scholarly journals Impact of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction panel on duration of empiric antibiotic therapy in suspected bacterial meningitis

Author(s):  
Justin J Choi ◽  
Lars F Westblade ◽  
Lee S Gottesdiener ◽  
Kyle Liang ◽  
Han A Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels allow for rapid detection or exclusion of pathogens causing meningitis and encephalitis (ME). The clinical impact of rapid multiplex PCR ME panel results on the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy is not well characterized. Methods We performed a retrospective pre-post study at our institution that evaluated the clinical impact of a multiplex PCR ME panel among adults with suspected bacterial meningitis who received empiric antibiotic therapy and underwent lumbar puncture in the emergency department. The primary outcome was the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy. Results The positive pathogen detection rates were similar between pre- and post-multiplex PCR ME panel periods (17.5%, 24 of 137, vs. 20.3%, 14 of 69, respectively). The median duration of empiric antibiotic therapy was significantly reduced in the post-multiplex PCR ME panel period compared to the pre-multiplex PCR ME panel period (34.7 h vs. 12.3 h, P=0.01). At any point in time, 46% more patients in the post-multiplex PCR ME panel period had empiric antibiotic therapy discontinued or de-escalated compared to the pre-multiplex PCR ME panel period (sex- and immunosuppressant use-adjusted HR 1.46, P=0.01). The median hospital length of stay was shorter in the post-multiplex PCR ME panel period (3 d vs. 4 d, P=0.03). Conclusions The implementation of the multiplex PCR ME panel for bacterial meningitis reduced the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy and possibly hospital length of stay compared to traditional microbiological testing methods.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S65-S66
Author(s):  
Justin J Choi ◽  
Lars Westblade ◽  
Lee S Gottesdiener ◽  
Kyle Liang ◽  
Han A Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels allow for rapid detection or exclusion of pathogens causing community-acquired meningitis and encephalitis (ME). However, the clinical impact of rapid multiplex PCR ME panel results on the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy is not well characterized. Methods We performed a retrospective pre-post study to evaluate the implementation of the FilmArray ME panel (BioFire Diagnostics, LLC) for diagnosis of bacterial meningitis at our institution. We included adults who presented with suspected bacterial meningitis, received empiric antibiotic therapy, and underwent cerebrospinal fluid microbiological testing in the emergency department. The primary outcome was duration of empiric antibiotic therapy. A bivariable analysis that compared baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and study outcomes between the pre-ME panel and post-ME panel periods was performed using Mann-Whitney tests, chi-squared tests, or Fisher’s exact tests. Time-to-event analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank statistics. Results In the pre-ME panel period, the positive detection rate of bacterial pathogens was 2.2% (3/137) by cerebrospinal fluid culture and 4.3% (3/69) in the post-ME panel period. Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of patients. Compared to the pre-ME panel period, there were significant reductions in the post-ME panel period for the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy (median 34.7 h, IQR 8.5–61.7, vs. 12.3 h, IQR 3.3–40.0, P=0.01), time to targeted therapy (59.3 h, IQR 36.5–74.6, vs 7.02 h, IQR 0.9–12.4, P< 0.001), and hospital length of stay (4 d, IQR 2–7, vs. 3 d, IQR 1–5, P=0.03), as shown in Table 2. There was also significant reduction in time to discontinuation or de-escalation of empiric antibiotic therapy (P=0.049) as shown in Figure 1. Table 1. Baseline characteristics for patients with suspected bacterial meningitis Table 2. Antimicrobial use and hospitalization outcomes Compared to the pre-ME panel period, there were significant reductions in the post-ME panel period for the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy (P=0.01), time to targeted therapy (P<0.001), and hospital length of stay (P=0.03). Figure 1. Probability of Empiric Antibiotic Therapy Between Pre- and Post-ME Panel Periods Kaplan-Meier analysis of the time from initiation of empiric antibiotic therapy to discontinuation or de-escalation of empiric antibiotic therapy between the pre- and post-ME panel periods. P value from log-rank test=0.049 (n=206). There was a significant difference in the time to discontinuation or de-escalation of empiric antibiotic therapy between the groups (sex- and immunosuppressant use-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% confidence interval, 1.08–1.97]; P=0.01). Conclusion The implementation of the FilmArray ME panel for suspected bacterial meningitis appears to reduce the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy, time to targeted therapy, and hospital length of stay compared to traditional culture-based microbiological testing methods. Disclosures Justin J. Choi, MD, Allergan (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Roche (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Lars Westblade, PhD, Accelerate Diagnostics Inc (Grant/Research Support)BioFire Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)Hardy Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)Roche (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Shionogi Inc (Advisor or Review Panel member)Talis Biomedical (Advisor or Review Panel member) Marshall J. Glesby, MD, Enzychem (Consultant)Gilead (Grant/Research Support)ReAlta Life Sciences (Consultant)Regeneron (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Sobi (Consultant)Springer (Other Financial or Material Support, Royalties)UpToDate (Other Financial or Material Support, Royalties)


