scholarly journals 143. Use of First-Generation Cephalosporins in Patients with Serious Penicillin Allergies

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S86-S87
Author(s):  
Sydney E McNeill ◽  
Shauna Junco ◽  
Janessa Smith ◽  
Mallory C Cowart ◽  
Alejandro Jordan Villegas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Penicillin allergies have a negative impact on patient outcomes due to utilization of second-line agents. Newer data suggests cephalosporins are well tolerated in penicillin allergies; however, none have solely evaluated anaphylactic penicillin allergies with first-generation cephalosporins. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of any allergic reaction to first-generation cephalosporins compared to aztreonam in patients reporting anaphylaxis to an agent in the penicillin class. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study with patients who reported “anaphylaxis” to a penicillin agent and received cefazolin, cephalexin, or aztreonam. The final analysis included 220 patients: aztreonam (n=81), cefazolin (n=81), and cephalexin (n=58) (Figure 1). IgE-mediated reactions (within six hours of antibiotic administration) were defined as any one of the following: anaphylaxis, angioedema, urticarial rash, hypotension, immediate airway compromise, or receipt of epinephrine, hydrocortisone, or diphenhydramine. Non-IgE mediated reactions (within thirty days of antibiotic administration) included delayed hypersensitivity reactions and other dermatologic reactions. Figure 1: Patient Enrollment Patients admitted between January 1, 2013 to September 1, 2020 with a reported allergy of “anaphylaxis” to an agent in the penicillin class who received at least one dose of cefazolin, cephalexin, or aztreonam were screened for inclusion. Patients were excluded if the allergy was deleted from the electronic health record prior to antibiotic administration. All first-generation cephalosporin patients were included. Aztreonam patients were included in chronological order and limited to the number of included cefazolin patients. Results There were less allergic reactions in the first-generation cephalosporin group compared to the aztreonam group, but this was not statistically significant (7% vs. 14%, p=0.077). There were fewer IgE-mediated reactions in the cephalosporin group (6% vs. 14%, p=0.046). No difference in allergic reactions was observed when comparing those who received a single antibiotic dose versus multiple doses within the cephalosporin and aztreonam groups, respectively (3% vs. 11%, p=0.082, 20% vs. 12%, p=0.451). Because cephalexin has a similar R1 side chain to aminopenicillins, five patients with an aminopenicillin allergy who received cephalexin were evaluated separately; none had an allergic reaction (Table 1, Table 2, Figure 2). Table 1: Baseline Characteristics The median age was higher in the aztreonam group, and the majority of patients were female and Caucasian. There were significantly more pregnant females in the cephalosporin group, and the majority of patients reported a natural penicillin allergy. Table 2: Outcomes There were less allergic reactions (IgE or non-IgE mediated) in the first-generation cephalosporin group compared to the aztreonam group, but this was not statistically significant. Also, there were fewer IgE-mediated reactions in the cephalosporin group. There was no difference in allergic reactions in patients with two or more reported drug allergies compared to less than two drug allergies. No difference in allergic reactions was observed when comparing those who received a single antibiotic dose versus multiple doses within the cephalosporin and aztreonam groups. Of the five patients who received cephalexin and reported an aminopenicillin anaphylactic allergy, none had an allergic reaction. Additionally, there were not any patients readmitted within 30 days for delayed hypersensitivity reactions and no antibiotics were discontinued due to other documented adverse reactions. Figure 2: Occurrence of Allergic Reactions Of the patients who had allergic reactions in the cephalosporin and aztreonam groups, these included immediate airway compromise, hypotension with one patient in the aztreonam group receiving vasopressors within the pre-defined time frame, receipt of the non-standing rescue medication of diphenhydramine, and drug rash. Conclusion There was no difference in the incidence of allergic reactions between the aztreonam and first-generation cephalosporin group, and fewer serious allergic reactions occurred in the cephalosporin group. This study suggests that cefazolin and cephalexin can safely be used in patients who report anaphylaxis to an agent in the penicillin class. Disclosures Janessa Smith, PharmD, Merck & Co. (Employee)

Author(s):  
Siraj Misbah

A type I IgE-mediated systemic allergic reaction is characterized by a constellation of symptoms which are due to widespread histamine release and which comprise acute-onset urticaria, angioedema, bronchospasm, and hypotension. While a mild reaction may be limited to localized urticaria and/or angioedema, a full-blown allergic reaction associated with systemic features is best described as anaphylaxis. The term ‘anaphylactoid’, previously used to denote non-IgE-mediated systemic allergic reactions, is no longer recommended for use.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristopher K. Ford ◽  
Timothy M. Loftus ◽  
Joseph J. Moellman

Allergic reactions vary in intensity from mild rash or allergic rhinitis to devastating anaphylactic shock. Anaphylaxis, often underrecognized and undertreated, can be a life-threatening syndrome leading to multiorgan dysfunction. This review covers the etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. It is precipitated by exposure to particular allergens—commonly food, medications, insect stings, and environmental exposures—in a previously sensitized individual. Symptoms develop from an IgE-mediated immune response leading to degranulation of mast cells and basophils and the release of preformed mediators, lipid-derived metabolites, and inflammatory cytokines. First-line treatment for anaphylaxis involves epinephrine. Secondary treatments are antihistamines and corticosteroids. Further treatments for patients refractory to standard therapies involve vasopressor agents, nebulized albuterol, and glucagon. Frequency and duration of biphasic reactions are variable, limiting the development of consensus guidelines for monitoring of anaphylactic reactions. Figures show the immune activity and inflammatory pathways in allergic responses, mast cell degranulation, and a depiction of common organs involved and corresponding clinical manifestations. Tables list the criteria for diagnosis of anaphylaxis, classification of hypersensitivity reactions, common clinical manifestations, and etiology and mediators of anaphylaxis.  This review contains 4 highly rendered figures, 11 tables, and 43 references. Key words: allergy, anaphylaxis, antihistamine, corticosteroid, epinephrine, mast cells


