scholarly journals 779. COVID-19 Pandemic and Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection Trends

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S486-S487
Author(s):  
Geehan Suleyman ◽  
Rita Kassab ◽  
Smitha Gudipati ◽  
Ramesh Mayur ◽  
Indira Brar

Abstract Background It has been postulated that the COVID-19 pandemic would increase the overall catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) risk in part due to higher acuity, increased indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) utilization, longer length of stay, changes in infection prevention practices due to staffing shortages. However, reported data are limited. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our CAUTI rates. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study comparing CAUTI rate per 1,000 indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) days, urine culture (UC) utilization rate per 1,000 IUC days, IUC utilization rate per 1,000 patient days, Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) and Standardized Utilization Ratio (SUR) in the pre-COVID-19 period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 to the COVID-19 period from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 at an 877-bed tertiary care hospital in Detroit, Michigan. CAUTI, UC utilization and IUC utilization rate were extracted from the electronic medical record (Epic™ Bugsy). SIR and SUR data were extracted from National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Results The average CAUTI rate per 1,000 IUC days decreased from 0.99 pre-COVID-19 to 0.64 during COVID-19, yielding a 35% reduction. The UC order rate per 1,000 IUC days decreased from 19.19 to 18.83 with only 2% reduction. However, IUC utilization rate increased by 55% from 0.184 to 0.286. The SIR decreased from 0.483 to 0.337 with a 30% reduction, although this was not statistically significant ((P-value 0.283). The overall SUR decreased significantly from 0.806 to 0.762 (P-value < 0.001). Figure 2 is a control chart of the CAUTI rate from July 2019 to April 2021. Figure 1. CAUTI, indwelling urinary catheter and urine culture utilization rates pre-and during COVID-19 pandemic. Figure 2. CAUTI control chart pre-and during COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion Although the IUC utilization increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, CAUTI rate, SIR and SUR decreased and UC orders remained unchanged. Thus, the pandemic did not have a negative impact on our CAUTI rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-158
Author(s):  
Ghuzala Anwar ◽  
Ghalib Nawaz ◽  
Muhammad Afzal ◽  
Iram Majeed ◽  
Ali Waqas

Nursing is an art science and an essential health care profession in which the skilled knowledgeable persons are committed to provide care to  sick peoples and strive for the, protection and promotion of health and prevention against diseases and helps to minimize the risk and risk related injuries. Urinary tract infections are very common infection in the hospital settings almost responsible for 40% nosocomial infections. All the urinray tract infection is expected that approximately more than 70% infection reported because of indewelling cathters.Objectives: To assess the perceptions of nurses regarding indwelling urinary catheter and its care. To assess the practices of nurses to prevent the indwelling catheter related urinary tract infection. Methodology: Descriptive cross sectional design and data was collected through a five point Likert scale questioner. Study population was the nursing staff from the Jinnah hospital Lahore.  Sample size was 184 nurses from all indoor departments of the Jinnah Hospital Lahore. Results: The findings show that the practice and perceptions scores of the registered nurses’ in the study group are insignificant with age, qualification and experience (i.e., p-value > 0.05) with the evidence-based guidelines for prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infection. Results of study indicated insignificant relationship between registered nurses’ practice and perceptions regarding the indwelling urinary catheter associated infection.Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. Vol 5(2): 150-158


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S482-S482
Author(s):  
Geehan Suleyman ◽  
Nicholas sturla ◽  
Smitha Gudipati ◽  
Indira Brar ◽  
Ramesh Mayur

Abstract Background Recent publications suggest that central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates have increased in US hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on CLABSIs. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study comparing CLABSI rate per 1,000 central line (CL) days, blood culture (BC) utilization rate per 1,000 CL days, CL utilization rate per 1,000 patient days, Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) and Standardized Utilization Ratio (SUR) in the pre-COVID-19 period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 to the COVID-19 period from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 at an 877-bed tertiary care hospital in Detroit, Michigan. CLABSI, and BC and CL utilization rate were extracted from the electronic medical record (Epic™ Bugsy). SIR and SUR data were extracted from National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Results The average CLABSI rate per 1,000 CL days increased 24% from 1.66 to 2.06. Twenty percent of patients were hospitalized for COVID-19. The BC utilization rate per 1,000 CL days decreased from 0.43 to 0.32 with a 26% reduction. However, CL utilization increased by 28% from 0.25 to 0.32 (Figure 1). However, CLABSIs due to common commensals decreased from 13.8% to 10.9%. The SIR increased significantly from 1.055 to 1.795 (P-value 0.008), resulting in a 70% increase. The overall SUR also increased from 0.900 to 0.988 (P-value < 0.001). Figure 2 is a control chart of the CLABSI rate from July 2019 to April 2021. Figure 1. CLABSI, blood culture utilization and central line utilization rates pre-and during COVID-19 pandemic Figure 2. CLABSI control chart pre-and during COVID-19 pandemic Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant increase in CL utilization, CLABSI rate, SIR and SUR likely due to higher acuity in COVID-19 patients despite a decrease in BC orders. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s482-s483
Author(s):  
Paul Gentile ◽  
Jesse Jacob ◽  
Shanza Ashraf