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 395-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Thomson ◽  
Matt Hall ◽  
Lilliam Ambroggio ◽  
Jay G Berry ◽  
Bryan Stone ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To compare hospital outcomes associated with commonly used antibiotic therapies for aspiration pneumonia in children with neurologic impairment (NI). DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective study of children with NI hospitalized with aspiration pneumonia at 39 children’s hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System database. Exposure was empiric antibiotic therapy classified by antimicrobial activity. Outcomes included acute respiratory failure, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariable regression evaluated associations between exposure and outcomes and adjusted for confounders, including medical complexity and acute illness severity. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, children receiving Gram-negative coverage alone had two-fold greater odds of respiratory failure (odds ratio [OR] 2.15; 95% CI: 1.41-3.27), greater odds of ICU transfer (OR 1.80; 95% CI: 1.03-3.14), and longer LOS [adjusted rate ratio (RR) 1.28; 95% CI: 1.16-1.41] than those receiving anaerobic coverage alone. Children receiving anaerobic and Gram-negative coverage had higher odds of respiratory failure (OR 1.65; 95% CI: 1.19-2.28) than those receiving anaerobic coverage alone, but ICU transfer (OR 1.15; 95% CI: 0.73-1.80) and length of stay (RR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.98-1.16) did not statistically differ. For children receiving anaerobic, Gram-negative, and P. aeruginosa coverage, LOS was shorter (RR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.76-0.90) than those receiving anaerobic coverage alone; odds of respiratory failure and ICU transfer rates did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS: Anaerobic therapy appears to be important in the treatment of aspiration pneumonia in children with NI. While Gram-negative coverage alone was associated with worse outcomes, its addition to anaerobic therapy may not yield improved outcomes.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (4) ◽  
pp. 856A
Author(s):  
Kyle W. Bierman ◽  
Lee E. Morrow ◽  
Joshua D. Holweger ◽  
John T. Ratelle ◽  
Mark A. Malesker

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Galeb ◽  
Maysaa El Sayed Zaki ◽  
Raghdaa Shrief ◽  
Rasha Hassan ◽  
Mohamed Anies

Background: Proper identification of the causative organism in pediatric sepsis is crucial for early diagnosis and prevention of septic shock and organ failure. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to detect Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from positive blood cultures for these pathogens isolated from children, with hospital-acquired sepsis compared to the conventional biochemical reactions for identification of these organisms. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study performed on 100 isolates from pediatric blood cultures, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The study also included 100 isolates of Escherichia coli as a negative control. All isolates were identified by API 20NE and the multiplex PCR, with primers specific to the 3 tested bacteria. Results: Multiplex PCR was positive in 96% of isolates, and 4 isolates had negative results. False positive results were reported with three E. coli strains. Multiplex PCR identified all the isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii, 29 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 27 isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Compared to the biochemical identification, the diagnostic value of the multiplex PCR revealed 96.04% sensitivity, 96.9% specificity, 97.00%, positive predictive value, 96.00% negative predictive value, and 96.50% accuracy. Conclusion: The present study highlights the diagnostic value of multiplex PCR to identify Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from positive blood cultures. Multiplex PCR was sensitive, specific, and accurate. The accuracy differs according to the organisms, with 100% accuracy for Acinetobacter baumannii.


