteria and 1,260 (0.4%) had reportable HAIs. In-hospital mortality rates were higher with HO-ASEs than reportable HAIs (28.6% vs 12.9%). Mortality rates for HO-ASE missed by reportable HAIs were substantially higher than mortality rates for reportable HAIs missed by HO-ASE (28.1% vs 6.3%). Reportable HAIs were only present in 334/2,301 (14.5%) HO-ASEs, most commonly CLABSIs (6.0% of HO-ASEs), C.difficile (5.0%), and CAUTI (3.0%). On medical record review, most HO-ASEs were caused by pneumonia (39.1%, of which only 34.9% were ventilator-associated), bloodstream infections (17.4%, of which only 10.5% were central line-associated), non-C.difficile intra-abdominal infections (14.5%), urinary infections (7.3%, of which 87.5% were catheter-associated), and skin/soft tissue infections (6.4%). Conclusions CDC’s HO-ASE definition detects many serious nosocomial infections missed by currently reportable HAIs. HO-ASE surveillance could increase the efficiency and clinical significance of surveillance while identifying new targets for prevention.

Self-Perceived End-of-Life Care Competencies of Health-Care Providers at a Large Academic Medical Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1409-1416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Montagnini ◽  
Heather M. Smith ◽  
Deborah M. Price ◽  
Bidisha Ghosh ◽  
Linda Strodtman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Eol Care

Background: In the United States, most deaths occur in hospitals, with approximately 25% of hospitalized patients having palliative care needs. Therefore, the provision of good end-of-life (EOL) care to these patients is a priority. However, research assessing staff preparedness for the provision of EOL care to hospitalized patients is lacking. Objective: To assess health-care professionals’ self-perceived competencies regarding the provision of EOL care in hospitalized patients. Methods: Descriptive study of self-perceived EOL care competencies among health-care professionals. The study instrument (End-of-Life Questionnaire) contains 28 questions assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to the provision of EOL care. Health-care professionals (nursing, medicine, social work, psychology, physical, occupational and respiratory therapist, and spiritual care) at a large academic medical center participated in the study. Means were calculated for each item, and comparisons of mean scores were conducted via t tests. Analysis of variance was used to identify differences among groups. Results: A total of 1197 questionnaires was completed. The greatest self-perceived competency was in providing emotional support for patients/families, and the least self-perceived competency was in providing continuity of care. When compared to nurses, physicians had higher scores on EOL care attitudes, behaviors, and communication. Physicians and nurses had higher scores on most subscales than other health-care providers. Conclusions: Differences in self-perceived EOL care competencies were identified among disciplines, particularly between physicians and nurses. The results provide evidence for assessing health-care providers to identify their specific training needs before implementing educational programs on EOL care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document