Background: Using alternatives to indwelling urinary catheters plays a vital role in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). We assessed the impact of introducing female external catheters on urinary catheter utilization and CAUTIs. Methods: In a 500-bed academic medical center, female external catheters were implemented on October 1, 2017, with use encouraged for eligible females with urinary incontinence but not meeting other standard indications for urinary catheters. Nurses were educated and trained on female external catheter application and maintenance, and infection prevention staff performed surveillance case reviews with nursing and medical staff. We determined the number of catheter days for both devices based on nursing documentation of device insertion or application, maintenance, and removal. We used the CAUTI and DUR (device utilization ratio) definitions from the CDC NHSN. Our primary outcomes were changes in DUR for both devices 21 months before and 24 months after the intervention in both intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICU wards. We used a generalized least-squares model to account for temporal autocorrelation and compare the trends before and after the intervention. Our secondary outcome was a reduction in CAUTIs, comparing females to males. Results: In total, there were 346,213 patient days in 35 months. The mean rate of patient days per month increased from 7,436.4 to 7,601.9 after the implementation of female external catheters, with higher catheter days for both urinary catheters (18,040 vs 19,625) and female external catheters (22 vs 12,675). After the intervention, the DUR for female external catheters increased (0 vs 0.07; P < .001) and for urinary catheters the DUR decreased (0.12 vs 0.10; P < .001) (Fig. 1). A reduction in urinary catheter DUR was observed in ICUs (0.29 vs 0.27; P < .001) but not wards (0.08 vs 0.08; P = NS) (Fig. 2). Of the 39 CAUTIs, there was no significant overall change in the rate per 1,000 catheter days (1.22 vs 0.87; P = .27). In females (n = 20 CAUTI), there was a 61% reduction in the CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter days (0.78 vs 0.31; P = .02), but no significant change in the rate in males (0.44 vs 0.56; P = .64). The CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter days among females decreased in the ICUs (1.14 vs 0.31; P = .04) but not in wards (0.6 vs 0.33; P = .96). Conclusions: In a setting with a baseline low UC DUR, successful implementation of female external catheters further modestly reduced UC DUR and was associated with a 61% decrease in CAUTI among females in the ICU but not in wards. Further interventions to better identify appropriate patients for female external catheters may improve patient safety and prevent patient harm.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1494-1496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cecilia Bardossy ◽  
Takiah Williams ◽  
Karen Jones ◽  
Susan Szpunar ◽  
Marcus Zervos ◽  
...  

AbstractWe compared interventions to improve urinary catheter care and urine culturing in adult intensive care units of 2 teaching hospitals. Compared to hospital A, hospital B had lower catheter utilization, more compliance with appropriate indications and maintenance, but higher urine culture use and more positive urine cultures per 1,000 patient days.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1740-1744
Author(s):  
Eva Lorel Kouassi ◽  
Abdul Wahid Ishaque ◽  
Amulya P. Shetty ◽  
Rimpa Devi ◽  
Sheethal Kuriakose ◽  
...  

Although urinary tract infections (UTIs) are considered to be the most common bacterial infections worldwide, their assessment remains a big clinical challenge, because they are not reportable diseases in developed countries like United States and any other parts of the world including India. This situation is further complicated by the fact that accurate diagnosis depends on both the presence of symptoms and a positive urine culture, although in most outpatient settings this diagnosis is made without the benefit of culture. Our study aimed to appraise the impact of urinary tract infections symptoms on selected patients and comprehend their adherence to medications despite the challenges of antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance observed. One hundred and twenty patients with confirmed cases of urinary tract infections were recruited for the study. The mean age of females and males patients was found to be 59.86±2.37and 52.27±3 years respectively. Pertinent descriptive and inferential statistics were performed. Spearman correlation test revealed a strong positive correlation between overall UTIs’ symptoms and their impact on patients at baseline (0.84) and at follow up (0.799) with p value =0.5. On the other hand the majority of patients were found to be adherent to the medications after discharge. The current study revealed that Urinary tract infections if left untreated can negatively impact the lives of patients suffering from it and hinder their adherence to medications. Consequently, accurate and early assessment of UTIs’ symptoms in clinics and hospitals becomes a necessity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica R. Howard-Anderson ◽  
Shanza Ashraf ◽  
Elizabeth C. Overton ◽  
Lisa Reif ◽  
David J. Murphy ◽  
...  

Accurately diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs) in hospitalized patients remains challenging, requiring correlation of frequently nonspecific symptoms and laboratory findings. Urine cultures (UCs) are often ordered indiscriminately, especially in patients with urinary catheters, despite the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines recommending against routine screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB).1,2 Positive UCs can be difficult for providers to ignore, leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment of ASB.2,3 Using diagnostic stewardship to limit UCs to situations with a positive urinalysis (UA) can reduce inappropriate UCs since the absence of pyuria suggests the absence of infection.4–6 We assessed the impact of the implementation of a UA with reflex to UC algorithm (“reflex intervention”) on UC ordering practices, diagnostic efficiency, and UTIs using a quasi-experimental design.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 631-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brady L. Miller ◽  
Sarah L. Krein ◽  
Karen E. Fowler ◽  
Karen Belanger ◽  
Debbie Zawol ◽  
...  

We assessed the impact of a quality improvement intervention to reduce urinary catheter use and associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) at a single hospital. After implementation, UTIs were reduced by 39% (P = .04). Additionally, we observed a slight decrease in catheter use and the number of catheters without an appropriate indication.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 606-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Epstein ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards ◽  
Alison Laufer Halpin ◽  
Michael Anne Preas ◽  
David Blythe ◽  
...  

We assessed the impact of a reflex urine culture protocol, an intervention aimed to reduce unnecessary urine culturing, in intensive care units at a tertiary care hospital. Significant decreases in urine culturing rates and reported rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infection followed implementation of the protocol.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:606–609


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document