Author(s):  
S. Reisfeld ◽  
M. Paul ◽  
B. S. Gottesman ◽  
P. Shitrit ◽  
L. Leibovici ◽  
...  

Nematology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1107-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Filipiak ◽  
Przemysław Wieczorek ◽  
Marek Tomalak

Differentiation between Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and other related, non-pathogenic species can be ambiguous when based exclusively on morphological characters. The morphology of B. mucronatus and B. fraudulentus most closely resembles that of B. xylophilus. Moreover, all of these nematodes are found in both Asia and Europe and can colonise various species of pine. Therefore, for phytosanitary purposes it is necessary to identify the three species precisely and rapidly. We report the results of a multiplex PCR that utilises four primers to identify and discriminate the three Bursaphelenchus species simultaneously. The multiplex PCR yielded DNA fragments of 767, 305 and 132 bp, for B. xylophilus, B. mucronatus and B. fraudulentus, respectively. This primer combination has produced reliable results in multiplex PCR assays with a number of different populations of the listed species, and no cross-reactions were observed with other Bursaphelenchus species. The described approach is simple, reliable and cheaper than other molecular methods presently used for simultaneous identification of the above three species within the xylophilus group.


2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. e2.43-e2
Author(s):  
Michelle Kirrane ◽  
Rob Cunney ◽  
Roisin McNamara ◽  
Ike Okafor

Appropriate choice of empiric antibiotic therapy, in line with local guidelines, improves outcome for children with infection, while reducing adverse drug effects, cost, and selection of antimicrobial resistance. Data from national point prevalence surveys showed compliance with local prescribing guidelines at our hospital was suboptimal. A team with representatives from the pharmacy, microbiology and emergency departments collaborated with prescribers to improve the quality of empiric antibiotic prescribing. The project aim was, using the ‘Model for Improvement’, to ensure ≥90% of children admitted via the Emergency Department (ED) and commenced on antibiotic therapy, have a documented indication and a choice of therapy in line with local antimicrobial guidelines.MethodResults of weekly audits of the first ten children admitted via ED and started on antibiotics were fed back to prescribers. Front line ownership techniques were used to develop ideas for change, including; regular antibiotic prescribing discussion at Monday morning handover meeting, antibiotic ‘spot quiz’ for prescribers, updates to prescribing guidelines (along with improved access and promotion of prescribing app), printed ID badge guideline summary cards, reminders and guideline summaries at point of prescribing in ED.Collection of audit data initially proved challenging, but was resolved through a series of rapid PDSA cycles. Initial support from ED consultants and other ED staff facilitated establishment of the project. Presentation of weekly run charts to prescribers fostered considerable support among consultants and non-consultant doctors (NCHDs). We saw a shift in perspective from ‘how is your project going?’ to ‘How are we doing?’.ResultsDocumentation of indication and guideline compliance increased from a median of 30% in December 2014/January 2015 to 100% consistently from February 2015 to the present. It is felt that a change in approach to antimicrobial prescribing is now embedded in our hospital culture as this improvement has remained constant through three NCHD changeovers. A comparison of 2014 Antimicrobial expenditure to 2015 figures shows a reduction in expenditure of €101,078.44.ConclusionThis project has inspired other departments to develop local QIPs and has encouraged the surgical teams to lead their own audits in antimicrobial stewardship. An improvement in other areas of antimicrobial prescribing has also been noted e.g. documentation of review date.The initiative has been shared with other hospitals throughout Ireland via presentations at the National Patient Safety Conference, Antimicrobial Awareness day and the Irish Antimicrobial Pharmacist’s Group meeting. It has also been shared at both European and international conferences. The project was a shortlisted finalist for a national healthcare excellence award and has been rolled out as part of a national quality improvement collaborative.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document