Author(s):  
Sabine Altrichter ◽  
Stefan Wöhrl ◽  
Fritz Horak ◽  
Marco Idzko ◽  
Galateja Jordakieva ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Along with the newly approved vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), first reports of allergic or intolerance reactions were published. Subsequently, questions arose whether these vaccines pose an increased risk for intolerance reactions and whether allergic patients may be at higher risk for this. Results Allergic reactions following COVID-19 vaccinations have been reported, but mostly of mild severity and at normal (Moderna®) or only slightly increased frequency (BioNTech/Pfizer®) compared to established conventional vaccines. The risk of allergic reaction to the newly licensed vector vaccines (AstraZeneca®, Johnson&Johnson®) cannot be conclusively assessed yet, but also appears to be low. There is currently no evidence that patients with allergic diseases (atopic patients) react more frequently or more severely to these vaccines. It is currently assumed that intolerance reactions of the immediate-type are either type I allergic (IgE-mediated) reactions or occur via complement activation (CARPA, “complement activation-related pseudoallergy”). Polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate, which are present as stabilizers in the vaccines, are suspected as triggers for this. Conclusion The data available so far do not show a significantly increased risk of immediate-type allergic reactions in atopic persons. In almost all cases, atopic patients can be vaccinated without problems. Standardized follow-up tests after suspected allergic reactions or CARPA-mediated reactions are currently limited.


2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Caimmi ◽  
S. Caviglioli ◽  
R. Raschetti ◽  
P. Demoly

Hypersensitivity reactions due to muscle relaxant drugs may be related either to a nonspecific release of allergic mediators or to allergic reactions induced by the molecules themselves. Rare cases of hypersensitivity reactions have been associated to thiocolchicoside, and no case of IgE-mediated immediate reaction has actually been reported to date. We report the first documented case of immediate anaphylaxis to thiocolchicoside.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S91-S92
Author(s):  
Joel Waddell ◽  
Russell Mcculloh ◽  
Jennifer Goldman ◽  
Brian Lee ◽  
Warren Teachout

Abstract Background Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) is a common infection of childhood. Inadequately treated AHO can lead to significant morbidity. Small studies have demonstrated alterations in the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics among obese children. Consequently, there is no consensus regarding appropriate dosing of antibiotics among overweight and obese children with AHO. Methods This is a single center, retrospective, cohort study of children 2–17 years of age with a discharge diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis admitted between 1/1/2012 and 12/31/2015. Complicated osteomyelitis cases were excluded. Variability of the initial mg/kg antibiotic dose was determined and compared between healthy weight, overweight, and obese children. Results 142 children were included in the cohort. In total, 83 (58%) were classified as healthy weight, 25 (18%) overweight, and 34 (24%) obese. No difference was found in the variability of mg/kg dosing of vancomycin or clindamycin across the three weight groups. Cefazolin dosing in healthy weight children (median 33.3mg/kg [IQR 32.9–36.7mg/kg]) was significantly higher as compared with obese children (24.4mg/kg 
[20.0–33.3mg/kg]) (P = 0.041). Cephalexin dosing in healthy weight children (33.0mg/kg 
[30.6–34.5mg/kg]) was also significantly higher than in obese children (23.0mg/kg [20.0–29.9mg/kg])(P = 0.013). Conclusion There was significant variability and lower overall dosing of first-generation cephalosporins among obese children compared with healthy weight children. Given the increasing incidence of invasive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections, this study highlights the need for practitioners to optimize first-generation cephalosporin dosing in obese children suffering from AHO. These data also call for future studies to determine the clinical outcomes in obese children with AHO in relation to dosing adequacy. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1033
Author(s):  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Karthi Duraisamy ◽  
Billy Kwok Chong CHOW

Mas-related G-protein coupled receptor member X2 (MRGPRX2) is a class A GPCR expressed on mast cells. Mast cells are granulated tissue-resident cells known for host cell response, allergic response, and vascular homeostasis. Immunoglobulin E receptor (FcεRI)-mediated mast cell activation is a well-studied and recognized mechanism of allergy and hypersensitivity reactions. However, non-IgE-mediated mast cell activation is less explored and is not well recognized. After decades of uncertainty, MRGPRX2 was discovered as the receptor responsible for non-IgE-mediated mast cells activation. The puzzle of non-IgE-mediated pseudo-allergic reaction is unlocked by MRGPRX2, evidenced by a plethora of reported endogenous and exogenous MRGPRX2 agonists. MRGPRX2 is exclusively expressed on mast cells and exhibits varying affinity for many molecules such as antimicrobial host defense peptides, neuropeptides, and even US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs. The discovery of MRGPRX2 has changed our understanding of mast cell biology and filled the missing link of the underlying mechanism of drug-induced MC degranulation and pseudo-allergic reactions. These non-canonical characteristics render MRGPRX2 an intriguing player in allergic diseases. In the present article, we reviewed the emerging role of MRGPRX2 as a non-IgE-mediated mechanism of mast cell activation in pseudo-allergic reactions. We have presented an overview of mast cells, their receptors, structural insight into MRGPRX2, MRGPRX2 agonists and antagonists, the crucial role of MRGPRX2 in pseudo-allergic reactions, current challenges, and the future research direction.


2014 ◽  
Vol 165 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mercè Corominas ◽  
Idoia Postigo ◽  
Victoria Cardona ◽  
Ramon Lleonart ◽  
Lucía Romero-Pinel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document